On 9/21/06, Simon Stelling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Huge amounts of time, effort and users. How much arch team time was
spent fixing genkernel? How much time was spent fixing the OS X mess?
How many users did we lose as a result of all the QA screwups?
Eh, I wanted
On 9/28/06, Mark Stier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How about entering the removed ebuilds into bugzilla under an adequate section?
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
In the event of tree booting, you have the option to maintain the
ebuild in an overlay such as sunrise[1]. Or seeking out some
/msmtp
mail-mta/ssmtp
rest of the list
...
If there are no objections, the above change will be committed in ~10
days.
Would it be prudent to coordinate Gentoo documentation changes with the above?
--
Mike Pagano
Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project
Team Lead
procedure for kernels to include
opening up a bug to stabilize the corresponding linux-docs version.
So going forward, you can exclude this and hopefully we'll do a better job of
keeping this package stable.
--
Mike Pagano
Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project
E-Mail : mpag...@gentoo.org
GnuPG
days. It's just kernel documentation.
--
Mike Pagano
Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project
Team Lead - Gentoo Sources
E-Mail : mpag...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : EEE2 601D 0763 B60F 848C 9E14 3C33 C650 B576 E4E3
Public Key : http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xB576E4E3op=index
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 12:04:04PM +0100, Markos Chandras wrote:
On 24 June 2013 11:54, Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org wrote:
On 24/06/2013 07:30, Pavlos Ratis wrote:
That's why I'd like to propose Gentoo Hangouts. Gentoo Hangouts will
be Google+ video Hangouts(video calls) held
to a smaller
group of our users. (Thinking about our thinkpad patches)
--
Mike Pagano
Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project
E-Mail : mpag...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : EEE2 601D 0763 B60F 848C 9E14 3C33 C650 B576 E4E3
Public Key : http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xB576E4E3op=index
is welcome.
Original thread of discussion:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.kernel/697
--
Mike Pagano
Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project
E-Mail : mpag...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : EEE2 601D 0763 B60F 848C 9E14 3C33 C650 B576 E4E3
Public Key : http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search
On Saturday, July 27, 2013 09:58:08 AM Rich Freeman wrote:
Unless it were stable-masked it would create the exact same problem.
^^ This
--
Mike Pagano
Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project
E-Mail : mpag...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : EEE2 601D 0763 B60F 848C 9E14 3C33 C650 B576 E4E3
Public
All,
Here is the vanilla-sources non stablizing policy news item.
If all goes well, this will be committed to the tree on 08/07 UTC.
Mike
Title: vanilla-sources stabilization policy
Author: Mike Pagano mpag...@gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Posted: 2013-08-07
Revision: 1
News-Item-Format
with some of the
requested changes:
Title: vanilla-sources stabilization policy
Author: Mike Pagano mpag...@gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Posted: 2013-08-07
Revision: 1
News-Item-Format: 1.0
Display-If-Installed: sys-kernel/vanilla-sources
The Gentoo Kernel Team will no longer be providing stable
On Sunday, August 04, 2013 07:24:23 PM Alex Xu wrote:
wat. Possibly intended:
For the latest upstream kernel unpatched by Gentoo
Not intended
---
Title: vanilla-sources stabilization policy
Author: Mike Pagano mpag...@gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Posted: 2013-08-07
Revision: 1
News
, and
additional closed ones that were broken by this upgrade, are tracked at
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=252467
Please help us fix this in the stable tree in advance of the stabling date.
Thanks,
Mike
--
Mike Pagano
Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project
E-Mail : mpag...@gentoo.org
I'm planning to request the stabling of gentoo-sources-2.6.30 on July
22nd, 1 week from now. We have no known regressions in the kernel.
Regressions in external packages in the stable tree are tracked in bug
#277944. If any arise, please make every effort to fix these.
Thanks,
Mike Pagano
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:28:18AM -0400, Mike Pagano wrote:
I'm planning to request the stabling of gentoo-sources-2.6.30 on July
22nd, 1 week from now. We have no known regressions in the kernel.
Thanks,
Mike Pagano
Due to serious patches released, the new plan is too release
packages in the stable tree are tracked in bug
#291927. If any arise, please make every effort to fix these.
Thanks,
Mike Pagano
--
Mike Pagano
Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project
E-Mail : mpag...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : EEE2 601D 0763 B60F 848C 9E14 3C33 C650 B576 E4E3
Public Key : http
packages in the stable tree are tracked in bug
#300324. If any arise, please make every effort to fix these.
