Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [RFC] LTS branch of Portage

2021-10-18 Thread Francesco Riosa
Il giorno mar 5 ott 2021 alle ore 10:31 Michał Górny ha scritto: > Hi, everyone. > > I've been thinking about this for some time already, and the recent > FILESDIR mess seems to confirm it: I'd like to start a more stable LTS > branch of Portage. > > Roughly, the idea is that: > > - master

Re: [gentoo-dev] EAPI=5 must go -- final sprint! :)

2021-10-18 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Am Sonntag, 17. Oktober 2021, 21:43:40 CEST schrieb Oskari Pirhonen: > On Sun, Oct 17, 2021 at 08:57:26PM +0200, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > > So, let's make that number go down further fast! :D Cheers! > > What is the best way to help with that? Should I just grep for "EAPI=5" > in

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Moving more architectures to ~arch only

2021-10-18 Thread Michał Górny
On Mon, 2021-10-18 at 17:09 +0200, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > On 2021-10-18 03:08, John Helmert III wrote: > > A security bug, for example, is currently blocked for almost a month > > waiting for hppa stabilization [1], and this isn't the first time > > we've had to wait for a "slower" arch on a

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Moving more architectures to ~arch only

2021-10-18 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
On 2021-10-18 03:08, John Helmert III wrote: A security bug, for example, is currently blocked for almost a month waiting for hppa stabilization [1], and this isn't the first time we've had to wait for a "slower" arch on a security bug. Excuse me? How is this possible? We have that Gentoo