[gentoo-dev] Adding ABI_MIPS USE_EXPAND

2013-07-29 Thread Matt Turner
Hi, Any objections to me adding an ABI_MIPS USE_EXPAND variable so that I can take advantage of the multilib work on mips? Thanks, Matt

Re: [gentoo-dev] Dropping static libs support from cryptsetup and lvm2

2013-07-29 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 5:28 PM, yac y...@gentoo.org wrote: I have fully encrypted systems, including /, which requires an initramfs with cryptsetup built staticaly. Doesn't it actually require them built statically, or simply that the necessary libraries are also in the initramfs? I think

Re: [gentoo-dev] Adding ABI_MIPS USE_EXPAND

2013-07-29 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 5:41 PM, Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote: go ahead -- note that some packages have broken multilib deps though Thanks! ah, and it wont work if you dont add support to multilib-build.eclass also. Of course :)

[gentoo-dev] Autobuilds go to /experimental and to /releases only when someone actually tests them

2013-07-26 Thread Matt Turner
(I sent this to gentoo-releng@. Resending to gentoo-dev@ for a wider audience) Can we make autobuilds go to /experimental and then only move them to /releases when someone actually tests them? Looking at bugzilla and listening in #gentoo-releng, it's kind of embarrassing how often someone

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: toolchain-r1.eclass

2013-07-25 Thread Matt Turner
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 9:26 AM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote: Then there is a question whether toolchain packages should use EAPI 5, EAPI=5 would be useful for both the mips team (for bug 477956) and for catalyst builders (for subslot dependencies when dealing with binary

Re: [gentoo-dev] new category: games-adventure/

2013-07-14 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote: Diego, hasufell wrote: I would object... 10 games are wa too few for a new category and especially pkg moves.. 1 app-antivirus/ 3 net-zope/ 5 x11-base/ 7 gpe-utils/ 8 app-officeext/ 11

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: toolchain update was Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Questions for candidates for Gentoo Council 2013/2014

2013-07-10 Thread Matt Turner
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote: On 07/10/2013 10:03 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 09:27:46PM -0700, Brian Dolbec wrote: The other thing we needed to do was completely remove the use of or building of binpkgs during the

[gentoo-dev] Re: toolchain update was Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Questions for candidates for Gentoo Council 2013/2014

2013-07-06 Thread Matt Turner
On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote: When we then move onto stage 2, it uses just the packages built during stage1 (/tmp/stage1root becomes /). This means, if seed stage has mpc.so.0.1 but portage has since included mpc.so.2 that the gcc in stage2

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: toolchain update was Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Questions for candidates for Gentoo Council 2013/2014

2013-07-06 Thread Matt Turner
On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 12:46 AM, Brian Dolbec dol...@gentoo.org wrote: Yes, it does need to be rebuilt if key deps are updated. The gcc produced in the stage1 is broken, so won't run to rebuild itself during the stage2 run. But we keep the old libs around via preserve_libs, and once stage1 is

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: toolchain update was Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Questions for candidates for Gentoo Council 2013/2014

2013-07-06 Thread Matt Turner
On Sat, Jul 6, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote: You are misremembering that we are using preserve_libs to save our butts when mpc is updated and gcc is still linked to the old mpc. I feel very uncomfortable as the recommendation of preserve-libs is to remerge

Re: [gentoo-dev] Going against co-maintainer's wishes (ref. bug 412697)

2013-05-26 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, May 26, 2013 at 9:15 AM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote: Perhaps this was covered already, but how exactly did this one file, added by your co-maintainer, hurt you? Did it cause additional bugs? Did it break a working ebuild? Did it kill your cat? It would seem to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: CPU use flag detection

2013-05-19 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 8:47 AM, Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sat, 18 May 2013 22:31:11 -0400 Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote: [...] ...shouldn't mmxext be moved out of use.local.desc into use.desc? all the cpu flags should be global IMHO, regardless of how many

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: CPU use flag detection

2013-05-18 Thread Matt Turner
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 9:39 PM, Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wed, 15 May 2013 16:59:57 +0200 yac y...@gentoo.org wrote: Hi, I was recently investigating what cpu flags do I have and how does it work. I have put what I have so far at [1]. So I thought I let you know in case

