Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs, round #2

2021-06-01 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Mon, 2021-05-31 at 22:49 +0200, David Seifert wrote: > The following packages have been dropped to m-n, since their > maintainers > haven't touched them in over a year and show no signs of maintaining > them: > > >   media-gfx/icoutils Could you explain what maintenance is expected here?

[gentoo-dev] last-rite: many openstack packages

2021-06-01 Thread Matthew Thode
https://bugs.gentoo.org/793800 Maintenance burden is a bit too high with the mismatch of what the python team wants to support for python-impls and what upstream supports and the various support lifecycles not matching (enterprise vs rolling release). Some openstack clients and utilities will be

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: sys-boot/lilo

2021-06-01 Thread Hank Leininger
On 2021-06-01, Mike Gilbert wrote: > The base system project is dropping LILO: it really needs to be > maintained by someone who actually uses it. I still use/prefer LILO; I'll take a look at the open bugs and consider submitting PRs for them & taking on p-m of it. An actual @gentoo.org dev is

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/2] meson-multilib.eclass: Add new eclass

2021-06-01 Thread Matt Turner
Signed-off-by: Matt Turner --- eclass/meson-multilib.eclass | 126 +++ 1 file changed, 126 insertions(+) create mode 100644 eclass/meson-multilib.eclass diff --git a/eclass/meson-multilib.eclass b/eclass/meson-multilib.eclass new file mode 100644 index

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] meson.eclass: Run einstalldocs from ${S}

2021-06-01 Thread Matt Turner
This is how cmake.eclass works. Signed-off-by: Matt Turner --- eclass/meson.eclass | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/eclass/meson.eclass b/eclass/meson.eclass index 0acc490452f..c9a5e0b5956 100644 --- a/eclass/meson.eclass +++ b/eclass/meson.eclass @@ -420,7 +420,10 @@

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/2] New meson-multilib eclass

2021-06-01 Thread Matt Turner
Please review my proposed meson-multlib.eclass. It's modeled on cmake-multilib.eclass and is useful for cutting large amounts of boilerplate from ebuilds of multilib packages using meson. The diff stat of the 50 commits to switch the tree over (available in [1]) is 90 files changed, 307

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: sys-boot/lilo

2021-06-01 Thread Peter Stuge
Mike Gilbert wrote: > The base system project is dropping LILO: it really needs to be > maintained by someone who actually uses it. I also use it. Hank Leininger wrote: > I still use/prefer LILO; I'll take a look at the open bugs and > consider submitting PRs for them & taking on p-m of it.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: sys-boot/lilo

2021-06-01 Thread Philip Webb
210601 Hank Leininger wrote: > On 2021-06-01, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> The base system project is dropping LILO: >> it really needs to be maintained by someone who actually uses it. > I still use/prefer LILO; I'll take a look at the open bugs > and consider submitting PRs for them & taking on p-m of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs, round #2

2021-06-01 Thread Marco Scardovi
Nevermind, it's not required so I will not take them Il giorno mar 1 giu 2021 alle ore 11:50 Marco Scardovi ha scritto: > I took app-mobilephone/smstools and related for PinePhone supports > > Il Mar 1 Giu 2021, 07:10 Rolf Eike Beer ha scritto: > >> Am Montag, 31. Mai 2021, 22:49:56 CEST

[gentoo-dev] Package up for grabs: sys-boot/lilo

2021-06-01 Thread Mike Gilbert
The base system project is dropping LILO: it really needs to be maintained by someone who actually uses it.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs, round #2

2021-06-01 Thread Marco Scardovi
I took app-mobilephone/smstools and related for PinePhone supports Il Mar 1 Giu 2021, 07:10 Rolf Eike Beer ha scritto: > Am Montag, 31. Mai 2021, 22:49:56 CEST schrieb David Seifert: > > The following packages have been dropped to m-n, since their maintainers > > haven't touched them in over a