On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 01:43:28PM +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 09:19:56AM +0100, Harald van D??k wrote:
LDFLAGS? Assuming you meant ASFLAGS, this doesn't affect C files,
correct
would need rechecking of the assembly code on updates just as much as
patches which
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 02:38:00PM +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
there's a few problems with trying to get configure to detect whether
the host assembler supports the --noexecstack option:
- it's very easy to get the detection wrong and i'd bet money that
anyone doing it for the first time
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 08:31:06PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Friday 23 December 2005 20:19, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
Well, you should know that those are because of portage bugs or some
portage peculiarity, read the corresponding bugs for example for cups
to find out more.
Can you
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 10:00:20PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Friday 23 December 2005 21:39, Harald van Dijk wrote:
On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 08:31:06PM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Friday 23 December 2005 20:19, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
Well, you should know that those are because
On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 02:22:06AM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
Symlinks are handled within portage differently to regular files. Regular
files get an mtime check and are removed if it matches. Symlinks don't get an
mtime check (even thought the mtime is stored) and are only removed if the
On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 03:09:47AM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
On Saturday 24 December 2005 02:52, Harald van Dijk wrote:
On Sat, Dec 24, 2005 at 02:22:06AM +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
Symlinks are handled within portage differently to regular files. Regular
files get an mtime check
On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 01:01:10AM -0600, R Hill wrote:
Removing these files and relying on LICENSE=foo in the ebuild could be seen
as
a copyright violation. There are lots of samples in /usr/src/licenses that
aren't generic, but include a copyright notice naming the authors of a
On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 12:32:25PM +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
Harald van Dijk wrote:
On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 01:01:10AM -0600, R Hill wrote:
Removing these files and relying on LICENSE=foo in the ebuild could be
seen as
a copyright violation. There are lots of samples in /usr/src
On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 03:57:55PM +0100, Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
On Tue, Dec 27, 2005 at 12:20:39PM +0100, Harald van Dijk wrote:
iputils doesn't do a make install, and if it did, it would still be
reasonable if that didn't copy the license, since the users who run that
themselves don't
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 10:17:00AM -0700, Drake Wyrm wrote:
Jakub Moc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stephen Bennett napsal(a):
Please, try to stay on the right mailing list. It's very annoying
when you don't...
No matter how hard I try, I always hit the _retarded_ behaviour of the
_one_
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 11:10:57PM +0200, Andrej Kacian wrote:
On Mon, 16 Oct 2006 22:10:37 +0200
Harald van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anybody explain how that one list is different from the others? Are
the headers being munged differently for gentoo-core?
This list sets
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 11:57:55PM +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
Harald van Dijk napsal(a):
It's meant to be used when the user chooses to reply to the list. That
is not necessarily the function of the Reply button. In mutt, and IIRC
in Thunderbird as well, reply is intended to mean reply
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 05:45:54PM -0700, Drake Wyrm wrote:
Harald van D??k [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 10:17:00AM -0700, Drake Wyrm wrote:
Jakub Moc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stephen Bennett napsal(a):
Please, try to stay on the right mailing list. It's very
On Mon, Oct 23, 2006 at 12:43:52AM +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
So, Luis gave up on this, and now it's time againf or removing xmms from the
tree.
I've masked the xmms useflag and the following packages:
[...]
They'll be removed next month... so that I can have my birthday
On Sun, Oct 29, 2006 at 07:15:01PM -0800, David Shakaryan wrote:
The desktop-wm herd is understaffed and has a bunch of dead packages
lying around which no one wants to maintain. I tried to give a valid
alternative for all of the packages I want removed. At first glance, it
seems like all of
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 06:47:07PM +0300, Peter Volkov (pva) wrote:
Hello.
Short question: What shall we use to link libraries/programs: gcc or ld?
Why?
A bit longer story: I have a problem during linking of wepattack on
amd64 systems. Linking stage issues warning:
$
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 05:20:26PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 06 November 2006 17:09, Alin Nastac wrote:
I re-stated my case in comment #14
most of your dislike for SPF centers around the idea you dont want to send
mail via gentoo.org mail servers ... is this really a problem ?