Thanks,
Mike Pagano
Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project
E-Mail : mpag...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : EEE2 601D 0763 B60F 848C 9E14 3C33 C650 B576 E4E3
Public Key : http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks
running on nonGentoo
infrastructure. We've been looking for a new 'home' for awhile. [1]
[1]http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=176186
---
Mike Pagano
Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project
E-Mail : mpag...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : EEE2 601D 0763 B60F 848C 9E14 3C33 C650 B576 E4E3
Public Key
On Thursday, June 03, 2010 10:44:10 am Markos Chandras wrote:
kernel can merge with kernel-misc.
Please don't do this.
positive change.
Thanks, again.
MIke
Mike Pagano
Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project
E-Mail : mpag...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : EEE2 601D 0763 B60F 848C 9E14 3C33 C650 B576 E4E3
Public Key : http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xB576E4E3op=index
. It is
appreciated.
--
Mike Pagano
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG FP : EEE2 601D 0763 B60F 848C 9E14 3C33 C650 B576 E4E3
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Monday 07 April 2008 04:37:18 pm Petteri Räty wrote:
Petteri Räty kirjoitti:
So I wrote a new slacker script that gets the active developers from
LDAP and checks the activity for the last 60 days. One repoman commit
should equal a couple entries on history but not sure on that. robbat2
Mike Pagano [EMAIL PROTECTED] (19 May 2008)
Masked for removal in 30 days. Upstream has changed
name to crossvc, which is available in the tree.
(bug #213496)
---
Mike Pagano
Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project
E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
GnuPG FP : EEE2 601D 0763
On Wednesday 06 August 2008 17:18:05 Robin H. Johnson wrote:
Hi folks,
Sorry that it's taken this long to get completed, but the Jeeves
replacement, Willikins, is finally 99% done, and ready to join lots of
channels.
#gentoo-kernel
Thanks to everyone involved.
--
Mike Pagano
Gentoo
I am working on a new ebuild for a currently open bug in bugzilla.
This ebuild happens to be a snapshot as upstream provides anonymous
web cvs but does not provide a nice tar.
When a non-dev submits a snapshot ebuild to bugzilla what is the
proper method of providing access to the snapshot I
On 10/4/06, Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 12:21 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
Now, perhaps what everyone would like, instead, would be status reports
*where necessary* from certain projects?
In fact, the
On 10/20/06, Daniel Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christian Faulhammer wrote:
Announce it here (or -core) which needs a fix and then just commit the
fix if it is trivial and there has been no reaction.
I think you didn't grasp the problem exactly.
There are a large number of packages which
On 3/28/07, Daniel Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
...here are the diffs of the
latest alsa development release vs the latest kernel development release:
snip
Just a user opinion here, but I find the need to use unstable
alsa-driver to solve a bug every now and then. This procedure
the way. You set an example with your
intelligence in technical matters and patience with users that goes years
beyond your age.
You will be missed and I hope you find your way back here someday.
Best regards,
Mike
--
Mike Pagano
Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project
E-Mail : mpag
For all the kernel maintainers that use genpatches in their kernel
package, please make sure you are subscribed to gentoo-kernel so that I
know I can reach all of you easily.
Thanks,
--
Mike Pagano
Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project
Gentoo Sources - Lead
E-Mail : mpag...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP
repo or any
hooks I should be aware of.
Thanks
--
Theo Chatzimichos (tampakrap)
Gentoo KDE/Qt, Planet, Overlays
linux-patches is still active and I would like it to remain in svn.
Thanks.
--
Mike Pagano
Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project
Gentoo Sources - Lead
E-Mail : mpag
On Friday 20 May 2011 04:58:12 Luca Barbato wrote:
On 5/17/11 6:57 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
That shouldn't be read as endorsing the peculiar and conceptually broken
init replacement called systemd.
lu
Just curious, would you mind elaborating on it's peculiarities and conceptual
On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 05:43:10 AM Michał Górny wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to announce that I've created an initial project page for
Gentoo systemd project [1].
The main purpose of that project page would be keeping docs for systemd
users in Gentoo. Hopefully, we will include some soon. If
/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/eclass/kernel-2.eclass?view=log
Diff to previous 1.278
Revision 1.279 - (view) (download) (annotate) - [select for diffs]
Sat Mar 9 21:05:50 2013 UTC (15 months, 2 weeks ago) by tomwij
Kernel sources and (gen)patches now use xz instead of bz2. Bug #421721
--
Mike Pagano
Gentoo
On Friday, January 02, 2015 01:10:21 PM Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
Resending as I replied to Ian instead of the list by accident. (sorry, Ian)
On 02/01/15 12:25 PM, Mike Pagano wrote:
Hello, Everyone,
Are there solid arguments for stabilizing any version of
gentoo-sources? I think
On Friday, January 02, 2015 04:05:42 PM Rich Freeman wrote:
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Mike Pagano mpag...@gentoo.org wrote:
To summarize.
