On Wed, 2019-11-06 at 02:19 +0100, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote:
> > > +# @ECLASS-VARIABLE: ECM_NONGUI
> > > +# @DESCRIPTION:
> > > +# If set to "false", add dependency on kde-frameworks/breeze-icons
> > > +# or kde-frameworks/oxygen-icons and run the xdg.eclass routines for
> > > +# pkg_preinst,
On Tuesday, 5 November 2019 22:20:46 CET Michał Górny wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-11-05 at 00:30 +0100, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote:
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/eclass/ecm-utils.eclass
>
> I know we historically screwed this up repeatedly but please don't use
> '-utils' for eclasses that export phases.
On Tue, 2019-11-05 at 00:30 +0100, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote:
> Support eclass for packages that use KDE extra-cmake-modules.
>
> This eclass is intended to streamline the creation of ebuilds for packages
> that follow KDE upstream packaging conventions. It's primarily intended for
> the three
On 11/5/19 10:15 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-11-05 at 18:13 +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
>> Can Portage handle this error more gracefully please?
>>
>
> Is it still happening though? I thought the Portage upgrade fixed it.
The UnboundLocalError is an outstanding bug. I'll make a
# Michał Górny (2019-11-05)
# The following packages are unmaintained and have incorrect LICENSE
# entries. All of them have additional bugs reported.
#
# app-admin/certmgr: #694690
# app-admin/ksonnet: #694710
# dev-go/delve: #694382
# Removal in 30 days.
app-admin/certmgr
app-admin/ksonnet
On Tue, 2019-11-05 at 18:13 +, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> Can Portage handle this error more gracefully please?
>
Is it still happening though? I thought the Portage upgrade fixed it.
> The symlink test file is there to verify mirror behavior, so we don't
> want to delete it either.
I
Can Portage handle this error more gracefully please?
The symlink test file is there to verify mirror behavior, so we don't
want to delete it either.
--
Robin Hugh Johnson
Gentoo Linux: Dev, Infra Lead, Foundation Treasurer
E-Mail : robb...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E
On Tue, 2019-11-05 at 14:01 +0100, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 10/24/19 2:37 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > TL;DR: I'd like to disable thick Manifest support in Portage, in order
> > to disable some of the compatibility quirks from MetaManifest format.
> > All files
Hi,
On 10/24/19 2:37 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> TL;DR: I'd like to disable thick Manifest support in Portage, in order
> to disable some of the compatibility quirks from MetaManifest format.
> All files would still be verified by gemato.
>
> WDYT?
>
I'm using Gentoo Prefix as a
On Mon, 4 Nov 2019 23:24:57 +
Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote:
> Straw man anyone? I know Guy Fawkes night is coming up here in the UK ... ;)
I love you, but please, less trolling.
This is a developer discussion venue, not a place for cheap-shots like
reddit.
pgpVMFPNhhCyl.pgp
10 matches
Mail list logo
