Re: [gentoo-dev] Inconsistent use of || preferences for www-client/elinks, links, lynx, w3m, and w3mmee

2020-02-09 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 2020-02-09 at 22:51 -0800, Zac Medico wrote: > On 2/9/20 10:44 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Sun, 2020-02-09 at 22:30 -0800, Zac Medico wrote: > > > Hi all (especially package owners in CC), > > > > > > In various packages we have inconsistent use of || preferences for > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Inconsistent use of || preferences for www-client/elinks, links, lynx, w3m, and w3mmee

2020-02-09 Thread Zac Medico
On 2/9/20 10:44 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sun, 2020-02-09 at 22:30 -0800, Zac Medico wrote: >> Hi all (especially package owners in CC), >> >> In various packages we have inconsistent use of || preferences for >> www-client/elinks, links, lynx, w3m, and w3mmee. This means that the >> default

Re: [gentoo-dev] Inconsistent use of || preferences for www-client/elinks, links, lynx, w3m, and w3mmee

2020-02-09 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 2020-02-09 at 22:30 -0800, Zac Medico wrote: > Hi all (especially package owners in CC), > > In various packages we have inconsistent use of || preferences for > www-client/elinks, links, lynx, w3m, and w3mmee. This means that the > default preference depends on the combination of

[gentoo-dev] Inconsistent use of || preferences for www-client/elinks, links, lynx, w3m, and w3mmee

2020-02-09 Thread Zac Medico
Hi all (especially package owners in CC), In various packages we have inconsistent use of || preferences for www-client/elinks, links, lynx, w3m, and w3mmee. This means that the default preference depends on the combination of packages that one has installed and the order that one has installed

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: sys-apps/hbaapi

2020-02-09 Thread David Seifert
# David Seifert (2020-02-10) # Unmaintained, EAPI 4, doesn't respect CFLAGS and LDFLAGS, which masks # undefined symbols in the shared object, upstream gone, no other distro # packages this anymore, no revdeps. Removal in 30 days. sys-apps/hbaapi signature.asc Description: This is a digitally

[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2020-02-09 23:59 UTC

2020-02-09 Thread Robin H. Johnson
/shutterbug 20200203-05:51 mgorny22fd4eef49b x11-terms/multi-aterm 20200203-06:08 mgornyec9b6020b83 Additions: acct-group/lighttpd 20200209-15:48 zlogene 30b52da67e3 acct-group/smtpd 20200205-12:22 zx2c4

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/3] eclass/go-module: add support for building based on go.sum

2020-02-09 Thread William Hubbs
On Sun, Feb 09, 2020 at 11:35:25PM +, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Sun, Feb 09, 2020 at 04:11:28PM -0600, William Hubbs wrote: > > On Sun, Feb 09, 2020 at 12:31:19PM -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > > +# "go.mod" only: > > > +# - Populate EGO_VENDOR > > go.mod without go.sum can mean that

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/3] eclass/go-module: add support for building based on go.sum

2020-02-09 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Sun, Feb 09, 2020 at 04:11:28PM -0600, William Hubbs wrote: > On Sun, Feb 09, 2020 at 12:31:19PM -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > > +# "go.mod" only: > > +# - Populate EGO_VENDOR > go.mod without go.sum can mean that there are no external dependencies, so > there > shouldn't be a reason to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last-rites: net-misc/wicd

2020-02-09 Thread Stefan Strogin
Upd. The port to Python 3 is not finished in the upstream. Particularly it is still using pygtk, it seems no work in porting to gtk+3 has been done yet. I don't think I'm going to do it. If anybody will, many people will be grateful. I personally suggest to look at net-wireless/iwd (it has its

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/3] eclass/go-module: add support for building based on go.sum

2020-02-09 Thread William Hubbs
On Sun, Feb 09, 2020 at 12:31:19PM -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > EGO_SUM mode now supplements the existing EGO_VENDOR mode. > > EGO_SUM should be populated by the maintainer, directly from the go.sum > file of the root package. See eclass and conversion example > (dev-go/go-tour &

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] app-admin/kube-bench: convert to go-module go.sum

2020-02-09 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Feb 9, 2020 at 1:16 PM Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote: > > On 09/02/20 20:59, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote: > > On 09/02/20 20:57, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote: > >> On 09/02/20 20:55, Michał Górny wrote: > >>> On Sun, 2020-02-09 at 20:38 +, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote:

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] app-admin/kube-bench: convert to go-module go.sum

2020-02-09 Thread Michael 'veremitz' Everitt
On 09/02/20 20:59, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote: > On 09/02/20 20:57, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote: >> On 09/02/20 20:55, Michał Górny wrote: >>> On Sun, 2020-02-09 at 20:38 +, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote: Hrm, pardon my ignorance, but do 'we' really need to review 232 lines

