On Fri, 2020-05-08 at 13:33 +0300, Andreas K. Hüttel wrote:
>
> Background, I tried to locally emulate www.g.o using jekyll, and ran
> into
> troubles because lots of dev-ruby/* lost stable keywords. Newest
> ~arch didn't
> do the job, so I needed to figure out the config of www.g.o
> (correspon
gcc-10 was released yesterday and was pushed to ::gentoo's ~arch as:
https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=32258c6414a31898ff5592893678a3910d2c5c75
Most of packages should Just Work. But we expect some amount of
build- and runtime breakage. Non-exhaustive list of things to watc
Hi all,
quite some packages were un-stabilized across the tree recently.
In general that is in my opinion a good thing if it helps us keep up, in
particular where many arches are involved.
What's the general opinion on re-stabilizing things on *amd64* only?
I would say that maintaining a lar
Hi,
On 2020/05/08 08:17, Hans de Graaff wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-05-07 at 09:29 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
>>
>> 1) list of selected packages (@world)
>>
>> We would use this to determine the popularity of individual packages,
>> plus by scanning their dependencies we would be able to make combined
>