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making systemd more accessible to normal users

2013-05-01 Thread Matt Turner
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Peter Stuge pe...@stuge.se wrote: Steven, I think you can behave a lot better on the internet. kthx. Amazing. I came to the exact opposite conclusion.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GCC USE flag changes

2013-05-01 Thread Matt Turner
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wed, 01 May 2013 08:00:29 +0100 Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote: On 01/05/2013 06:29, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote: I don't mean to start a flamewar here but the test suite situation is so bad with

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [OT/NIT] Re: Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog package.mask

2013-04-23 Thread Matt Turner
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Rich Freeman ri...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote: Er, you can't be seriously suggesting we will drop repoman checks with the migration to git? I don't see how that would benefit anyone. Interesting

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Last rites: media-tv/tvtime

2013-03-24 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: And what if it breaks again in the future? Should we go over the same discussion again? Can't this be restated as Shouldn't we tree clean it now since it could have bugs in the future?? Tree cleaning packages over

Re: [gentoo-dev] Evaluating a new malloc()

2013-02-26 Thread Matt Turner
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote: In terms of 'following Gentoo policy.' We encourage packages to be as close to upstream as possible. I cannot fathom why when you basically find a performance bug in malloc, you start a thread on the list about replacing

Re: [gentoo-dev] Evaluating a new malloc()

2013-02-26 Thread Matt Turner
On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 1:37 PM, Maciej Mrozowski reave...@gmail.com wrote: On Tuesday 26 of February 2013 11:44:31 Rich Freeman wrote: On Tue, Feb 26, 2013 at 11:35 AM, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote: I see a *HUGE* reason. glibc ships with ptmalloc. If you think they should use

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GCC 4.7 unmasking

2013-02-25 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 5:02 PM, Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sun, 24 Feb 2013 23:03:01 -0600 Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote: I'm going to be unmasking 4.7.2 later this week. There are still 47 open bugs blocking the 4.7 tracker, so if any are yours now would be a good

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH multilib-build] Tee the build logs to ABI-specific files.

2013-02-21 Thread Matt Turner
On Thu, Feb 21, 2013 at 3:27 AM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: This makes reading them a bit easier, especially with phases run in parallel. --- gx86/eclass/multilib-build.eclass | 7 --- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in profiles: ChangeLog profiles.desc

2013-02-19 Thread Matt Turner
On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 7:19 AM, Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote: On Mon, 7 Jan 2013 00:02:33 + (UTC) Mike Frysinger (vapier) vap...@gentoo.org wrote: [...] + 07 Jan 2013; Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org profiles.desc: + Mark s390 profiles stable. + 06 Jan 2013; Justin

Re: [gentoo-dev] Porting ZFS to additional architectures

2013-02-05 Thread Matt Turner
On Tue, Feb 5, 2013 at 11:25 AM, Richard Yao r...@gentoo.org wrote: Dear Everyone, Does anyone have root access to Linux systems on any of the following architectures that is willing to help ZFS development? Alpha HPPA IA-64 MIPS/MIPS64 PPC/PPC64 SH SPARC/SPARC64 I want to port

Re: [gentoo-dev] The gx86 multilib project -- masterplan

2013-01-27 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: 5. Solutions to specific problems - 1. x11-proto packages Those packages install headers to /usr/include and pkg-config files to /usr/lib64. This supposedly means that the headers could be

Re: [gentoo-dev] Getting proper USE_EXPAND variable(s) for multilib

2013-01-20 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Jan 20, 2013 at 3:01 PM, Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote: So you want to re-implement multilib-portage in an eclass without the additional benefits a package-manager level implementation has? I really wish you'd just make the PMS diff and get your stuff implemented. How long has it

Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates

2013-01-16 Thread Matt Turner
On Wed, Jan 16, 2013 at 5:58 AM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina zeroch...@gentoo.org wrote: net-wireless/b43-fwcutter-017 be my guest, although I prefer the bugs personally. That's what he's doing... asking maintainers if it's okay to open stabilization bugs for their packages.

Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates

2013-01-16 Thread Matt Turner
honestly this list is such a tinderbox that I hardly read it. I actually missed the email at first and had to go back in the thread when I saw a lot of responses. Hence, I would prefer to get bugs than random emails that I have to search through. So ignore it and he'll open bugs just the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Switching order of packages in virtual/pkgconfig

2013-01-02 Thread Matt Turner
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 4:11 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: i'd say never. there is no benefit in switching. pkg-config is the default implementation from freedesktop.org. pkg-config is now lighter and has less dependencies than before as the switch from bundled glib1 to glib2

Re: [gentoo-dev] Local bindist descriptions

2012-12-29 Thread Matt Turner
On Sat, Dec 29, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Alexander Berntsen alexan...@plaimi.net wrote: All packages should have local descriptions of what the bindist USE-flag specifically does. This should be a policy when writing ebuilds that include it. Agreed. media-libs/mesa Fixed. (bug 448932)

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Wordiness

2012-12-21 Thread Matt Turner
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote: My point is that you consistently write long essays that I, and apparently most others, don't bother to read. I'm not sure if you're aware of this. Someone said on IRC this morning in response to this thread the tragic thing

Re: [gentoo-dev] Time based retirements

2012-12-20 Thread Matt Turner
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 7:21 PM, Doug Goldstein car...@gentoo.org wrote: I'm curious who had the brain dead idea to retire Gentoo developers that are still interested in the distro, that maintain low activity packages for herds that are stretched way too thin, and are still contributing to the

[gentoo-dev] Wordiness

2012-12-20 Thread Matt Turner
On Thu, Dec 20, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote: Do you realize that you just wrote a two-and-a-half page single-spaced thousand-word email? Seriously, this is way too much. This mailing list is way too much.

Re: [gentoo-dev] borked release media

2012-12-07 Thread Matt Turner
On Fri, Dec 7, 2012 at 8:55 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote: Hey people, what are we going to do with bugs like: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=421839 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=445848 I'd like to help with things. Is the process of building livecd

Re: [gentoo-dev] Ohloh Organizations - Gentoo Linux

2012-11-27 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote: On Fri, Nov 23, 2012 at 12:18 PM, Dirkjan Ochtman d...@gentoo.org wrote: I haven't heard back from them, maybe you can ask them what's up. This has been setup (with Donnie's help): https://www.ohloh.net/orgs/gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: udev-ng? (Was: Summary Council meeting Tuesday 13 November 2012)

2012-11-18 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 12:06 AM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote: Richard Yao posted on Sun, 18 Nov 2012 00:35:22 -0500 as excerpted: Having a builtin is a good idea, but the implementation as a mandatory dependency on kmod is not. The plan is to reintroduce it as an optional dependency,

Re: [gentoo-dev] udev-ng? (Was: Summary Council meeting Tuesday 13 November 2012)

2012-11-18 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Nov 18, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Richard Yao r...@gentoo.org wrote: On 11/18/2012 11:59 AM, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: All I'm asking is some kind of coherent mission statement. How can we define a mission statement when we are still in the process of understanding the codebase, what it does

Re: [gentoo-dev] udev-ng? (Was: Summary Council meeting Tuesday 13 November 2012)

2012-11-17 Thread Matt Turner
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 11:05 PM, Walter Dnes waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote: As I posted elsewhere, working on a project based on hate only lasts so long. I should know, that's the reason I started udev in the first place over 9 years ago. The Xfree86 people generated a lot of hate, just

Re: [gentoo-dev] ship app-arch/pbzip2 instead of app-arch/bzip2

2012-09-26 Thread Matt Turner
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 1:30 PM, Michael Mol mike...@gmail.com wrote: A few months ago, I filed bug 423651 to ask that bzip2 on the install media be replaced with pbzip2. It was closed a short while later, telling me that it'd involve changing what's kept in @system, and that had to be

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] autotools-multilib: wrapper eclass for multilib builds.

2012-09-24 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Sep 24, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, 25 Sep 2012 00:10:21 +0200 Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 18:59:14 -0300 Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote: On Mon, 24 Sep 2012 23:51:27 +0200 Michał Górny

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] autotools-multilib: wrapper eclass for multilib builds.

