On Tue, 15 Dec 2009 19:59:44 +0100, Fabian Groffen grob...@gentoo.org
wrote:
With the current route where EAPI=3 will simply be EAPI=2 +
offset-prefix support, and EAPI=4 will be EAPI=3 + some other stuff, the
following question arose:
Should an ebuild using an EAPI that has offset-prefix
William Hubbs wrote:
All,
I have been helping lately with the maintenance of openrc/baselayout-2.
I was just asked today on IRC about posting stabilization plans to the
list.
I don't have a stabilization plan, so, what I am going to do is post a
question to the list.
What still needs to be
On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 22:09:23 -0500, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org
wrote:
On Tuesday 03 November 2009 13:33:55 Christian Ruppert wrote:
Dear gentoo-dev subscriber,
as some of you might have been noticed, we're having some trouble with
Bugzilla's mail notification.
In some cases you might
Some questions answered. snipped the rest.
Denis Dupeyron wrote:
2009/10/18 Tomáš Chvátal scarab...@gentoo.org:
Why on earth portage simply does not detect the prefix enviroment is being run
and then INTERNALY switch D-ED and other variables.
If that means we can get away without touching
Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
Hi there!
Resulting from discussion during last Gentoo KDE team meeting taking place 22
Oct 2009 at #gentoo-meetings (summary fill be available soon), having Gentoo
GNOME team representative, it's been decided to go ahead with splitting
desktop profile to DE-specific
Hello,
Since the 10.0 release there has not been an outward facing announcement
for users to switch profiles.
* Are we deprecating the 2008.0 profiles?
* Are 10.0 profiles feature complete ?
* Will there be an announcement?
* Why are only the 2008.0 hardened profiles deprecated? ( %% find
Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote:
Le mardi 13 octobre 2009 à 23:48 +0200, Jeroen Roovers a écrit :
On Tue, 13 Oct 2009 21:22:13 +0200
Fabian Groffen grob...@gentoo.org wrote:
We are working on a proper explanation targetted to devs of this. I'm
sorry for the inconvenience caused.
How large of a
Daniel Bradshaw wrote:
Hi all,
It occurs to me that my work flow when doing updates follows a fairly
predictable (and probably common) pattern.
The obvious next step is to wonder why no one though of automating it...
When doing updates I tend to look through the package list and classify
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Petteri Räty betelge...@gentoo.org wrote:
Stelian Ionescu wrote:
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 16:32 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
I wrote a script to check which ebuilds use built_with_use and have
keywords in never versions making the ebuild unused. This means that
2009/10/5 Tomáš Chvátal scarab...@gentoo.org:
Dne pondělí 05 Říjen 2009 23:31:03 Samuli Suominen napsal(a):
Jeremy Olexa (darkside) wrote:
darkside 09/10/05 21:22:30
Modified: ChangeLog xfconf-4.6.1.ebuild
Log:
Port Gentoo Prefix ebuild to gentoo-x86
(Portage
On Wed, Sep 23, 2009 at 2:53 AM, Fabian Groffen grob...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi all,
Recently, we added a new QA check in Gentoo Prefix' Portage to check
shebangs (the #! things) of scripts before they are installed. We
basically did this simply because we don't want to use say
/usr/bin/perl
On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 1:25 PM, Philip Webb purs...@ca.inter.net wrote:
090922 Rémi Cardona wrote:
# Rémi Cardona r...@gentoo.org (19 Sep 2009)
# Outdated and useless X doc packages
# Masked for removal in 30 days
app-doc/opengl-manpages
app-doc/xorg-sgml-doctools
app-doc/xorg-docs
Before
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Torsten Veller ml...@veller.net wrote:
snip
if s/EXPF/TEST_EXPF/ in test.eclass, it does:
* another_test_src_configure
* another_test_src_compile
* test_pkg_postinst
Although I don't anticipate xfconf and cmake being used together, we
changed
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 5:12 PM, Mounir Lamourivolk...@gentoo.org wrote:
It's even worst when we try to use ACCEPT_LICENSE to have a free
operating system.
