# Guilherme Amadio (2023-10-30)
# net-libs/xrootd-ceph was split from net-libs/xrootd as a git
# submodule, but has been merged back to the main repository in
# net-libs/xrootd-5.6.0. Please switch to net-libs/xrootd[ceph]
# instead of net-libs/xrootd-ceph. Removal on 2023-11-30.
net-libs/xrootd
Hi,
On Thu, Aug 19, 2021 at 07:45:16PM +0200, Andreas Sturmlechner wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Sturmlechner
> ---
> eclass/cmake.eclass | 11 ---
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/eclass/cmake.eclass
Hi,
On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 05:42:12PM +, Peter Stuge wrote:
> Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> > The previous algorithm would scan for all primes for a given number,
> > which takes needlessly long.
>
> Please also mention how this caused a problem for you in the commit
> message, to help us
On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 12:58:20AM -0400, Aaron Bauman wrote:
> > # Aaron Bauman (2020-06-20)
> > # Py2 only
> > # Removal in 14 days
> > dev-util/uftrace
This is a function tracer written in C. I don't know why it's on this
list. If a package has only optional support for python like this,
just
Hi,
On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 02:45:29PM +0200, Toralf Förster wrote:
> On 5/27/20 2:16 PM, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
> > The problem when doing review on Github
> > for me is, that we usually create new revisions. Therefore we don't see
> > what's changed in new revision versus previous revision.
Hi Michał,
longdescription lang="pt"
A categoria dev-python contém pacotes cujo propósito principal é
fornecer módulos, extensões e bindings para Python, bem como ferramentas
e outros utilitários para desenvolvimento de software em Python.
Cheers,
-Guilherme
On Sun, Mar 08, 2020 at 10:24:17AM
Hi Michał,
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 10:44:54PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hi, everyone.
>
> I've recently (finally!) started adding tests to cpuid2cpuflags. Tests
> are based on mocked syscalls that return arch-specific data read from
> text files. So far I've got x86 and ppc covered, and now
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 04:36:24AM -0500, Joshua Kinard wrote:
> Does anyone have an idea why util-linux's build time would go up
> significantly from 2.32.x to 2.33.x? It may be a MIPS thing, as my x86_64
> box shows no discernible change in build times between the same versions.
> Can any other
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 10:24:48AM -0700, Matt Turner wrote:
> I don't understand what a potential solution would be.
>
> The various projects use -std=c++XXX because that's what their code
> requires. -std=c++XXX can't generally be changed. If a dependent
> project is incompatible that's no
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 08:46:46AM -0400, Richard Yao wrote:
>
> > On Sep 17, 2018, at 12:40 PM, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov
> > wrote:
> >
> > I'd prefer to wait another replies on the list for the main theme of this e-
> > mail, but this problem also affects C (so, as **c**flags and C
Hi everyone,
I would like to discuss a system-wide way to handle C++ standard setting
in Gentoo. We currently have many packages appending -std=c++XX to their
flags, and it's hard to keep track of which packages use which version
of the standard. This is a problem when packages force dependencies
Hi everyone,
We have several packages (~35) with local USE=cuda. Should we make that
a global USE flag? It's a quite generic flag for GPU support, so I was
surprised to learn it was still local when I added support for it to a
package recently.
Another thing we might want to discuss is a global
Hello,
I like the idea of enforcing quality rules in the tree, but I have a few
reservations regarding the current plan.
On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 04:47:47PM +0900, Alice Ferrazzi wrote:
> Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity.
>
> On Sun, 29 Jul 2018, 16:39 Fabian Groffen, wrote:
>
> >
Hi,
This is a simple fix, but I'd like it to be reviewed.
Without this get_udevdir returns the prefixed directory, leading
to double prefix on udev related packages (e.g. fuse-common).
Even if not used in prefix, udev related packages are usually pulled
in as dependencies of other packages
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 03:16:22AM +0200, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> On Wed, 2018-02-14 at 23:43 +0100, Jonas Stein wrote:
> > Did I miss something?