2012-09-23 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote: On 22/09/2012 20:42, Matt Turner wrote: I think this means make 32-bit binary packages' dependencies on amd64 not use the emul- packages? If so, that'd certainly be a component of getting rid of emul-linux-x86

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] autotools-multilib: wrapper eclass for multilib builds.

2012-09-23 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 3:02 AM, hasufell hasuf...@gentoo.org wrote: I prefer the stronger solution. This is just a quick workaround. And I'd prefer if people who aren't involved with what I'm working on don't try to block my progress. I appreciate your opinion, and truthfully I'd just rather

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] autotools-multilib: wrapper eclass for multilib builds.

2012-09-23 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 2:07 AM, Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote: Matt Turner schrieb: On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: It is a simple eclass using autotools out-of-source builds to build packages for multiple ABIs when multilib is supported. Thanks

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] autotools-multilib: wrapper eclass for multilib builds.

2012-09-23 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 5:30 AM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote: One problem that I remembered now: If every ebuild inheritting this eclass (either this one or similar) will add a multilib USE, people running multilib profiles will get it enabled for ALL packages inheritting it, causing

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] autotools-multilib: wrapper eclass for multilib builds.

2012-09-22 Thread Matt Turner
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: It is a simple eclass using autotools out-of-source builds to build packages for multiple ABIs when multilib is supported. Thanks a lot, Michał! This looks good to me. Use case: xorg packages, ask Matt. So the idea is

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] autotools-multilib: wrapper eclass for multilib builds.

2012-09-22 Thread Matt Turner
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote: On 22/09/2012 18:54, Matt Turner wrote: I'd like to add multilib USE flags to Mesa and thus its dependencies. I realized that almost everything in x11-libs/ could be converted very easily, which would allow us

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP: gentoo sync based unified deps proposal

2012-09-19 Thread Matt Turner
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote: On 19 September 2012 03:18, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 12:11 PM, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote: Readability is more important, and there I still don't buy the argument that the new

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP: gentoo sync based unified deps proposal

2012-09-19 Thread Matt Turner
On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 11:36 PM, Ulrich Mueller u...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, 18 Sep 2012, Matt Turner wrote: From the other thread (example conversion of gentoo-x86 current deps to unified dependencies): [Sorry, I've missed this one in the other thread, so replying here.] 4

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP: gentoo sync based unified deps proposal

2012-09-19 Thread Matt Turner
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 12:12 AM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote: On 19 September 2012 14:01, Matt Turner matts...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, Sep 18, 2012 at 9:07 PM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote: On 19 September 2012 03:18, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, Sep 18

Re: [gentoo-dev] example conversion of gentoo-x86 current deps to unified dependencies

2012-09-18 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 6:15 AM, Brian Harring ferri...@gmail.com wrote: 1) 746 hits in the tree for COMMON_DEPEND; that's 2%, and the usages I'm aware of have been for literally, what it sounds like- depends that are both DEPEND and RDEPEND. CDEPEND is pretty common as well. I could 466 files

Re: [gentoo-dev] Unified DEPENDENCIES concept

2012-09-08 Thread Matt Turner
On Fri, Sep 7, 2012 at 4:45 AM, Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote: Since DEPENDENCIES hasn't been written up in a Gentoo-friendly manner, and since the Exherbo documentation doesn't seem to suffice to explain the idea here, here's some more details on the DEPENDENCIES

Re: [gentoo-dev] Make connman a global USE flag

2012-07-21 Thread Matt Turner
On Sat, Jul 21, 2012 at 4:51 AM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote: Several packages are using it with the same sense (support connman), maybe we should move it from local to global USEs, what do you think? Off-topic question, but how is connman related to NetworkManager? Is it an alternative,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GLEP draf for cross-compile support in multilib profiles

2012-07-01 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Jul 1, 2012 at 4:52 PM, Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote: Matt Turner schrieb: I suppose that's just for ease of implementation? Not having to special-case packages that don't install binaries. I dont follow. Did you think about only having additional ABI flags for certain cases

Re: GLEP draf for cross-compile support in multilib profiles (was: Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: spec draft for cross-compile support in future EAPI (EAPI-5))

