[gentoo-dev] Suggestions for simplifying VIDEO_CARDS situation

2018-06-16 Thread Matt Turner
Hello, VIDEO_CARDS is an annoying mess. We used to have radeon, intel, and some others in media-libs/mesa's VIDEO_CARDS. radeon and intel corresponded to disparate sets of drivers -- VIDEO_CARDS=radeon has meant classic r100, r200, r300, and r600 drivers and gallium r600 and radeonsi drivers.

[gentoo-dev] Monthly x11@ project status for June 2018

2018-06-01 Thread Matt Turner
x11@ is currently assigned or cc'd on 176 bugs. This number is down from 222 on April 1st and more than 412 in February 2015 (I reported this on #gentoo-desktop after closing out a bunch of bugs that day). == Fix x11-base/xorg-server suid/systemd situation == https://bugs.gentoo.org/635102

Re: [gentoo-dev] Developers, please start switching to 17.1 amd64 profiles

2018-05-27 Thread Matt Turner
On Fri, May 25, 2018 at 12:29 PM, Georgy Yakovlev wrote: > On Tuesday, May 22, 2018 9:36:17 AM PDT Michał Górny wrote: >> Hi, everyone. >> >> With some delay, I would like to officially announce that the Council >> has approved the direction in which 17.1 amd64 profiles are

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: x11-libs/libXfont

2018-05-20 Thread Matt Turner
# Matt Turner <matts...@gentoo.org> (20 May 2018) # Removal in 30 days. Bug #655102 x11-libs/libXfont signature.asc Description: Digital signature

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-i18n/fbiterm

2018-05-20 Thread Matt Turner
# Matt Turner <matts...@gentoo.org> (20 May 2018) # Unmaintained. Dead homepage. Depends on dead libXfont. # Removal in 30 days. Bug #655104 app-i18n/fbiterm signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Access to DRM render nodes from portage sandbox?

2018-05-09 Thread Matt Turner
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 11:43 AM, Matt Turner <matts...@gentoo.org> wrote: > Irrespective to the answer to that question, it's my opinion that we > should not execute code via the package manager that has the potential > to bring down the whole system. ... and if anyone doubts t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Access to DRM render nodes from portage sandbox?

2018-05-09 Thread Matt Turner
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 10:19 AM, Alec Warner <anta...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 12:34 PM, Matt Turner <matts...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> >> On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 11:51 PM, Dennis Schridde <devuran...@gmx.net> >> wrote: >> > H

Re: [gentoo-dev] Access to DRM render nodes from portage sandbox?

2018-05-09 Thread Matt Turner
On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 11:51 PM, Dennis Schridde wrote: > I see sandbox violations similar to "ACCESS DENIED: open_wr: /dev/dri/ > renderD128" pop up for more and more packages, probably since OpenCL becomes > used more widely. I want to respond to the mention of OpenCL being

Re: [gentoo-dev] Access to DRM render nodes from portage sandbox?

2018-05-09 Thread Matt Turner
On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 11:51 PM, Dennis Schridde wrote: > Hello! > > I see sandbox violations similar to "ACCESS DENIED: open_wr: /dev/dri/ > renderD128" pop up for more and more packages, probably since OpenCL becomes > used more widely. Hence I would like to ask: Could we

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly x11@ project status for May 2018

2018-05-08 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 11:24 PM, Brian Dolbec <dol...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Mon, 7 May 2018 13:38:47 -0700 > Matt Turner <matts...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> >> If there's a way to have repoman alert developers to deprecated >> dependencies in the same way

[gentoo-dev] Re: Monthly x11@ project status for May 2018

2018-05-07 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, May 7, 2018 at 1:38 PM, Matt Turner <matts...@gentoo.org> wrote: > == Convert media-libs/mesa ebuild to build with Meson == > https://bugs.gentoo.org/652762 > > Ebuild posted. Blocked on problems surrounding LLVM (this is the story of > maintaining media-libs/m

[gentoo-dev] Monthly x11@ project status for May 2018

2018-05-07 Thread Matt Turner
Firstly, I'd like to welcome Nick Sarnie to the X11 team. He's been very helpful in improving the state of media-libs/vulkan-loader for a while now, so it's nice to make it official! == Fix x11-base/xorg-server suid/systemd situation == https://bugs.gentoo.org/635102

[gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH] profiles/profiles.desc: move hppa profiles stable->exp

