we receive from our users,
the better we will be able to decide which hardened-sources kernels to mark
stable and which to drop.
Refs.
[1] https://grsecurity.net
[2] https://grsecurity.net/announce.php
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.or
On 10/20/15 4:23 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 10/18/2015 06:36 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
Hi everyone, for your consideration:
Title: Future Support of hardened-sources Kernel Content-Type:
text/plain Posted: 2015-10-21 Revision: 1 News-Item
hey may not know is that the
3.x is no longer public.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA
apply_user()? I must be missing some subtle point.
foo() {
if [[ -z $DONE ]]; then
DONE="all done"
echo "in foo"
fi
}
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 1FED
ite sane
eclasses?
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA
problems, but be
prepared for
the occasional "bad" kernel. The more reporting we receive from our users,
the better we will be able to decide which hardened-sources kernels to mark
stable and which to drop.
Refs.
[1] https://grsecurity.net
[2] https://grsecurity.net/announce.php
--
in-gentoo/
i know there's no rush, but let's not loose sight of this.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA
d just absorb those patches as contributions, eg i may want
all patching done after some preliminary work in src_prepare() but
before eautoreconf. for other entry points, the user can use hooks.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org
Gn
gs will be preserved.
But if you emerge when using a vanilla kernel or some other which
doesn't support user.pax.* on tmpfs, then you'll loose those markings.
Booting afterwards into a hardened-sources kernel will leave pkgs which
require pax markings broken.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Ge
On 10/16/15 7:49 PM, Peter Stuge wrote:
Anthony G. Basile wrote:
if you emerge when using a vanilla kernel or some other which doesn't
support user.pax.* on tmpfs, then you'll loose those markings.
Would it be at all possible to add the markings after/as files land
on the destination
w any problems with XATTR_PAX markings because that's going to
become the default soon and in the near future the only option once we
drop the PT_PAX patch from binutils.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA
ike
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA
thread before responding :) i didn't see
someone had already pointed out busybox.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA
there is a
compelling reason not to (or when we get s4s).
Regards,
Tobias
use busybox's ping. its poorly maintained if its maintained at all. it
makes my life easier because i don't have to worry about its brokenness
on alt libc's. just look at the patches we have to carry for it.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D
can live with this. the busybox ebuild provides ping. let's just
document `ln -sf /bin/busybox /bin/ping`
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA
the issue that xattrs
on btrfs should not be a problem.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA
an annoyance/spam to me, but I
suspect this may be more of a problem for people who have lower
pain thresholds.
Regards,
Tobias
open a bug because this should work on btrfs.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C
and
@profile are controlled via the packages file in portage and stack.
Packages in @system lead with an * while @profile don't. @system
packages have incomplete dependency specifications while @profile have
full. This affects more than just emerge's ability to parallelize, no?
--
Anthony G
On 10/15/15 4:14 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 10/15/2015 01:06 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 10/15/15 3:15 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
In portage, @world = @profile + @selected + @system, which means that
@profile is protected from depclean since it's a part of @world.
[1] https://bugs.gentoo.org
Rich and you are going in with
packages.stage3. Can we call it something else though, like
packages.world. :)
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA
n mix-ins
as being a better long-term solution I'm not suggesting that we should
hold off on a reasonable interim solution until we work that out.
Without mix-in support we don't really want to add more profiles,
which is the other way to go with this.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gento
the
building of the /tmp/stage1root during stage1, @system won't include
iputils and this saves on the number of packages built.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
GnuPG ID
tal review on github per se,
just that we don't have that history mirrored on gentoo infra. This
crosses the line of dependency.
There is a judgment call on "small" vs "large" and I'm sure we'll argue
about that. But there is a line.
We can also debate why the Social Contra
.6 should be enough.
They can read the docs if they don't know how.
Nothing precludes adding "see if you use paludis or clang."
However, I'd like to see the above in there.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 1
of automation
otherwise here ?
