[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2019-10-13 23:59 UTC
The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed from the tree, for the week ending 2019-10-13 23:59 UTC. Removals: app-admin/yaala 20191007-08:21 mgorny 6672aea9261 app-emulation/vov 20191008-18:26 mgorny 2eb1b30a04d app-text/fdftk20191007-08:18 mgorny 7d43e6d8d7c app-text/freepwing20191008-18:26 mgorny 5b307714b86 dev-cpp/xsd 20191007-08:06 mgorny fcf4dfb546f dev-db/vbisam 20191008-18:28 mgorny 6e74faffd09 dev-haskell/language-docker 20191011-15:04 mgorny 2c78492ae6b dev-java/jdbc-informix20191007-08:16 mgorny 112aa6e26d2 dev-lang/gwydion-dylan-bin20191008-18:29 mgorny 62fab2d9b9d dev-lang/tinycobol20191008-18:28 mgorny 7015b91a928 dev-libs/actor-framework 20191012-08:08 mgorny 665abaca474 dev-libs/asyncresolv 20191008-18:29 mgorny 70f500d43b7 dev-libs/cgicc20191012-08:09 mgorny b84a4aee846 dev-libs/cpl-stratego 20191008-18:29 mgorny 103bfbbb377 dev-libs/elfio20191012-08:09 mgorny a60194f8efb dev-libs/fampp2 20191012-08:09 mgorny deb1209ee78 dev-libs/gecode 20191011-15:05 mgorny 36f30cb79ab dev-libs/hashit 20191012-08:09 mgorny fe7d83fe43e dev-libs/legousbtower 20191012-08:11 mgorny 7f0ba0fe09e dev-libs/libcaldav20191012-08:11 mgorny 9df04ddf772 dev-libs/libcli 20191012-08:11 mgorny fec3c6c98ed dev-libs/libcxml 20191012-08:14 mgorny ad7b37d5dab dev-libs/libhome 20191012-08:14 mgorny c558ab2720b dev-libs/libhtmlparse 20191012-08:14 mgorny 354b146f534 dev-libs/libidmef 20191012-08:14 mgorny f8167bda466 dev-libs/libmail 20191012-08:15 mgorny bc617305898 dev-libs/libmongo-client 20191012-08:17 mgorny bc8e0957962 dev-libs/libntru 20191012-08:17 mgorny 609889344b1 dev-libs/libproccpuinfo 20191012-08:17 mgorny aa5d902f9bf dev-libs/libsqlora8 20191012-08:18 mgorny 6c0681ba640 dev-libs/libtrain 20191012-08:18 mgorny a2e4ff7cd7e dev-libs/libucl 20191012-08:18 mgorny 62c1d41b30e dev-libs/libunicode 20191012-08:18 mgorny 66ac88971ab dev-libs/libvolume_id 20191008-18:29 mgorny adf7544f127 dev-libs/locked_sstream 20191012-08:13 mgorny d906f9705c7 dev-libs/log4shib 20191012-08:20 mgorny 544ac3c9ad5 dev-libs/ltxml20191012-08:20 mgorny 8b5b31864a6 dev-libs/mapm 20191012-08:21 mgorny 96ea78d32f1 dev-libs/mdsplib 20191012-08:21 mgorny afd3c148c94 dev-libs/pcre++ 20191012-08:21 mgorny fd42336a419 dev-libs/polylib 20191012-08:21 mgorny 5c48a04587d dev-libs/rote 20191012-08:22 mgorny 990b237fa9e dev-libs/sblim-sfcc 20191012-08:23 mgorny 9eec67dce63 dev-libs/socketstream 20191012-08:24 mgorny 02a308b9e42 dev-libs/stlsoft 20191012-08:24 mgorny 0d2538d8931 dev-libs/syncdir 20191012-08:24 mgorny 0726cc1333c dev-libs/vanessa-adt 20191008-18:36 mgorny 46cba45d2d8 dev-libs/vanessa-logger 20191008-18:36 mgorny e3ee3836ef9 dev-libs/xmlrpc-epi 20191012-08:25 mgorny 44abcddf84d dev-libs/xml-security-c 20191012-08:24 mgorny 8914ea85a9d dev-libs/xmlwrapp 20191012-08:25 mgorny 43e567f763d dev-ruby/dep_selector 20191011-15:04 mgorny 3156b4c6bb8 dev-util/hadolint 20191011-15:03 mgorny bb0dca080cd dev-util/idea-ultimate20191013-12:41 mgorny 074bc773cf6 dev-util/pkgconfig-openbsd20191011-15:01 mgorny 33ad8e06443 dev-util/webstorm 20191013-12:40 mgorny 41be79a4ef1 games-action/mutantstorm-demo 20191007-08:24 mgorny b91caa3210a games-action/spacetripper-demo20191007-08:23 mgorny 4480567cafb games-emulation/daphne20191008-18:25 mgorny 5036ee905de games-fps/serious-sam-tfe 20191007-08:27 mgorny 621943cff17 mail-mta/mini-qmail 20191008-18:25 mgorny 263a1ab586d media-libs/fmod 20191007-08:07 mgorny c319138dc63 media-libs/libbmp 20191013-12:34 mgorny 991c391bf08 media-libs/libipod20191007-08:08 mgorny 14c8ee9cdc5 media-libs/libjackasyn20191007-08:08 mgorny a2765a066b1 media-libs/libmkv 20191013-12
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] use.desc: add global USE flag 'split-sbin'
On Sun, 2019-10-13 at 12:43 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 12:33 PM Mike Gilbert wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 1:52 PM David Seifert wrote: > > > On Sat, 2019-10-12 at 19:01 +0200, Dennis Schridde wrote: > > > > On Samstag, 12. Oktober 2019 18:02:28 CEST William Hubbs wrote: > > > > > On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 01:11:49PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, 2019-10-12 at 13:00 +0200, David Seifert wrote: > > > > > > > * Some distros have not just merged / and /usr, they > > > > > > > > > > > > > > have also merged /usr/bin and /usr/sbin. By giving > > > > > > > users the choice of merging */bin and */sbin, > > > > > > > Gentoo follows suit. > > > > > > > > > > > > What about the scenario when /bin has been merged with /usr/sbin > > > > > > and /sbin with /usr/bin? ;-P > > > > > > > > > > I also don't see the need for something like this. The idea of the > > > > > /usr > > > > > merge is to have all binaries available in one place, and there > > > > > really > > > > > is not a good justification for separating bin from sbin. > > > > > > > > Do I read this correctly? USE=-split-usr currently means that /bin, > > > > /sbin, / > > > > usr/bin