> On 30 Aug 2021, at 04:25, WANG Xuerui wrote:
>
> From: WANG Xuerui
>
> The Linux port currently under review has arch/loongarch, and should
> almost certainly remain that way till merge; meanwhile it's ARCH=loong
> on the Gentoo side, per mailing list discussion[1] and eselect
> adaptation[
# Michał Górny (2021-12-13)
# Unmaintained in Gentoo. Requires media-libs/libpng[apng].
# Removal on 2022-01-12. Bug #824830.
media-gfx/apngasm
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
On Mon, 13 Dec 2021 09:34:46 +0100 Lars Wendler wrote:
> On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 13:35:20 +0300 Andrew Savchenko wrote:
>
> >On Tue, 7 Dec 2021 15:33:34 +0100 Lars Wendler wrote:
> >> Fails to build with recent kernel headers (bug #801688).
> >> Upstream is gone for a long time. Masked for removal in
Ühel kenal päeval, E, 13.12.2021 kell 10:19, kirjutas Marek Szuba:
> On 2021-12-09 15:04, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > Why do you need to use random name in the first place? We have
> > full
> > control over T, so why not just hardcode a good name?
>
> Having discussed the matter with eclass mainta
On 2021-12-09 15:04, Michał Górny wrote:
Why do you need to use random name in the first place? We have full
control over T, so why not just hardcode a good name?
Having discussed the matter with eclass maintainers on IRC, they are not
entirely sure whether using a static name in this contex
On Sun, 12 Dec 2021 13:35:20 +0300 Andrew Savchenko wrote:
>On Tue, 7 Dec 2021 15:33:34 +0100 Lars Wendler wrote:
>> Fails to build with recent kernel headers (bug #801688).
>> Upstream is gone for a long time. Masked for removal in 30 days.
>> Users should switch over to net-dns/dnsmasq which pro
