-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/30/2012 11:04 AM, Michael Mol wrote:
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org
wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2012 10:35:36 -0400 Michael Orlitzky
mich...@orlitzky.com wrote:
On 07/27/12 16:16, Aaron W. Swenson wrote
decide to use as a default. I
will be especially upset if we use the metric system instead of the
*STANDARD* system. It has 'standard' in the name for a reason people.
(^_^)
- --
Mr. Aaron W. Swenson
Gentoo Linux Developer
Email: titanof...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 2C00 7719 4F85 FB07 A49C 0E31 5713
-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo/xml/htdocs/doc/
- --
Mr. Aaron W. Swenson
Gentoo Linux Developer
Email: titanof...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 2C00 7719 4F85 FB07 A49C 0E31 5713 AA03 D1BB FDA0
GnuPG ID : D1BBFDA0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG
version is always current where the stages
can be a week or so behind.
- --
Mr. Aaron W. Swenson
Gentoo Linux Developer
Email: titanof...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 2C00 7719 4F85 FB07 A49C 0E31 5713 AA03 D1BB FDA0
GnuPG ID : D1BBFDA0
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (GNU/Linux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 07/25/2012 10:27 AM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
On 25-07-2012 13:29, Michael Mol wrote:
On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 9:25 AM, Aaron W. Swenson
titanof...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
On 07/24/2012 04
be
determined at dependency checking time. That way, the user can approve
the rebuild of the packages.
Just placing the commands in a separate log won't really solve a whole
lot. Further, it will bump any elog messages even further down in the
importance ranking.
- --
Mr. Aaron W. Swenson
Gentoo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05/30/2012 04:31 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 8:33 PM, Robin H. Johnson
robb...@gentoo.org wrote:
No, the last mock conversion is still live and updating fairly
often:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05/30/2012 12:53 PM, Tobias Klausmann wrote:
Hi!
On Wed, 30 May 2012, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Wed, May 30, 2012 at 6:16 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org
wrote:
Yeah... this is why I was asking about access to infra to test
the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05/24/2012 03:57 PM, Dan Douglas wrote:
Git is about decentralized version control. When you clone a repo,
you have your own fork. When everyone has their own branch,
everyone is effectively equal. So yes you can expect much much
more
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05/23/2012 09:25 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
Please discuss my arguments and come to the conclusions to
RESO/WONT-FIX testing git-cvsserver, make a clean cut and
remove this bug from the blockers of [TRACKER] portage migration
to git.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05/17/2012 03:51 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
any complaints ? -mike
Index: profiles/base/packages
===
RCS file: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/base/packages,v
retrieving
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05/17/2012 04:15 PM, Samuli Suominen wrote:
On 05/17/2012 11:00 PM, Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
On 05/17/2012 03:51 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
any complaints ? -mike
Index: profiles/base
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 04/07/2012 07:52 AM, Paweł Rumian wrote:
Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org:
Thank you for your report. Yes this looks like an issue. If I had
to choose I'd pick 'vpx' but it seems to me that media-video@
and mozilla@ teams needs to reach
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Find attached a license for an application I'm using. I've already
cleared that redistribution of the package is okay. [1]
I didn't see anything in there much more than the standard don't
blame us if your system blows up, and some fairly standard
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/30/2012 12:08 PM, Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
Find attached a license for an application I'm using. I've already
cleared that redistribution of the package is okay. [1]
I didn't see anything in there much more than the standard don't
blame
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/27/2012 03:05 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
All,
I know this has come up before, but I don't really recall what the
specific objections were.
IMO the portage directory doesn't belong under /usr at all. I was
chatting with another
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/28/2012 02:53 PM, Christoph Mende wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Aaron W. Swenson
titanof...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256
On 03/27/2012 03:05 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
All,
I know this has
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/27/2012 02:01 PM, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 07:49:00PM +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote:
I am a bit surprised handbook still doesn't suggest people to
create a separate partition for /usr/portage tree. I remember my
first
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/27/2012 02:53 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On 27/03/12 02:47 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 2:34 PM, Alexandre Rostovtsev
tetrom...@gentoo.org
The partitioning scheme is something that the user needs to
decide on
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/27/2012 03:05 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
All,
I know this has come up before, but I don't really recall what the
specific objections were.
