Simon Stelling wrote:
That being said, I think this is really up to the releng team and noone
else. They are doing the work, so we can discuss it far and wide, as
long as releng doesn't want to do it, nothing will happen. So maybe we
should wait for a statement from Chris before doing
On Sat, 3 Mar 2007 02:12:48 -0700 Daniel Robbins
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
Right now, you're effectively doing an end-run around the entire
Gentoo management structure. Fortunately for you, it doesn't look like
anyone cares.
Not really. We're working on a document, as requested by the Gentoo
Christel Dahlskjaer wrote:
Hiya all,
As some of you are already aware, I was at the last Council meeting
given a Task. This Task was to draft a proposed Code of Conduct for
Gentoo, and a scheme for enforcing it. The current version of this
proposal can be found at
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
* Portage. Gentoo hasn't delivered anything useful or cool for two
years or so. Things like layman are merely workarounds for severe
Portage limitations (not a criticism of layman). Delivery to end users
is based around what's possible with Portage, not what people
William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
On Sat, 2007-03-17 at 03:11 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote:
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007 18:25:17 -0400
William L. Thomson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hierarchy would be the following
snapshot - dev - build - alpha - beta
And that's where the problems start. As you
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 01:46:45PM +1100, Jonathan Adamczewski wrote:
Paludis is a tool used for working with the Gentoo Portage tree - there
is no problem with it being part of a Gentoo Google Summer of
Code project as it will benefit the Gentoo project and its users.
Why not simply solve
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Assuming you mean piotr, who is not pioto... The difference is, piotr's
proposal is possible and doable within the timeframe, whereas lu_zero's
sounds nice if you don't know anything about any of the package
managers in question and can't be delivered within three
Sadly, this just goes to show how people need to be more careful in
their wording in a community like ours with people coming from so many
different cultures. Or maybe people need to lighten up a bit more, I
don't really know which.
Anyone have any further suggestions how we as a community
I'd like to ask what are the negative side-effects of adding such
paragraph. Are there any true negative side-effects to a specification
like that?
A different topic is the way the paragraph is written. If we don't
like how it is written, we can change it and problem solved.
To be honest,
Duncan wrote:
A segment of an already minor segment (certainly currently, tho that
/may/ eventually change), not likely to be something that can reasonably
be characterized as benefiting Gentoo as a whole, at least in the near
to
medium term, and beyond that, well, things remain up for
On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 03:45:38 +0200
arfrever [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisaÅ#8218;:
I commented this out of package.mask. x11-libs/fox-1.2.6-r2 still
uses it. Need to fix that up before masking it.
These not numerous packages still using
If you are not a glep author; stop reading now.
This message is to warn anyone trying to write a glep, there is a error
the in the glep template. Bug 152313[1] was filed to address the issue
and I fixed all the GLEPs currently in CVS (this should include all
submitted GLEPs). If you want to
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 23:07:03 -0400
Seemant Kulleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ciaran has brought attention to a very important thing -- QA seems to
take a backseat to a few things, and it is actually a little
disturbing that it does.
I believe the QA team expect developers to *ask* when they
First off, this is not a discussion on why XML sucks, or why we shouldn't
be using XML or anything like that. This is not a discussion about what
we should be using instead of XML. This is a discussion about using XML
for our webpages.
Many projects have old and nasty webpages. This has been a
Thanks for all the replies (and the offers of help, very comforting). I
will no longer accept the excuse of 'I can't write GuideXML' since we have
an army of volunteers to GuideXMLify stuff for us :)
As such, I don't need to learn (I know enough to get by, and with this
glep index I'll soon know
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 22:46:14 +0530
Anant Narayanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 29-Mar-07, at 2:26 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 01:19:45 +0530
Anant Narayanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I certainly don't think so. A lot of people *switch* to Gentoo
because of portage.
On Sat, 31 Mar 2007 15:24:03 -0400
Seemant Kulleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To make it more clear. If the gcc developers decided to stick some
malicious code into gcc, it affects the entire linux community, the
entire BSD community and would take out a few other communities as
well. The
Hello.