2018-05-06 Thread Matt Turner
default/linux/hppa/17.0/desktop exp > hppadefault/linux/hppa/17.0/developer exp > -- > 2.17.0 > Acked-by: Matt Turner <matts...@gentoo.org> For those not in #gentoo-hppa, I attempted to start a conversation with Jeroen about moving hppa

Re: [gentoo-dev] bug queue size over time

2018-05-02 Thread Matt Turner
On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 10:24 AM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 2. Mai 2018, 18:42:32 CEST schrieb Paweł Hajdan, Jr.: >> >> Just checking back here - what would be the best way to graph number of >> bugs with given assignee, preferably with historical backfill? >>

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 4/4] kde4-base.eclass: Transition deps to x11-base/xorg-proto

2018-04-27 Thread Matt Turner
--- eclass/kde4-base.eclass | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/eclass/kde4-base.eclass b/eclass/kde4-base.eclass index 8abade2677d4..72e4fcfe526b 100644 --- a/eclass/kde4-base.eclass +++ b/eclass/kde4-base.eclass @@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ kdedepend="

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/4] toolchain.eclass: Transition deps to x11-base/xorg-proto

2018-04-27 Thread Matt Turner
--- eclass/toolchain.eclass | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/toolchain.eclass b/eclass/toolchain.eclass index 2da455ad4e3b..df76dc4feb8c 100644 --- a/eclass/toolchain.eclass +++ b/eclass/toolchain.eclass @@ -206,11 +206,10 @@ DEPEND="${RDEPEND} if

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/4] xorg-2.eclass: Fix typo'd DRI_COMMON_DEPEND

2018-04-27 Thread Matt Turner
--- eclass/xorg-2.eclass | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/eclass/xorg-2.eclass b/eclass/xorg-2.eclass index 96a469163cfd..0329a7aa623a 100644 --- a/eclass/xorg-2.eclass +++ b/eclass/xorg-2.eclass @@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ case ${XORG_DRI} in IUSE+="

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/4] xorg-2.eclass: Transition deps to x11-base/xorg-proto

2018-04-27 Thread Matt Turner
DRI_DEPEND can go away since all xf86-video-* drivers now directly depend on x11-base/xorg-proto, which includes the dependencies from DRI_DEPEND. --- eclass/xorg-2.eclass | 25 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/xorg-2.eclass

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: x11-libs/xpyb

2018-04-22 Thread Matt Turner
# Matt Turner <matts...@gentoo.org> (21 Apr 2018) # Awful, unmaintained, unused. Removal in 30 days. Bug #651300. x11-libs/xpyb signature.asc Description: Digital signature

[gentoo-dev] Last Rites: x11-libs/libXp and x11-proto/printproto

2018-04-22 Thread Matt Turner
# Matt Turner <matts...@gentoo.org> (21 Apr 2018) # Protocol headers and client library for the long dead Xprint extension. # Removal in 30 days. Bug #649076. x11-proto/printproto x11-libs/libXp signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] berkdb and gdbm in global USE defaults

2018-04-07 Thread Matt Turner
On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 12:57 PM, Lars Wendler wrote: > On Sat, 7 Apr 2018 14:16:33 -0500 William Hubbs wrote: > >>On Sat, Apr 07, 2018 at 02:55:53PM -0400, Michael Orlitzky wrote: >>> On 04/07/2018 02:44 PM, William Hubbs wrote: >>> > >>> > I'm with floppym on this one.

[gentoo-dev] Re: Monthly x11@ project status for April 2018

2018-04-02 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 8:08 PM, Matt Turner <matts...@gentoo.org> wrote: > == Update packages to depend on x11-base/xorg-proto == > https://bugs.gentoo.org/651286 > > The new x11-base/xorg-proto package combines nearly all (28 in fact) of > the x11-proto/* packages into one, w

[gentoo-dev] Monthly mips@ project status for April 2018

2018-04-01 Thread Matt Turner
I'd like to start giving ~monthly updates on the status of mips@ in Gentoo. Recently I received a Loongson 3A system (quad-core 1.35GHz, 16GB RAM, AMD graphics) which is significantly faster and more stable than any other mips system I have. mips@ is currently assigned or cc'd on 29 bugs. This

[gentoo-dev] Monthly x11@ project status for April 2018

2018-04-01 Thread Matt Turner
I'd like to start giving ~monthly updates on the status of x11@ packages in Gentoo. I hope it gives some insight into the status of a rather important set of packages and maybe encourages others to lend a hand to a very understaffed project when possible. I expect future reports to be

