[gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2020-04-12 23:59 UTC

2020-04-12 Thread Robin H. Johnson
/ownpaste20200409-08:12 zlogenebfabc357c69 www-apps/venus 20200409-08:08 zlogene3bba40048f8 Additions: acct-group/anope 20200330-16:46 whissi 1c3e8b59c9e acct-group/dnsdist 20200412-14:23

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] special_env_vars: add ENV_UNSET to environ_whitelist (bug 700830)

2020-04-12 Thread Zac Medico
Add ENV_UNSET to the environ_whitelist. Since DISPLAY is also in the environ_whitelist, ENV_UNSET must also be in environ_whitelist in order to unset DISPLAY. Fixes: a5e02c92fd72 ("Support ENV_UNSET for EAPI 7") Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/700830 ---

Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilizations and src_test

2020-04-12 Thread Patrick McLean
On Sun, 12 Apr 2020 11:21:29 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > On Sun, 2020-04-12 at 10:43 +0200, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > > Hello all, > > > > If you work on the stabilization workflow you may have noticed that: > > > > - There are people that rant if you don't run src_test against their > >

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2 8/9] glep-0072: Move 'overlays' to spec, and change behavior

2020-04-12 Thread Michał Górny
Change the handling of slave repositories to the usual notion of 'slave overrides master'. Signed-off-by: Michał Górny --- glep-0072.rst | 22 ++ 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/glep-0072.rst b/glep-0072.rst index 9ad8b61..68b8e91 100644 ---

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2 9/9] glep-0072: Update metadata

2020-04-12 Thread Michał Górny
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny --- glep-0072.rst | 16 +--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) diff --git a/glep-0072.rst b/glep-0072.rst index 68b8e91..d148a25 100644 --- a/glep-0072.rst +++ b/glep-0072.rst @@ -1,23 +1,17 @@ --- GLEP: 72 Title: Architecture stability

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2 7/9] glep-0072: Explicitly cover file not existing case

2020-04-12 Thread Michał Górny
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny --- glep-0072.rst | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff --git a/glep-0072.rst b/glep-0072.rst index d3afaef..9ad8b61 100644 --- a/glep-0072.rst +++ b/glep-0072.rst @@ -96,6 +96,8 @@ whitespace-separated columns: Additional columns are ignored to allow for

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2 6/9] glep-0072: Combine and amend description of states

2020-04-12 Thread Michał Górny
Provide a combined description for every status that explains what it means, how it's used by linting tools and how it affects stabilization requests. Signed-off-by: Michał Górny --- glep-0072.rst | 46 +++--- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 27

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2 5/9] glep-0072: Update initial values

2020-04-12 Thread Michał Górny
I'm not aware of any profiles that should be set to 'degraded', so let's focus on the immediate problem of stable/testing. It will also probably make sense to wait before we start using the third state. Signed-off-by: Michał Górny --- glep-0072.rst | 7 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+),

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2 1/9] glep-0072: Remove redundant 'broken' status

2020-04-12 Thread Michał Górny
This is really no different from marking the profiles exp, and there seems no value in having this controlled in two places. Signed-off-by: Michał Górny --- glep-0072.rst | 8 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/glep-0072.rst b/glep-0072.rst index

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2 4/9] glep-0072: Remove weird third column from example

2020-04-12 Thread Michał Górny
While it should technically be ignored, I don't think it's a good idea to encourage developers using it for their own purposes. Signed-off-by: Michał Górny --- glep-0072.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/glep-0072.rst b/glep-0072.rst index 5be7941..acc5da7

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2 3/9] glep-0072: Use 'testing' for pure ~arch

2020-04-12 Thread Michał Górny
'Testing' has generally nicer meaning than 'unstable'. Signed-off-by: Michał Górny --- glep-0072.rst | 10 +- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/glep-0072.rst b/glep-0072.rst index 1e906d2..5be7941 100644 --- a/glep-0072.rst +++ b/glep-0072.rst @@ -92,7 +92,7

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2 2/9] glep-0072: Rename bad depgraph state to 'degraded'

2020-04-12 Thread Michał Górny
In Gentoo terms, 'testing' and 'unstable' are mostly synonymous, so using the two names for different purposes is confusing. Use 'degraded' instead. Signed-off-by: Michał Górny --- glep-0072.rst | 25 + 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2 0/9] GLEP 72 revival

2020-04-12 Thread Michał Górny
Hi, Here's the updated patch series. Changes: - reverted profile directory rename. - renamed 'degraded' to 'transitional'. Not changed: - did not introduce a separate security-supported level as sec team indicated they don't want to keep sec-supp and stable separate long-term. Michał Górny

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] KEYWORDREQ and STABLEREQ keywords

2020-04-12 Thread David Seifert
On Sat, 2020-04-11 at 12:53 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Sat, Apr 11, 2020 at 12:28 PM Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > > On 2020-04-11 17:33, Michał Górny wrote: > > > 1. We kill both keywords, and just rely on components, or > > > > > > 2. I make NATTkA automatically add KEYWORDREQ or STABLEREQ

Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilizations and src_test

2020-04-12 Thread Andreas Sturmlechner
On Sunday, 12 April 2020 11:33:38 CEST Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > On Sunday, 12 April 2020 10:43:07 CEST Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > > - There are people that rant if you open a test failure bug against their > > packages and you block the stabilization. > > Maybe start ignoring those packages

Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilizations and src_test

2020-04-12 Thread James Le Cuirot
On Sun, 12 Apr 2020 10:43:07 +0200 Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > If you work on the stabilization workflow you may have noticed that: > > - There are people that rant if you don't run src_test against their packages; > - There are people that rant if you open a test failure bug against their >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilizations and src_test

2020-04-12 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
On 2020-04-12 11:21, Michał Górny wrote: > This is not a problem that can be solved by a binary flag. > > If package's test suite is entirely broken and unmaintained, the package > should use RESTRICT=test and not silently ask arch teams to ignore it. > > If package's test suite is only slightly

Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilizations and src_test

2020-04-12 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 2020-04-12 at 10:43 +0200, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > Hello all, > > If you work on the stabilization workflow you may have noticed that: > > - There are people that rant if you don't run src_test against their packages; > - There are people that rant if you open a test failure bug

Re: [gentoo-dev] Stabilizations and src_test

2020-04-12 Thread Marek Szuba
On 2020-04-12 09:43, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > If you work on the stabilization workflow you may have noticed that: > > - There are people that rant if you don't run src_test against their packages; > - There are people that rant if you open a test failure bug against their > packages and you

[gentoo-dev] Stabilizations and src_test

2020-04-12 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
Hello all, If you work on the stabilization workflow you may have noticed that: - There are people that rant if you don't run src_test against their packages; - There are people that rant if you open a test failure bug against their packages and you block the stabilization. So, unless there