The following packages are up for grabs:
Two outstanding issues:
A collection of graphics.
No open bugs. No other package depends on it.
# Marek Szuba (2020-07-27)
# No longer available upstream. Potentially copyrighted.
# Removal in 30 days. Bug #734116.
Second iteration of proposed changes to sword-module.eclass, this time
without incrementing revision because I am fairly confident that it
should all be backwards-compatible. Changes with respect to the first
- SWORD_MODULE now defaults to a value extracted from PN;
- do not bother
1. The old version expected versioned source archives to have been
manually uploaded to the Gentoo mirror network by package
maintainers. This is no longer allowed, or indeed possible for most
Gentoo developers. Instead, use the SRC_URI arrow mechanism to
version archives fetched
On 2020-07-27 12:02, Michał Górny wrote:
> +# Note that while all SWORD modules which do not require prior registration
Not quite sure if this is really necessary, as far as I remember both
"which" and "that" are grammatically correct in this context - in British
On Mon, 2020-07-27 at 11:51 +0200, Marek Szuba wrote:
> On 2020-07-26 21:19, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Please use git-send-email, so that we can reply in context without
> > jumping through hoops.
> Funny, last time I used git-send-email to post a diff introducing a new
> revision of a file
On 2020-07-26 21:19, Michał Górny wrote:
> Please use git-send-email, so that we can reply in context without
> jumping through hoops.
Funny, last time I used git-send-email to post a diff introducing a new
revision of a file (it was virtual/opencl, IIRC) I got told it was too
On 7/26/20 12:57 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> Even more appropriate would be to enable the flag with an IUSE default.
> The ebuild could still display an ewarn message pointing out the alleged
> security issue.
This'd be nice. A news-worthy update in my opinion regardless.