).
--
Olivier Crête
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Wed, 2007-20-06 at 18:28 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Wednesday 20 June 2007, Olivier Crête wrote:
On Wed, 2007-20-06 at 17:19 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
the use of the binpkg is not an issue, it's the creation ... people
blindly creating tbz2's which could contain their sensitive
and RDEPEND on flash-support if any is
enabled.
--
Olivier Crête
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Fri, 2007-11-05 at 13:19 -0600, Jim Ramsay wrote:
Olivier Crête wrote:
On Fri, 2007-11-05 at 12:12 -0600, Jim Ramsay wrote:
Josh Saddler wrote:
Jim Ramsay wrote:
I suppose I could also propose:
4) netscape-flash just RDEPENDS on libflashsupport all the time.
It's
.
It would be much more clear to only use the ssl USE flag when it
actually affects ssl support.
The solution to this is use-based deps.. The short term workaround is to
use built_with_use.
--
Olivier Crête
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
option 1. Otherwise, if they'll always be together, then just put it in
the same package.
--
Olivier Crête
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
.
A combination of passing --disable-static to econf and INSTALL_MASK
should do it. That said, having a feature/use flag to enable static
library might not be such a good idea (and disable it on packages where
static libraries are needed).
--
Olivier Crête
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Developer
invasion!
Bienvenu à bord!
--
Olivier Crête
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Hahah, yes! - But /which/ House of Commons?!
I believe none of them is a great example of civility... (at least ours
isn't).
--
Olivier Crête
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
responsible for the extinction of the dinosaurs. Would that make you
happy?
Are you implying that he is the One True God ?
--
Olivier Crête
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
opt for 3, since it allows the council to keep on functioning
properly. Or maybe 3 if there is unanimous approuval from the council or
2 otherwise.
--
Olivier Crête
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
it redundant. I think
we should exclude changes to package.mask from that changelog otherwise
it will drown in noise.
--
Olivier Crête
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
and CC yourself on the bug.
Its also unmaintained upstream and is showing its age.
Its now masked and will be removed in 30 days if no one comes forward,
and becomes a new quasi-upstream.
--
Olivier Crête
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
On Sun, 2006-01-10 at 11:08 -0400, Olivier Crête wrote:
Hi,
There have been no release since June 2004, the newer versions have
p.masked since 2004. The older versions doesnt build. They have open
bugs #62182, #88929 and #101581.
I'll remove them on November 1st.
Gabber is gone.. All
On Sat, 2006-04-11 at 16:36 +0100, Christian Heim wrote:
Its my pleasure to introduce to you Hans de Graaff (also known as
graaff), our latest addition helping with emacs/xemacs.
Go Emacs! Go Emacs!
--
Olivier Crête
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Developer
signature.asc
Description
like this be a Firefox/Seamonkey extension instead ?
--
Olivier Crête
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Tue, 2006-24-10 at 21:57 -0400, Olivier Crête wrote:
On Fri, 2006-20-10 at 21:08 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I wrote an eselect module for choosing between the browser plugins from
net-www/gnash and net-www/netscape-flash, and I was wondering if it could
be included
On Sun, 2006-22-10 at 16:54 -0400, Patrick McLean wrote:
Petteri Räty wrote:
So please give dirtyepic the usual warm welcome.
Welcome Ryan, always nice to have another Canadian :)
Go Canooks!!
--
Olivier Crête
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
it to use it. Read the man
page. Otherwise yea it will crash.
--
Olivier Crête
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Hi,
I haven't updated it in years and no one has noticed. I guess no one
uses it. And I don't use it anymore either. Bug #67273 has been there
for a long time.
It is p.masked and will be removed on Nov 16 2006.
--
Olivier Crête
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description
Hi,
There have been no release since June 2004, the newer versions have
p.masked since 2004. The older versions doesnt build. They have open
bugs #62182, #88929 and #101581.
I'll remove them on November 1st.
--
Olivier Crête
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
with dmix and I
can keep aRts disabled. All KDE sounds are ogg files and when I play
them with mpg321, it just exits without producing any sound. I guess
the only thing left for me to use is mplayer?
You can use ogg123
--
Olivier Crête
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description
still believe we should reserve the regular directory for the real
multilib stuff, otherwise it will be very painful when we decide to
move. And continue to put the stopgap binary packages in /emul.
--
Olivier Crête
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
in North Hatley.
Our conspiracy is defintely growing.. I live in Montreal... We're like
5-6 in Quebec now!!
--
Olivier Crête
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
requires old drivers. There
is no valid combination of new and old.
Then you should probably has new drivers block old servers and new
servers block old drivers...
--
Olivier Crête
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gentoo Developer
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
legitimately utilize gtk/gtk2
Is there a legitimate reason to use gtk1 if the gtk2 support is useable?
Either way, there shouldnt be a gtk2 flag..
--
Olivier Crête
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Fri, 2006-10-02 at 10:33 +0100, Jakub Moc wrote:
Otherwise, I suggest to p.mask this in two weeks and then remove from
portage.
Is there any other useful gtk ldap browser in the tree ?
--
Olivier Crête
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
to libdir? They are all executables, not
libraries. Its in the same category as /usr/bin.
--
Olivier Crête
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
to lib/misc.. will need to modify a lot of gnome
package at least.
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2005-May/msg00240.html
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/05/msg00401.html
--
Olivier Crête
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message
1.5 GB inside /usr/lib ..
--
Olivier Crête
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
is at:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tester/debugedit-4.4.3-ebuild.tar.bz2
--
Olivier Crête
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
).
--
Olivier Crête
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
x86 Security Liaison
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
/imlate/
Ah yea, and I also tried my new imlate script on amd64 and it finds
about 50% more packages than the regular version..
We really need to form an x86 team...
--
Olivier Crête
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
x86 Security Liaison
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 03:09 +0200, Sven Wegener wrote:
And EVER automatically was E-VER for me, never had the idea to read it
as ever. Does that count as being addicted to Gentoo?
Yes it does
--
Olivier Crête
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
x86 Security Liaison
signature.asc
Description
/stage1-ppc64-2005.0.tar.bz2
18756 ./alpha/2005.0/stages/stage1-alpha-2005.0.tar.bz2
19468 ./ia64/2005.0/stages/stage1-ia64-2005.0.tar.bz2
168528 total
--
Olivier Crête
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
x86 Security Liaison
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
it or not.
Thanks,
Tony (Chainsaw).
--
Olivier Crête
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
x86 Security Liaison
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
101 - 136 of 136 matches
Mail list logo
