On Fri, 2006-01-06 at 23:55 +0100, Wernfried Haas wrote:
On Fri, Jan 06, 2006 at 11:25:57PM +0100, Tobias Scherbaum wrote:
Yo, Welcome Tobias!
Oh no, not another Tobias!
Isn't it a beautiful name? :P
Tobias
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sat, 2006-01-28 at 12:37 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please welcome Markus to the team.
... and once again a candidate for the one and only German conspiracy :)
Welcome aboard, Markus!
wkr,
Tobias
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
First of all, someone from infra/recruiters might please revoke my write
access to gentoo/xml/htdocs/news/gwn. I'm no longer interested in
contributing to the GWN.
I also believe that when posting an article or interview, a copy should
be sent to the relevant people to ensure that they are ok
Am Montag, den 09.03.2009, 10:12 +0100 schrieb Michael Haubenwallner:
On Sun, 2009-03-08 at 21:22 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
I think the idea of ebuilds as scripts showing directly how to build
software is a core part of the Gentoo build-system philosophy. This
proposal pushes
Michael Haubenwallner:
Hi people,
I've been cooking a thought for some time now, and now I'm inviting you
to have a look at and share your thoughts about it:
The title could be somehow like:
How to use Gentoo, the Meta Distribution to create my own
Enterprise
Mike Frysinger wrote:
This is your one-day friendly reminder ! The monthly Gentoo Council
meeting is tomorrow in #gentoo-council on irc.freenode.net. See the
channel topic for the exact time (but it's probably 2000 UTC).
If you're supposed to show up, please show up. If you're not
Would you please stop that? kthxbye.
wkr,
Tobias
Ioannis Aslanidis:
Ioannis Aslanidis (aslani...@gmail.com) wants to start sharing their
location with you on Google Latitude. You need to sign in to Latitude
with a Google Account (e.g., @gmail.com) and invite Ioannis Aslanidis.
To get
(Somewhat late, but here we go )
* PKG-PRETEND
critical
* SLOT-OPERATOR-DEPS
yes
* USE-DEP-DEFAULTS
critical
* DEFINED-PHASES
critical
* PROPERTIES
critical
* SRC-INSTALL
critical
* CONTROLLABLE-COMPRESS
critical
* DODOC
yes
* DOINS
yes
* ANY-USE
whatever
*
Am Freitag, den 01.05.2009, 22:33 +0300 schrieb Petteri Räty:
#gentoo-dev 20:19 @zmedico jmbsvicetto: it's only an issue for people
upgrading from less than portage-2.1.4, which is pretty rare nowadays
For the KDE team,
It's an issue for people who have packages in vdb emerged
Am Donnerstag, den 14.05.2009, 20:48 +0200 schrieb Thomas Sachau:
This is already done. darkside/idl0r did/do suggest sunrise to all
maintainer-wanted bugs, that meet
some specific criteria.
noticed that, and i'd like to give a thanks guys for doing so :)
But have to say, while hundreds of
And here we go, these are the ones I'd like to nominate:
* dev-zero, well because ... i'd like him to be on the council again!
* ulm because I think he's an excellent addition to the council
* amne, because I want him to stop slacking :P
that's it for now :)
wkr,
Tobias
Am Montag, den
Heya,
thanks for bringing this up!
Doug Goldstein wrote:
All,
The current council meetings have gotten completely out of hand for
weeks meetings have become nothing more then a continuation of the
senseless bicker-fest that have become the e-mail threads on GLEP54,
GLEP55, and EAPI-3
Tiziano Müller wrote:
EAPI 3: Short discussion of the progress
zmedico will provide an update on the progress of the implementation. Short
discussion of problems and implementation decisions if needed.
Guess that's a rather short topic. Nothing to
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Oh please no wiki.
Whatever. My requirements are quite simple: public accessible, no
accounts needed on 3rd party systems (like Google) to add feature
requests or comments and changes must be traceable. Using bugzilla fits
those criteria as well.
The problem for EAPI 3
Roy Bamford wrote:
What about the case where the new EAPI breaks backwards compatibility
with existing package managers, as would be the case with glep 55?