2012-06-30 Thread Matt Turner
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote: I'm interested in this because I'm regularly annoyed with the emul- packages and also because multilib is pretty important for mips. If a package has dependencies, then those dependencies are required to have at least the

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: PROPERTIES=funky-slots

2012-06-27 Thread Matt Turner
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 18:45:46 +0100 Ciaran McCreesh ciaran.mccre...@googlemail.com wrote: On Sat, 23 Jun 2012 19:43:10 +0200 Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote: It treats -r300 as being newer than -r200, and so will

Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver

2012-05-23 Thread Matt Turner
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 12:47 PM, Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote: 2. Arches were Git repos are too heavy (Kumba wanted this for MIPS) Please don't go to this trouble for the ability to commit to portage on *really* slow systems.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Portage Git migration - clean cut or git-cvsserver

2012-05-23 Thread Matt Turner
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Arun Raghavan ford_pref...@gentoo.org wrote: I, for one, think we should stay with CVS and leave all this git Linusware to the new-fangled Fedora kids with their fancy init systems and tight coupling. CVS was good enough for my grandfather, and it's good enough

Re: [gentoo-dev] latest commits to dev-lang/go

2012-05-15 Thread Matt Turner
On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 9:07 PM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote: On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 06:37:39PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote: All, I know my latest commits to dev-lang/go haven't updated the ChangeLog. I got into the habbit of using repoman commit -[Mm] to do that, but for some

Re: [gentoo-dev] Possible lastrite of sys-fs/rar2fs (waiting for upstream reaction)

2012-05-05 Thread Matt Turner
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 8:35 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: # Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (05 May 2012) # Broken with unrar-4.2.1 wrt upstream ticket of: # http://code.google.com/p/rar2fs/issues/detail?id=10 # Either waiting for fixed release, or the package will # be

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in www-plugins/adobe-flash: metadata.xml adobe-flash-11.2.202.228.ebuild ChangeLog

2012-05-02 Thread Matt Turner
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Christian Ruppert id...@gentoo.org wrote: On 04/26/12 at 06:00PM +0200, Jeroen Roovers wrote: On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 23:04:08 -0600 Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote: Arg, no.  Please just print the warning if the host doesn't do SSE2. There's no reason to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in www-plugins/adobe-flash: metadata.xml adobe-flash-11.2.202.228.ebuild ChangeLog

2012-04-26 Thread Matt Turner
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Christian Ruppert id...@gentoo.org wrote: I haven't followed the prev. conversation but what's wrong with a USE flag for SSE2? We already have SSE2 flags, even global.. That's not it. The flash binary uses SSE2 instructions without checking for their presence,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in www-plugins/adobe-flash: metadata.xml adobe-flash-11.2.202.228.ebuild ChangeLog

2012-04-26 Thread Matt Turner
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 4:06 PM, Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote: wouldnt adding a sse2 useflag and putting it in REQUIRED_USE solve the problem ? afaik portage wont even try to upgrade if people have -sse2 If that works, which I think it will, that does sound like the best thing to

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: A tiny news item for migrating to libjpeg-turbo

2012-04-23 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 7:58 AM, Richard Yao r...@cs.stonybrook.edu wrote: What is the plan for platforms that are not supported by libturbo? It's not that they're not supported, just that libjpeg-turbo doesn't have optimized routines for them. It'll still run fine. (Check the keywords, you'll

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: ocamlopt unmask on arm

2012-04-18 Thread Matt Turner
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 10:14 PM, hero...@gentoo.org wrote: Dear All, I have just emerged ocaml-3.12.0[ocamlopt] on arm and used it to compile mldonkey[ocamlopt]. It seems to work well. it was masked on Apr 18, 2010, , | /usr/portage/profiles$ grep -n -B3 ocamlopt ./arch/arm/use.mask

Re: [gentoo-dev] Happy 10th birthday (in advance)

2012-03-30 Thread Matt Turner
On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 5:55 PM, Richard Yao r...@cs.stonybrook.edu wrote: On 03/30/12 17:15, Joshua Kinard wrote: Maybe it's time for Gentoo-2.0? I think we should wait for Portage 2.2 to be stabilized before we declare Gentoo 2.0. @preserved-libs is enough of an advance that I think

