On 28 Oct 2021 23:43, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> > checking whether the C compiler works... *
> > /var/tmp/portage/sys-apps/sandbox-2.25/work/sandbox-2.25/libsandbox/trace.c:_do_ptrace():83:
> > failure (Function not implemented):
> > * ISE:_do_ptrace: ptrace(PTRACE_TRACEME, ...,
>
> PS.
> checking whether the C compiler works... *
> /var/tmp/portage/sys-apps/sandbox-2.25/work/sandbox-2.25/libsandbox/trace.c:_do_ptrace():83:
> failure (Function not implemented):
> * ISE:_do_ptrace: ptrace(PTRACE_TRACEME, ..., 0x,
> 0x): Function not
Mike,
could you please do this just like everyone else, i.e. file a bug and give
arch teams a go? Even if you're on all the arch teams? Even if you know the
code best? More eyes do not hurt.
(I am absolutely not in the mood right now for hunting down why alpha stage
builds now fail.)
TIA
Hi,
the following packages are up for grabs:
dev-python/python-fcl (1 open bug)
dev-python/pooch (1 open bug)
dev-python/glooey (2 open bugs)
Cheers,
Dennis
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, Oct 27, 2021 at 10:51 AM Alec Warner wrote:
> Can we do better than X and Y here?
The patch has gone through several revisions on Github.
https://github.com/gentoo/portage/pull/763
Hi,
On 28/10/2021 08:55, Hanno Böck wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Oct 2021 14:41:01 -0400
> Mike Gilbert wrote:
>
>> Oops, I accidentally committed my vim swap file. I have fixed this
>> locally.
>
> Should we add *.swp (and a few others like *~, *.bak, *.orig) to
> .gitignore to avoid this from
On Tue, 26 Oct 2021 14:41:01 -0400
Mike Gilbert wrote:
> Oops, I accidentally committed my vim swap file. I have fixed this
> locally.
Should we add *.swp (and a few others like *~, *.bak, *.orig) to
.gitignore to avoid this from happening again?
--
Hanno Böck
https://hboeck.de/