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] cmake-utils.eclass: Make the new ASM-ATT rules actually work

2018-03-23 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 3:40 PM, James Le Cuirot <ch...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Mon, 19 Mar 2018 15:16:47 -0700 > Matt Turner <matts...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> Thanks for looking into this! >> >> I'm not sure I understand the -nostdlib portion. It's somethin

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] cmake-utils.eclass: Make the new ASM-ATT rules actually work

2018-03-19 Thread Matt Turner
Thanks for looking into this! I'm not sure I understand the -nostdlib portion. It's something about working around a side-effect of -x assembler?

Re: [gentoo-dev] Is removing old EAPIs worth the churn?

2018-03-06 Thread Matt Turner
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 2:27 PM, Alec Warner <anta...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 5:22 PM, Matt Turner <matts...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 1:35 PM, Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> > On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 4:17

Re: [gentoo-dev] Is removing old EAPIs worth the churn?

2018-03-06 Thread Matt Turner
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 1:35 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 4:17 PM, Andreas K. Huettel > wrote: >> >> Is it worth the effort? Yes, see below. >> Is it a high priority task? No. >> > > It sounds like all that has been done is to log a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Is removing old EAPIs worth the churn?

2018-03-06 Thread Matt Turner
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 1:17 PM, Andreas K. Huettel <dilfri...@gentoo.org> wrote: > Am Dienstag, 6. März 2018, 02:52:54 CET schrieb Matt Turner: >> EAPI 2 removal bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/648050 >> >> It seems like tons of churn to update old stable ebuilds to a ne

Re: [gentoo-dev] Is removing old EAPIs worth the churn?

2018-03-06 Thread Matt Turner
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 1:00 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <d...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 2:52 AM, Matt Turner <matts...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> >> In the end we might get to delete some code from portage or an eclass? >> Does this seem worth it? > > &

Re: [gentoo-dev] Is removing old EAPIs worth the churn?

2018-03-06 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Mar 5, 2018 at 9:56 PM, Kent Fredric wrote: > On Mon, 5 Mar 2018 17:52:54 -0800 > And with Perl packages at least, incrementing EAPI results in actual > changes driven by the eclass: > > - Changes the names of various control variables > - Makes perl tests on by

[gentoo-dev] Is removing old EAPIs worth the churn?

2018-03-05 Thread Matt Turner
EAPI 2 removal bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/648050 It seems like tons of churn to update old stable ebuilds to a new EAPI, just for its own sake. Take https://bugs.gentoo.org/648154 for example. New ebuild added with EAPI 6 bumped from EAPI 2. Otherwise functionally identical. Now asking arch

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last Rites: Dead X11 packages

2018-02-09 Thread Matt Turner
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 5:37 AM, Brian Evans <grkni...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On 2/7/2018 9:54 PM, Matt Turner wrote: >> # Matt Turner <matts...@gentoo.org> (06 Feb 2018) >> # Dead and unused >> # Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug #646838 >> x11-libs/libXCal

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last Rites: Dead X11 packages

2018-02-08 Thread Matt Turner
On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 5:37 AM, Brian Evans <grkni...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On 2/7/2018 9:54 PM, Matt Turner wrote: >> # Matt Turner <matts...@gentoo.org> (06 Feb 2018) >> # Dead and unused >> # Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug #646838 >> x11-libs/libXCal

[gentoo-dev] Last Rites: Dead X11 packages

2018-02-07 Thread Matt Turner
# Matt Turner <matts...@gentoo.org> (06 Feb 2018) # Dead and unused # Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug #646838 x11-libs/libXCalibrate x11-libs/libXfontcache x11-misc/xtscal x11-proto/fontcacheproto x11-proto/xcalibrateproto x11-proto/xf86rushproto signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] reproducible builds

2018-02-04 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 7:25 AM, Samuel Bernardo wrote: > Hi, > > I send this email to know the opinion of gentoo developers about > registering gentoo profiles in the context of reproducible-builds.org Reproducible builds makes sense when you're distributing

Re: [gentoo-dev] Upcoming posting restrictions on the gentoo-dev mailing list

2018-01-10 Thread Matt Turner
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 1:55 AM, Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: > W dniu wto, 09.01.2018 o godzinie 17∶08 -0800, użytkownik Matt Turner > napisał: >> On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 1:20 PM, Andreas K. Huettel <dilfri...@gentoo.org> >> wrote: >> >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Upcoming posting restrictions on the gentoo-dev mailing list