Re: [gentoo-dev] About suggesting to create a separate partition for portage tree in handbook

2012-03-28 Thread Matt Turner
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Richard Yao r...@cs.stonybrook.edu wrote: On 03/28/12 03:16, Brian Dolbec wrote: On Tue, 2012-03-27 at 19:16 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: But that's ok, because extensive studies have shown that the only possible reasons for putting /usr/portage on its own

[gentoo-dev] Change USE flags when compiling with FEATURES=test

2012-03-17 Thread Matt Turner
So you run set FEATURES=test to run a package's test suite during keywording. Later, you emerge -vuNDa ... and portage wants to reemerge that package with USE=-test. Can't we avoid this somehow? I presume in the vast majority of cases emerging with FEATURES/USE=test doesn't actually affect what's

Re: [gentoo-dev] lurking *.ebuild'less packages

2012-03-15 Thread Matt Turner
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 4:59 PM, Sergei Trofimovich sly...@gentoo.org wrote: slep noticed and reported an odd thing: $ euse -i kate ... ls: cannot access /gentoo/portage/metadata/cache/kde-base/kdebindings-perl-*: No such file or directory ls: cannot access

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: About gcc-4.6 unmasking

2012-02-20 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Feb 20, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Ryan Hill dirtye...@gentoo.org wrote: On Mon, 20 Feb 2012 21:34:14 +0100 Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote: I don't know if this has been discussed before but, what issues are preventing us from unmasking gcc-4.6 (and think on a near stabilization)? I have

Re: [gentoo-dev] profiles/features/64bit-native/package.use.mask contents redundancy

2012-02-13 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Sergei Trofimovich sly...@gentoo.org wrote: some mips profiles are scary too:    http://dev.gentoo.org/~slyfox/profiles_mips.png Weird. I'll take a look at that.

Re: [gentoo-dev] The following USE changes are necessary to proceed - Why?

2012-02-10 Thread Matt Turner
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 2:17 PM, ross smith gaur...@gmail.com wrote: The line above is not prompting you to turn on the nettle use flag, which appears to already be on.  It's prompting you to add the gmp use flag for dev-libs/nettle. Which looks like it's on as well. In either case -- this

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: media-sound/minitunes

2012-01-21 Thread Matt Turner
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 5:28 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: # Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org (21 Jan 2012) # Package renamed to media-sound/musique # http://flavio.tordini.org/minitunes-renamed-to-musique # Removal in 30 days media-sound/minitunes Is it normal to wipe

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-libs/glibc: glibc-2.14.1-r2.ebuild glibc-2.12.2.ebuild glibc-9999.ebuild glibc-2.15.ebuild glibc-2.10.1-r1.ebuild glibc-2.14.1-r1.ebuild

2012-01-20 Thread Matt Turner
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 12:37 AM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote: Mike Frysinger posted on Wed, 18 Jan 2012 22:00:52 -0500 as excerpted: On Wednesday 18 January 2012 21:42:14 Michael Weber wrote: Um, what happend to the policy to not f*** around with stable ebuilds? take a chill pill phil

Re: [gentoo-dev] crossdrev mingw 64 bit

2012-01-13 Thread Matt Turner
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 5:49 AM, Dmitrij K kdi...@live.ru wrote: Maciej Mrozowski wrote: On Tuesday 10 of January 2012 03:34:06 Dmitrij K wrote: Dear developers of crossdev. Can you realize --target mingw64 (for creating windows app 64 bit) (like mingw-w64.sourceforge.net)? And can

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New global USE flag neon for ARM NEON optimization(s)

2011-12-23 Thread Matt Turner
On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 4:26 AM, Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote: Samuli Suominen posted on Thu, 22 Dec 2011 21:03:41 +0200 as excerpted: i'll add USE=neon to use.desc and punt the local descriptions if nobody objects media-libs/libpng: support ARM NEON cpu instruction set

Re: [gentoo-dev] sys-libs/zlib: punt from system in profiles

2011-11-29 Thread Matt Turner
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 3:09 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: we have USE=zlib already which should cover automatically pulling in zlib when necessary, and we have that by default in make.conf.  so there's no need to explicitly list zlib as part of the system target.  so time to drop

