[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] emerge: Warn on maintainer-needed pkgs

2020-05-09 Thread Zac Medico
From: "Sam James (sam_c)" Introduces new repos.conf/layout.conf variables: * maintainer-nag (yes/no) * maintainer-nag-url (URL to be given for volunteers to look at) Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/711466 Closes: https://github.com/gentoo/portage/pull/529 Signed-off-by: Sam James (sam_c)

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] Change BINPKG_COMPRESS default from bzip2 to xz

2020-05-09 Thread Zac Medico
On 4/26/20 2:12 PM, Zac Medico wrote: > On 4/26/20 1:09 PM, Matt Turner wrote: >> On Sun, Apr 26, 2020 at 12:29 PM Michał Górny wrote: >>> >>> On Sun, 2020-04-26 at 09:55 -0700, Matt Turner wrote: Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/715108 Signed-off-by: Matt Turner --- Strawman

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] NeededEntry: don't use scanelf -q (bug 721336)

2020-05-09 Thread Zac Medico
We don't use scanelf -q, since that would omit libraries like musl's /usr/lib/libc.so which do not have any DT_NEEDED or DT_SONAME settings. Since we don't use scanelf -q, we have to handle the special rpath value " - ". Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/721336 Fixes: 25fbe7bc1a92 ("NeededEntry:

Re: [gentoo-dev] [gentoostats continued] Collected data and justification for it

2020-05-09 Thread Kent Fredric
On Thu, 07 May 2020 09:29:36 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > For example, if OCaml bindings on some package are broken and require > a lot of work, I would find useful to know how likely it is that anyone > is using it. Or if a lot of people are enabling 'frobnicate' flag, > I could consider

Re: [gentoo-dev] [gentoostats continued] Collected data and justification for it

2020-05-09 Thread Kent Fredric
On Sat, 09 May 2020 15:22:52 +0200 Gerion Entrup wrote: > I'm not sure, if Portage is capable of this, but a distinction in USE > flags needed to fulfil some dependency of another package and USE flags > actively activated by the user could be useful. Presently impossible, as how portage

Re: [gentoo-dev] [gentoostats continued] Collected data and justification for it

2020-05-09 Thread Kent Fredric
On Fri, 8 May 2020 09:49:18 +0200 Jaco Kroon wrote: > So we do need the full list of packages installed, filtered to ::gentoo, > but there needs to be an indicated whether it's installed because it's > in @world, as a dep of something in @world (which is possibly not in > ::gentoo), or is some

Re: [gentoo-dev] [gentoostats continued] Collected data and justification for it

2020-05-09 Thread Andreas K . Hüttel
> > I think we shouldn't collect any data unless we have a good plan on how > we'd be able to use it. In this thread, I'd like to collect ideas > on what data to collect and how it could realistically be used. > 5) CFLAGS and possibly related variables 6) "active" version of slotted system

Re: [gentoo-dev] [gentoostats continued] Collected data and justification for it

2020-05-09 Thread Gerion Entrup
Am Donnerstag, 7. Mai 2020, 09:29:36 CEST schrieb Michał Górny: > I'm going to start with the data and uses I can think of. Please reply > with other things you can think of. > > > 1) list of selected packages (@world) > > We would use this to determine the popularity of individual packages, >

Re: [gentoo-dev] De-stabilizing and re-stabilizing (on amd64 only)

2020-05-09 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Fri, 2020-05-08 at 13:33 +0300, Andreas K. Hüttel wrote: > > Background, I tried to locally emulate www.g.o using jekyll, and ran > into > troubles because lots of dev-ruby/* lost stable keywords. Newest > ~arch didn't > do the job, so I needed to figure out the config of www.g.o >