Re: [gentoo-dev] Lastrite: lilypond and reverse dependencies

2012-03-12 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 12:29:47PM -0500, Matthew Summers wrote: On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 11:29 AM, Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org wrote: # Samuli Suominen ssuomi...@gentoo.org (12 Mar 2012) # Severely broken wrt bugs #179178, #331181, #334835, #350059, # #372839, #380155, #380627,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due dragonheart retirement

2011-12-01 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 05:08:57PM +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote: Due dragonheart retirement the following packages need a new maintainer: ... app-arch/lzop dev-libs/lzo I've taken the remainder of the lzo family. -- binki Look out for missing or extraneous apostrophes! pgpdP6uhTaIrq.pgp

Re: [gentoo-dev] Linking Stage, building a ebuild

2011-12-01 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 12:22:30AM -0300, Willian Vale da Rocha wrote: I'm writing a ebuild for GNU Radio, just to learn how to write and i doesn't found any where(or i was looking for wrong) how to define a LDFLAGS for the linking stage. GNU Radio need this because they use their library. If

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs

2011-11-11 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 09:38:24AM -0500, Ian Stakenvicius wrote: OK, to clarify i'm just re-listing which packages ppl have spoken up for: On 11/11/11 06:38 AM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: app-misc/dsgui app-misc/klavaro dev-cpp/yaml-cpp - neurogeek dev-libs/softhsm - mschiff

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH scons-utils] Support setting common SCons arguments using myesconsargs.

2011-10-23 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 08:20:37PM +0200, Micha?? G??rny wrote: --- scons-utils.eclass | 33 + 1 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) ... +# @ECLASS-VARIABLE: myesconsargs +# @DEFAULT_UNSET +# @DESCRIPTION: +# List of package-specific options to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion for getting rid of udev

2011-10-12 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 09:09:24AM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote: On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 05:32:05AM +, Nathan Phillip Brink wrote You can already try out what using mdev instead of udev is like in Gentoo. Just add `sys-apps/busybox mdev' to /etc/portage/package.use, remerge busybox. You

Re: [gentoo-dev] Suggestion for getting rid of udev

2011-10-11 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 12:40:23AM -0400, Walter Dnes wrote: Hi all Recently, there was a firestorm on the gentoo-user list over the idea that udev would eventually require /usr to be on the same physical parition as /, or else use initramfs, which is its own can of worms. I'm not a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs due tanderson retirement

2011-09-13 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 08:31:33PM +0200, Pacho Ramos wrote: Due tanderson retirement the following packages need a new maintainer: dev-libs/check dev-libs/stfl net-libs/udns Thanks for taking them I'll take dev-libs/check. -- binki Look out for missing or extraneous apostrophes!

Re: [gentoo-dev] multilib setup

2011-09-12 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 03:55:49PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: as for no-multilib systems, lib64 will be the same, and lib will be symlinked to lib64. this will be easier i think to share files between multilib and non-multilib 64bit systems. Isn't this slightly more complicated than it

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: using /libexec

2011-09-07 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Wed, Sep 07, 2011 at 05:31:23PM -0400, Joshua Kinard wrote: Are there possibilities about breaking off just a small piece of openrc and putting that into /run (or /boot)? Enough of the core scripts so that it can find /usr and mount it before continuing? Isn't /run something that's

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Implicit system dependencies

2011-08-23 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 03:53:26AM +1000, Michael wrote: Also, on a related note, would it be appropriate to report the following undeclared deps, given that the package in question already has DEPEND for gtk+? * Checking app-arch/guitar-0.1.4 for undeclared dependencies *

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] gentoo-x86 migration to repo-per-package

2011-08-07 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Sat, Aug 06, 2011 at 04:13:52PM +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote: - tree generation is dynamic + easy to move packages around, their category is specified by the tree configuration, the repository the package lives in doesn't change, probably overlays, betagarden, graveyard, sunset,

Re: [gentoo-dev] demanual update (was: Don't use / when applying sed with CFLAGS)

2011-06-28 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Tue, Jun 28, 2011 at 10:24:26PM +0400, Peter Volkov wrote: ?? ??, 28/06/2011 ?? 12:23 -0400, Mike Frysinger ??: On Tuesday, June 28, 2011 02:54:03 Micha?? G??rny wrote: emake CC=$(tc-getCC) CFLAGS=${CFLAGS}... this is easily dangerous when it comes to packages (and many

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Tags (Was: RFC: split up media-sound/ category)