2018-01-09 Thread Matt Turner
On Tue, Jan 9, 2018 at 1:20 PM, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > During the last Gentoo council meeting, the decision was made to implement > changes to the gentoo-dev mailing list [1]. > > These changes affect only the gentoo-dev mailing list, and will come into > effect on 23

Re: [gentoo-dev] We Are All wltjr On This Blessed Day

2017-12-04 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 1:46 PM, William L. Thomson Jr. <wlt...@o-sinc.com> wrote: > On Mon, 4 Dec 2017 13:26:26 -0800 > Matt Turner <matts...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 10:52 AM, William L. Thomson Jr. >> <wlt...@o-sinc.com> wrote:

Re: [gentoo-dev] We Are All wltjr On This Blessed Day

2017-12-04 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Dec 4, 2017 at 10:52 AM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: > That being said, that people find it acceptable to talk behind another's > back. Lobbing lots of insults. Then having the ego to assume someone > would create a fake identity. Any minimal research can show

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-project] [RFC] Splitting developer-oriented and expert user mailing lists

2017-12-03 Thread Matt Turner
A user requested I forward this information to the mailing list: There's been research, on this, and the study by harvard business school was summarized and discussed by NPR in 2015: [ Turns out toxic coworkers are more than just an annoyance. A new study out of the Harvard Business School warns

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-project] [RFC] Splitting developer-oriented and expert user mailing lists

2017-12-03 Thread Matt Turner
On Sat, Dec 2, 2017 at 3:18 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > The problems of more abusive behavior from some of the mailing list > members have been reported to ComRel numerous times. After the failure > of initial enforcement, I'm not aware of ComRel doing anything to solve > the

[gentoo-dev] Last Rites: Unmaintained x11-drivers/xf86-input-* drivers

2017-11-25 Thread Matt Turner
Unmaintained upstream since 2011. Likely zero users. Masked for removal in 30 days. Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/606132 x11-drivers/xf86-input-acecad x11-drivers/xf86-input-aiptek x11-drivers/xf86-input-fpit x11-drivers/xf86-input-hyperpen x11-drivers/xf86-input-mutouch

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last Rites: Ancient x11-drivers/*

2017-11-25 Thread Matt Turner
On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 12:05 AM, Michał Górny <mgo...@gentoo.org> wrote: > W dniu pią, 24.11.2017 o godzinie 18∶02 -0800, użytkownik Matt Turner > napisał: >> On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 10:52 PM, Richard Bradfield <bradf...@fstab.me> >> wrote: >> > On Thu,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last Rites: Ancient x11-drivers/*

2017-11-24 Thread Matt Turner
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 10:52 PM, Richard Bradfield <bradf...@fstab.me> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 11:24:24PM -0800, Matt Turner wrote: >> >> Very few if any users. They break occasionally with new xserver >> versions, and then I have to do the leg work to fix

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last Rites: Ancient x11-drivers/*

2017-11-24 Thread Matt Turner
On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 11:31 PM, Robin H. Johnson <robb...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 23, 2017 at 11:24:24PM -0800, Matt Turner wrote: >> Very few if any users. They break occasionally with new xserver >> versions, and then I have to do the leg work to fix them,

[gentoo-dev] Last Rites: Ancient x11-drivers/*

2017-11-23 Thread Matt Turner
Very few if any users. They break occasionally with new xserver versions, and then I have to do the leg work to fix them, make the upstream releases, and then push them into Gentoo. Again, for between zero and one person to use. I left some other ancient ones that are also candidates for

Re: [gentoo-dev] Manifest2 hashes: validation of single hash per MANIFESTx_REQUIRED_HASH

2017-11-20 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 7:15 PM, R0b0t1 wrote: > What I wanted to avoid was something I encountered on the GCC mailing > list: When I asked why GCJ was removed, I was told that it was hard to > maintain. When I asked for an example of past maintenance issues (and > made it clear

Re: [gentoo-dev] Open Build Service

2017-11-10 Thread Matt Turner
On Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 3:03 PM, Samuel Bernardo wrote: > Hi, > > I send this email to know the devs opinion about Gentoo integration with > Open Build Service[1]. It sounds like an interesting idea. I've long thought that making our binary package story more