Its quite true that such changes can be introduced after a wait and
only upset late adoptors. By implementing the key feature of glep
Tiziano Müller wrote:
The people I'd like to nominate:
- dertobi123 ... for his solid comments, experience, common sense,
reliability
And I accept the nomination.
Tobias
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Petteri Räty wrote:
I think we agreed that we would send comments about the agenda before
the meeting. The agenda presented seems fine to me. I don't see a need
for doing any major votes in the last meeting.
ACKing the agenda, too.
I didn't started to get the deployment part of the
Denis Dupeyron wrote:
Thanks for the reminder, Doug.
Make sure to also check everybody's manifesto here:
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/elections/council-200906-nominees.xml
Just for the record - i did add my manifesto to the elections page
myself as that somehow got missed.
- Tobias
Ned Ludd wrote:
The devs have a voice one time of the year: when it comes time to vote.
But what about the rest of the year? What happens when the person you
voted for sucks? You are mostly powerless to do anything other than be
really vocal in what seems like a never ending battle. That needs
Alec Warner wrote:
What I'd like to see for sure is a formal rule on who can decide to
modify or change parts of glep 39. As it's the council's constitution
somehow, we have two options from my pov (besides that a former council
did decide the council itself can change it's rules):
- a
Mike Frysinger wrote:
here's an item that should be relatively quick to address: fix the typo in
GLEP 39 where this line is missing (it's been in the council homepage
forever):
Only Gentoo developers may be nominated
I'd like to add that requirement for proxies as well. Varied
Am Dienstag, den 15.12.2009, 23:36 -0100 schrieb Jorge Manuel B. S.
Vicetto:
nomination: December 17th to 30th
I'd like to nominate dev-zero.
- Tobias
--
Praxisbuch Nagios
http://www.oreilly.de/catalog/pbnagiosger/
https://www.xing.com/profile/Tobias_Scherbaum
signature.asc
Description:
Hell no, but ...
We have lots of quite understaffed areas, to sum up in a positive way.
Summing it up the negative way one might say, we have lots of areas were
users might get the idea Gentoo already is dead.
For example:
- hardened-sources are nowadays only available in an experimental
Am Samstag, den 03.04.2010, 02:37 -0700 schrieb Brian Harring:
On Sat, Apr 03, 2010 at 11:16:32AM +0200, Tobias Scherbaum wrote:
Hell no, but ...
Then avoid feeding the distrowatch trolls w/ sensational
subjects please ;)
oh, well ;)
We have lots of quite understaffed areas, to sum up
Am Samstag, den 03.04.2010, 11:26 +0200 schrieb Paweł Hajdan, Jr.:
For example:
- hardened-sources are nowadays only available in an experimental
overlay, lots of users keep asking what's happening to the
hardened-sources on both the -dev but also the -hardened mailinglist.
I recently
Am Samstag, den 03.04.2010, 11:46 +0200 schrieb Patrick Lauer:
We have lots of quite understaffed areas, to sum up in a positive way.
Summing it up the negative way one might say, we have lots of areas were
users might get the idea Gentoo already is dead.
So what are _you_ doing to make
Am Samstag, den 03.04.2010, 16:40 +0300 schrieb Dror Levin:
There is currently a wiki for gentoo at gentoo-wiki.com, which is
running MediaWiki, so it would be easiest to transfer the content if
we were to run the same software.
This should happen (if at all) on a per article basis imho.
Am Samstag, den 03.04.2010, 15:40 +0100 schrieb Roy Bamford:
First, we need some metrics - the first step to controlling anything is
to measure it.
So, how do you want to measure those metrics? I for one can't think of a
useful algorithm which helps to identify understaffed or orphaned areas.
Joshua Saddler wrote lots of:
Thanks for sh**ting on my efforts.
See, this is not about your personal efforts. I really do appreciate the
work and time you invest in improving both the docs and PR. But otoh try
to compare what the docs-team and PR did say 5 years ago and what they're
doing today
Am Mittwoch, den 02.06.2010, 09:18 +0200 schrieb Torsten Veller:
net-analyzer/nagios-check_logfiles
net-analyzer/nagircbot
net-analyzer/pnp4nagios
I'll take this packages.