Path of some utilities in coreutils-6.7-r1 changed from /usr/bin to /bin
and vice versa. This cause some scripts became broken as they relied on
the full path to executable. The question is: does there exist best
practice on how to avoid this problem in future? Should we set some
On Sun, 01 Apr 2007 19:15:13 +0400
Peter Volkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2007-04-01 at 00:01 -0700, Alec Warner wrote:
One idea that comes to mind is /usr/bin/env $bin
And here we return to the problem that one day /usr/bin/env, could
become /bin/env... Or that /usr/ sometimes
So, fellow devs, what's new with development? For those interested, genlop
has
migrated into gentoo as a project with the permission of upstream, which
no
longer maintain it. Um...any new tools or projects people are working on?
Anyone?
My current projects include:
block_sync glep:
Gentoo experts,
I am curious in finding the code that actually does config file
protection. I found some code in portage library, but it seems that it
only decides what the next backup file name should be, not doing
diffing, merging, etc.
Is the protection code in some base eclass
Much to the joy of many I am now retiring from Gentoo. I've already done
most of the work (sorry to burden you kloeri I think just the tree-bits
are left).
Many will wonder why; but this has been a while in coming. I don't get
along with many like I used to and in many cases I don't find myself
Matthias Langer wrote:
Well, I don't know what your problem really is about; I'm running x86,
and if something breaks on my system, it's mostly not because of broken
packages, but because I should have been informed about possible issues
that could have been caused by an upgrade, and how to
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
* src_test always called except if RESTRICT=test
I don't think this would fit into EAPI, to me it's an implementation
detail of the package manager, or why should the ebuild care about it?
It's the best way of ensuring that ebuilds have a working src_test.
Arch teams
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 14 Apr 2007 02:44:31 -0700
Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Any arch team that wants tests by default on their arch can just add
test to FEATURES in their arch profiles; magically the users running
that arch will get the tests run (with USE=test set
Peter Weller wrote:
On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 00:23:08 +0100
Charlie Shepherd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 15/04/07, Tobias Heinlein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stefan Schweizer wrote:
Yup, I'm 16, phreak was shocked as well.
Welcome to the young ones :)
w00t! You'll be joining me, masteriverz,
As I see it most people have a couple of roads here:
You want more information regarding the issue surrounding the suspension
of Jakub or you have a problem with the manner in which the issue was
handled/executed. You can reach devrel at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and on
their mailing list, [EMAIL
Larry Lines wrote:
On Thu, 2007-04-19 at 08:52 -0700, Alec Warner wrote:
As I see it most people have a couple of roads here:
You want more information regarding the issue surrounding the suspension
of Jakub or you have a problem with the manner in which the issue was
handled/executed. You
Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
On Sat, 21 Apr 2007 12:00:55 +0200
Thilo Bangert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I do the same. The '$Header: $' tells me which version of a file in
the CVS tree I last synced to in my overlay, then I can just do a
cvs diff on the tree to get a patch of differences since
As usual if you have issues with the council's decision, this is the
wrong list to complain on. Try [EMAIL PROTECTED], I here
they have popcorn.
This is the right list to discuss versioning schemes though.
-Alec
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
Petteri Räty wrote:
Daniel Drake kirjoitti:
Petteri Räty wrote:
Why would the kernel have to go stable before the usual month dictated
by policy? Yes there are usually security bugs but you did not mention
that as a reason in your post.
At last check this was a recommendation, not a policy,
Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
Hello,
There was some discussion about forcing/not forcing tests in EAPI-1, but
there
was clearly no compromise. Imho, tests are very important and thus I want to
discuss them a little more, but in more sensible fashion.
Firstly each test can be(not all
Michael Cummings wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2007 at 08:29:43PM +0200, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
You are declared official Project Status Report Gathering Manager.