In this instance, as this moment:
1. Only enter stable req bugs for 3.18 and 3.17.
I assume this bit is just a transition since we don't
=137182668616082w=2
[2] http://packages.gentoo.org/package/sys-kernel/gentoo-sources
--
Mike Pagano
Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project
Team Lead - Gentoo Sources
E-Mail : mpag...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : EEE2 601D 0763 B60F 848C 9E14 3C33 C650 B576 E4E3
Public Key : http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks
On Friday, January 02, 2015 03:11:22 PM Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On 02/01/15 02:57 PM, Mike Pagano wrote:
I understand your point. Maybe waiting a few days to auto stable
makes sense, because less than 7 days later, a new version with
bug/security fixes is released.
Isn't our current
rate of stabilization selling a promise of stability we
can't stand behind?
Mike
--
Mike Pagano
Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project
Team Lead - Gentoo Sources
E-Mail : mpag...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : EEE2 601D 0763 B60F 848C 9E14 3C33 C650 B576 E4E3
Public Key : http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks
On Saturday, January 03, 2015 12:39:39 AM Mikle Kolyada wrote:
02.01.2015 20:25, Mike Pagano пишет:
This is in no way complaining about how long it takes to stabilize a
kernel.
As for this fact.
hat type=arch teams developer
The main problem is that: we only can test sources on machine
On Saturday, January 03, 2015 11:18:26 AM Pacho Ramos wrote:
El vie, 02-01-2015 a las 12:25 -0500, Mike Pagano escribió:
Hello, Everyone,
[2] http://packages.gentoo.org/package/sys-kernel/gentoo-sources
In my case I still run only stable gentoo-sources in many machines to
prevent
On Friday, January 02, 2015 03:22:31 PM Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On 02/01/15 03:17 PM, Mike Pagano wrote:
On Friday, January 02, 2015 03:11:22 PM Ian Stakenvicius wrote:
On 02/01/15 02:57 PM, Mike Pagano wrote:
I understand your point. Maybe waiting a few days to auto
stable makes sense
On Friday, January 02, 2015 03:30:40 PM Rich Freeman wrote:
On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 02/01/15 02:57 PM, Mike Pagano wrote:
I understand your point. Maybe waiting a few days to auto stable
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 01:08:21PM -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 01:29:15PM -0500, Mike Pagano wrote:
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 11:11:32AM -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 11:21:56AM -0500, Mike Pagano wrote:
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 05:47:10PM -0600
their
systems and we can remove this entry?
Mike
--
Mike Pagano
Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project
Gentoo Sources - Lead
E-Mail : mpag...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : EEE2 601D 0763 B60F 848C 9E14 3C33 C650 B576 E4E3
Public Key : http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xB576E4E3op=index
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 11:11:32AM -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 11:21:56AM -0500, Mike Pagano wrote:
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 05:47:10PM -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
All,
#
# Pinkie Pie discovered an issue in the futex subsystem that allows a
# local user
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 12:14:23PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote:
On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 12:11 PM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote:
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 11:21:56AM -0500, Mike Pagano wrote:
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 05:47:10PM -0600, William Hubbs wrote:
All,
If you remove
On Tuesday, November 17, 2015 08:19:29 AM Michał Górny wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 23:38:08 + (UTC)
>
> "Mike Pagano" <mpag...@gentoo.org> wrote:
> > commit: aac24917ebe254a23990f0d7fff9f6f570b99d15
> > Author: Mike Pagano gentoo org>
Tha
On 02/19/2017 12:32 PM, Mike Pagano wrote:
> Upstream does not version patches and every change breaks the manifest
> which
> breaks the tree. This results in a constant chasing of bugs since we can't
> predict the breakage.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Pagano <mpag...@gentoo
On 02/19/2017 06:03 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Mike Pagano <mpag...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> Upstream does not version patches and every change breaks the manifest
>> which
>> breaks the tree. This results in a constant chasing of bug
On 02/19/2017 05:55 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> On Sun, 19 Feb 2017 12:32:26 -0500 Mike Pagano wrote:
>> Upstream does not version patches and every change breaks the manifest
>> which
>> breaks the tree. This results in a constant chasing of bugs since we can't
&g
Upstream does not version patches and every change breaks the manifest
which
breaks the tree. This results in a constant chasing of bugs since we can't
predict the breakage.
