[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-lang/opendylan{,-bin} and dev-libs/mps

# Aaron Bauman (2019-12-12) # EAPI 4, new versions upstream, not bumped # Removal in 30 days dev-lang/opendylan dev-lang/opendylan-bin dev-libs/mps -- Cheers, Aaron signature.asc Description: PGP signature

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-lang/bas

# Aaron Bauman (2019-12-12) # EAPI 4, not bumped in years, maintainer-needed # Removal in 30 days dev-lang/bas -- Cheers, Aaron signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/2] acct-user/suricata: new user for UID 477

On 2019-12-11 13:54, Michael Orlitzky wrote: >> +ACCT_USER_HOME=/var/lib/suricata >> +ACCT_USER_HOME_PERMS=0750 > > Please don't set these unless it's absolutely necessary. The rationale > for this has finally been committed to the devmanual, but has yet to be > pushed to the website. In the

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-util/cmt

# Aaron Bauman (2019-12-12) # Multiple QA issues and docs no longer build # Removal in 30 days dev-util/cmt -- Cheers, Aaron signature.asc Description: PGP signature

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v2] eapply: Output verbosely only if patch fails to apply with -F0

> On Thu, 12 Dec 2019, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 11:14 PM Michał Górny wrote: >> On Wed, 2019-11-27 at 23:49 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> > The difference is that there is now a QA warning for something that >> > is perfectly within the spec. Maybe the extra

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] eapply: Drop -s option for patch.

On 12/12/19 3:15 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > It was also suggested that we add -F0 in EAPI 8, but that would break > the build in those cases that are producing extra output now. I don't > think that would be preferable. It would only break the build for the maintainer, who would then

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] eapply: Drop -s option for patch.

> On Thu, 12 Dec 2019, Mike Gilbert wrote: > I think this should be reverted. It causes too much noise, and > "solves" a problem only very rarely. Now, how many lines of output does this typically produce, compared to the total size of a typical build log? Especially with mgorny's subsequent

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH v2] eapply: Output verbosely only if patch fails to apply with -F0

On Wed, Nov 27, 2019 at 11:14 PM Michał Górny wrote: > > On Wed, 2019-11-27 at 23:49 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, 27 Nov 2019, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > > > This now disagrees with the PMS algorithm, doesn't it? > > > > The difference is that there is now a QA warning for

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] eapply: Drop -s option for patch.

On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 11:53 AM Zac Medico wrote: > > On 11/25/19 5:03 AM, Ulrich Müller wrote: > > We generally try to have verbose build logs, e.g., by calling > > configure with --disable-silent-rules. Silencing patch contradicts > > this, and will suppress reporting of fuzz factors. > > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] virtualx.eclass: Append RESTRICT="!test? ( test )" by default

On Thu, Dec 12, 2019 at 12:02 PM NP-Hardass wrote: > > On 12/11/19 9:58 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > > Append RESTRICT="!test? ( test )" in the default case when virtualx > > is conditional to USE=test. This fixes 440 MissingTestRestrict > > warnings. > > > > Signed-off-by: Michał Górny > > --- >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] virtualx.eclass: Append RESTRICT="!test? ( test )" by default

On 12/11/19 9:58 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > Append RESTRICT="!test? ( test )" in the default case when virtualx > is conditional to USE=test. This fixes 440 MissingTestRestrict > warnings. > > Signed-off-by: Michał Górny > --- > eclass/virtualx.eclass | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] oasis.eclass: Add RESTRICT="!test? ( test )"

On Thu, 2019-12-12 at 16:18 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > This fixes 30 cases of MissingTestRestrict. > > Signed-off-by: Michał Górny > --- > eclass/oasis.eclass | 7 +-- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/eclass/oasis.eclass b/eclass/oasis.eclass > index

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] oasis.eclass: Add RESTRICT="!test? ( test )"

This fixes 30 cases of MissingTestRestrict. Signed-off-by: Michał Górny --- eclass/oasis.eclass | 7 +-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/oasis.eclass b/eclass/oasis.eclass index 53db4b777271..7727253575d4 100644 --- a/eclass/oasis.eclass +++

[gentoo-portage-dev] Build path abi missing in qemu-user

When build in a qemu-user chroot I get odd build paths: /var/tmp/portage/dev-libs/libxml2-2.9.9-r1/work/libxml2-2.9.9-.ppc This path is missing the abi_ppc_32 like so: /var/tmp/portage/dev-libs/libxml2-2.9.9-r1/work/libxml2-2.9.9-abi_ppc_32.ppc I struggle to find out why this happens, any

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] kde5.eclass: Add RESTRICT="!test? ( test )"

This fixes further 19 cases of MissingTestRestrict. Signed-off-by: Michał Górny --- eclass/kde5.eclass | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/eclass/kde5.eclass b/eclass/kde5.eclass index ef45ba420d73..e0841887355c 100644 --- a/eclass/kde5.eclass +++ b/eclass/kde5.eclass @@ -235,6

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] java-utils-2.eclass: Add RESTRICT="!test? ( test )"

On Thu, 2019-12-12 at 08:14 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > Add RESTRICT="!test? ( test )" when the ebuild specified > JAVA_PKG_IUSE="test". This fixes further 100 MissingTestRestrict > cases. > > Signed-off-by: Michał Górny > --- > eclass/java-utils-2.eclass | 2 ++ > 1 file changed, 2