FWIW: Given the state of ebuilds, I think this should never be
attempted unless the user knows it may not be accurate[1]. We should
not
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 1:42 PM, Nikos Chantziarasrea...@arcor.de wrote:
Is this dead before it even began? I'm getting no replies from
yng...@gentoo.org.
He is away:
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/roll-call/devaway.xml?select=yngwin#yngwin
Eray Aslan wrote:
On 03.09.2009 05:38, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
- xfce4-meta : former name xfce-base/xfce4. Renamed to reflect reality.
This meta package is the *core* of XFCE, it *only* has in it what is
required to run. Thus, returning XFCE to a minimalistic status in Gentoo
Linux. This is desired
Hello all,
You /may/ have noticed some fuzz going on with XFCE lately. Here is a
quick outline of what Samuli and myself (mainly him though with my
'consulting' =P ) have been doing.
- pkg renames: We want to match what upstream calls the packages. This
includes renaming plugins to
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 10:45 AM, William Hubbswilli...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 08:16:47PM +0530, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
On Sun, Aug 30, 2009 at 7:41 PM, Matthias Schwarzottz...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi there!
The new udev-145 and newer have some new kernel requirements. How
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Of course that's my personal opinion. I don't use
developer/experimental overlays, I only use those who provide some
extra packages I want. And I was under the impression that pure-funtoo
falls under this category: providing packages that don't exist in portage.
Samuli Suominen wrote:
Fernando V Orocu (likewhoa) has been working on getting the 10.0 LiveDVD
images in shape for the Gentoo 10th year anniversary release. We need
some assistance in terms of LiveDVD testers, user suggestions for new
packages software testers since there will be over 100+ new
Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Uhm, I just discovered that there are conflicts with portage too. That
is not good. After I added pure-funtoo, it messed up my emerge -u world
(stuff like wanting to upgrade to sys-apps/baselayout-2.1.5).
Hopefully fixed
On Wed, Jul 29, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Robin H. Johnsonrobb...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi folks,
I've been doing some more mucking with the Bugzilla code and setup, and
I think I've got most of the issues worked out that previously prevented
it from being fully load balanced.
So, please test at:
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 08/22/2009 05:59 AM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
On 08/22/2009 05:39 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Sebastian Pipping wrote:
Commits are done automatically, triggering and pushing is
manual at the moment.
By now a cron-based setup is running syncing the pure-funtoo
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Rémi Cardonar...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi all,
Just a quick heads up that I have just unmasked x11-libs/libxcb-1.4 and its
companion libraries in all profiles _except_ 2008.0.
Hey Rémi,
Next time, mind running echangelog in the appropriate directory? It
help us
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Jeremy Olexadarks...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, Aug 18, 2009 at 9:52 AM, Rémi Cardonar...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi all,
Just a quick heads up that I have just unmasked x11-libs/libxcb-1.4 and its
companion libraries in all profiles _except_ 2008.0.
Hey Rémi,
I am suggesting that the new 10.0 profiles be marked as EAPI-2
compliant. This involves setting the content of the 'eapi' file to 2
and bumping up the required portage version.
This seems like progress to me. Often, developers are complaining that
they can't use SLOT syntax in profiles (I know
Josh Saddler wrote:
Why isn't this on git.overlays.gentoo.org?
If it's not on Gentoo infrastructure, it's not official.
Q: Are All Official Overlays Hosted On overlays.gentoo.org?
A: No. Gentoo developers are free to put their overlay wherever suits
them best; they don't have to use
Samuli Suominen wrote:
I've just closed http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105016. But bugs
like these shouldn't be around in the first place. When you remove a
package from tree, please grep the profiles/ directory for matching
entries and remove them too.
Anyhow, package.mask's and
Tobias Klausmann wrote:
Hi!