I have to concede, I saw this last thursday and sat on it all weekend, mulling
it over. I realize you (most likely) meant it as a
Stephen Bennett wrote:
Anyone have a reason why we can't start to put them in the tree?
Portage support is, I'm told, coming in a month or so, and other
package managers have supported glep42 for a while now. The format is
well specified by the GLEP, so compatibility shouldn't be an issue.
Alan McKinnon wrote:
On Friday 04 May 2007, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
I also don't agree with having an exception for the games herd. As
others have questioned, how are games more important than security
bumps? If we were considering exceptions, I would argue that allowing
the
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 5 May 2007 17:44:46 +0200
Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Why did I knew that this argument would come? Maybe because it's your
default reaction to any opposition.
What, providing evidence to the contrary? What more do you want?
This is such a
I picked a random mail to reply to:
The paludis news item has been approved by me, cause I rock, and
commited to the proper location. Assuming the code Zac wrote was
actually tested and is turned on, the news item will hit the tree soon.
Good Day Sirs.
-Alec
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
oops, sent with wrong address the first time.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: May 8, 2007 9:09 PM
Subject: [RFC - Moving categories around]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So a random thought I had was 'lets move categories out of gentoo-x86
I hate gmail
-- Forwarded message --
From: Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: May 11, 2007 10:50 PM
Subject: Re: [gentoo-dev] Increasing contributions and interest via
personal project aggregation
To: gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org
On 5/8/07, Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED
On 5/12/07, Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/12/07, Jakub Moc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nice utility, now unfortunately a bit orphaned and with lots of open
bugs. If you are interested, see http://tinyurl.com/2mkd7s
Thanks.
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
I vote no, because someone has to.
-Alec
PS: Thanks to be keeping the packages in the tree up to date.
On 6/22/07, Wernfried Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the council discussed/decided something about mailing lists in
their last meeting, there doesn't seem to be a log/summary out
Ask for forgiveness, not permission.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On 8/11/07, Rumi Szabolcs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
I've got a couple of suggestions for emerge:
1.) I apparently cannot exclude one or two packages from a large
emerge action. For example if I say 'emerge -upv world' or
'emerge -Dupv xorg-x11' it may pull in some large updates I do
On 8/13/07, Nathan Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/12/07, Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 8/11/07, Rumi Szabolcs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello!
I've got a couple of suggestions for emerge:
1.) I apparently cannot exclude one or two packages from a large
emerge
On 8/15/07, Vaeth [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 14 Aug 2007, Alec Warner wrote:
On 8/13/07, Nathan Smith [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I suppose this comes down to weighing the utility of such a feature
against the amount of effort which would go into adding it to Portage.
Its
perhaps it'd be useful to introduce an anal_die. developers run anal tests,
users get sane tests.
-mike
Anal ftw
-Alec
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On 8/17/07, Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 17 August 2007, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 13:40 Fri 17 Aug , Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 17 August 2007, Hans de Graaff wrote:
On Fri, 2007-08-17 at 18:43 +0200, Vlastimil Babka wrote:
Also known as
On 8/17/07, Peter Volkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
В Птн, 17/08/2007 в 13:18 -0700, Donnie Berkholz пишет:
On 13:40 Fri 17 Aug , Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 17 August 2007, Hans de Graaff wrote:
Unfortunately FEATURES=stricter stopped being really useful
i can make it more
On 8/19/07, Ulrich Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 19 Aug 2007, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
Christian Heim [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Christian is joining us [...]
This finally makes Christian the most common first name of Gentoo devs:
heh, at work we have
alec-team ;)
-Antarus
--
On 8/21/07, Natanael Copa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I use the gentoo framework to build binary packages. I noticed that most
packages creates the ssl certificate during src_install(). This makes
all binary packages contain the ssl certs which is a security threat.
The net-nds/openldap
On 8/24/07, Steen Eugen Poulsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Matthias Langer skrev:
http://www.arcdraco.net/~dragon/checkrestart
(Needs lsb-release, portage-utils, lsof and python)
looks interesting indeed... whats also interesting: is there a reason
for lsb-release (a shell script) to be
what about A*? it's also a search algorithm you see.
