Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] 2021-11-23-mariadb-database-restore-maybe-required: add item

2021-11-25 Thread Sam James
> On 25 Nov 2021, at 17:07, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > > On 2021-11-25 18:01, Piotr Karbowski wrote: >>> https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/blob/master/sys-libs/glibc/glibc-2.34-r2.ebuild#L643 >> Would you see something like this on more ebuilds, postgres, mysql, >> elasticsearch, or have

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] 2021-11-23-mariadb-database-restore-maybe-required: add item

2021-11-25 Thread Sam James
> On 25 Nov 2021, at 03:21, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > > Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/825234 > Signed-off-by: Thomas Deutschmann > --- > [snip] > +On 2021-11-21, a member of the QA project accidentially de-keyworded > +MariaDB 10.6 to address a file collision, users, who also had latest >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] 2021-11-23-mariadb-database-restore-maybe-required: add item

2021-11-25 Thread Sam James
> On 25 Nov 2021, at 13:59, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > If you do a normal world upgrade, this is the default portage behavior, not? > I.e. package manager will downgrade if you don't stop. And especially on > servers, people tend to use cronjobs/scripts to do that... I would really not

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] 2021-11-23-mariadb-database-restore-maybe-required: add item

2021-11-25 Thread Sam James
> On 25 Nov 2021, at 13:37, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > For the records: > I hope that this news item won't get delayed by the recent ComRel bug someone > filled against me regarding this news item. No need to reference that here. Please keep that to e.g. -core. > While we often rush with

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-misc/netkit-routed

2021-11-25 Thread Marek Szuba
# Ancient, very few distributions still package it. Both upstream # and the Debian package we use in SRC_URI are now gone. EAPI 5, # unmaintained in Gentoo. # Removal in 30 days. Bug #827322 net-misc/netkit-routed -- Marecki OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] 2021-11-23-mariadb-database-restore-maybe-required: add item

2021-11-25 Thread James Le Cuirot
On Thu, 2021-11-25 at 18:01 +0100, Piotr Karbowski wrote: > > https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/blob/master/sys-libs/glibc/glibc-2.34-r2.ebuild#L643 > > Would you see something like this on more ebuilds, postgres, mysql, > elasticsearch, or have proper FEATURE flag for it instead? I don't think

[gentoo-dev] [PATCHv3] 2021-11-23-mariadb-database-restore-maybe-required: add item

2021-11-25 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/825234 Signed-off-by: Thomas Deutschmann --- ...adb-database-restore-maybe-required.en.txt | 45 +++ 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+) create mode 100644

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCHv2] 2021-11-23-mariadb-database-restore-maybe-required: add item

2021-11-25 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 1:26 PM Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > +Keep in mind that due to the forced downgraded, point-in-time recovery > +may not be available to the extent that you are used to. Sorry, I guess I missed this instance of "forced". Also, "downgraded" is the incorrect form to use here.

[gentoo-dev] [PATCHv2] 2021-11-23-mariadb-database-restore-maybe-required: add item

2021-11-25 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/825234 Signed-off-by: Thomas Deutschmann --- ...adb-database-restore-maybe-required.en.txt | 45 +++ 1 file changed, 45 insertions(+) create mode 100644

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-analyzer/nagios-check_pidfile

2021-11-25 Thread Marek Szuba
# Upstream is gone. Unmaintained in Gentoo, last updated # back in the CVS era, EAPI 5, open bugs. # Removal in 30 days. Bug #826790 net-analyzer/nagios-check_pidfile -- Marecki OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-analyzer/nagios-check_fail2ban

2021-11-25 Thread Marek Szuba
# Upstream is gone. Unmaintained in Gentoo, last updated # back in the CVS era, EAPI 5, open bugs. # Removal in 30 days. Bug #826786 net-analyzer/nagios-check_fail2ban -- Marecki OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] 2021-11-23-mariadb-database-restore-maybe-required: add item

2021-11-25 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 12:01 PM Piotr Karbowski wrote: > > > https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/blob/master/sys-libs/glibc/glibc-2.34-r2.ebuild#L643 > > Would you see something like this on more ebuilds, postgres, mysql, > elasticsearch, or have proper FEATURE flag for it instead? > > It's all

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] 2021-11-23-mariadb-database-restore-maybe-required: add item

2021-11-25 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
On 2021-11-25 18:01, Piotr Karbowski wrote: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/blob/master/sys-libs/glibc/glibc-2.34-r2.ebuild#L643 Would you see something like this on more ebuilds, postgres, mysql, elasticsearch, or have proper FEATURE flag for it instead? It's all cool and giggles until

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] 2021-11-23-mariadb-database-restore-maybe-required: add item