-mike
A reminder message with suggestions about how to upgrade safely would be
good.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA
On 10/1/15 10:14 AM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 30/09/15 03:29 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 9/30/15 12:18 PM, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: On 30/09/15 07:42
AM, hasufell wrote:
* libressl has to conflict with openssl
Right now libressl exports
GNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iF4EAREIAAYFAlYMC3EACgkQAJxUfCtlWe34nwD+N+4s1ZFVLS8CGokYOEa64U6o
EINP0tsAe2EyA/cpy6oBANoIyxf7bfPStLPofV1ZW7/7+z3DsmtSqYztsU6dptmz
=oAIp
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C
image. I'll use debians. I guess I could be macho and try to build
everything from scratch, cross compile a kernel and all, but time.
Has anyone tried qemu simulating ppc64le on amd64? Lu I thought you
said you tried on x86 and it didn't work.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux
On 9/25/15 5:09 AM, Leno Hou wrote:
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Anthony G. Basile <bluen...@gentoo.org>
wrote:
On 9/25/15 1:05 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 25 Sep 2015 10:32, Leno Hou wrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:07 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 14 Aug 2015 15:52, Leno Hou
On 9/25/15 6:59 AM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 9/25/15 5:09 AM, Leno Hou wrote:
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Anthony G. Basile <bluen...@gentoo.org>
wrote:
On 9/25/15 1:05 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 25 Sep 2015 10:32, Leno Hou wrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 11:07 PM, Mike Fry
@Leno, can you give me a url where i can download the stage3 and i'll
try to set up a development environment on our power7.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
GnuPG ID
to ~arch.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA
en dynamically linking.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA
t an unfortunate risk we have to
take because we are short of manpower and don't have automated arch
testing. I say use it where it appears reasonable (eg interpreted
script and not compiled code) but be ready that every once in a while
we'll get bitten.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo
On 9/17/15 6:32 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 17 września 2015 11:07:43 CEST, "Anthony G. Basile" <bluen...@gentoo.org>
napisał(a):
On 9/17/15 4:35 AM, Justin (jlec) wrote:
On 16/09/15 23:43, Matthew Thode wrote:
On 09/16/2015 04:25 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
So, what a
On 9/17/15 7:05 AM, James Le Cuirot wrote:
On Thu, 17 Sep 2015 06:57:08 -0400
"Anthony G. Basile" <bluen...@gentoo.org> wrote:
Totally rethink the idea of emails aliases as something that is
created on the fly. We just need to know who should get emails for a
package when
with
base-system
base-sys...@gentoo.org
Anthony G. Basile
bluen...@gentoo.org
Devan Franchini
twitch153@gentoo
would be maintained by all of base system with alias
base-sys...@gentoo.org and me. twitch153 is listed as just an observer
of the pkg and would receive emails
://lilblue.freeharbor.net
[4] http://bluedragon.freeharbor.net
[5] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:RelEng_GRS
[6] http://bluemoon-tinderbox.freeharbor.net
[7] http://lilblue-tinderbox.freeharbor.net
[8] http://bluedragon-tinderbox.freeharbor.net
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux
help you here.
I can help out here.
**Most importantly, Any Ideas/steps of how to porting gentoo on ppc64le
architecture?**
do you have hardware ? then it's simply a matter of booting Gentoo in it and
filing/fixing bugs :).
-mike
We should also start building stage3s.
--
Anthony G. Basile
.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA
, should be relegated to the
libc and kernel.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2
iF4EAREIAAYFAlXKB7UACgkQAJxUfCtlWe1sbQD+KcbYpfo56GrLIVlFyw2iXbMB
ZOWzuvyI8SVq/DY0SQMBAJgDIjCza8QyUgWEtq2/g5Yu+uWiCibf2ouMeNAOkQ33
=YoUg
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D
. (Can't
think of another example right now, but there probably is.)