On 9/3/07, Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 03 September 2007, Marius Mauch wrote:
You should rename 'himerge' to YAPG (yet another portage GUI).
god no, please never let any Y* acronym soil Gentoo
-mike
--
[EMAIL
On 9/5/07, Robin H. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 10:34:05AM +0200, Matthias Schwarzott wrote:
So here we are:
In udev git-gtree suse and redhat rules are already merged.
But they use a different permission / group system than we have, they have
less groups and
On 9/7/07, Doug Goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 07 September 2007, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Fri, Sep 07, 2007 at 02:44:21PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
X-VCS-Repository: gentoo-x86
X-VCS-Files: udev-115-r2.ebuild
X-VCS-Directories: sys-fs/udev
On 9/8/07, Christian Faulhammer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Robin H. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
After much toiling, Infra has finally got the commits list active.
Kudos to you all!
What we now need is the installation of some kind of peer review. For
example add to the recruitment guide a
Can we do away with all the extra foo return bullshit and just set a trap?
trap eshopts pop RETURN
?
On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
now that eutils.eclass contains a common version of safely handling shopts
settings, we can drop the local
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Monday, July 19, 2010 03:38:39 Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sun, 18 Jul 2010 20:17:45 -0700 Alec Warner wrote:
Can we do away with all the extra foo return bullshit and just set
a trap?
trap eshopts pop RETURN
On Sat, Jul 31, 2010 at 7:44 AM, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
arfre...@gentoo.org wrote:
2010-07-30 04:36:22 Brian Harring napisał(a):
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 01:16:42AM +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar
Arahesis wrote:
--- python.eclass
+++ python.eclass
@@ -355,6 +355,8 @@
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 5:11 PM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sat, Aug 07, 2010 at 05:32:42PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Saturday, August 07, 2010 12:32:31 Markos Chandras wrote:
It seems like few of our fellow developers don't know how to track down
packages that don't
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 4:39 AM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 5:39 AM, Ben de Groot wrote:
On 12 August 2010 17:13, Thilo Bangert wrote:
Ben de Groot said:
On 9 August 2010 14:29, Mike Frysinger wrote:
sure would be nice if someone picked up the installer
I have access to main/en and I am willing to do website stuff; just
nothing with a quick turnaround.
I know guidexml and enough xsl to be dangerous.
-A
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 17 August 2010 02:43, Joshua Saddler nightmo...@gentoo.org wrote:
2010/8/23 Tomáš Chvátal scarab...@gentoo.org:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
as we discussed on scons.eclass thread at -dev ml we should have some
nice naming scheme for use_xxx calls with cmake and scons. And it should
be done in same fashion. for both So please head up
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Diego E. Pettenò flamee...@gmail.com wrote:
# Diego E. Pettenņ flamee...@gentoo.org (30 Aug 2010)
# on behalf of QA team
#
# Initial import in 2005 and never bumped; no users in tree;
What does 'no users in tree' mean? No revdeps?
# since revision 1.2 it
On Sun, Sep 19, 2010 at 12:14 PM, Matti Bickel m...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'm a couple weeks late with this, but here goes:
from my failed attempts at reviving GLEP33 grow a discussion with
ferringb on IRC about how to get what I wanted anyway :)
I've placed my immediate feedback in CVS:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 5:19 AM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 9/19/10 9:14 PM, Matti Bickel wrote:
So, yeah, what do you think? Is it worth it?
I second this GLEP. It seems like it will cleanly replace our hacked
eblits implementations from packages like php, glibc, and
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sunday, September 26, 2010 12:57:42 Petteri Räty wrote:
On 09/26/2010 07:30 PM, Joshua Saddler wrote:
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 08:37:35 -0400 Jacob Godserv wrote:
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:32:49 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 2:43 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
since the last time I asked Zac about this it came back to bite me[1]
this time I'm going to send the announce to the list first, and if
nobody can actually come up with a good reason not to, I'm going to
The portion that is not clear to me is why there is so much animosity
against a var to enable .la files.