On Mon, Nov 06, 2006 at 05:11:42PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Monday 06 November 2006 18:03, Jakub Moc wrote:
considering that quite a
couple of arguments were given against using it
which were a copy and paste of existing websites ... how about for the
counterargument i copy and
On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 08:47:18PM +, Roy Marples wrote:
On Tuesday 07 November 2006 20:32, Drake Wyrm wrote:
I could be missing something, but:
[[ $'\nwombat' =~ $'wombat' ]] \
echo These compare as equal, with or without the leading \n
A working example in bash-3.2 :)
[[
On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 03:23:19AM +, Saleem Abdulrasool wrote:
Please do NOT reply to this message with a reason why package X should not be
masked. If you feel strongly about a package, please port it to GTK+-2 and
submit patches on a new bug.
x11-wm/sawfish
This should say
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 04:34:25AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 11/12/06, Peter Volkov (pva) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The possible solution is to add virtual/editor ebuild
this is a horrible idea
why not modify sudo to not filter the EDITOR env var then there is no
more problem
Except
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 04:56:33AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 11/12/06, Harald van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 04:34:25AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 11/12/06, Peter Volkov (pva) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The possible solution is to add virtual/editor ebuild
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 08:43:55AM -0600, Mike Doty wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Harald van Dijk wrote:
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 04:56:33AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On 11/12/06, Harald van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Nov 12, 2006 at 04:34:25AM -0500
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 03:17:39PM +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Sunday 26 November 2006 13:24, Charlie Shepherd wrote:
The description for the nls use flag is currently 'Adds Native
Language Support (using gettext - GNU locale utilities)'. However, in
bug 137297, the kde herd
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 04:45:59PM +0100, Harald van Dijk wrote:
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 03:17:39PM +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Sunday 26 November 2006 13:24, Charlie Shepherd wrote:
The description for the nls use flag is currently 'Adds Native
Language Support (using
On Mon, Nov 27, 2006 at 05:42:31PM +0100, Marius Mauch wrote:
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006 10:53:43 -0500
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Monday 27 November 2006 10:48, Marius Mauch wrote:
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sunday 26 November 2006 18:38, Marius Mauch wrote:
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 10:48:03AM -0800, James Ausmus wrote:
On 12/1/06, Philip Webb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
061201 Alec Warner wrote:
If you look at
http://spaceparanoids.org/gentoo/gpnl/qa.php?q=no-herd-maintainer
you will see a list of packages with NO maintainer and NO herd.
For
On Fri, Dec 08, 2006 at 06:40:40PM +0100, Andreas Vinsander wrote:
Harald van Dijk wrote:
On Sun, Nov 05, 2006 at 06:47:07PM +0300, Peter Volkov (pva) wrote:
Hello.
Short question: What shall we use to link libraries/programs: gcc or ld?
Why?
A bit longer story: I have a problem
On Sat, Dec 23, 2006 at 12:10:44AM +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Friday 22 December 2006 23:43, Alec Warner wrote:
Say I approve only GPL-3 packages (cause' I hate patents, and I dislike
having a working system too!). This would encompass anything strictly
GPL-3 and also
On Fri, Jan 05, 2007 at 07:19:30AM -0500, Caleb Tennis wrote:
Don't use debug.eclass.
Pardon what may be a stupid question here, but what's the fix/workaround for
using
the debug.eclass ?
Simply stop using it. Drop it from the inherit line, and if your ebuild
has a legitimate use of the
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 07:15:53AM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 07:55:00 +0100 Harald van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| When does upstream get to install arbitrary content on my computer?
| Upstream's build system gets to write stuff to $D, but not to $ROOT
| (malice
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 08:00:18AM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 08:48:37 +0100 Harald van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 07:15:53AM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 07:55:00 +0100 Harald van Dijk
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 08:30:49AM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 09:11:11 +0100 Harald van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| Why else would a user want to refuse ebuilds that set userpriv?
|
| As a safeguard against accidental mistakes by upstream.
But ebuilds setting
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 10:11:59AM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 10:53:02 +0100 Harald van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| ACCEPT_RESTRICT=-userpriv (or whatever) would mean I want to be
| protected against accidental mistakes, even if it means I can't
| install some
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 11:55:44AM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:41:27 +0100 Harald van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| I don't think anyone was planning on encouraging people to mess with
| ACCEPT_RESTRICT if it gets implemented.
