[gentoo-dev] [RFC] News Item: sys-boot/raspberrypi-firmware will not install device tree files

2019-11-25 Thread Andrey Utkin
Title: sys-boot/raspberrypi-firmware will not install device tree files Author: Andrey Utkin Content-Type: text/plain Posted: 2019-11-25 Revision: 1 News-Item-Format: 1.0 Display-If-Installed: sys-boot/raspberrypi-firmware sys-boot/raspberrypi-firmware up to and including version 1.20190709

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: sys-apps/nix and sys-apps/guix

2019-11-25 Thread Sergei Trofimovich
# Sergei Trofimovich (2019-11-25) # Mask for removal from main tree into ::nix-guix overlay. # Removal in 30 days. sys-apps/nix sys-apps/guix -- Sergei

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/6] nix and guix GID/UID assignments

2019-11-25 Thread Sergei Trofimovich
On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 21:32:18 +0100 Michał Górny wrote: > On Mon, 2019-11-25 at 20:28 +, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > > On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 17:24:08 +0100 > > David Seifert wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 2019-11-24 at 20:35 +, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > > > > On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 17:19:36

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/6] nix and guix GID/UID assignments

2019-11-25 Thread Michał Górny
On Mon, 2019-11-25 at 20:28 +, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 17:24:08 +0100 > David Seifert wrote: > > > On Sun, 2019-11-24 at 20:35 +, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > > > On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 17:19:36 +0100 > > > Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 24

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/6] nix and guix GID/UID assignments

2019-11-25 Thread Sergei Trofimovich
On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 17:24:08 +0100 David Seifert wrote: > On Sun, 2019-11-24 at 20:35 +, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > > On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 17:19:36 +0100 > > Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On Sun, 24 Nov 2019, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > > > > I interpreted 'reserved' as

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] dev-python/setuptools deps in distutils-r1 packages

2019-11-25 Thread Michał Górny
On Mon, 2019-11-25 at 20:39 +0200, Joonas Niilola wrote: > Hey, > > > On 11/25/19 7:38 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > Hi, > > > > TL;DR: should we depend on setuptools by default? Alternatively, should > > we add distutils_enable_setuptools API to provide at least partial > > validity checks. > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] dev-python/setuptools deps in distutils-r1 packages

2019-11-25 Thread Joonas Niilola
Hey, On 11/25/19 7:38 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, > > TL;DR: should we depend on setuptools by default? Alternatively, should > we add distutils_enable_setuptools API to provide at least partial > validity checks. > > > The problem > === > The vast majority of Python packages nowadays

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] emerge: add --quickpkg-direct option

2019-11-25 Thread Zac Medico
Enable use of installed packages directly as binary packages. This is similar to using binary packages produced by quickpkg(1), but installed packages are used directly as though they are binary packages. This option only works in combination with the --root=DIR option, and it comes with the

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] dev-python/setuptools deps in distutils-r1 packages

2019-11-25 Thread Michał Górny
Hi, TL;DR: should we depend on setuptools by default? Alternatively, should we add distutils_enable_setuptools API to provide at least partial validity checks. The problem === The vast majority of Python packages nowadays uses setuptools as their build system. According to a cheap

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] eapply: Drop -s option for patch.

2019-11-25 Thread Zac Medico
On 11/25/19 5:03 AM, Ulrich Müller wrote: > We generally try to have verbose build logs, e.g., by calling > configure with --disable-silent-rules. Silencing patch contradicts > this, and will suppress reporting of fuzz factors. > > Note that the eapply specification in PMS calls patch without -s:

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/6] nix and guix GID/UID assignments

2019-11-25 Thread David Seifert
On Sun, 2019-11-24 at 20:35 +, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > On Sun, 24 Nov 2019 17:19:36 +0100 > Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > > > > > > On Sun, 24 Nov 2019, Sergei Trofimovich wrote: > > > I interpreted 'reserved' as 'free to use' on > > > > > >

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] eapply: Drop -s option for patch.

2019-11-25 Thread Ulrich Müller
We generally try to have verbose build logs, e.g., by calling configure with --disable-silent-rules. Silencing patch contradicts this, and will suppress reporting of fuzz factors. Note that the eapply specification in PMS calls patch without -s:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Migrate away from python-2 or not

2019-11-25 Thread Jaco Kroon
Hi Benda, On 2019/11/24 14:15, Benda Xu wrote: > What do you think? Is it possible to disable python2_7 by default, even if python2 is installed, and only enable python2_7 for those packages specifically requiring it (ie, being a dep for one of the packages that only supports python2_7? I tried