On Tue, 30 Jun 2009, Christian Faulhammer wrote:
Tobias Klausmann klaus...@gentoo.org:
Revision: 2
This is only needed for an in-repo revision...so please leave it at 1.
but but no fixes are available yet, please see
But but
Imagine a trembling lower
Hello devs,
It has been brought to my attention that deltup is in need of some
lovin' via a treecleaner bug (bug 246916). Both deltup and
app-portage/getdelta are used in combination to provide smaller tarballs.
If anyone is interested in helping out the Gentoo dial-up users, please
consider
On Sun, May 31, 2009 at 11:25 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S.
Vicettojmbsvice...@gentoo.org wrote:
snip
Thanks to those that have nominated me, I would not have expected it
to be honest. I am going to decline for the Council election. I have
lots of other items going on in my life and can't quite add this
Maciej Mrozowski wrote:
While it usually doesn't do any particular harm (but I guess security and
prefix/alt team won't agree on this) - insanely enabling everything by default
The Prefix team does not care either way.
is not the best idea in my opinion.
Of course we need an example. Let's
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Josh Saddler nightmo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
I hope it goes without saying that bug 213988
(http://bugs.gentoo.org/213988) should be resolved before either
stabilization or news posting. The doc is somewhat out of date now.
I assume you mean
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:36 PM, Jeremy Olexa darks...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:13 PM, Josh Saddler nightmo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
I hope it goes without saying that bug 213988
(http://bugs.gentoo.org/213988) should be resolved before either
stabilization
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Dale rdalek1...@gmail.com wrote:
Alistair Bush wrote:
Dale wrote:
The Gentoo subforum on LQ would help to collect the posts in one place.
That would be the point. Gentoo has its own forum so why have two
forums? What would be the point in having two
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 2:06 PM, David Leverton
levert...@googlemail.com wrote:
yourself, shell-like. printf -v EAPI 1 is perfectly valid shell (at
least if we decide to allow bash 3.1 features), and has the same effect
To stir things up:
Who decides this? There are more and more bash-3.1
Mart Raudsepp wrote:
Hello,
I have had this project in my mind for a while, so it's about time to
get it out there, as to see if feedback finds it a good one - and if
that is so, if there are people who want to make it happen.
snip
Hmm, I wonder what the point is when there is 400
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 2:47 PM, Fabian Groffen grob...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 04-04-2009 20:41:34 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
The two aren't mutually contradictory. Quite the contrary.
For EAPI 3, we're aiming to make it illegal to do anything with a flag
unless it's either explicitly listed
Hello all,
In the Gentoo Prefix project we have a special USE flag: 'prefix',
kind of like $ARCH USE flags. I am writing here to ask of the best way
to introduce a global implicit USE flag to gentoo-x86. There has been
some interest from other devs to kill diffs in ebuilds between
gentoo-x86 and
On Wed, Apr 1, 2009 at 4:13 AM, Christian Faulhammer fa...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi,
Donnie Berkholz dberkh...@gentoo.org:
On 12:59 Fri 27 Mar , Fabian Groffen wrote:
This eclass facilitates in some of the needs of the Gentoo Prefix
project. For now it provides the 'eprefixify' function,
Alin Năstac wrote:
snip
Fine, then remove $PV from patch name and use it in any ebuild version
you want. Or just decouple the patch version from the ebuild version
(foo-bar-r1.patch sounds OK to me).
What exactly is your problem that you are trying to solve here? Posting
to the community to
Alexey Shvetsov wrote:
Alec Warner wrote:
I am interested in the number of ebuilds at specific APIs in the tree,
do you have those numbers?
Basically, how much work is this (raw ebuild count)?