Re: [gentoo-dev] USE flags in base profiles

2017-10-22 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > The following USE flags are enabled by default in our base/linux > profiles. I think they can be disabled, possibly turning them on in > package.use (or in the ebuilds) if they are important. Yes, no? > > 1. USE=cracklib

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reviving the Sandbox project

2017-09-21 Thread Matt Turner
On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 2:25 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > Given that sandbox is utterly broken by design, I don't really want to > put too much effort in trying to make it a little better. I'd rather put > the minimal effort required to make it not-much-worse. You said in your

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: On dropping sparc@ from CC on bugs

2017-09-12 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Aaron Bauman wrote: > On Monday, September 11, 2017 3:43:13 AM EDT Sergei Trofimovich wrote: >> On Sun, 10 Sep 2017 22:18:08 + >> >> bugzilla-dae...@gentoo.org wrote: >> > DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL. Also, do not reply via email to the person

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites:sys-apps/more

2017-08-26 Thread Matt Turner
On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 3:27 PM, Mikle Kolyada wrote: > # Mikle Kolyada (26 Aug 2017) > # Masked for removal in 30 days. > # No major keywords, old EAPI, no maintainer. > # Use sys-apps/less instead. > sys-apps/more Isn't it just part of util-linux? The

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: sys-boot/plymouth needs major fixes/maintainer

2017-08-05 Thread Matt Turner
On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 8:16 PM, M. J. Everitt wrote: > You mean to say treecleaners and QA should actually contact maintainers > before wielding their chainsaws ?? Musta missed that policy doc ... Can you please stop? You're contributing nothing but noise to this mailing

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: x11-proto/evieext

2017-07-15 Thread Matt Turner
# Matt Turner <matts...@gentoo.org> (16 Jul 2017) # Header package for removed x11-libs/libXevie. No dependencies. Removal in a # month (#615314) x11-proto/evieext signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Call for help in testing - sparc + gnutls-3.5

2017-07-15 Thread Matt Turner
On Sat, Jul 15, 2017 at 11:33 AM, Alon Bar-Lev wrote: > Hello, > > I am looking for someone that is using gentoo on sparc and is willing to > help out to resolve an issue[1] of gnutls-3.5 with sparc so that we can drop > gnutls-3.3 from tree. > > I tried to create a bootable

Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: openrc-0.28 mounts efivars read only

2017-07-12 Thread Matt Turner
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 5:29 PM, Lucas Ramage wrote: > What needs to be changed for the bootloaders? I may be able to assist. The documentation should be updated to say that with OpenRC 0.28 that you'll have to remount efivars as RW before you can install the bootloader

Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: openrc-0.28 mounts efivars read only

2017-07-12 Thread Matt Turner
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 2:44 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 04:03:25PM -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 11:42 AM, William Hubbs wrote: >> > OpenRC 0.28 will mount efivars read only by default due to concerns >> >

Re: [gentoo-dev] taking a break from arches stabilization

2017-07-10 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 10:22 AM, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > Hi all. > > every time that I attach my tmux session to see what happens on irc, I always > see the same discussion about the 'minor' arches status. > Since I joined gentoo(2011) I worked on all arches except hppa, I put

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Profile-enforced big-endian USE flag

2017-06-29 Thread Matt Turner
On Thu, Jun 29, 2017 at 2:19 PM, James Le Cuirot wrote: > On Wed, 28 Jun 2017 23:29:03 +0100 > James Le Cuirot wrote: > >> > On Tue, Jun 27, 2017 at 6:44 PM, James Le Cuirot wrote: >> > > I am therefore proposing a new global big-endian

Re: [gentoo-dev] Dropping ia64/ppc/sparc profiles to dev/exp

2017-05-08 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 6:48 AM, Rich Freeman wrote: > On Mon, May 8, 2017 at 9:21 AM, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: >> >> It isn't like security project adds any additional load to any arch >> team, an architecture capable to keep up with normal keyword and >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] linux/dma-buf.h mysteriously missing

2017-03-30 Thread Matt Turner
On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 7:44 AM, Mike Gilbert <flop...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 29, 2017 at 1:51 PM, Matt Turner <matts...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> It's a bug that has since been fixed by kernel commit >> 2220fc1ab363e6fab1f321430d69be17a8b92bd7 ("uapi: add

