On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 09:12:28PM +0200, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
On Sunday 02 April 2006 20:41, Mike Frysinger wrote:
nothing personal, but who are you to say whether it's legit ?
It's really not a question what's legit (heck, you started using this term,
so
blaming Olivier for using it
On Sun, Apr 02, 2006 at 10:00:25PM +0200, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
On Sunday 02 April 2006 21:51, Harald van D??k wrote:
Others did speak up at that time. The result:
http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/31641
Yeah, that was the one and only single voice.
On gentoo-dev. I'd
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006 at 05:38:48PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~solar/xml/conduct.html
If you choose the latter option, please ensure members of the
Infrastructure project have reviewed and approved the proxy
relationship to avoid having access cut off for both
On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 10:49:24PM -0400, Patrick McLean wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Alec Warner wrote:
Except you need a way for them to turn it off, and you do not currently
provide one. We can set default flags all we want, but I don't see
filtering 'bad'
On Fri, Apr 14, 2006 at 01:47:41PM -0400, Patrick McLean wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Harald van D?k wrote:
The only flags that are actually removed are the flags that are invalid
_by themselves_. There are cases where flags are valid because of other
flags