- Tobias
--
Praxisbuch Nagios
http://www.oreilly.de/catalog/pbnagiosger/
https://www.xing.com/profile/Tobias_Scherbaum
Am Freitag, den 04.06.2010, 00:49 +0200 schrieb Ben de Groot:
From what I understand it is still being worked on,
but it moves forward very slowly. Maybe someone from the wiki project
could add some more up to date info?
Initially I was one of those who offered to help with the wiki project
Denis Dupeyron wrote:
It's my pleasure to introduce Timo Gurr (tgurr) who will join us as a
new developer. He will work primarily on KDE and printing.
Timo lives in Neckarsulm, Germany, and works as an IT technician in a
local city administration near his home. He finds his job very
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
chown root:nagios ${D}/usr/nagios || die Failed Chown of
${D}usr/nagios
chown -R root:nagios ${D}/usr/nagios/libexec || die Failed Chown of
${D}usr/nagios/libexec
chmod -R o-rwx ${D}/usr/nagios/libexec || die Failed Chmod of
Heya,
Andrea Barisani wrote:
Hi folks, I'm retiring.
Sorry to see you go - i'd like to especially thank you for your ldap+ssh
+lpk effort! thanks! :)
I was maintaining the following packages:
app-admin/tenshi (note: I'm upstream as well)
I can take a look at tenshi if noone else is
Am Montag, den 10.03.2008, 23:02 +0100 schrieb Lars Weiler:
* Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] [08/03/10 23:13 +0200]:
One of those people working on those weird paper weights. This time our
monkey comes from the world of alphas. Tobias hails from Germany (there
seems to be no end).
Mike Frysinger wrote:
net-ftp/ncftp
i can take this one
wkr,
Tobias
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 05-06-2008 02:35:16 -0700, Josh Saddler wrote:
Now that nominations are officially open, I nominate the current council
members (again):
I nominate:
dertobi123
Though I'm in favor of just re-electing the current council members as
they did a very good job in
Doug Goldstein wrote:
What is the benefit?
Regards,
There is none really. Allow all use flags to exist in metadata.xml. It's
really more of a clarification to the GLEP if this is allowed.
Agreed, it has no benefit at all plus would lead to some kind of useless
duplication of
Santiago M. Mola wrote:
I think that's all we need in order to know how were things when the
patch was added and if it needs to be pushed/tracked upstream, removed
in the next version of the package, etc.
Some of us already put these kind of headers, or at least an URL to
upstream bug or a
John Brooks wrote:
Random idea: How about a different bug assignee for maintainer-needed
packages with provided ebuilds/patches? Either something generic, or
try to go for something more category/package specific (herds, etc).
Lots of work for bugwranglers, though. There is a huge difference
Santiago M. Mola wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 12:02 AM, Tobias Scherbaum
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Santiago M. Mola wrote:
However, tracking the status of every patch since its inclusion in
portage until it's removed would be a huge work overhead... and I
doubt it's worthy.
I
Zac Medico wrote:
Does package.keywords seem like a good solution for the types of
problems it's meant to solve? Would anybody like to discuss any
alternative approaches?
I think it's a good and easy solution to the problem(s) solar described
in #55321. But as Marius [1] said this can become
Mark Loeser wrote:
I personally don't see why they should be allowed to stay part of our
communication channels where they have caused problems bad enough to get
them retired. With that being said, I think the same technical issues
come into play here as with banning someone from Gentoo
Mark Loeser wrote:
Lukasz Damentko [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
1. I'd like to ask Council to discuss possible reactions to our [...]
Due to their privacy policy I don't think we'll ever be able to get
adequate explanations from Freenode staff when our devs are banned.
I think that's a
Doug Goldstein wrote:
It seems Mr_Bones and I got a bit crazy and finished off the rest of the
tree, along with some help from jer.
Thanks to everyone that converted a package, and a double thanks to
anyone that converted a category.
GLEP 56 is now done.
Thanks Doug (and also everyone
Luca Barbato wrote:
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
Hi again.
Quoting Zac earlier in #gentoo-portage:
21:46 zmedico jmbsvicetto: I think we essentially have a spec already
that people can agree on. just take my draft and subtract the eapi*
functions and the gitweb unpack
Torsten Veller:
I guess some of you use spamassassin.