Signed-off-by: Mike Pagano <mpag...@gentoo.org>
---
eclass/kernel-2.eclass
ed" ;;
> --
> 2.7.3
>
>
++
I think I've addressed all EAPI-6 bugs opened against the eclass.
--
Mike Pagano
Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project
Gentoo Sources - Member
E-Mail : mpag...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : EEE2 601D 0763 B60F 848C 9E14 3C33 C650 B576 E4E3
Public Key : http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xB576E4E3=index
This patch will add some additional text to bring some additional notice
to users
about the security considerations of a specific kernel and direct them
to the
upstream website for further information. See bug #599454
Signed-off-by: Mike Pagano <mpag...@gentoo.org>
---
eclass/kernel-2.
On 11/27/2016 09:06 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Mike Pagano <mpag...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> If kernel-2_src_unpack() is called in EAPI6, epatch_user() function
>> inherited from eutils.eclass is undefined.
>> See bug #579188
>
> ke
KV_to_int usage should be removed.
Tracker bug is at: 384041 and kernel-2.eclass bug is at 587318.
---
eclass/kernel-2.eclass | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/eclass/kernel-2.eclass b/eclass/kernel-2.eclass
index 1398c0c..c171940 100644
---
If kernel-2_src_unpack() is called in EAPI6, epatch_user() function
inherited from eutils.eclass is undefined.
See bug #579188
---
eclass/kernel-2.eclass | 8 ++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/kernel-2.eclass b/eclass/kernel-2.eclass
index
2nd round. As per mgorny's advice, fix eapply_user as per PMS spec and
execute in src_prepare. Support older EAPIs with epatch_user.
---
eclass/kernel-2.eclass | 25 ++---
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/kernel-2.eclass
On 11/29/2016 07:05 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Mike Pagano <mpag...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> 2nd round. As per mgorny's advice, fix eapply_user as per PMS spec and
>> execute in src_prepare. Support older EAPIs with epatch_user.
>>
>&g
On 11/29/2016 03:46 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 06:42:44 -0500
> Mike Pagano <mpag...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
>> On 11/27/2016 09:06 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>>> On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Mike Pagano <mpag...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>
According to PMS, @USAGE is required for functions.
This patch only touches comments and no code has been modified.
---
eclass/kernel-2.eclass | 38 ++
1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/kernel-2.eclass
On 12/14/2016 07:23 PM, Mike Pagano wrote:
> kdbus is discontinued and is being reworked upstream as a different
> effort with a different name.
> That said, remove unused kdbus support from the kernel eclass.
>
Committed.
--
Mike Pagano
Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project
Gentoo So
On 12/12/2016 09:49 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 9:44 PM, Mike Gilbert <flop...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 7:34 PM, Mike Pagano <mpag...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>> According to PMS, @USAGE is required for functions.
>&g
On 12/12/2016 07:34 PM, Mike Pagano wrote:
> According to (not pms) devmanual, @USAGE is required for functions.
> This patch only touches comments and no code has been modified.
Committed. If the devmanual changes, I can easily remove the empty USAGE
statements.
signature.asc
Descr
kdbus is discontinued and is being reworked upstream as a different
effort with a different name.
That said, remove unused kdbus support from the kernel eclass.
---
eclass/kernel-2.eclass | 18 --
1 file changed, 18 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/kernel-2.eclass
lchreest <jo...@gentoo.org>
+# Mike Pagano <mpag...@gentoo.org>
+#
+# @BLURB: Eclass for kernel packages
+# @DESCRIPTION:
+# This ia the kernel.eclass rewrite for a clean base regarding the 2.6
+# series of kernel with back-compatibility for 2.4
# Please direct your bugs to the c
On 11/30/2016 07:32 PM, Mike Pagano wrote:
> Round 3. As per mgorny's additional advice, fix eapply_user as per PMS
> spec and execute in src_prepare. Support older EAPIs with epatch_user.
> export src_prepare only for supported EAPI versions.
mgorny, thanks for the feedback.
EAPI 6 prohibits dying in global scope. Move that check to pkg_setup.