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] app-admin/kube-bench: convert to go-module go.sum

2020-02-09 Thread Michael 'veremitz' Everitt
On 09/02/20 20:57, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote: > On 09/02/20 20:55, Michał Górny wrote: >> On Sun, 2020-02-09 at 20:38 +, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote: >>> Hrm, pardon my ignorance, but do 'we' really need to review 232 lines of >>> Manifest?! >> Pardon mine but do 'we' really need

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] app-admin/kube-bench: convert to go-module go.sum

2020-02-09 Thread Michael 'veremitz' Everitt
On 09/02/20 20:55, Michał Górny wrote: > On Sun, 2020-02-09 at 20:38 +, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote: >> Hrm, pardon my ignorance, but do 'we' really need to review 232 lines of >> Manifest?! > Pardon mine but do 'we' really need to read your useless comments > everywhere, all the time and

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] app-admin/kube-bench: convert to go-module go.sum

2020-02-09 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 2020-02-09 at 20:38 +, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote: > Hrm, pardon my ignorance, but do 'we' really need to review 232 lines of > Manifest?! Pardon mine but do 'we' really need to read your useless comments everywhere, all the time and just get irritated for no benefit to Gentoo?

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] app-admin/kube-bench: convert to go-module go.sum

2020-02-09 Thread Michael 'veremitz' Everitt
On 09/02/20 20:47, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Sun, Feb 09, 2020 at 08:38:23PM +, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote: >> On 09/02/20 20:31, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > ... >> Hrm, pardon my ignorance, but do 'we' really need to review 232 lines of >> Manifest?! > No, but I wanted to show scale of

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] app-admin/kube-bench: convert to go-module go.sum

2020-02-09 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Sun, Feb 09, 2020 at 08:38:23PM +, Michael 'veremitz' Everitt wrote: > On 09/02/20 20:31, Robin H. Johnson wrote: ... > Hrm, pardon my ignorance, but do 'we' really need to review 232 lines of > Manifest?! No, but I wanted to show scale of Manifest that is going to be present in covering

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] app-admin/kube-bench: convert to go-module go.sum

2020-02-09 Thread Michael 'veremitz' Everitt
On 09/02/20 20:31, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > Signed-off-by: Robin H. Johnson > --- > app-admin/kube-bench/Manifest | 232 ++ > .../kube-bench/kube-bench-0.2.3-r1.ebuild | 120 + > 2 files changed, 352 insertions(+) > create mode 100644

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] app-admin/kube-bench: convert to go-module go.sum - diff vs previous version example

2020-02-09 Thread Robin H. Johnson
Attached is the diff between the EGO_VENDOR vs EGO_SUM variants of this ebuild. -- Robin Hugh Johnson Gentoo Linux: Dev, Infra Lead, Foundation Treasurer E-Mail : robb...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 11ACBA4F 4778E3F6 E4EDF38E B27B944E 34884E85 GnuPG FP : 7D0B3CEB E9B85B1F 825BCECF EE05E6F6 A48F6136

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/3] dev-go/go-tour: convert to go-module go.sum

2020-02-09 Thread Robin H. Johnson
Signed-off-by: Robin H. Johnson --- dev-go/go-tour/Manifest | 12 dev-go/go-tour/go-tour-0_p20190829-r2.ebuild | 67 2 files changed, 79 insertions(+) create mode 100644 dev-go/go-tour/go-tour-0_p20190829-r2.ebuild diff --git

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/3] eclass/go-module: add support for building based on go.sum

2020-02-09 Thread Robin H. Johnson
EGO_SUM mode now supplements the existing EGO_VENDOR mode. EGO_SUM should be populated by the maintainer, directly from the go.sum file of the root package. See eclass and conversion example (dev-go/go-tour & app-admin/kube-bench) for further details. The go-module_set_globals function performs

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] app-admin/kube-bench: convert to go-module go.sum

2020-02-09 Thread Robin H. Johnson
Signed-off-by: Robin H. Johnson --- app-admin/kube-bench/Manifest | 232 ++ .../kube-bench/kube-bench-0.2.3-r1.ebuild | 120 + 2 files changed, 352 insertions(+) create mode 100644 app-admin/kube-bench/kube-bench-0.2.3-r1.ebuild diff --git

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-nntp/kwooty

2020-02-09 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
# Andreas Sturmlechner (2020-02-09) # Dead upstream, broken by Qt 5.14, bug #703930. # Masked for removal in 30 days. net-nntp/kwooty signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.