Re: [gentoo-project] Re: [gentoo-dev] Call for agenda items -- Council meeting 2011-11-08

2011-10-26 Thread Matt Turner
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 2:05 PM, Pacho Ramos pa...@gentoo.org wrote: El mié, 26-10-2011 a las 19:15 +0200, Fabian Groffen escribió: On 26-10-2011 19:11:24 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: On Wed, 26 Oct 2011 19:06:07 +0200 Fabian Groffen grob...@gentoo.org wrote: 3) one step towards

Re: [gentoo-dev] python.eclass EAPI 4 support, this gets really annoying

2011-10-14 Thread Matt Turner
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 3:16 PM, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. phajdan...@gentoo.org wrote: OK, so what are the _blocking_ reasons for no EAPI 4 support in python.eclass yet? I understand you have some complicated patches in flight etc etc, but are they _required_ for the eclass not to break with EAPI 4?

Re: [gentoo-dev] python.eclass EAPI 4 support, this gets really annoying

2011-10-14 Thread Matt Turner
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Matthew Summers quantumsumm...@gentoo.org wrote: Its being worked on currently. There are many fairly difficult issues to be worked through here. That's kind of the question though. What's are the issues?

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GCC upgrades, FUD and gentoo documentation

2011-10-12 Thread Matt Turner
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 3:13 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: On Saturday 08 October 2011 11:07:49 Diego Elio Pettenò wrote: Il giorno sab, 08/10/2011 alle 11.33 +, Sven Vermeulen ha scritto: - The fix_libtool_files.sh command is now part of the toolchain eclass, so  

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in net-im/qutecom: metadata.xml ChangeLog qutecom-2.2_p20110210.ebuild

2011-10-12 Thread Matt Turner
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 7:58 PM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: On 10/13/2011 02:27 AM, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote: Mike Frysinger schrieb: The removed qutecom ebuild was not broken at any time. by splitting my reply, you changed the meaning.  having qutecom in the tree

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in app-admin/chrpath: ChangeLog chrpath-0.13-r2.ebuild

2011-10-11 Thread Matt Turner
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: I just hope nobody will take an example of the ebuild with code duplication (multiple epatch calls), overquoting, redudant use of find when rm is more than enough, ... I haven't looked, but if we don't already, a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrite: media-gfx/pngcrush

2011-10-11 Thread Matt Turner
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:07 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: Wait, what? If you're not even in QA, then who are you to start masking other people's packages? It seems you don't even bother to read the masking message or my comments on the bug. I said Talk to QA and CC me if you

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrite: media-gfx/pngcrush

2011-10-10 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: I am not in QA fwiw just trying to keep a basic QA level in portage tree. Wait, what? If you're not even in QA, then who are you to start masking other people's packages?

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrite: media-gfx/pngcrush

2011-10-09 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 5:18 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: Watch your language. This is not your $home playroom And it's not your mailing list. I'm sure I'm not the only one that's tired of your Let Me Insert Myself Into Everything syndrome just because you're on QA. QA's a joke

Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC upgrades, FUD and gentoo documentation

2011-10-09 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 4:35 PM, James Cloos cl...@jhcloos.com wrote: MT == Matt Turner matts...@gentoo.org writes: MT Is that a problem with the ABI, or just that gcc-4.6 is more strict? MT I think it's the latter. The failure occurs at the linking stage, not the compiling stage. Ie, ln(1

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrite: media-gfx/pngcrush

2011-10-08 Thread Matt Turner
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 4:47 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: # Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (08 Oct 2011) # Fails to compile against system libpng15, bug 356127 # Removal in 14 days 14 days? media-gfx/pngcrush

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrite: media-gfx/pngcrush

2011-10-08 Thread Matt Turner
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: On 10/08/2011 02:19 PM, Matt Turner wrote: On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 4:47 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: # Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (08 Oct 2011) # Fails to compile against system libpng15

Re: [gentoo-dev] GCC upgrades, FUD and gentoo documentation

2011-10-08 Thread Matt Turner
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 6:57 PM, James Cloos cl...@jhcloos.com wrote: SV == Sven Vermeulen sw...@gentoo.org writes: SV - Since 3.4.0/4.1.0, the C++ ABI is forward-compatible, so rebuilds SV   from that version onwards should not be needed That is not generally true. I use gcc-4.5 as my