Implementing it *is* encouraging
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 12:19:18PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:04:21 +0100 Harald van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 11:55:44AM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 12:41:27 +0100 Harald van Dijk
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 12:46:58PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:30:11 +0100 Harald van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| FEATURES has legitimate values. The feature as a whole is useful,
| even if some of the options have very restricted target audiences.
|
| So
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 05:19:02PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 14:05:49 +0100 Harald van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 12:46:58PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 13:30:11 +0100 Harald van Dijk
| [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote
On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 07:12:00PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 18:42:20 +0100 Harald van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| With ACCEPT_RESTRICT=-fetch, you tell it you don't want packages with
| RESTRICT=fetch, so portage /should/ complain regardless of whether the
| sources
On Sat, Jan 13, 2007 at 05:45:31AM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 13 Jan 2007 02:05:45 +0100 Harald van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
| On Fri, Jan 12, 2007 at 07:12:00PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| On Fri, 12 Jan 2007 18:42:20 +0100 Harald van Dijk
| [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 03:19:23AM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
the new version of portage has customizable compression ... this is cool as
now people can do bzip/gzip/whatever
the downside is that it breaks with packages that assume everything is
compressed with gzip ... so here is a list
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 09:29:04AM +, Roy Marples wrote:
On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 01:03:04 -0800
Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jakub Moc wrote:
Mike Frysinger napsal(a):
On Thursday 08 February 2007, Roy Marples wrote:
The actual scripts themselves can be re-worked if they
On Fri, Feb 09, 2007 at 11:49:05AM +, Roy Marples wrote:
On Fri, 9 Feb 2007 12:05:52 +0100
Harald van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One issue is that any valid character is allowed in WPAPSK,
including ;
Good point, but excluding newline, right? I can't try it, but rt2500's
own
On Wed, Feb 14, 2007 at 08:47:20PM +0100, Raúl Porcel wrote:
# Raúl Porcel [EMAIL PROTECTED] (14 Feb 2007)
# Doesn't build, upstream dead, network dead, bug 1666887
# Pending removal 13 Mar 2007
net-p2p/mnet
That's bug #166887; mnet may be broken, but it's not the incarnation of
evil. :-)
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 03:25:31PM +, Steve Long wrote:
Ioannis Aslanidis wrote:
Maybe if Ciaran recognized his past faults, begged pardon and promised
to be kinder from now and on, everything would be easier for everyone,
everything would calm down.
I share your dream ;)
On Fri, Mar 16, 2007 at 09:24:33PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 16 March 2007, Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog) wrote:
Just a note to this. I'm co-maintainer of netbeans ebuild. Netbeans does
milestone releases. These are pretty stable and usable since milestone 7
of netbeans 6.0 with
On Sat, Mar 24, 2007 at 12:29:06AM +0200, Petteri Räty wrote:
I got annoyed enough about emerge -pl not working when people don't use
echangelog like:
# $Header: /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/x11-libs/libXinerama/ChangeLog,v 1.27
2007/03/22 02:18:21 joshuabaergen Exp $
22 Mar 2007; Joshua
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 02:27:20PM +0200, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
No. LICENSE=GPL-2 some-exception suffices.
No, that means something completely different. It means that you should
install the software only if you find both the GPL-2 and the exception
acceptable, rather than if you find the
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 03:13:02PM +0200, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
On Samstag, 12. Mai 2007, Harald van Dijk wrote:
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 02:27:20PM +0200, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
No. LICENSE=GPL-2 some-exception suffices.
No, that means something completely different. It means that you
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 04:21:52PM +0200, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
On Samstag, 12. Mai 2007, Harald van Dijk wrote:
Do you need to accept the unmodified GPL-2 for software licensed under
the GPL-2 plus exception? No? Then GPL-2 does not belong in LICENSE,
unless in a || group.
Of course you
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 11:13:25PM +0200, Wernfried Haas wrote:
On Tue, Jun 05, 2007 at 09:44:23PM +0100, Roy Bamford wrote:
Please step back, take a deep breath and avoid posting to this thread
for 24 hours.
Folks, while we're cutting some slack to the people replying
somewhere else in
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 09:31:44PM +0100, Stephen Bennett wrote:
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007 19:42:45 +0200
Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thing is: if you see sys-fs/ntfs-3g, is that an atom or a CPV? You
don't know unless you actually check the tree.