Re: [gentoo-dev] linux/dma-buf.h mysteriously missing

2017-03-29 Thread Matt Turner
It's a bug that has since been fixed by kernel commit 2220fc1ab363e6fab1f321430d69be17a8b92bd7 ("uapi: add missing install of dma-buf.h"). The header was originally added in 4.10, and the fix commit is in 4.11-rc1. I guess we just need to hack around it in sys-kernel/linux-headers-4.10.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eclass/kernel-2: Add additional help text when K_SECURITY_UNSUPPORTED is set

2017-03-05 Thread Matt Turner
On Wed, Mar 1, 2017 at 4:09 PM, Mike Pagano wrote: > This patch will add some additional text to bring some additional notice > to users > about the security considerations of a specific kernel and direct them > to the > upstream website for further information. See bug

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-misc/ofl

2017-03-05 Thread Matt Turner
# Matt Turner <matts...@gentoo.org> (05 Mar 2017) # Part of dev-util/hxtools (and collides with it) # Removal in 30 days. Bug #445436 app-misc/ofl signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] xorg-2.eclass: Enable verbose build logs.

2017-03-04 Thread Matt Turner
On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 6:31 PM, Ulrich Mueller <u...@gentoo.org> wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 4 Mar 2017, Matt Turner wrote: > >> On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Ulrich Mueller <u...@gentoo.org> wrote: >>> Isn't that rather pointless, given that in all

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] xorg-2.eclass: Enable verbose build logs.

2017-03-04 Thread Matt Turner
On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 12:03 PM, Ulrich Mueller <u...@gentoo.org> wrote: >>>>>> On Sat, 4 Mar 2017, Matt Turner wrote: > >> + # Check if package supports a verbose build >> + if grep -q -s "disable-silent-rules" ${ECONF_SOURCE:-.}/configure;

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] xorg-2.eclass: Enable verbose build logs.

2017-03-04 Thread Matt Turner
From: Agostino Sarubbo Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/458000 --- eclass/xorg-2.eclass | 6 ++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/eclass/xorg-2.eclass b/eclass/xorg-2.eclass index 1af1705..fe44658 100644 --- a/eclass/xorg-2.eclass +++ b/eclass/xorg-2.eclass @@

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: moving OpenRC to a meson-based build

2017-01-31 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 12:04 PM, William Hubbs wrote: > All, > > I have been looking at the meson build system [1] [2], and I like what I > see. > > I have opened an issue on OpenRC's github wrt migrating OpenRC to the > meson build system [3]. > > As I said on the bug, the

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] xorg-2.eclass: Use --disable-selective-werror.

2017-01-29 Thread Matt Turner
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/416069 --- eclass/xorg-2.eclass | 6 ++ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) diff --git a/eclass/xorg-2.eclass b/eclass/xorg-2.eclass index b7c7ba2..fabad09 100644 --- a/eclass/xorg-2.eclass +++ b/eclass/xorg-2.eclass @@ -468,8 +468,14 @@ xorg-2_src_configure() {

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] xorg-2.eclass: Use --disable-selective-werror.

2017-01-29 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Jan 29, 2017 at 12:00 PM, Sergei Trofimovich <sly...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Sun, 29 Jan 2017 11:42:16 -0800 > Matt Turner <matts...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/416069 >> --- >> eclass/xorg-2.eclass | 5 + >> 1 f

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] xorg-2.eclass: Use --disable-selective-werror.

2017-01-29 Thread Matt Turner
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/416069 --- eclass/xorg-2.eclass | 5 + 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff --git a/eclass/xorg-2.eclass b/eclass/xorg-2.eclass index b7c7ba2..7d681f2 100644 --- a/eclass/xorg-2.eclass +++ b/eclass/xorg-2.eclass @@ -468,6 +468,11 @@ xorg-2_src_configure() {

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: x11-drivers/ati-drivers, x11-libs/amd-adl-sdk, x11-libs/xvba-video

2017-01-27 Thread Matt Turner
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 7:36 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > Matt Turner posted on Thu, 26 Jan 2017 18:16:12 -0800 as excerpted: > >> # Matt Turner <matts...@gentoo.org> (26 Jan 2017) >> # Dead and replaced by media-libs/mesa[video_cards_radeonsi] >&

Re: [gentoo-dev] berkdb and gdbm in global USE defaults

2017-01-27 Thread Matt Turner
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 2:54 AM, Mart Raudsepp wrote: >> Then there is no need to think about what is enabled globally or not. >> Point being, use REQUIRED_USE sparingly, and rarely a good idea to >>