and /usr/sbin point to the same directory? > > > > > > > > If that is not the case, then I agree that users should have the > > > > possibility > > > > to set it up like this and USE=-split-sbin should be supported. > > > > > > > > --Dennis > > > > > > I agree, I wasn't aware that USE=-split-usr implies the complete 2- > > > level (/usr and *sbin) merge. In that case, all of this is obsolete. > > > > That was NOT my intention when I introduced the split-usr USE flag. > > > > For bin/sbin, I would prefer to drop any conflicting links > > unconditionally. Do you have examples of scenarios where this is not > > possible? > > I guess more generally, I would like to know how you see this USE flag > being used. > > I have some guidelines for split-usr on my devspace (needs a home on the > wiki). > > https://dev.gentoo.org/~floppym/split-usr.txt Or devmanual. Would be nice to finally start having all the fancy policies there. -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] use.desc: add global USE flag 'split-sbin'
On Sun, Oct 13, 2019 at 12:33 PM Mike Gilbert wrote: > > On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 1:52 PM David Seifert wrote: > > > > On Sat, 2019-10-12 at 19:01 +0200, Dennis Schridde wrote: > > > On Samstag, 12. Oktober 2019 18:02:28 CEST William Hubbs wrote: > > > > On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 01:11:49PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > > On Sat, 2019-10-12 at 13:00 +0200, David Seifert wrote: > > > > > > * Some distros have not just merged / and /usr, they > > > > > > > > > > > > have also merged /usr/bin and /usr/sbin. By giving > > > > > > users the choice of merging */bin and */sbin, > > > > > > Gentoo follows suit. > > > > > > > > > > What about the scenario when /bin has been merged with /usr/sbin > > > > > and /sbin with /usr/bin? ;-P > > > > > > > > I also don't see the need for something like this. The idea of the > > > > /usr > > > > merge is to have all binaries available in one place, and there > > > > really > > > > is not a good justification for separating bin from sbin. > > > > > > Do I read this correctly? USE=-split-usr currently means that /bin, > > > /sbin, / > > > usr/bin and /usr/sbin point to the same directory? > > > > > > If that is not the case, then I agree that users should have the > > > possibility > > > to set it up like this and USE=-split-sbin should be supported. > > > > > > --Dennis > > > > I agree, I wasn't aware that USE=-split-usr implies the complete 2- > > level (/usr and *sbin) merge. In that case, all of this is obsolete. > > That was NOT my intention when I introduced the split-usr USE flag. > > For bin/sbin, I would prefer to drop any conflicting links > unconditionally. Do you have examples of scenarios where this is not > possible? I guess more generally, I would like to know how you see this USE flag being used. I have some guidelines for split-usr on my devspace (needs a home on the wiki). https://dev.gentoo.org/~floppym/split-usr.txt
Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] use.desc: add global USE flag 'split-sbin'
On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 1:52 PM David Seifert wrote: > > On Sat, 2019-10-12 at 19:01 +0200, Dennis Schridde wrote: > > On Samstag, 12. Oktober 2019 18:02:28 CEST William Hubbs wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 01:11:49PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > On Sat, 2019-10-12 at 13:00 +0200, David Seifert wrote: > > > > > * Some distros have not just merged / and /usr, they > > > > > > > > > > have also merged /usr/bin and /usr/sbin. By giving > > > > > users the choice of merging */bin and */sbin, > > > > > Gentoo follows suit. > > > > > > > > What about the scenario when /bin has been merged with /usr/sbin > > > > and /sbin with /usr/bin? ;-P > > > > > > I also don't see the need for something like this. The idea of the > > > /usr > > > merge is to have all binaries available in one place, and there > > > really > > > is not a good justification for separating bin from sbin. > > > > Do I read this correctly? USE=-split-usr currently means that /bin, > > /sbin, / > > usr/bin and /usr/sbin point to the same directory? > > > > If that is not the case, then I agree that users should have the > > possibility > > to set it up like this and USE=-split-sbin should be supported. > > > > --Dennis > > I agree, I wasn't aware that USE=-split-usr implies the complete 2- > level (/usr and *sbin) merge. In that case, all of this is obsolete. That was NOT my intention when I introduced the split-usr USE flag. For bin/sbin, I would prefer to drop any conflicting links unconditionally. Do you have examples of scenarios where this is not possible?
[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-office/eqe
# Michał Górny (2019-10-13) # Last release in 2008. Declared dead upstream, apparently broken # on newer systems. EAPI 0. # Removal in 30 days. Bug #697384. app-office/eqe -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