Is there any place in the tree where
On Thu, Jun 07, 2007 at 09:40:20PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 7 Jun 2007 22:33:21 +0200
Harald van Dijk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An ebuild's PROVIDE list.
Nnnnope. Not legal.
The question was Is there any place in the tree where a dep atom and a
CPV are both accepted? Look
On Mon, Jun 11, 2007 at 01:41:30AM +0200, Thilo Bangert wrote:
Herds with no email
===
As robbat2 points out, in order to allow for automatic bug assignment all
herds need to have an email address. The following herds do not have an
email address specified in herds.xml.
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 12:08:20AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
get your waaait dont do it votes in now, i plan on pushing:
glibc-2.6 ~amd64 ~ppc ~ppc64 ~x86
gcc-4.2.0 ~amd64 ~x86
in the next day or so
Why 4.2.0 rather than 4.2.1 RC1? Are there problems with the RC, or are
all important
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 03:09:23PM +0300, Samuli Suominen wrote:
Missed something before.. But after reading this it leads me to
conclusion nero-3.0.0.0 needs RESTRICT=fetch? Would someone be kind
enough to take a look for me to get a second opinion as it might be out
of context / I'm
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 07:40:47PM +0200, Jakub Moc wrote:
Mike Frysinger napsal(a):
On Friday 06 July 2007, Jakub Moc wrote:
Harald van Dijk napsal(a):
so eutils.eclass's check_license function should probably be used.
Broken until Bug 17367 is implemented.
the same exact thing could
On Fri, Jul 06, 2007 at 08:08:13PM +0200, Torsten Rehn wrote:
On Friday 06 July 2007 19:56, Harald van Dijk wrote:
And what if they decide they don't accept the license on the first run?
They'll already have installed the software, which requires acceptance
of the license.
No violation
On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 03:50:56PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jul 2007 16:46:57 +0200
Dominique Michel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With the original statement GPL-2 alone, you have to take contact
and get an authorisation to move from each single programmer that
contributed code
On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 08:52:30PM +0200, Wulf C. Krueger wrote:
On Sunday, 08. July 2007 20:15:31 Harald van Dijk wrote:
No, you have to get permission of the copyright holders. Which, in
this case, is the Foundation.
Could you back that up, please? I was looking for something to confirm
On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 09:42:49PM +0200, Wulf C. Krueger wrote:
On Sunday, 08. July 2007 21:12:38 Harald van Dijk wrote:
# Copyright 1999-2007 Gentoo Foundation
Thus, the copyright owner/holder is the Gentoo Foundation.
If I write an ebuild today, why does it not say Copyright 2007
On Thu, Jul 12, 2007 at 11:16:46PM +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh kirjoitti:
As I understand it, merely using an eclass doesn't force GPL-2 on an
ebuild because there's no linkage involved.
This argument would make it possible to write apps using GPL-2 python
libraries
Correct, it does, just like it permits C applications with
GPL-incompatible licenses to link with GPL libraries, so long as this
linking is done by the end user and the application is not distributed
in its linked form. See for example the NVidia kernel module, or for a
somewhat different but
On Fri, Jul 13, 2007 at 07:04:20AM +0200, Harald van Dijk wrote:
Correct, it does, just like it permits C applications with
GPL-incompatible licenses to link with GPL libraries, so long as this
linking is done by the end user and the application is not distributed
in its linked form. See
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 01:16:18AM +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
wrote:
We received too many invalid bugs caused by unsupported locales.
python_pkg_setup() needs to check
locale and print error (using eerror(), without die()), when unsupported
locale has been detected.
I'm
On Mon, Aug 02, 2010 at 11:02:20PM +0200, Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis
wrote:
It would have to be parsed using e.g. grep and sed. It's easier to call
Python in this case.
It's even easier not to.
The call to Python is sufficiently fast:
$ time python -c 'import os;
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 06:26:12PM +0200, Thilo Bangert wrote:
So you want me to force everyone to update the package just to respect
the LDFLAGS.
yes. IIRC it has been stated on this list before, that a change which
changes the resulting binary always needs to be done in a revbump.
If
101 - 167 of 167 matches
Mail list logo