2021-11-25 Thread Piotr Karbowski
https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/blob/master/sys-libs/glibc/glibc-2.34-r2.ebuild#L643 Would you see something like this on more ebuilds, postgres, mysql, elasticsearch, or have proper FEATURE flag for it instead? It's all cool and giggles until you realize that even such random variable is

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] 2021-11-23-mariadb-database-restore-maybe-required: add item

2021-11-25 Thread David Seifert
On Thu, 2021-11-25 at 17:21 +0100, Piotr Karbowski wrote: > Hi, > > On 25/11/2021 16.50, Pacho Ramos wrote: > > As a side note, maybe ebuild should add sanity checks (like those from > > glibc) to > > prevent downgrades, otherwise people could still accidentally hit the > > issue > > You might

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] 2021-11-23-mariadb-database-restore-maybe-required: add item

2021-11-25 Thread Piotr Karbowski
Hi, On 25/11/2021 16.50, Pacho Ramos wrote: As a side note, maybe ebuild should add sanity checks (like those from glibc) to prevent downgrades, otherwise people could still accidentally hit the issue You might have valid use cases to downgrade mysql, if you are okay not preserving data. I'd

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] 2021-11-23-mariadb-database-restore-maybe-required: add item

2021-11-25 Thread Pacho Ramos
El jue, 25-11-2021 a las 09:20 -0500, Mike Gilbert escribió [...] > I don't like the phrase "forcefully downgraded" here. This implies > > > that something happened without the user's consent. emerge would have > > > informed them of the downgrade before it happened. I would suggest > > > removing

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] profiles: mask sys-fs/eudev for removal

2021-11-25 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 9:15 AM Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > > Hi, > > why do you want to drop the package? Since news item, upstream changed. > There will be a new release soon. Was this just on your list to finish > or is there another reason? > > I am currently watching upstream and would wait

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] profiles: mask sys-fs/eudev for removal

2021-11-25 Thread Joonas Niilola
On 25.11.2021 16.15, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > Hi, > > why do you want to drop the package? Since news item, upstream changed. > There will be a new release soon. Was this just on your list to finish > or is there another reason? > > I am currently watching upstream and would wait to see if

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] 2021-11-23-mariadb-database-restore-maybe-required: add item

2021-11-25 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 8:59 AM Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > > Hi, > > On 2021-11-25 04:49, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > On 2021-11-21, keywords for dev-db/mariadb-10.6 were removed to > > address a file collision with dev-db/mariadb-connector-c. This > > unintentionally triggered a version downgrade

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] profiles: mask sys-fs/eudev for removal

2021-11-25 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
Hi, why do you want to drop the package? Since news item, upstream changed. There will be a new release soon. Was this just on your list to finish or is there another reason? I am currently watching upstream and would wait to see if they really do the release and keep up with the promise.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] 2021-11-23-mariadb-database-restore-maybe-required: add item

2021-11-25 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
Hi, On 2021-11-25 04:49, Mike Gilbert wrote: On 2021-11-21, keywords for dev-db/mariadb-10.6 were removed to address a file collision with dev-db/mariadb-connector-c. This unintentionally triggered a version downgrade for users who had successfully upgraded to dev-db/mariadb-10.6 already.

[gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH] 2021-11-23-mariadb-database-restore-maybe-required: add item

2021-11-25 Thread Joonas Niilola
On 25.11.2021 15.37, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > For the records: For the records: This post could've been an attempt to get it merged faster. But no, you chose to prolong it even further. -- juippis OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH] 2021-11-23-mariadb-database-restore-maybe-required: add item

2021-11-25 Thread Thomas Deutschmann
For the records: I hope that this news item won't get delayed by the recent ComRel bug someone filled against me regarding this news item. While we often rush with news items and don't wait the 72h listed in GLEP 42, this one should go out as soon as possible. Why? Because every minute we

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] 2021-11-23-mariadb-database-restore-maybe-required: add item

2021-11-25 Thread Georgy Yakovlev
On 25.11.2021 04:21, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/825234 > Signed-off-by: Thomas Deutschmann > --- > ...adb-database-restore-maybe-required.en.txt | 46 +++ > 1 file changed, 46 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] 2021-11-23-mariadb-database-restore-maybe-required: add item

2021-11-25 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Thu, 25 Nov 2021, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Wed, Nov 24, 2021 at 10:21 PM Thomas Deutschmann wrote: >> +On 2021-11-21, a member of the QA project accidentially de-keyworded >> +MariaDB 10.6 to address a file collision, users, who also had latest >> +dev-db/mariadb-connector-c installed,

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] 2021-11-23-mariadb-database-restore-maybe-required: add item

2021-11-25 Thread Marek Szuba
On 2021-11-25 04:49, Mike Gilbert wrote: Also, I don't think it is relevant to call out the mistake by the QA team in a news item intended for end users. My sentiment exactly. No finger pointing in news items, please. I don't like the phrase "forcefully downgraded" here. This implies that