Re: [gentoo-dev] GPL and Source code providing

2006-06-28 Thread Mivz
and a M$ lover... Well... I'm a squatter, I try to live anarchistic and I do not prejudge people. And if I disagree... I certainly do not say things that go straight against the subject in discussion and break the social Gentoo rules on offending other people. I think you ow me a apology. Mivz -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] GPL and Source code providing

2006-06-28 Thread Mivz
Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Wed, 2006-06-28 at 17:18 +0200, Mivz wrote: >> Mike Doty wrote: >>> Mivz wrote: >>>>> Then I have got this one question, I don't need a answer too. >>>>> >>>>> How free is free software if you need a

Re: [gentoo-dev] GPL and Source code providing

2006-06-28 Thread Mivz
Mike Doty wrote: > Mivz wrote: >>> Mike Doty wrote: >>>> Mivz wrote: >>>>>> Then I have got this one question, I don't need a answer too. >>>>>> >>>>>> How free is free software if you need a lawyer and a e

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GPL and Source code providing

2006-06-28 Thread Mivz
Wiktor Wandachowicz wrote: > I mean, if someone is able to create its own web page and put a binary > download(s) of its work, then how hard is it to comply with the GPL > license and just put some more links to the source code? > It's like the (old?/new?) Decalogue: "You shall not steal". > But

Re: [gentoo-dev] GPL and Source code providing

2006-06-28 Thread Mivz
Mike Doty wrote: > Mivz wrote: >>> Then I have got this one question, I don't need a answer too. >>> >>> How free is free software if you need a lawyer and a expensive server >>> just to be able to publish your addition under your own name? >>>

Re: [gentoo-dev] GPL and Source code providing

2006-06-28 Thread Mivz
Kevin F. Quinn wrote: > On Wed, 28 Jun 2006 11:21:45 +0200 > Mivz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Does this obligation, to provide your own source, also count for a >> none Gentoo developer making a overlay tree for one of his projects >> which is licensed under

Re: [gentoo-dev] GPL and Source code providing

2006-06-28 Thread Mivz
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: > On Wednesday 28 June 2006 11:21, Mivz wrote: >> Does this obligation, to provide your own source, also count for a none >> Gentoo developer making a overlay tree for one of his projects which is >> licensed under de GPL-2? Becaus

[gentoo-dev] GPL and Source code providing

2006-06-28 Thread Mivz
with all those packages, this would cause that every developer that wanted to make a overlay should be a Gentoo file mirror? Do my senses run wilde? Your just my imagination? Do I understand this right? Mivz -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] unicode and userlocales useflag

2006-06-22 Thread Mivz
en_US.utf8 es_MX fa_IR fr_FR [EMAIL PROTECTED] it_IT ja_JP ja_JP.eucjp ja_JP.utf8 probably because NL_nl.UTF-8 is not build anymore? But, my LINGUAS has only "nl en", why do I have de, es, fa, fr, it and ja locales and not nl? Mivz -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] SATA disk slower as /dev/sda then as in /dev/hda

2006-06-07 Thread Mivz
times as fast. Why is it that when I use the new kernel SATA drivers and load is as /dev/sda it is slower as with the old IDE drivers? Mivz -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list