Re: Re : Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] precisions on installed packages' dependencies

2020-03-23 Thread Zac Medico
On 3/23/20 3:21 PM, michael.lienha...@laposte.net wrote: > - Zac Medico a écrit : > >>> 3. before removing a library, "ebuild unmerge" always checks if it is used >>> by another package: this means that installed packages' dependencies are >>> never broken. >> >> That's true if the

Re: [gentoo-dev] musl doesn't provide execinfo.h

2020-03-23 Thread Georgy Yakovlev
On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 21:09:15 +0200 Jaco Kroon wrote: > Hi Michał, > > On 2020/03/23 18:25, Michał Górny wrote: > > > On Mon, 2020-03-23 at 10:21 +0200, Jaco Kroon wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/713668 relates. > >> > >> * Searching for /usr/include/execinfo.h ... > >>

Re : Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] precisions on installed packages' dependencies

2020-03-23 Thread michael . lienhardt
- Zac Medico a écrit : > > 3. before removing a library, "ebuild unmerge" always checks if it is used > > by another package: this means that installed packages' dependencies are > > never broken. > > That's true if the package is removed via emerge --depclean, but emerge > --unmerge

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: backward-incompatible changes in eclasses

2020-03-23 Thread Michał Górny
On Mon, 2020-03-23 at 14:26 -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 08:19:20PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Mon, 2020-03-23 at 13:23 -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > > > Hey all, > > > > > > it has been brought to my attention that there have been several > > >

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: app-office/magicpoint, sys-apps/flashrom

2020-03-23 Thread Jonas Stein
Dear all, The following packages are up for grabs: app-office/magicpoint sys-apps/flashrom after retirement of the proxied maintainer. https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/app-office/magicpoint https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/sys-apps/flashrom There are open bugs. Some with patches:

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: backward-incompatible changes in eclasses

2020-03-23 Thread William Hubbs
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 08:19:20PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > On Mon, 2020-03-23 at 13:23 -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > > Hey all, > > > > it has been brought to my attention that there have been several > > backward-incompatible changes made to the python eclasses lately. > > Does 'several'

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: backward-incompatible changes in eclasses

2020-03-23 Thread Michał Górny
On Mon, 2020-03-23 at 14:00 -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 07:36:13PM +0100, David Seifert wrote: > > On Mon, 2020-03-23 at 13:23 -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > > > Hey all, > > > > > > it has been brought to my attention that there have been several > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: backward-incompatible changes in eclasses

2020-03-23 Thread Michał Górny
On Mon, 2020-03-23 at 13:23 -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > Hey all, > > it has been brought to my attention that there have been several > backward-incompatible changes made to the python eclasses lately. Does 'several' in this case mean more than one? Please correct me if I'm mistaken but the

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: backward-incompatible changes in eclasses

2020-03-23 Thread William Hubbs
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 02:14:06PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 08:03:47PM +0100, David Seifert wrote: > > On Mon, 2020-03-23 at 14:00 -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 07:36:13PM +0100, David Seifert wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2020-03-23 at 13:23

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: backward-incompatible changes in eclasses

2020-03-23 Thread William Hubbs
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 08:03:47PM +0100, David Seifert wrote: > On Mon, 2020-03-23 at 14:00 -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 07:36:13PM +0100, David Seifert wrote: > > > On Mon, 2020-03-23 at 13:23 -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > > > > Hey all, > > > > > > > > it has been

Re: [gentoo-dev] musl doesn't provide execinfo.h

2020-03-23 Thread Jaco Kroon
Hi Michał, On 2020/03/23 18:25, Michał Górny wrote: > On Mon, 2020-03-23 at 10:21 +0200, Jaco Kroon wrote: >> Hi, >> >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/713668 relates. >> >> * Searching for /usr/include/execinfo.h ... >> sys-libs/glibc-2.29-r7 (/usr/include/execinfo.h) >> >> As I see I can either add

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: backward-incompatible changes in eclasses

2020-03-23 Thread David Seifert
On Mon, 2020-03-23 at 14:00 -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 07:36:13PM +0100, David Seifert wrote: > > On Mon, 2020-03-23 at 13:23 -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > > > Hey all, > > > > > > it has been brought to my attention that there have been several > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: backward-incompatible changes in eclasses