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA
prepend CATEGORY/PN: to the first
line so we can easily search git log for what happened to a package.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA
On 8/9/15 10:31 AM, Gordon Pettey wrote:
On Sun, Aug 9, 2015 at 7:06 AM, Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org
wrote:
Particularly, we should prepend CATEGORY/PN: to the first line so we
can easily search git log for what happened to a package.
Good format to help reading unfiltered logs
bootstrapping work on my part. I suspect others may
be in the same situation.
In fact, I'm looking forward to python3.4 because it cleans up some
stuff wrt to os.makedirs() and similar minutiae. So I'm all for the
july 25 date.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened
there for communicating the above situation.
Refs.
[1] https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Hardened_musl
[2] http://www.musl-libc.org/
[3] https://gitweb.gentoo.org/proj/musl.git
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C
on this, so people
who care can get in touch with me. I'll probably write a detailed blog
post at some point.
Depending on how much interest there is this may be something Gentoo
wants to consider as an official project and publish official stage
tarballs.
cu, Hanno
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D
. When I moved that script into sys-libs/musl, I masked
getent:
# /usr/portage/profiles/package.mask:
# Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org (14 May 2015)
# No longer required by any packages in the tree.
# Masked for removal in 30 days.
If you want to keep it, we can remove the mask
On 6/10/15 2:49 PM, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
On Wed, 2015-06-10 at 14:06 -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 6/10/15 1:52 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 12:44 PM, Joakim Tjernlund
joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se wrote:
I wonder if it would be possible to use the script from
sys
be testing today or tomorrow. Can you hang on to the news release
until then? Not critical, but just in case there's some other issue
that needs to be stated in the news item.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph. D.
Chair of Information Technology
D'Youville College
Buffalo, NY 14201
(716) 829-8197
stages that i do. can i use
- or will you put -28 on the tree before this news item goes out.
while i think i get what you're up to, i'd like to see it first hand.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph. D.
Chair of Information Technology
D'Youville College
Buffalo, NY 14201
(716) 829-8197
are also in a fairly healhty state
healthy state now thanks to ago, jer, jmorgan and others.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA
On 04/28/15 17:52, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 04/26/15 23:21, Duncan wrote:
Diego Elio Pettenò posted on Sun, 26 Apr 2015 17:41:04 +0100 as excerpted:
On 25 April 2015 at 16:57, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote
-4.7 and 4.8 are different and
since you link against the latest version (see the ordering of
directories in /etc/ld.so.conf.d/05gcc-x86_64-pc-linux-gnu.conf),
building with the earlier gcc can cause breakage. We may not want to
support such a situation but I'd like to.
--
Anthony G. Basile
iF4EAREIAAYFAlU6kfYACgkQ2ugaI38ACPCDuQEAhAv0boCkTU3RvT5d/fX3la7V
8so0wqnPtHKI4fSqEwgA+wXmVlB14ykbTQ1VnrRR5WrEPRjMbm9V1MSXAA6MnC43
=i/3U
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB
.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA
.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA
On 02/25/15 14:51, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 02/22/15 01:30, Zac Medico wrote:
On 02/21/2015 10:22 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
If we put the real/canonical libstdc++.so path in the DT_NEEDED section,
then it will automatically work with existing soname dependency support.
Actually, we'd also
make me feel better.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph. D.
Chair of Information Technology
D'Youville College
Buffalo, NY 14201
(716) 829-8197
On 02/22/15 12:08, Nicolas Sebrecht wrote:
* Fun is lost for a long time.
George Boole was wrong. Boolean values live on a continuum. Most of
your statements were false. This is is extremely false.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen
may be introduced by clang as well.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph. D.
Chair of Information Technology
D'Youville College
Buffalo, NY 14201
(716) 829-8197
$1000 in grant money. Want to recommend some equipment?
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA
On 02/16/15 11:05, Pacho Ramos wrote:
El lun, 16-02-2015 a las 10:36 -0500, Anthony G. Basile escribió:
On 02/16/15 08:34, Pacho Ramos wrote:
Hello
Every day I am hitting tons of blockers stabilizations and keywording
requests for alpha, sparc, ia64, ppc and ppc64.
