Andreas K. Huettel dixit (2011-03-25, 09:53):
Do you want to reject signed commits if
- keys are not publicly available [1]
Yes, since that defies the purpose of the signature.
- signatures are from expired keys [2]
Yes if the signature was made after expiration. (Dont know if that
Torsten Veller dixit (2011-03-25, 08:15):
* Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org:
On Thu, Mar 24, 2011 at 8:09 PM, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
[Manifest signing]
Does that get us any closer to GLEPs 57, 58, 59 (or generally
approaching the tree-signing/verifying group of problems)?
yes
I
Thomas Kahle dixit (2011-03-25, 10:47):
it says here http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gnupg-user.xml#doc_chap2 that
the validity should be 6 month. What is the protocol when the expiry
date is approaching?
“After size comes the expiration date. Here smaller is better, but most
users can go for a
Jeroen Roovers dixit (2011-03-25, 00:50):
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 17:59:45 -0400
Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
is there any reason we should allow people to commit unsigned
Manifest's anymore ?
Funny that. I only started doing that Yesterday. It had been on my TODO
for a
Alex Alexander dixit (2011-03-05, 01:46):
On Sat, Mar 05, 2011 at 12:32:15AM +0100, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 4.3.2011 10:35, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. napsal(a):
# Pawel Hajdan jr phajdan...@gentoo.org (04 Mar 2011)
# Masked for removal in 90
Tomáš Chvátal dixit (2011-02-22, 19:39):
On Tue, 22 Feb 2011, Francesco R wrote:
Build gnuplot with USE=cairo and you can get PDF output with the
pdfcairo terminal.
Last time (many moons ago) I've checked cairo did not generated pdf
it did generated raster images and wrapped them in a
Fabian Groffen dixit (2011-02-10, 10:39):
On 10-02-2011 07:54:16 +0100, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
The only way to avoid epic failures is to keep the whole thing simple,
without trying to fit everybody. An installer that would cover a
standard install, newbie-oriented scenario would be
Konstantin Tokarev dixit (2011-02-10, 13:01):
10.02.2011, 12:56, Antoni Grzymala awa...@chopin.edu.pl:
Fabian Groffen dixit (2011-02-10, 10:39):
On 10-02-2011 07:54:16 +0100, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
The only way to avoid epic failures is to keep the whole thing simple,
without
Samuli Suominen dixit (2011-02-01, 21:09):
# Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (01 Feb 2011)
# Masked for QA because the package has not been installable for an year
now.
# See http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=302456
# Removal in 30 days
net-dialup/slmodem
“Thanks Lech, works
hare_krsna_hare_krsna_krsna_krsna_hare_hare_hare_rama_hare_rama_rama_rama_hare_h...@lavabit.com
dixit (2011-01-20, 15:06):
please fix your stupid e-mail
Meeku: Very good email address.
Since we're onto hares why not shorten it to: tea_party@mad_hatter.uk?
--
[a]
Tim Harder dixit (2010-12-09, 15:26):
For those of you running postfix, I was wondering if there is any
interest in having the 2.8 experimental releases added to the tree.
According to upstream [1] they are production quality so they should run
as expected but the config setup may change a
Patrick Nagel dixit (2010-10-29, 15:26):
On 2010-10-29 18:05 UTC cl...@jhcloos.com wrote:
[garbage, malware attached]
Wow, that's a first, I think ;) Mydoom worm sent to the gentoo-dev list.
I only got information from spamassassin on my server. Was actually
quite surprised to see the
William Hubbs dixit (2010-09-20, 11:16):
I want to start a new thread since the discussion on openrc is
centering on whether we should use oldnet, newnet, or keep both.
The drawback I see for newnet is that it does not allow the user to
control each interface separately, so if you want to
Tobias Klausmann dixit (2010-09-20, 20:34):
On Mon, 20 Sep 2010, Benedikt Böhm wrote:
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010, Tobias Klausmann klaus...@gentoo.org wrote:
who runs servers: DHCP is uncommon there, WLAN is very unusual,
as a result, they would not only have to switch the way they
Diego E. Pettenò dixit (2010-05-26, 14:54):
# Diego E. Pettenò flamee...@gentoo.org (26 May 2010)
# on behalf of QA team
#
# cl-smtp fails to fetch since at least September 2007
# (bug #193627); cl-pop needs the former.
#
# Removal on 2010-07-25
dev-lisp/cl-smtp
dev-lisp/cl-pop
Joshua Saddler dixit (2010-04-04, 00:31):
Show me a wiki that has the flexibility of our handbook, which can be
a huge printer-friendly all-in-one doc, or an as-you-need-it doc with
one page per chapter.
Show me a wiki that has built-in intradoc linking to every paragraph,
chapter,
Ben de Groot dixit (2010-04-04, 14:31):
On 4 April 2010 10:48, Antoni Grzymala awa...@chopin.edu.pl wrote:
Has anyone considered the immensely powerful twiki?
No. So tell us why we should. Specifically, how does it compare to
MediaWiki in terms of features and performance?
I don't have
Matti Bickel dixit (2010-03-08, 10:39):
A stable user who doesn't want python 3 installed shouldn't have it
forced on them. If something is pulling in python-3 then that
package needs to have its dependencies fixed. IIRC Portage isn't
greedy wrt. SLOTs like it was before (unless you use
Ulrich Mueller dixit (2010-03-04, 10:32):
On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
My proposal would be to call it dev-scm and put all version
controls, direct frontends, plugins and the like into that.
Better call it dev-vcs to avoid confusion with both the Scheme
language and
Max Arnold dixit (2010-01-29, 12:24):
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 04:17:41PM +0100, Beber wrote:
So, do you guys plan to implement a such thing ? That's one of the
features that is mostly missing imho. The principal miss in on
client side as I have tools to manage packages but would like to
Alex Alexander dixit (2010-01-18, 11:07):
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 09:05:58AM +0100, Peter Hjalmarsson wrote:
I sometimes think the main problem is the tree itself. Portage really
should had a directory of its own, but maybe with anoher structure,
like /var/portage, /var/portage/tree (the
Mike Frysinger dixit (2010-01-15, 20:45):
On Friday 15 January 2010 20:24:38 Sebastian Pipping wrote:
On 01/16/10 00:33, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
- From the alternatives, /var/lib/layman doesn't sound right. If
/var/cache/layman doesn't work, what about /var/spool/layman
Ben de Groot dixit (2010-01-16, 00:41):
2010/1/15 Dawid Węgliński c...@gentoo.org:
On Friday 15 January 2010 20:44:43 Alex Legler wrote:
/var/lib/layman
do well?
+1
-1, /usr/local/layman?
/usr/local/ is a location the system should avoid. Somewhere in /var/
seems to be
Denis Dupeyron dixit (2009-11-25, 14:50):
The next council meeting will be on 7 Dec 2009 at 1900UTC. If you want
us to discuss things please let us know in reply to this email. What
is already known is we'll talk about mtime preservation and prefix.
You can find threads about those at:
Antoni Grzymala dixit (2009-11-30, 12:30):
Denis Dupeyron dixit (2009-11-25, 14:50):
The next council meeting will be on 7 Dec 2009 at 1900UTC. If you want
us to discuss things please let us know in reply to this email. What
is already known is we'll talk about mtime preservation
25 matches
Mail list logo