Does anyone volunteer to maintain it?
Search bugzilla for open bug-reports.
I (or much better net-mail) can take it.
Tobias
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Tue, 11 Nov 2008 18:45:32 -0500
Mark Loeser [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What are others feelings on this? What issues do you see with having
a wiki? Do you see anyway to resolve the issue you see with us
having a wiki?
What will policy on articles that are
Mark Loeser wrote:
Removing Stable Ebuilds
If an ebuild meets the time criteria above, and there are no technical issues
preventing stabilization, then the maintainer MAY choose to delete an older
version even if it is the most recent stable version for a particular arch.
What if this would
Josh Saddler wrote:
Long as we're discussing things to punt, here's some stuff to kick out
of the desktop profile:
and for the server profiles there's
mailwrapper - merely broken, nothing useful at all
Tobias
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Mauricio Lima Pilla wrote:
What are the nominees intending to do if they are elected? I miss the
manifests.
dev-zero and leio posted their manifests, they're available on the
elections webpage:
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/elections/council-200811-nominees.xml
Tobias
signature.asc
Jan Kundrát:
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
I have a very quick proposal: why don't we move the packages' homepage
in metadata.xml (since it's usually unique for all the versions)
I believe the reason was that HOMEPAGE might change with new versions
and that metadata.xml didn't
Matti Bickel wrote:
And while your proposal sounds more compliant to the DRY principle, i
would object it on the basis that it makes a single ebuild actually
harder to understand as you have to read (1) eclasses, (2) -base.ebuild
and (3) -version.ebuild.
That's quite exactly what I wanted to
Serkan Kaba wrote:
I don't know if there are others but I can give one specific example,
sun-{jdk,jre-bin} where homepage differs in SLOT's
1.4 pointing to http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/ , 1.5 to
http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/ , 1.6 to http://java.sun.com/javase/6/
and 1.7 will probably
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
Tobias Scherbaum [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But what about additional slot or version attributes like
link type=homepage slot=1.4http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2//link
(or a version attribute)? If slot and version aren't specified they'd be
interpreted
Marius Mauch wrote:
So I guess that wraps it up. It's been a nice ride most of the time,
but now it's time for me to leave the Gentoo train.
... and time for another sad to see you go. :(
I'd link to thank you for contributions to Portage - but also for
being a very active forums user as well.
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 14:47 Mon 01 Dec , Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Please give the OK on the following, assuming no objections crop up
before then:
* [RFC] Label profiles with EAPI for compatibility checks (revised)
Thilo Bangert wrote:
Now what do people think about extending metadata.xml so that you
could have these
bugs filed automatically when there are no open bugs? Something like
a auto-stable-request enabled=true/
element with the DTD setting the default as true and you could just
use
Matsuu Takuto (matsuu) wrote:
matsuu 09/01/02 16:19:02
Modified: ChangeLog use.local.desc
Log:
Adding local use flags for app-i18n/ibus-table-{erbi,wubi,zhengma}.
Please add local use flags to metadata.xml ... see GLEP 56 for
reference.
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Thu, 22 Jan 2009, Tobias Scherbaum wrote:
- PMS, bug #250077: Do we need to get involved in this? (-dev)
We haven't been asked to get involved, therefore we don't need to.
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/59321/focus=59324
well, http
Alec Warner wrote:
Why do you not tend to commit news or approve things?
PR@ is a nghtmare of spam and what I'll term 'crap.' having real
things marked as such with informative subjects would be useful.
having some kind of rotation would be useful
having some kind of vague 'we will read
Markus Ullmann wrote:
+# Markus Ullmann jo...@gentoo.org (31 Jan 2009)
+# Mask for removal in 30 days (found its way into mainline kde as
kde-base/ksudoku)
+games-puzzle/ksudoku
+
Wouldn't it make much more sense to package move ksudoku then?
Tobias
signature.asc
Description: Dies
Am Mittwoch, den 18.02.2009, 12:26 +0200 schrieb Petteri Räty:
Michael Sterrett wrote:
I added a prepalldocs function to eutils.eclass to provide the
functionality. It implements the
behavior of the current stable sys-apps/portage-2.1.6.4.