The powerpc team figured
be dropped to ~.
Thanks a lot for your help
No problem. Can you categorize where most of the blockers are coming
from? Are they mostly desktop?
Comments from other ppc people?
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9
to all my github
repos. What a wonderful service. If only I can figure out how to make
it work with clang static analysis.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
GnuPG ID
On 02/06/15 14:41, Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2015-02-05, o godz. 19:11:11
Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org napisał(a):
I proxy a set of bitcoin ebuilds for Luke-jr. Currently several ebuilds
make use of the same codebase, so its probably a good idea to migrate
that code to an eclass. Can
() per se? Can you help me understand why you can't just
walk through $IUSE and see if there's a matching flag in there?
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA
On 02/07/15 13:50, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 07 Feb 2015 13:46:28 -0500
Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org wrote:
I assume this is a problem with $IUSE and its scope, and not with the
code for in_use() per se? Can you help me understand why you can't
just walk through $IUSE and see
/gentoo/source/674d32a2d029aed3bc967a1949f75586828ebe14:eclass/bitcoincore.eclass
Thanks.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA
On 02/04/15 03:06, Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
On 02/03/2015 08:55 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 02/02/15 19:06, viv...@gmail.com wrote:
Il 02/02/2015 23:30, Pacho Ramos ha scritto:
El sáb, 31-01-2015 a las 16:48 -0500, Anthony G. Basile escribió:
Hi everyone,
We need to revert
On 02/02/15 19:06, viv...@gmail.com wrote:
Il 02/02/2015 23:30, Pacho Ramos ha scritto:
El sáb, 31-01-2015 a las 16:48 -0500, Anthony G. Basile escribió:
Hi everyone,
We need to revert the following change to toolchain.eclass:
http://sources.gentoo.org/cgi-bin/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/eclass
unbuildable on those
systems. Only after gcc is built can you dump them. I did test on many
exotic systems, but did not look at gentoo/fbsd.
See bug #536878. Thanks Ryan and Fabian.
I'll revert after feedback.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen
and check.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph. D.
Chair of Information Technology
D'Youville College
Buffalo, NY 14201
(716) 829-8197
data
+
+ return (
+ ord(data[0:1]) +
+ (ord(data[1:2]) 8) +
+ (ord(data[2:3]) 16) +
+ (ord(data[3:4]) 24)
+ )
Endian fun.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph. D.
Chair of Information Technology
D'Youville College
Buffalo, NY
jump in on the arm64 craze.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA
to the differences in functions are being exported by the
two. This makes me lean towards a USE flag which can also be tied to
applying patches rather than a virtual which is better suited for simple
drop in substitutions.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail
On 01/20/15 19:49, Luca Barbato wrote:
On 17/01/15 18:43, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
Hi everyone,
It looks like there aren't too many bugs against gcc-4.9 (bug #495124).
There are a couple having to do with lto and one which is hardened
specific, but its probably a good idea to start keywording
On 01/19/15 13:34, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote:
On 1/18/15 10:50 PM, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
Hi everyone, I'd like to make a commit to toolchain.eclass in a few
days. mgorny noticed some code which can be improved. Basically gcc
creates fixed include files from system headers because
%40gentoo.orgemailcc1=1emailtype1=substringkeywords=KEYWORDREQ%2C%20keywords_type=allwordslist_id=2627676query_format=advancedresolution=---
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
} \
-rm -f ${x}
- done (find gcc/include*/ -name '*.h')
-
# Do the 'make install' from the build directory
S=${WORKDIR}/build emake -j1 DESTDIR=${D} install || die
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen
, to keyworded to
stabilization.