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: x11-drivers/ati-drivers, x11-libs/amd-adl-sdk, x11-libs/xvba-video

2017-01-26 Thread Matt Turner
# Matt Turner <matts...@gentoo.org> (26 Jan 2017) # Dead and replaced by media-libs/mesa[video_cards_radeonsi] # (or the proprietary amdgpu-pro, which is not in tree). # Masked for removal in 30 days. # Bug #582406 x11-drivers/ati-drivers x11-libs/amd-adl-sdk x11-libs/xvba-video signatu

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-misc/x11rdp and net-misc/xrdp

2017-01-24 Thread Matt Turner
# Matt Turner <matts...@gentoo.org> (24 Jan 2017) # Depends on xorg-server-1.16, which is going away. Unresolved security bug # #602764. Maintainer no longer interested in package. Masked for removal in 30 # days. net-misc/x11rdp net-misc/xrdp signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ada project needs your help!

2016-12-15 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Dec 11, 2016 at 7:59 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > dev-lang/gnat-gcc Something I've wondered about since I used gnat-gcc for assignments as an undergrad -- why is gnat-gcc a separate package from gcc? Isn't the Ada frontend just part of gcc? Why not just a gcc[ada] USE

Re: [gentoo-dev] Revision bumps vs git commits atomicity

2016-12-02 Thread Matt Turner
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 7:14 AM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > Hi all! > > Right now we have two somewhat conflicting policies (at least up to > my understanding of them): > > 1) git atomic commits [1]: > each logical change should be a separate commit. > > 2) revision bump policy

Re: [gentoo-dev] Automated Package Removal and Addition Tracker, for the week ending 2016-11-13 23:59 UTC

2016-11-15 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 4:05 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or removed > from the tree, for the week ending 2016-11-13 23:59 UTC. > > Removals: > app-editors/mlview20161109-10:57 pacho

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrites: dev-ada/cbind, net-dialup/dtrace, net-nds/lat, app-pda/jpilot-mail, net-dialup/drdsl, dev-util/insight, app-laptop/configure-trackpoint, x11-misc/lxmed, dev-util/ketchup, m

2016-10-30 Thread Matt Turner
On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 4:35 AM, David Seifert wrote: > On Sa, 2016-10-08 at 13:57 +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote: >> # Pacho Ramos (08 Oct 2016) >> # Uses get_libdir at global scope (#593382). Dead for ages. Removal >> in >> a >> # month. >> app-cdr/nero > > I'd

Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions

2016-10-24 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 4:43 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > I personally tend to favor a mandatory DCO (we absolutely need to know > the copyright status of our code), and a voluntary FLA (which I tend > to prefer to outright assignment as I think it lines up well with our >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions

2016-10-24 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 4:18 PM, Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 7:12 PM, Matt Turner <matts...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> wrote: >>> You cannot currently commit anythi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions

2016-10-24 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 4:03 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > You cannot currently commit anything with a different copyright notice > to gentoo.git According to whom or what?

Re: [gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus?

2016-10-24 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Rich Freeman <ri...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 6:34 PM, Matt Turner <matts...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> In order to contribute to GNU projects, one must sign a copyright >> assignment statement. >> >> Gentoo does

[gentoo-dev] Are "Copyright 1999-20xx Gentoo Foundation" headers bogus?

2016-10-24 Thread Matt Turner
In order to contribute to GNU projects, one must sign a copyright assignment statement. Gentoo doesn't have anything similar as far as I'm aware, which makes me question the legitimacy of "Gentoo Foundation" copyrights. What is the story? (I thought my other thread "Contributed ebuilds and

[gentoo-dev] Contributed ebuilds and copyright questions

2016-10-24 Thread Matt Turner
A former co-worker of mine is now at Google and wants to contribute ebuilds he wrote for ChromeOS to Gentoo. They add packages necessary for Vulkan (new 3D graphics API). For instance:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with GitHub Pull Requests the easy way

2016-10-19 Thread Matt Turner
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 2:10 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: >> On Wed, 19 Oct 2016, Kent Fredric wrote: > >> On Tue, 18 Oct 2016 21:45:05 -0500 >> Matthew Thode wrote: > >>> Does pram allow you to pass options to git >>> am (signedoffby for instance)? >

