Re: [gentoo-dev] pkgdev: an alternative to `repoman commit`
On 27/02/2021 15:50, Tim Harder wrote: Hi all, Finally responding to all the requests, I've hacked up an initial alternative to repoman's commit functionality in the form of pkgdev [1] that uses pkgcheck's API behind the scenes. The project is meant to grow into a collection of tools for Gentoo development and maintenance, but initially supports `pkgdev commit` and `pkgdev push` that should work for a basic git workflow on ebuild repos. In essence, `pkgdev commit` wraps `git add` and `git commit` functionality along with supporting GLEP 66 style message prefixes for any committed files across an ebuild repo. Package manifests are also regenerated and added automatically for any targeted pkg commits. QA scanning is done on `pkgdev push` (not per `pkgdev commit` call) so knowing/learning how to interactively `git rebase` is currently essential to the workflow. Probably the main thing lacking is good docs for the workflow that pkgdev envisions as it differs slightly from the one used with repoman. Feel free to respond with questions, ideas, or flames. If you want to give it a shot, I believe a live ebuild for it has already been added to the tree at dev-util/pkgdev. Also, please open issues on the upstream project if you run into bugs or have feature requests. Thanks, Tim [1]: https://github.com/pkgcore/pkgdev Hi Tim, That's really nice, thanks! I just tested it and it seems really nice, I just need to adjust to the new workflow. Could you make "push -v" a bit more verbose ? I initially forgot to rebase and couldn't see the error message from the remote. I guess this also means that the current code will hide messages from hooks such as changes made to Bugzilla. Cheers, Louis OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Re: [gentoo-dev] pkgdev: an alternative to `repoman commit`
> On 27 Feb 2021, at 14:50, Tim Harder wrote: > > Hi all, > > Finally responding to all the requests, I've hacked up an initial > alternative to repoman's commit functionality in the form of pkgdev [1] > that uses pkgcheck's API behind the scenes. The project is meant to grow > into a collection of tools for Gentoo development and maintenance, but > initially supports `pkgdev commit` and `pkgdev push` that should work > for a basic git workflow on ebuild repos. Thank you! Already using it. > [snip] > > Feel free to respond with questions, ideas, or flames. If you want to > give it a shot, I believe a live ebuild for it has already been added to > the tree at dev-util/pkgdev. Also, please open issues on the upstream > project if you run into bugs or have feature requests. Yes, please let me know if there’s any issues with the ebuild too. I’ll add a tagged release once it’s made, obviously. > > Thanks, > Tim > > [1]: https://github.com/pkgcore/pkgdev > signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
[gentoo-dev] pkgdev: an alternative to `repoman commit`
Hi all, Finally responding to all the requests, I've hacked up an initial alternative to repoman's commit functionality in the form of pkgdev [1] that uses pkgcheck's API behind the scenes. The project is meant to grow into a collection of tools for Gentoo development and maintenance, but initially supports `pkgdev commit` and `pkgdev push` that should work for a basic git workflow on ebuild repos. In essence, `pkgdev commit` wraps `git add` and `git commit` functionality along with supporting GLEP 66 style message prefixes for any committed files across an ebuild repo. Package manifests are also regenerated and added automatically for any targeted pkg commits. QA scanning is done on `pkgdev push` (not per `pkgdev commit` call) so knowing/learning how to interactively `git rebase` is currently essential to the workflow. Probably the main thing lacking is good docs for the workflow that pkgdev envisions as it differs slightly from the one used with repoman. Feel free to respond with questions, ideas, or flames. If you want to give it a shot, I believe a live ebuild for it has already been added to the tree at dev-util/pkgdev. Also, please open issues on the upstream project if you run into bugs or have feature requests. Thanks, Tim [1]: https://github.com/pkgcore/pkgdev
[gentoo-dev] Last rites: media-gfx/openexr_viewers
# Bernd Waibel (2021-02-27)
# No longer actively supported upstream.
# Removal needed to clean-up {ilmbase,openexr}-2.3.0
# Masked for removal in 30 days.
media-gfx/openexr_viewers
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