@rhill, any advice here :)
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA
.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA
On 12/23/14 21:39, Duncan wrote:
Anthony G. Basile posted on Tue, 23 Dec 2014 08:36:44 -0500 as excerpted:
I've watched musl and uclibc and just hit up against the glibc changes
as they mysteriously rain down from Drepper.
Just a quick reply to this side point...
There's no indication
On 12/23/14 21:40, Matt Turner wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 5:36 AM, Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 12/22/14 16:37, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
Am Montag, 22. Dezember 2014, 18:24:32 schrieb Anthony G. Basile:
Well the side effect of this is that arcane and unmaintainable
On 12/22/14 16:37, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
Am Montag, 22. Dezember 2014, 18:24:32 schrieb Anthony G. Basile:
Well the side effect of this is that arcane and unmaintainable bandworms
like toolchain.eclass are generated, with dozens of case distinctions
for packages that *nearly* noone needs
where Tony Vroon (Chainsaw) uses gentoo and runs broadcom II
which need blobs.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA
On 12/23/14 09:39, William Hubbs wrote:
On Tue, Dec 23, 2014 at 08:45:49AM -0500, Anthony G. Basile wrote:
On 12/22/14 23:55, William Hubbs wrote:
All,
this discussion got side-tracked into gcc, which was not my intent;
let's go back to my specific question about glibc.
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014
serious).
Please let's not tidy up gentoo. That old stuff is useful even if
its not useful to those who don't see a use for it. Let the maintainers
decide if they want to put effort into keeping it around.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen
On 12/22/14 11:11, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
Am Montag, 22. Dezember 2014, 16:52:22 schrieb Anthony G. Basile:
Please let's not tidy up gentoo. That old stuff is useful even if
its not useful to those who don't see a use for it. Let the maintainers
decide if they want to put effort
packages, it
is in no way an upper limit for support and core packages should be
considered carefully here.
Thank you.
Best regards,
Andrew Savchenko
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E
to the eclass was not sufficiently reviewed.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA
On 12/07/14 17:41, William Hubbs wrote:
On Sun, Dec 07, 2014 at 08:32:57AM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Sun, Dec 7, 2014 at 8:05 AM, Anthony G. Basile
bas...@opensource.dyc.edu wrote:
On 12/07/14 05:37, Michał Górny wrote:
If you're interested in testing it, 'layman -a mgorny' and enjoy. I'd
to test them (not that
there's anything to test).
[1]:https://511832.bugs.gentoo.org/attachment.cgi?id=389818
[2]:https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=531900
[3]:https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=531898
I agree with this approach.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer
On 12/08/14 07:32, Rich Freeman wrote:
On Mon, Dec 8, 2014 at 7:27 AM, Anthony G. Basile bluen...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 12/07/14 08:18, Michał Górny wrote:
I will also be happy to work on replacing
the new versions of original sys-devel/gcc completely. With QA process
against toolchain.eclass
and
since toolchain is fragile, I suggest a toolchain-r1.eclass where we can
test (just change the inheritance in gcc ebuilds for testing) and
finally, when we're happy, do the switcheroo.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph. D.
Chair of Information Technology
D'Youville College
Buffalo, NY 14201
(716) 829
to
get into toolchain and have held off again to do with alt libc's.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA
. If it is an emergency, then I
would think QA should take the action of least interference to unbreak
the tree.
Bikeshed time ...
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
GnuPG ID
On 11/21/14 18:05, Michał Górny wrote:
And yes, I'm waiting for some free time to redo the toolchain.
That I will help you with.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
GnuPG
either do something about vapier or reassign all his
packages (and team positions) to a volunteering proxy developer who will
handle human relations for him.
Chill dude.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5
with the
status quo that I'm not in favor of the extra work.
--
Anthony G. Basile, Ph.D.
Gentoo Linux Developer [Hardened]
E-Mail: bluen...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 1FED FAD9 D82C 52A5 3BAB DC79 9384 FA6E F52D 4BBA
GnuPG ID : F52D4BBA
201 - 300 of 561 matches
Mail list logo