Total ebuilds 26209
EAPI0 ebuilds 22880
EAPI1 ebuilds 1855
EAPI2 ebuilds 1474
this numbers
On Fri, Mar 13, 2009 at 6:53 AM, alex.alexan...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
Hi,
I already posted some initial images on tinderbox.
http://tinderbox.dev.gentoo.org/virtualization/amd64/
Some weeks old by now. But I am fairly confident that image building
can be made automatic via scripting. Granted,
On Mon, Mar 9, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Doug Goldstein car...@gentoo.org wrote:
I'm wondering what exactly is the harm in letting developers idle for a
while? While they might not be actively committing they are still
knowledgeable people that are just as capable as everyone else to push in a
fix for
Tiziano � wrote:
Hi everyone
With eapis 1 and 2 we introduced nice features but also a couple of new
problems. One of them are the use dependencies when the package you
depend on doesn't have the use flag anymore (see [1] for an example).
So I think it's time for a short eapi bump with some
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
As opposed to those same bugs being assigned to maintainer-needed and getting
lots of attention?
The inactive dev can just as easily resolve a m-needed bug as one that
is assigned to himself. The added benefit that some people actually look
at the m-needed
Mounir Lamouri wrote:
On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
hk...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mounir Lamouri wrote:
Hi,
I was writing a trivial version bump for net-voip/gnugk-2.2.8 (bug
#258518) but upstream added a file named
Petteri Räty wrote:
Let's try something new. I would like to get opinions from as many
people as possible about GLEP 55 and alternatives listed here in order
to get some idea what the general developer pool thinks. Everyone is
only allowed to post a single reply to this thread in order to make
Small change:
Effective immediately 30 days notice is becoming 30-59 days and 60
days notice is becoming 60-89 days.
Basically, all removal dates are going to be the last day of the month
in whichever month is appropriate. This allows us to process many bugs
at once. You won't see an exact
On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 11:55 AM, Jeremy Olexa darks...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hello,
I would like to request that bash-completion-20081218 to be marked
stable by the arches soon here.
In doing so, I'm going to make the following change to bash-completion.eclass:
-RDEPEND=bash-completion
Hello,
I would like to request that bash-completion-20081218 to be marked
stable by the arches soon here.
In doing so, I'm going to make the following change to bash-completion.eclass:
-RDEPEND=bash-completion?
- ( || (
- app-admin/eselect
-
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 12:02 PM, Santiago M. Mola coldw...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hello,
All my packages are up for grabs. Feel free to add yourself to
metadata.xml and don't hesitate to ask me any doubts about them.
I hope this doesn't mean you are retiring.. =/
app-shells/bash-completion
I
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
app-misc/colordiff
sys-process/iotop
I picked up these two. metadata changed. I'll get to the bugs next week
sometime.
-Jeremy
Alec Warner wrote:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 8:01 PM, Jeremy Olexa darks...@gentoo.org wrote:
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 21:04 Sun 25 Jan , Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Sat, 24 Jan 2009 20:25:44 -0100
Jorge Manuel
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
Hi.
I talked to Zac zmedico earlier in #gentoo-portage about adding an
entry to package.mask for KDE-4.2.0 using slot deps. Thomas tanderson
and Patrick bonsaikitten raised the concern we might need profile
eapis and that PMS nailed p.mask to EAPI-0.
Zac
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
This is your one-day friendly reminder ! The monthly Gentoo Council
meeting is tomorrow in #gentoo-council on irc.freenode.net. See the
channel topic for the exact time (but it's probably 2000 UTC).
If you're supposed to show up, please show up. If you're not supposed
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 5:40 PM, Ferris McCormick fmc...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Tue, 20 Jan 2009 23:50:47 +0100
Jan Kundrát j...@gentoo.org wrote:
Ferris McCormick wrote:
'cp -i' will at least ask a question, and I find that marginally better
--- it's confusing, but at least it says
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
Hi folks,
in light of some recent discussions where overlay maintainers found
that bug reports had been assigned incorrectly and thought it was apt
to inform the miscellaneous bug wranglers of the correct assignees, I
thought it would be a good idea to introduce a
Fabio Rossi wrote:
On Wednesday 31 December 2008, Duncan wrote:
Except that... in theory, some or all of those apps could technically be
used on/for other distributions and platforms as well.