2020-03-23 Thread William Hubbs
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 07:36:13PM +0100, David Seifert wrote: > On Mon, 2020-03-23 at 13:23 -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > > Hey all, > > > > it has been brought to my attention that there have been several > > backward-incompatible changes made to the python eclasses lately. > > > > It is true

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: backward-incompatible changes in eclasses

2020-03-23 Thread Aisha Tammy
On 3/23/20 2:27 PM, Joonas Niilola wrote: > On 3/23/20 8:23 PM, William Hubbs wrote: >> but we need to >> find a way to notify them when a breaking change is going into a widely >> used eclass and give them time to adjust their ebuilds. >> >> >> Thoughts? >> > Subscribe to this mailing list. > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: backward-incompatible changes in eclasses

2020-03-23 Thread Haelwenn (lanodan) Monnier
[2020-03-23 20:27:51+0200] Joonas Niilola: > On 3/23/20 8:23 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > > but we need to > > find a way to notify them when a breaking change is going into a widely > > used eclass and give them time to adjust their ebuilds. > > > > > > Thoughts? > > > Subscribe to this mailing

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: backward-incompatible changes in eclasses

2020-03-23 Thread David Seifert
On Mon, 2020-03-23 at 13:23 -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > Hey all, > > it has been brought to my attention that there have been several > backward-incompatible changes made to the python eclasses lately. > > It is true that everything in ::gentoo has been fixed along with the > changes to the

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: backward-incompatible changes in eclasses

2020-03-23 Thread Joonas Niilola
On 3/23/20 8:23 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > but we need to > find a way to notify them when a breaking change is going into a widely > used eclass and give them time to adjust their ebuilds. > > > Thoughts? > Subscribe to this mailing list. AFAIK all major changes have been posted here and pushed

[gentoo-dev] rfc: backward-incompatible changes in eclasses

2020-03-23 Thread William Hubbs
Hey all, it has been brought to my attention that there have been several backward-incompatible changes made to the python eclasses lately. It is true that everything in ::gentoo has been fixed along with the changes to the eclasses; however, when a change like this goes into a widely used

Re: [gentoo-dev] musl doesn't provide execinfo.h

2020-03-23 Thread Michał Górny
On Mon, 2020-03-23 at 10:21 +0200, Jaco Kroon wrote: > Hi, > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/713668 relates. > > * Searching for /usr/include/execinfo.h ... > sys-libs/glibc-2.29-r7 (/usr/include/execinfo.h) > > As I see I can either add an explicit depend on glibc which I'd prefer > not to. Or

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev.gentoo.org unreachable

2020-03-23 Thread Alec Warner
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 7:29 AM malc wrote: > On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 9:13 AM Jaco Kroon wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > Is there a known issue with dev.gentoo.org? > > https://infra-status.gentoo.org/ agrees with your analysis... (at > 10:50 UTC) I would keep checking there as infra wakes up

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last-rites: media-video/gtk-recordmydesktop

2020-03-23 Thread James Le Cuirot
On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 00:13:46 +0100 Andreas Sturmlechner wrote: > # Andreas Sturmlechner (2020-03-22) > # Unmaintained revdep on dev-python/pygtk blocking its removal, py2-only > # Bug #710172, masked for removal in 30 days. > media-video/gtk-recordmydesktop You may want to suggest

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev.gentoo.org unreachable

2020-03-23 Thread malc
On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 9:13 AM Jaco Kroon wrote: > > Hi All, > > Is there a known issue with dev.gentoo.org? https://infra-status.gentoo.org/ agrees with your analysis... (at 10:50 UTC) I would keep checking there as infra wakes up and updates the status.

[gentoo-dev] dev.gentoo.org unreachable

2020-03-23 Thread Jaco Kroon
Hi All, Is there a known issue with dev.gentoo.org? I initially thought it might just be a routing issue from our network but have since confirmed at least two other sources with the same problem.  One of these are IPv4 only, the other two are trying IPv6 too.  All failing. One v6 and v4:  

[gentoo-dev] musl doesn't provide execinfo.h

2020-03-23 Thread Jaco Kroon
Hi, https://bugs.gentoo.org/713668 relates.  * Searching for /usr/include/execinfo.h ... sys-libs/glibc-2.29-r7 (/usr/include/execinfo.h) As I see I can either add an explicit depend on glibc which I'd prefer not to.  Or someone from the musl team could possibly assist on how to get the