Re: [gentoo-dev] libpcre.so.3 - Compatibility with Debian

2016-08-11 Thread Matt Turner
On Thu, Aug 13, 2026 at 11:27 AM, james wrote: > be able to offer guidance, hence, I have filed no bugs on Vulcan. I'm not The API is Vulkan with a k. Vulcan is where Spock is from.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Augmenting the CPU_FLAGS_X86 list and creating CPU_FLAGS_PPC + CPU_FLAGS_ARM

2016-08-01 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 2:08 PM, David Seifert wrote: > Dear friends, > while version bumping sci-libs/fftw, I've noticed our CPU_FLAGS_X86 > list could be expanded a bit: > > avx512 - introduced with Skylake and Knights Landing > > I also propose creating a CPU_FLAGS_PPC variable

Re: [gentoo-dev] [QA] Official support for migrating ebuilds out of games.eclass

2016-06-30 Thread Matt Turner
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 3:47 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote: > I'm glad to see some reach-out here and taking responsibility for > decisions. However, what does the QA team have to say about systems that > want games on other media (such as an SSD or separate HDD), or wish to >

[gentoo-dev] app-portage/tatt: completely broken?

2016-05-25 Thread Matt Turner
Is tatt usable for anyone? Both the 0.3 and versions seem to hang after printing the Bugnumber: # tatt -b 576112 Bugnumber: 576112 CTRL+C gives this traceback: ^CTraceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python-exec/python3.4/tatt", line 135, in bugraw =

Re: [gentoo-dev] new developers' keyword requests

2016-05-20 Thread Matt Turner
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote: > To make sure I understand what you're getting at, are you saying some > devs get on board and then request to add keywords to packages that they > already maintain? No, you've misunderstood. He's saying people add new

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reminder: ALLARCHES

2016-05-04 Thread Matt Turner
On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 8:44 AM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 10:41 AM, Peter Stuge wrote: >> Mike Gilbert wrote: >>> "doing your job" >> >> Remember that everyone is a volunteer. > > I am referring to arch testing as a job, because it only

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reminder: ALLARCHES

2016-05-03 Thread Matt Turner
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 5:50 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: >> The solution is to have people with an actual interest in a specific >> architecture determine whether stabilising a package is viable, and >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] New USE_EXPAND NGINX_MODULES_STREAM

2016-02-06 Thread Matt Turner
On Fri, Feb 5, 2016 at 3:07 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > Dnia 5 lutego 2016 07:38:44 CET, Jason Zaman > napisał(a): >>On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 04:35:44PM -0600, Gordon Pettey wrote: >>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2016 at 6:17 AM, Kent Fredric

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: app-emulation/runc/

2015-12-07 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 10:58 AM, Mike Gilbert <flop...@gentoo.org> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 1:26 PM, Matt Turner <matts...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Robin H. Johnson <robb...@gentoo.org> wrote: >>> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 05

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: app-emulation/runc/

2015-12-07 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Dec 7, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 05:16:01AM +, Doug Goldstein wrote: >> commit: 37c1ec7ef31a51206421f03a2df489ec7d7ca244 >> Author: Doug Goldstein gentoo org> >> AuthorDate: Mon Dec 7 05:14:50 2015 + >>

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: ChangeLog

2015-11-02 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 5:20 PM, Dale wrote: > hasufell wrote: >> On 11/02/2015 10:54 PM, Dale wrote: >>> Ciaran McCreesh wrote: On Mon, 2 Nov 2015 14:00:18 -0600 Dale wrote: > Rich Freeman wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 2, 2015 at 1:08 AM,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH] cmake-utils.eclass: die if ninja is enabled but not installed

2015-10-17 Thread Matt Turner
On Sat, Oct 17, 2015 at 10:37 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Fri, 16 Oct 2015 03:22:48 +1100 > Michael Palimaka wrote: > >> On 16/10/15 03:04, Michał Górny wrote: >> > >> > >> > Dnia 15 października 2015 17:44:47 CEST, Michael Palimaka >> >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC/announcement] Reviewers project

2015-10-12 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Oct 12, 2015 at 7:23 AM, hasufell wrote: > On 10/12/2015 04:12 PM, Ian Delaney wrote: >> On Mon, 12 Oct 2015 15:47:19 +0200 >> hasufell wrote: >> >>> On 10/12/2015 03:29 PM, Ian Delaney wrote: Not sure how to read this. The whole idea

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   >