Yes, this is the theory but I think they'll be never ported to other
distributions.
sabayon
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 8:04 AM, Friedrich Oslage blueb...@gentoo.org wrote:
[1] http://dev.gentoo.org/~bluebird/sparc-multilib/
I would put it in the gentoo.org/doc/en/ domain and link to it in the
gentoo-sparc index
(http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/sparc/index.xml)
2 cents,
Jeremy
Exhibit A:
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/eclass/python.eclass?r1=1.48r2=1.49
This causes me pain on my hosts that don't have =bash-3.1[0] for
/bin/bash. Because I can't install portage with an old bash until I
get a new python installed which uses python.eclass which isn't
On Mon, Dec 8, 2008 at 10:33 AM, Jeremy Olexa darks...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hello,
I am seeking a positive code review on the following change to
flag-o-matic.eclass, diff is below (reasons are below that):
Er, cancel that. The proposed patch isn't robust enough to catch
something like append
On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 3:18 PM, Robin H. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Getting the bot out there
-
If you would like to have the new bot in your #gentoo-* channel, would
each channel founder/leader please respond to this thread, stating the
channel name, and that
Peter Volkov wrote:
В Сбт, 22/11/2008 в 18:11 +, Miroslav Sulc (fordfrog) пишет:
fordfrog08/11/22 18:11:25
Added:netbeans-6.5-r1.ebuild
Log: netbeans compiles fine even with JDK 1.6 so I dropped the restriction on
JDK, also commons-fileupload linking fixed
Index:
Mark Loeser wrote:
So, gentoo-wiki.com went down for a awhile and took something away from
our users something that is useful. Its back now, but I think we should
consider having our own official wiki that our users can contribute to.
We already have something very similar to this on the
Mark Loeser wrote:
snip
I really don't understand why it is better to break the stable trees of
$ARCH instead of just making them all ~ARCH. (ie. ~mips, ~x86-fbsd,
etc). If the $ARCH doesn't have the manpower to do stable reqs then they
don't have the manpower to fix broken stable trees
On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:52:59 -0400
Doug Goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone remind me again why we have the kerberos USE flag enabled by
default?
AFAIK it was added so that the default profile provides support for
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
Notes:
--
1. For handling herdno-herd/herd, we should add an entry into herds.xml to
catch it (maintainer-needed at g.o). Every herd listed in an ebuild MUST
be in
herds.xml.
As rbu pointed out, this is slightly incorrect. Most of my ebuilds
contain no-herd.
On Sun, Oct 12, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Thomas Sachau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I see packages like bison, flex, perl or sed in the system set. And i also
see ebuilds depending on
them. I also heard from Peter Volkov (pva) that there where discussions about
removing different
packages from the
Fabian Groffen wrote:
snip
Most notably, in Prefix all keywords are full GLEP53 style, which
results in e.g. amd64-linux. We did this on purpose, because in Prefix
we don't necessarily are on Gentoo Linux. We also chose to expand fbsd,
nbsd and obsd to their long variants, mainly because the
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Ciaran McCreesh
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 19:46:55 +0200
large snip
What's the scope of the changes? I think it'd be easiest to discuss
this if you posted an informal summary describing the differences in
terms of which bits of PMS are
Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 9:07 PM, Ryan Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 05 Oct 2008 20:44:51 -0500
Jeremy Olexa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I would suggest moving all the slacking arches to experimental
until there is desire from the dev community (read: manpower
Friedrich Oslage wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 05.10.2008, 16:26 -0500 schrieb Steev Klimaszewski:
Thoughts? Helps?
Afaik we have 3 types of arches:
- experimental
They are not CCed on stablization bugs and don't do stablizations at
all.