Re: [gentoo-dev] integrity of stage files

2011-10-08 Thread Matt Turner
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 6:43 PM, Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote: On Sat, Oct 08, 2011 at 02:45:02PM -0700, Paweł Hajdan, Jr. wrote: I checked http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook-x86.xml?part=1chap=5 and the Handbook only mentions validating MD5 checksums. There are two

Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrite: media-gfx/pngcrush

2011-10-08 Thread Matt Turner
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 9:41 PM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 10/08/11 22:45, Matt Turner wrote: On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 10:20 AM, Markos Chandras hwoar...@gentoo.org wrote: On 10/08/2011 02:19 PM, Matt Turner wrote: On Sat

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: various outdated dev-texlive/* packages

2011-10-05 Thread Matt Turner
On Wed, Oct 5, 2011 at 1:52 PM, Alexis Ballier aball...@gentoo.org wrote: # Moved to dev-texlive/texlive-langarabic after TeX Live 2009 dev-texlive/texlive-langarab Can this not just be a pkg move?

Re: [gentoo-dev] zlib breakage

2011-09-23 Thread Matt Turner
On Fri, Sep 23, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Nikos Chantziaras rea...@arcor.de wrote: I believe something needs to be done with the zlib-1.2.5.1-r1 and -r2 packages currently in the tree.  The maintainer of zlib pushed those revisions with a patch that alters macro identifiers, making Gentoo's zlib

[gentoo-dev] How to handle dependencies on protocol headers?

2011-09-15 Thread Matt Turner
Often packages depending on X11 libraries will also have to specify the X11 libraries' proto packages in DEPEND. This is because the X11 library itself #includes files provided by the proto package. It's not really that the X11 library depends on this at run-time, so the protocol packages aren't

[gentoo-dev] Re: How to handle dependencies on protocol headers?

2011-09-15 Thread Matt Turner
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:32 AM, Matt Turner matts...@gentoo.org wrote: Often packages depending on X11 libraries will also have to specify the X11 libraries' proto packages in DEPEND. This is because the X11 library itself #includes files provided by the proto package. It's not really

Re: [gentoo-dev] How to handle dependencies on protocol headers?

2011-09-15 Thread Matt Turner
On Fri, Sep 16, 2011 at 12:36 AM, Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote: The first is more correct, I think, but it's also much more annoying. Mesa winds up having x11-proto/inputproto in DEPEND for some long forgotten reason, for instance. Why is it annoying? Because the proto will have to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: euscan proof of concept (like debian's uscan)

2011-09-06 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 1:20 PM, Corentin Chary corentin.ch...@gmail.com wrote: Hi again, Found a little problem: it's not finding a newer version of wireless-regdb, which uses a date-based versioning system. If euscan tried to view/parse the directory index where the distfiles are located, it

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoostats, SoC 2011

2011-08-29 Thread Matt Turner
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 9:53 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto jmbsvice...@gentoo.org wrote: The point I was addressing is the suggestion that the above should be possible and the idea that any single developer is entitled to do so. It's a moot point, because no one (that I see) claimed or is

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: sys-boot/arcboot

2011-08-25 Thread Matt Turner
# Matt Turner matts...@gentoo.org (25 Aug 2011) # Masked for removal in 30 days. Use arcload instead. sys-boot/arcboot

Re: [gentoo-dev] mesa r600 gallium news item

2011-08-25 Thread Matt Turner
2011/8/25 Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn chith...@gentoo.org: Hello, Please see the attached news item for review. The news item should be published before mesa-7.11 goes stable. Corresponding bug report: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=377349 Best regards, Chí-Thanh Christopher

Re: [gentoo-dev] gcc: dropping cld workaround

2011-08-20 Thread Matt Turner
On Sat, Aug 20, 2011 at 2:08 PM, Andreas K. Huettel dilfri...@gentoo.org wrote: so... is this something where I should suddenly in a moment of clarity shout ah, that cld workaround ?! On Samstag 20 August 2011 20:03:04 Mike Frysinger wrote: we added the cld workaround to gcc-4.3.0+ in early

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >