[gentoo-dev] Re: Deprecating repoman
I've filed a Council bug to approve the plan for deprecating repoman. See https://bugs.gentoo.org/835013 The proposed plan, as copied from the bug is: > The devmanual has already been updated to contain information about pkgdev, > in March 2021. See > https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/devmanual.git/log/?qt=grep=pkgdev > > I have opened a devmanual pull request to remove references to repoman that > might suggest that it is still an appropriate tool to use. See > https://github.com/gentoo/devmanual/pull/274 > > The next steps once the devmanual change is committed, I think, are > > - Give the wiki similar treatment as the devmanual, replacing and removing > references to repoman that would suggest it is an appropriate tool to use. > > - Modify repoman to emit a warning informing users of its deprecation > > - After some period of time, maybe 6 months, give last rites to repoman > > - Delete repoman from portage.git > > (and of course adding any features/behaviors we find lacking in pkgdev, et al)
[gentoo-dev] Last rites: sys-apps/rtl-entropy
# David Seifert (2022-03-12) # Unmaintained, no revdeps in tree, no other distro packages this, # HOMEPAGE gone, stuck on deprecated (and soon-to-stop-working) # cmake-utils. bug #725610, #732056, #834117. # Removal on 2022-04-11. sys-apps/rtl-entropy signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-wireless/rtl_power_fftw
# David Seifert (2022-03-12) # Unmaintained, no revdeps in tree, no other distro packages this, # wrong dependencies, out of date, stuck on deprecated # (and soon-to-stop-working) cmake-utils. bug #702980, #834121. # Removal on 2022-04-11. net-wireless/rtl_power_fftw signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Re: [gentoo-dev] Deprecating repoman
Ühel kenal päeval, R, 11.03.2022 kell 21:53, kirjutas Joshua Kinard: > the extra checks that pkgcheck runs haven't really applied to me. Looks to be mostly true, as you maintain only a few packages, but you might find these links useful to filter the CI output per maintainer regardless: https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/output.html;maintainer=kumba https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/output.html;maintainer=kumba;include-projects Or some of these: https://packages.gentoo.org/maintainer/ku...@gentoo.org/stabilization https://packages.gentoo.org/maintainer/ku...@gentoo.org/outdated Mart
[gentoo-dev] Re: Deprecating repoman
Just wondering, is there a "migration guide" or something? I've never used pkg* since joining in 2005. I can derive some things from the first look at the below commit, but an "expert opinion" to just map the standard things from repoman to appropriate commands would be nice. Are those pkg* keyworded *everywhere*, by the way? Thanks, Fabian On 11-03-2022 13:19:34 -0800, Matt Turner wrote: > I've filed a PR against devmanual.git to remove references to repoman > and replace them with references to pkgdev where appropriate. Most > everywhere already had pkgdev/pkgcheck text in place so there wasn't > much to do. See: https://github.com/gentoo/devmanual/pull/274 > -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level signature.asc Description: PGP signature