~mips, ~sparc-fbsd and ~x86-fbsd
- unsupported
They are
On Thu, Oct 2, 2008 at 3:30 PM, Jeroen Roovers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2 Oct 2008 22:24:35 +0200
Jeroen Roovers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
# Gen 2 Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] (`date`)
# Masked for testing.
=rofl-cat/omgpkg-ver
Please people,
if you want to get something
Ben de Groot wrote:
So, can we have a nice little table of which functions die by themselves
and which ones need || die added in ebuilds? Please?
Thanks,
A quick grep of /usr/lib/portage/bin clues you in that every function
that is an external file does *not* die by itself. So, emake, do*,
Ryan Hill wrote:
On Mon, 22 Sep 2008 22:03:53 -0500
Jeremy Olexa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm thinking that a virtual/fonts package would be a good addition to
the tree. We have hit this issue in Gentoo Prefix where any font
package would satisfy a dependency. I also have an open bug where
I'm thinking that a virtual/fonts package would be a good addition to
the tree. We have hit this issue in Gentoo Prefix where any font package
would satisfy a dependency. I also have an open bug where a package
depends on corefonts but the reporter has stated that another fonts
package will
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
# Jeremy Olexa [EMAIL PROTECTED] (12 Sep 2008)
# Masked for removal in 60 days. dead upstream, missed modular X
transition.
# See bug #127193
x11-terms/root-tail
I have lifted this mask. Multiple users have said that it works and they
want it in the tree. I also got
Ryan Hill wrote:
On the other hand, it also seems completely ridiculous from a practical
POV to have to wait 30 days (and waste arch team resources) to fix an
incorrect licence on a stable package.
And have everyone recompile the package, thus wasting cpu cycles and
users' time.
I would
On Mon, Aug 18, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Tobias Scherbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
John Brooks wrote:
Random idea: How about a different bug assignee for maintainer-needed
packages with provided ebuilds/patches? Either something generic, or
try to go for something more category/package specific
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 12:00 AM, Andrew D Kirch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
Andrew D Kirch wrote:
snip all
Good points, I take it that you have found a mentor and are becoming a dev
to drive this project then?
-Jeremy
I've spoken in the past with both Elfyn McBratney
Andrew D Kirch wrote:
snip all
Good points, I take it that you have found a mentor and are becoming a
dev to drive this project then?
-Jeremy
Zac Medico wrote:
Like Alec said, I don't think this is a difficult thing to get right
and even if the maintainer doesn't get it right initially then it's
not something that's very difficult to spot and fix. More elusive
bugs certainly do exist. That said, I still would like to make use
of the
Please consider a new PROPERTIES=interactive setting that allows an
ebuild to indicate that it uses stdin and stdout for user
I don't think anyone will disagree with this one. The one problem that I
see is that if the ebuild still doesn't have this value in it, portage
will *look* like it has
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
It will at least allow QA team to fix such bugs where patches are already
available.
So, if bugs are being fixed why is there a need to fix something that
isn't broken with regards to a policy _needed_ to enforce this action?
Are bugs being ignored
Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
Some kind of warning or other mechanism that does selecting this profile
without knowing what you're doing would be a good idea.
This isn't enough?
%% grep KNOW *
make.defaults:I_KNOW_WHAT_I_AM_DOING=yes
;)
Philip Webb wrote:
080717 Jan Kundr�t wrote:
01 Dec 2000 Updated 03 Jul 2008 [2]
[2] http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/linux/library/l-awk1.html
The '03 Jul 2008' has been added since I sent my comment to them yesterday !
However, the incorrect URL for Gentoo Technologies -- www.gentoo.org --
large snip
[3]
http://overlays.gentoo.org/proj/science/browser/overlay/eclass/octave-forge.eclass
You may want to look into making it eclass-manpages ready.
-Jeremy
--
gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Jeroen Roovers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To anyone (else) out there who thinks that bug wranglers should be
punished when they make mistakes in the heap of unthankful work they
perform on a more than daily basis, I would like you to know that if
you reassign
101 - 189 of 189 matches
Mail list logo