> > Who can help to check with (an automatic) testenvironment, if these
> > packages will survive?
>
> Don't check with test environments, read the
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 11:26:16AM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 07:59:53PM +0200, Guilherme Amadio wrote:
> >
> > I would rather prefer to keep essential development tools in tree.
> > GCC is not only used as system compiler, but also for developme
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:01:32AM -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 02:35:48PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm thinking of masking old versions of sys-devel/gcc, in particular
> > older than the 4.9 branch.
> [...]
> > My solution
> > ===
> >
> > I
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 11:15:30AM +0800, Jason Zaman wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 04:08:34PM -0700, Jigme Datse Rasku wrote:
> > I'd have to say, there is likely a reason we are looking for a new
> > maintainer. I don't know what is involved, but I might be interested.
> > Might be wanting
On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 11:08:47PM +0200, David Seifert wrote:
> Dear friends,
> while version bumping sci-libs/fftw, I've noticed our CPU_FLAGS_X86
> list could be expanded a bit:
I like the idea of expanding the list of CPU_FLAGS_X86, and having flags
for other arches too, but I would be in
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 02:38:26PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> So if you have some time, please reply to this thread with
> a specific /boot layout that you think needs to be handled, with
> as much helpful information as possible -- including possible
> distinctive features and pitfalls.
Looks
Hello,
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 01:44:00PM +0200, Jonas Jelten wrote:
> Ohai!
>
> Phabricator is a fun adventure game: http://phabricator.org/
> It provides a tightly coupled set of project management tools.
>
> Many bigger projects (e.g. blender, mediawiki, ...) started using
> phabricator, it
Hi,
On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 11:04:03AM -0500, Göktürk Yüksek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> >
> > I will move all packages I maintain [1] to the associated projects if
> > possible. All devs are free to take what ever you are interested in. I
> > am also happy to proxy contributors if they like to maintain a
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 10:58:55PM +, James Le Cuirot wrote:
> Sorry for the length of this but you really need to consider the bigger
> picture with this stuff and not all devs are familiar with it.
>
> For EAPI 7, mgorny and I are seeking to address some cross-compiling
> issues. This is a
On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 02:42:15PM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Sat, 5 Sep 2015, Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> > I certainly support the principle, but for the sake of transparency
> > can we try to coordinate this so that the setting name doesn't
> > change when this moves into the package
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 11:00:49AM -0700, Zac Medico wrote:
On 08/19/2015 10:49 AM, hasufell wrote:
On 08/19/2015 07:37 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
On 08/19/2015 09:33 AM, hasufell wrote:
I don't want to start a lot of bikeshed, but I think this information is
practically useless.
If there
On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 08:59:38PM +0800, Ben de Groot wrote:
On 28 February 2015 at 19:52, Michael Orlitzky m...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 02/28/2015 01:47 AM, Ben de Groot wrote:
Since this is mostly used for web developers, I recommend to leave it
off for desktop users, but possibly on for
Hello!
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 03:45:23PM +0800, Ben de Groot wrote:
On 22 February 2015 at 03:43, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote:
To anyone within Gentoo who is interested in fonts
I would like to announce a meeting to be held in #gentoo-meetings on
Freenode, on Friday February 27
Hello,
On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 03:43:33AM +0800, Ben de Groot wrote:
To anyone within Gentoo who is interested in fonts
I would like to announce a meeting to be held in #gentoo-meetings on
Freenode, on Friday February 27 at 06:00 UTC, unless another date
and/or time will be suggested by
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 07:37:19AM -0400, Alex Xu wrote:
On 13/10/14 05:35 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
Please review the following news item.
-
Title: bash-completion-2.1-r90
Author: Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Posted: -MM-DD
Revision: 1
Hi guys,
I totally agree with the patch sent by Daniel in the previous message.
I think it clarifies to the user (me, for example), why it's not possible
to build pciutils with the zlib USE flag. This is just my humble opinion,
though, as a user.
And sorry to a bit off this thread, but I
30 matches
Mail list logo