---
eclass/kernel-2.eclass | 8 +---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/kernel-2.eclass b/eclass/kernel-2.eclass
index 547153c..91a24e9 100644
--- a/eclass/kernel-2.eclass
+++
On 12/03/2016 04:47 PM, Mike Pagano wrote:
> This patch modifies, removes and adds comments only. No code was harmed
> in the creation of this patch.
> This is to conform with ECLASS documentation standards.
>
> ---
> eclass
Committed
--
Mike Pagano
Gentoo Developer - Ker
Round 3. As per mgorny's additional advice, fix eapply_user as per PMS
spec and execute in src_prepare. Support older EAPIs with epatch_user.
export src_prepare only for supported EAPI versions.
---
eclass/kernel-2.eclass | 35 ++-
1 file changed, 26
On 12/01/2016 07:27 PM, Mike Pagano wrote:
> EAPI 6 prohibits dying in global scope. Move that check to pkg_setup.
>
> ---
> eclass/kernel-2.eclass | 8 +---
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Committed
Thank
On 12/27/2016 09:12 PM, Alice Ferrazzi wrote:
> looks like nice information to give :)
>
> ok, for me.
>
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Mike Pagano <mpag...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> This addresses concerns that users might not realize that after an
>> unm
Hi, this code is no longer relevant and breaks PMS. See bug #566396
---
eclass/kernel-2.eclass | 7 ---
1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/kernel-2.eclass b/eclass/kernel-2.eclass
index 424aa03..520a4c1 100644
--- a/eclass/kernel-2.eclass
+++ b/eclass/kernel-2.eclass
@@
This addresses concerns that users might not realize that after an
unmerge of kernel sources some files will need to be removed manually.
The particular concern was specific to the files in /lib/modules/. I
liked this solution, since it does not require a wordy explanation to be
written in the
On 12/23/2016 11:31 PM, Alice Ferrazzi wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 7:43 AM, Mike Pagano <mpag...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> ChangeLog
>
>
> looks good for me :)
>
Thanks, Alice.
Committed.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 03/02/2017 06:56 AM, Alice Ferrazzi wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Mike Pagano <mpag...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>> This patch will add some additional text to bring some additional notice
>> to users
>> about the security considerations of a spec
It's my bad if I've never thanked you but I *do* depend on you.
Thanks for the time you spend on my "stuff".
Mike
--
Mike Pagano
Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project
Gentoo Sources - Member
E-Mail : mpag...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : EEE2 601D 0763 B60F 848C 9E14 3C33 C650 B576 E4E3
Public Key : http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xB576E4E3=index
the change for rc kernels >= 4.12.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/5/13/182
Signed-off-by: Mike Pagano <mpag...@gentoo.org>
---
eclass/kernel-2.eclass | 16 +---
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/kernel-2.eclass b/eclass/kernel-2.ecl
On 05/17/2017 07:13 PM, Mike Pagano wrote:
> For the latest rc kernel release, (4.12-rc1), upstream has decided to
> change the way the patch is distributed.
> The patch now resides in a git repository and is no longer compressed.
>
> Some discussion can be found here[1] if on
As per PMS remove calls to external command 'tr' in global scope
See bug #629106
Signed-off-by: Mike Pagano <mpag...@gentoo.org>
---
eclass/kernel-2.eclass | 8 +---
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/kernel-2.eclass b/eclass/kernel-2.eclass
index 094
This time, use bash 4.0, but limit the use of this function to ebuild that have
EAPI >= 6.
Display a warning for maintainers to upgrade their ebuilds, or remove the call.
Thanks to mgorny for the suggestion.
Signed-off-by: Mike Pagano <mpag...@gentoo.org>
---
eclass/kernel-2.ec
As per PMS remove calls to external command 'tr' in global scope See bug
#629106.
Signed-off-by: Mike Pagano <mpag...@gentoo.org>
---
eclass/kernel-2.eclass | 11 ---
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/kernel-2.eclass b/eclass/kernel-2.eclass
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 07:27:10PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> W dniu czw, 31.08.2017 o godzinie 12∶33 -0400, użytkownik Mike Pagano
> napisał:
> > As per PMS remove calls to external command 'tr' in global scope See bug
> > #629106.
>
> Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/6
patch
attempts to fix.
[1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.12/process/submitting-patches.html
[2] https://github.com/git/git/blob/master/Documentation/SubmittingPatches
Mike
--
Mike Pagano
Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project
Gentoo Sources
E-Mail : mpag...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : 52CC A0B0 F631 0B17 0
This change will support moving the genpatches tarballs from
/space/distfiles-local to
the devspace ~developer/public_html/dist/genpatches.