I find the folks commenting to be very technical. I trust that
removing .la files is the right choice to make here. What I don't
grok is when someone makes a statement like 'removing .la
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 7:38 AM, Alex Alexander wi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Oct 31, 2010 at 11:50:02AM +, Markos Chandras wrote:
On Sat, Oct 30, 2010 at 10:59:08PM -0400, Richard Freeman wrote:
On 10/30/2010 08:10 AM, Thomas Sachau wrote:
If i remember it right, the server profile
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 8:02 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto
jmbsvice...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 29-11-2010 10:34, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
On 11/29/10 09:35, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
There will probably be no active version of
On Wed, Jan 19, 2011 at 3:47 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, 19 Jan 2011 16:25:03 +0100
Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
If enewuser or enewgroup is called from outside of pkg_setup, fail
It is useful sometimes to call it in pkg_postinst(), if the user/group
like on the discovery channel?
-A
2011/1/25 Tomáš Chvátal scarab...@gentoo.org:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 25.1.2011 23:08, Robin H. Johnson napsal(a):
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 12:02:16AM +0200, Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
And now, imagine the state of the user/ dev/
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 5:07 AM, Fabian Groffen grob...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 28-01-2011 22:11:30 +0100, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
So draft we would like to have implemented as Glep update is this diff:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~scarabeus/glep-0048.diff
Please comment and help us improve the english
I'm going to basically reply with my normal QA rant.
1) QA is important to the overall health of Gentoo. People will not
use broken shit.
2) QA should be straightforward. If a developer need to do X to
assure quality it should be fairly obvious why X is required. It
should be clear where to go
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, 10 Feb 2011 21:49:53 +0100
Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@gmail.com wrote:
Il giorno gio, 10/02/2011 alle 14.08 -0600, Ryan Hill ha scritto:
Hey, here's an idea. Before you go making big masks like this for
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 7:28 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 2:57 PM, Dane Smith wrote:
On 03/25/2011 02:46 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Fri, Mar 25, 2011 at 4:53 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
Of course now we can add additional requirements:
* The key
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan nirbh...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Jeremy Olexa darks...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 03/27/2011 02:47 AM, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
If you prohibit people from doing that, they'll just commit it
normally, and then remove
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan nirbh...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 12:47 AM, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Nirbheek Chauhan nirbh...@gentoo.org
wrote:
Just start removing old[1] maintainer-needed packages. If people
On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 5:59 AM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Eray Aslan wrote:
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 04:41:25PM -0500, Dale wrote:
+1 Some descriptions may as well not have one at all. May as well
Google the flag and the package and see what, if anything, it returns.
I would say
2011/4/4 Tomáš Chvátal scarab...@gentoo.org:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 4.4.2011 01:13, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis napsal(a):
2011-04-03 21:28:02 Tomáš Chvátal napisał(a):
Dne 3.4.2011 19:38, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis napsal(a):
I would like to add
On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 9:26 PM, Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, 27 Mar 2011 23:28:05 +0200
René 'Necoro' Neumann li...@necoro.eu wrote:
Am 27.03.2011 22:44, schrieb Rich Freeman:
Well, but you need some way of communicate that certain packages are
w/o a proper maintainer. Why
Hello fellow community members,
The election for Gentoo Foundation Trustees has concluded. We had 229
eligible voters with 76 voting for a turnout of ~33%.
Final ranked list:
robbat2
quantumsummers
rich0
blueness
The election officials should have sent you your election confirmation
number
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 2:58 PM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
All,
I know a decision about this type of use flag was made in the past, but
especially now with the --newuse option in portage, that decision
bothers me, so I would like to re-open the discussion.
I will use
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Alex Alexander wi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 09:56:06PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
You have 24 hours to comment on this news item. Sorry to put it so
bluntly but this is required for major security bug (#364973).
See attachment.
Should
ask on the gentoo-scm list?
-A
On Tue, May 3, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hello everyone,
I and maybe also some other people would be interested in the status of the
infamous git migration of the main portage tree... I am just curious, since
I have not
On Wed, May 11, 2011 at 6:12 AM, Jack Morgan j...@bonyari.com wrote:
On 05/10/2011 01:13 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
Hi.
Another issue that was raised in the discussion with the arch teams,
even though it predates the arch teams resources thread as we've talked
about it on FOSDEM
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 08:19:45PM +0200, Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera
(klondike) wrote:
El 16/05/11 19:54, Kacper Kowalik escribió:
Neither of those points include sending mail to gentoo-dev, which tend
to
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 5:15 PM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote:
Let's start with generalized example so everyone gets the idea...
Reference: man 8 pklocalauthority
/etc/polkit-1/localauthority/10-vendor.d/example-udisks.pkla
[Local users]
Identity=unix-group:plugdev
On Wed, May 18, 2011 at 11:58 PM, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, 18 May 2011, Jonathan Callen wrote:
Display-If-Installed: kde-base/kdelibs[kdeprefix]
I don't think that USE dependencies (or any other EAPI specific
features) are allowed here.
You should file a bug about that;
On Thu, May 19, 2011 at 2:49 AM, Jonathan Callen a...@gentoo.org wrote:
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Wed, 18 May 2011, Jonathan Callen wrote:
Display-If-Installed: kde-base/kdelibs[kdeprefix]
I don't think that USE dependencies (or any other EAPI specific
features) are allowed here.
The GLEP
On Tue, Jun 7, 2011 at 2:36 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jun 2011 17:35:11 -0400
Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
And yes, it should be automated. I agree. Doesn't change the current
situation.
of course it does. it makes the current situation
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 10:46 AM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr.
phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 6/16/11 7:22 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
Just a friendly reminder that you should update profiles/ and eclass/
before committing anything to the tree, so that you don't end up
committing packages with either
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 7:43 AM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, 03 Aug 2011 07:27:23 +0200
Francisco Blas Izquierdo Riera (klondike) klond...@gentoo.org wrote:
El 03/08/11 06:57, Robin H. Johnson escribió:
On Wed, Aug 03, 2011 at 04:13:19AM +0200, Francisco Blas Izquierdo
On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 11:41 AM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hello,
Now that we don't have any old-style virtuals in gx86 anymore,
I think the 'virtual' category is basically one another plain category
nowadays.
Considering the number of different virtuals in this category, maybe
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 5:05 AM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 7:45 AM, Thomas Kahle to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Sorry, but NO. If you want you can make a big noise message that asks
users to install the cron-job but opt-out is not an option here.
Well, that's up
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 6:48 AM, Roy Bamford neddyseag...@gentoo.org wrote:
It has to be opt-in as opt out would be a dangerous precendent to set.
I don't see any harm is a gentle reminder message from emerge, provided
that
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 6:41 AM, Corentin Chary
corentin.ch...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
some news about euscan (still available at http://euscan.iksaif.net)
- New design (yay !)
- Atom feeds available for each herd/category/maintainer/package
(http://euscan.iksaif.net/maintainers/59/feed/)
-
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 3:14 AM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, 32 Aug 2011 10:57:08 +0200
Tomáš Chvátal scarab...@gentoo.org wrote:
Good pointer is that we should probably check if the
MERGE_TYPE=binary and not check-reqs ram and disk_build in that case.
But there is slight
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Tomáš Chvátal schrieb:
Start collecting ideas for EAPI5.
1) USE-flag based support to cross-compile packages (mostly implemented in
multilib-portage)
2) USE-flag based support to install for different slots (e.g. python,
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 1:22 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 10/09/2011 11:15 πμ, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 4:04 AM, Markos Chandras
hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512
701 - 800 of 1315 matches
Mail list logo