2011-06-24 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 11:20:40PM -0400, Wyatt Epp wrote: I bring this up because there are several packages with the same name and different qualification. Obviously, they'll have different tags because they're not the same thing, but neither should they share the same directory. So the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Tags (Was: RFC: split up media-sound/ category)

2011-06-24 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 08:57:47PM -0400, Wyatt Epp wrote: Tags are basically keywords you can use to describe packages, allowing you to easily search and explore your options based on what the packages actually does (if we want to get technical, anything that identifies a package is a sort of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: better policy for ChageLogs

2011-06-01 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Wed, Jun 01, 2011 at 04:15:31PM +0100, Markos Chandras wrote: On 01/06/2011 04:08 , Peter Volkov wrote: ?? ??, 30/05/2011 ?? 14:55 -0700, Brian Harring ??: The problem is, that's a *fuzzy* definition. Ok, let's start with something and then we'll add more items if

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-irc/oer, net-irc/oer-mysql

2011-05-13 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
# Nathan Phillip Brink bi...@gentoo.org (13 May 2011) # # Abandoned by upstream. QA issues, such as failing _FORTIFY_SOURCE # checks. Bugs 240918, 252000, 332111, 339545, 354493. # # Removal on 2011-07-12. net-irc/oer net-irc/oer-mysql -- binki Look out for missing or extraneous apostrophes

Re: [gentoo-dev] RDEPENDing on packages from overlays?

2011-04-23 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 04:02:24AM -0700, Zac Medico wrote: On 04/22/2011 11:05 PM, Eray Aslan wrote: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364445 https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=364401 Basically, there are requests to add packages to RDEPEND in virtual/mda and virtual/mta

Re: [gentoo-dev] Using Jabber for developer communication

2011-04-10 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 10:29:56PM -0300, Zhu Sha Zang wrote: Em 10-04-2011 08:54, George Prowse escreveu: Currently, research has told us that that the best format for communication is MSN It is a joke too, right? This idea of MSN is very much a joke. Noone would possibly support using

Re: [gentoo-dev] Bugzilla 4 migration

2011-03-08 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Tue, Mar 08, 2011 at 03:53:01PM +0100, Micha?? G??rny wrote: On Tue, 08 Mar 2011 16:41:08 +0200 Antoni Grzyma??a awa...@chopin.edu.pl wrote: On Tue, 8 Mar 2011 15:26:34 +0100, Micha? Grny wrote: On Mon, 07 Mar 2011 15:06:25 -0500 Olivier Cr??te tes...@gentoo.org wrote:

Re: [gentoo-dev] Packaging LSB symlinks for ld-linux.so

2011-01-31 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 04:14:47PM +0100, Vlastimil Babka wrote: Hi, when trying to bump sci-geosciences/googleearth to a 6 beta version [1], there's a problem with missing /lib/ld-lsb.so.3 file, which the binary somehow requires, and otherwise fails with a rather cryptic error message

Re: [gentoo-dev] MULTI_ABI support addition to main tree portage

2011-01-29 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Sat, Jan 29, 2011 at 06:03:10PM +0100, Pacho Ramos wrote: Hello I would like to know what is blocking this from landing main tree in the near future, as I reviewed: http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org/msg41737.html and looks like there wasn't major problems (at

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Removing .la files

2010-10-24 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Sun, Oct 24, 2010 at 09:57:33PM +, Duncan wrote: Enrico Weigelt posted on Sun, 24 Oct 2010 22:09:30 +0200 as excerpted: I'm doing some investigation on which .la files are still needed and which are not. In general, .la files only are in use by very few packages which use them to

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [funtoo] [bugzilla-daemon-abrp7r+bbdudnm+yrof...@public.gmane.org: [Bug 322157] [mail-filter/procmail] new ebuild + autocreate maildirs]

2010-07-11 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 06:03:49PM -0600, Ryan Hill wrote: On Thu, 8 Jul 2010 00:56:52 +0200 Enrico Weigelt weig...@metux.de wrote: Hi folks, YFYI: yet another of my ebuilds kicked-down. It's an improved version of procmail, which automatically creates missing maildir

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [Survey || RFC] autotools-utils.eclass

2010-06-02 Thread Nathan Phillip Brink
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 03:29:01PM +0200, Maciej Mrozowski wrote: On Wednesday 26 of May 2010 19:27:43 Mike Frysinger wrote: On Wednesday 26 May 2010 05:38:00 Maciej Mrozowski wrote: I've updated documentation, added example usage and option to keep libtool files (ltdl.so supposedly needs