Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: x11-libs/libfm

2020-08-12 Thread Joonas Niilola
On 8/13/20 7:25 AM, Jimi Huotari wrote: > Unless I'm being blind, the LXQt project does not need this one, making it > 'maintainer-needed': > > x11-libs/libfm > Seems to be needed by LXDE stuff only. Regarding that, should we last-rite remaining LXDE stuff? It's pretty clear the development has

[gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: x11-libs/libfm

2020-08-12 Thread Jimi Huotari
Unless I'm being blind, the LXQt project does not need this one, making it 'maintainer-needed': x11-libs/libfm See also: - https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=699016 - https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=700186 - https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/17109 pgprURBlXgtec.pgp

[gentoo-portage-dev] [PATCH] lib/portage/xml/metadata.py: tolerate xml.parsers.expat import failures (bug 736912)

2020-08-12 Thread Zac Medico
Tolerate broken or missing xml support in python. This reverts a behavior change from commit 935c47d972d986f1822850618442c19c97e300c3. Fixes: 935c47d972d9 ("lib/portage/xml/metadata.py: fix ungrouped-imports w/refactor") Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/736912 Signed-off-by: Zac Medico ---

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: x11-misc/gpaste

2020-08-12 Thread Jonas Stein
Dear all the following packages are up for grabs after retirement of the proxied maintainer: x11-misc/gpaste https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/x11-misc/gpaste -- Best, Jonas signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs: app-admin/apg

2020-08-12 Thread Jonas Stein
Dear all the following packages are up for grabs after retirement of the proxied maintainer: app-admin/apg https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/app-admin/apg https://bugs.gentoo.org/629272 https://bugs.gentoo.org/643368 -- Best, Jonas

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: switching default udev provider for new systems to udev

2020-08-12 Thread Tomas Mozes
On Sat, Aug 8, 2020 at 8:51 PM William Hubbs wrote: > All, > > I would like to propose that we switch the default udev provider on new > systems from eudev to udev. > > This is not a lastrites, and it will not affect current systems since > they have to migrate manually. Also, this change can be