Co-authored-by: Thomas Deutschmann
Signed-off-by: Mike Pagano
---
eclass/kernel-2.eclass | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff
On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 06:23:06PM -0700, Alec Warner wrote:
>On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 10:01 AM Mike Pagano <[1]mpag...@gentoo.org>
>wrote:
>
> This change will support moving the genpatches tarballs from
> /space/distfiles-local to
> the devspace ~de
This change will support moving the genpatches tarballs from
/space/distfiles-local to
the devspace ~developer/public_html/dist/genpatches.
Additional modifications based on feedback.
Signed-off-by: Mike Pagano
---
eclass/kernel-2.eclass | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion
This change will support moving the genpatches tarballs from
/space/distfiles-local to
the devspace ~developer/public_html/dist/genpatches
Signed-off-by: Mike Pagano
---
eclass/kernel-2.eclass | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/eclass/kernel-2.eclass b
Thanks for the suggestion. This is version 2
This change will support moving the genpatches tarballs from
/space/distfiles-local to
the devspace ~developer/public_html/dist/genpatches.
Signed-off-by: Mike Pagano
---
eclass/kernel-2.eclass | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 11:28:48AM -0700, Alec Warner wrote:
>On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 3:04 AM Mike Pagano <[1]mpag...@gentoo.org>
>wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 06:23:06PM -0700, Alec Warner wrote:
> >Â Â On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 10:01 AM Mike P
s one of those occasions.
>
> Calling out bad actors (not saying veremit is one, I just mean in the general
> sense) is an unfortunate but important task, but call them out on bad
> behaviour, not for what appears to be an impassioned but otherwise
> unremarkable query.
>
I ag
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 12:10:38PM -0500, Mike Pagano wrote:
> # Mike Pagano (2020-02-07)
> # The standalone ebuild for this driver is made
> # unnecessary as it is included in the package:
> # sys-kernel/linux-firmware
> sys-firmware/iwl6050-ucode
Bug #708622
> --
>
# Mike Pagano (2020-02-07)
# The standalone ebuild for this driver is made
# unnecessary as it is included in the package:
# sys-kernel/linux-firmware
sys-firmware/iwl6050-ucode
--
Mike Pagano
Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project
Gentoo Sources - Member
E-Mail : mpag...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP
On Thursday, January 2, 2020 3:32:12 PM EST Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> > - Allowed a simple "Add keyword(s) for package " interface,
> >
> > that intelligently created an issue and a target list, and then once
> > the list was built, constantly ensured the list to be valid, or
> > determined
On Tuesday, July 7, 2020 10:57:57 PM EDT Max Magorsch wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am glad to announce further progress at packages.gentoo.org (pgo in
> the following). Compared to previous work during the last months,
> which mostly addressed the back end, the new changes are rather
> comprehensive.
On 4/29/21 9:48 AM, mpag...@gentoo.org wrote:
From: Mike Pagano
Thanks, Ulm, for the review. I have modified the code as suggested.
The CPU OPT patch now contains gcc ver checks within
the patch itself. This transitional change is to start supporting
just that patch while trying
On 3/12/21 11:34 AM, Gerion Entrup wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 11. März 2021, 17:41:45 CET schrieb Peter Stuge:
Hi,
Gerion Entrup wrote:
the Linux kernel has _a lot of_ configuration options, way too many to
configure them by hand.
I actually disagree strongly with that; I think it's
On 3/12/21 1:04 PM, Gerion Entrup wrote:
Am Freitag, 12. März 2021, 17:40:02 CET schrieb Mike Pagano:
On 3/12/21 11:34 AM, Gerion Entrup wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 11. März 2021, 17:41:45 CET schrieb Peter Stuge:
Hi,
Gerion Entrup wrote:
the Linux kernel has _a lot of_ configuration options
linux-mod.eclass : Fix eclassdoc problems
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/637782
Signed-off-by: Mike Pagano
---
eclass/linux-mod.eclass | 13 +
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
diff --git a/eclass/linux-mod.eclass b/eclass/linux-mod.eclass
index 7e47a2e20..eda5e9aee 100644
Change to respect INSTALL_MOD_PATH
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/642240
Signed-off-by: Mike Pagano
---
eclass/linux-mod.eclass | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/eclass/linux-mod.eclass b/eclass/linux-mod.eclass
index e87c5ec0c..7e47a2e20 100644
--- a/eclass
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