IMO the portage directory doesn't belong under /usr at all. I was
chatting with another
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/27/2012 03:13 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On 27/03/12 03:04 PM, Aaron W. Swenson wrote:
You know, we have Code Listing 2.1: Filesystem Example in
Section 4, we could always adjust that to have a /usr/portage
partition in it (take a bit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/27/2012 03:47 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 12:40 PM, William Hubbs
willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 08:25:58AM +1300, Kent Fredric wrote:
On 28 March 2012 08:05, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org
wrote:
for 'en en_US' as well for packages that are native
English and don't need the translation. So, it doesn't actually make
sense to warn about 'en en_US' not being supported.
--
Mr. Aaron W. Swenson
Gentoo Linux
Developer, Proxy Committer
Email: titanof...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 2C00 7719 4F85 FB07
font. It is something I think we should look at changing.
--
Mr. Aaron W. Swenson
Gentoo Linux
Developer, Proxy Committer
Email: titanof...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 2C00 7719 4F85 FB07 A49C 0E31 5713 AA03 D1BB FDA0
GnuPG ID : D1BBFDA0
pgplps8mKK3ip.pgp
Description: PGP signature
# Aaron W. Swenson titanof...@gentoo.org (28 Jan 2012)
# Masked for last rites. Package is no longer maintained upstream and
# is not fully compatible with recent versions of PostgreSQL. Removal
# in 60 days.
# Alternatives: dev-db/pgadmin3 or dev-db/phppgadmin
dev-db/pgaccess
--
Mr. Aaron W
of the packages in the tree are
free.
As to the name: 'Gentoo' is the name of the organization, 'Linux' is the
name of the operating system. 'Gentoo Linux' is a fairly sensible name for
a product.
--
Mr. Aaron W. Swenson
Gentoo Linux Developer
Email: titanof...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 2C00 7719 4F85
be submitting requests for unmaintained packages constantly
unless somebody is sneaking in bumps. After this first large batch I'd
imagine the requests to taper off quickly.
--
Mr. Aaron W. Swenson
Gentoo Linux Developer
Email: titanof...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 2C00 7719 4F85 FB07 A49C 0E31 5713 AA03
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 09/07/2011 11:48 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Wed, 7 Sep 2011 11:07:21 +0200 Tomáš Chvátal
scarab...@gentoo.org wrote:
Start collecting ideas for EAPI5.
I'd highlight the following bugs:
311795 - [Future EAPI] Allow dots in USE flag
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 08/31/2011 03:24 PM, Pacho Ramos wrote:
I won't be able to reply to this thread for now, but would like to
ask about how to handle cases like:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381355
Until now, I usually opted to trust upstreams and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 05/01/2011 03:04 PM, Maxim Koltsov wrote:
Hi,
Assuming we have a package, that want to have any tftp server on
system, no matter which one exactly, what must we set in DEPEND? I
think creating virtual for tftp server would be nice.
Maxim
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 04/07/2011 07:09 AM, Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog) wrote:
hi,
today i tried to update my local copy of gentoo-x86 cvs repo but the
update failed with this error:
cvs [checkout aborted]: Could not map memory to RCS archive
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/31/2011 12:00 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
2011/3/31 Tomáš Chvátal scarab...@gentoo.org:
Dne 31.3.2011 06:55, Jeroen Roovers napsal(a):
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 01:42:51 +0100
Tomáš Chvátal scarab...@gentoo.org wrote:
Again the diff is:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/30/2011 03:58 AM, Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 29-03-2011 22:35:48 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
Because 'ls' would complain that files didn't exist, such as lib*.dylib
when on a Linux system. It doesn't matter. But, using 'find' avoids this
mess.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/30/2011 05:41 PM, Dale wrote:
Amadeusz Żołnowski wrote:
Justin has pointed problem which is worth our attention. It is not just
me being pissed off when reading „Enable support for foo”, there are
many users complaining about that.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 03/29/2011 05:06 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Mon, 28 Mar 2011, Aaron W Swenson wrote:
This module is to replace the existing one that is shipped with
app-admin/eselect-postgresql-1.0.3. It is an entire rewrite.
Some remarks:
- Global
available as the default unless a
valid slot is already set
* Properly orders LDPATH giving preference to the set slot and then
lists the other slots in descending order
Thank you.
Sincerely,
Mr. Aaron W. Swenson (TitanOfOld)
# Copyright 1999-2011 Gentoo Foundation
# Distributed under the terms
# Aaron W. Swenson titanof...@gentoo.org (15 Mar 2011)
# Upstream no longer exists. Superseded by dev-lib/libpqxx.
# Removal 15 Apr 2011 (bug #348359)
dev-cpp/libpqpp
101 - 137 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