Have fun,
Michael Sterrett
-Mr.
Hello folks,
it's been a while since I stepped back as a Gentoo-developer (about 1 1/4
years) and in that time I did exactly zero.
Good news to see you back in action, Benni! :)
I hereby request every person make suggestions. Please note, that Dolphin
will
be a CLI-based CD only, so
I think this is a fun way to build some team spirit.
Thoughts?
I think it's a *very* bad idea - both from a QA and a team spirit
point of view.
Instead of having such commitfests and bounties for the one who
managed to get as many as possible commits done within - say - 5 minutes
I'd rather
Living in Weimar and studying CS in Jena, he is going to join the German
conspiracy. He is also a member of the local CCC there. Non-computer
hobbies are reading (science, hitchhiker up and down, other novels,
but of course also computer-related) and adrenaline sports such as table
tennis.
Am Freitag, den 27.10.2006, 22:32 +0200 schrieb Christian Heim:
Christian is currently studying mechanical engineering at the RWTH Aachen
(that's in Germany!) and has been an arch tester for the x86-herd for quite
some time - that's about 3 months.
Welcome aboard, Christian! See you at LWE
Am Sonntag, den 05.11.2006, 20:08 +0100 schrieb Christian Heim:
On Sunday, 05. November. 2006 19:02, John Jawed wrote:
Two patches which allow a user to bypass files created with doman and
dodoc in FEATURES:
FEATURES=noman nodoc emerge -av foo
http://jawed.name/dev/gentoo/nodoc.patch
I want to propose a Maintainer Timeout such as FreeBSD.
If a maintainer or herd does not fix (or assign/comment) a bug in a
reasonable amount of time (2 weeks? 3 month?) any developer can fix it
(or a pre established group of developers such as QA)
There's a little difference between does not
Joseph Jezak wrote:
I like this thread!
Indeed! This thread is fun - and fun is what Gentoo should be about.
The PPC team had a bugday yesterday and managed to get almost 70
bugs off of our list of open issues! Thanks to nixnut, mabi,
dertobi123 and ndansmith for helping to clean up the bug
Bryan Østergaard wrote:
Good luck to all of you and may Gentoo development be as much fun for you as
it used to be for me.
Just as Marius already said, I usually also don't participate in the
goodbye and thanks for all the fish-threads - but this one is kinda
special. Bryan is one of the few
Konstantin V. Arkhipov wrote:
i'm too busy with real life atm, is there anyone willing to help with
bind's
maintaining?
What's the current state of both packages? i.e. lots of open bugs? How
much attention do these packages need?
wkr,
Tobias
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein
Jakub Moc wrote:
Tobias Scherbaum napsal(a):
Konstantin V. Arkhipov wrote:
i'm too busy with real life atm, is there anyone willing to help with
bind's
maintaining?
What's the current state of both packages? i.e. lots of open bugs?
Not really... 8 bugs altogether, 2
Denis Dupeyron wrote:
Tobias tells us his hobbies were computers, programming, reading,
meeting friends, and sleeping. Which means it's now down to computers
and programming only.
So please, everybody, give a warm non-welcome to Tobias.
Congrats! :)
Und mach nix kaputt :P
Tobias
Jakub Moc wrote:
This ebuild has a security bug open for almost one year (Bug 142817),
plus lots of other bugs as well.
If you are interested, please see http://tinyurl.com/32webs
I'll take a look at it.
wkr,
Tobias
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter
Markus Ullmann wrote:
nominating:
others are nominated already ;)
d'oh, forgot fellow
dertobi123
Thanks, I accept the nomination.
Tobias
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
Heya,
Christina Fullam write:
Most who have accepted havent told us why we should vote for them. While
that information is not required perhaps it should be if we are to make
intelligent votes - sorry this isnt a popularity contest so give us some
content to review.
I put my little manifesto
Christian Heim wrote:
It's my pleasure to introduce to you Christian Hoffmann (also known as hoffie
on IRC), our latest addition joining the PHP herd.
Christian is joining us from Bamberg (which is about 60km north of Nuremberg,
which happens to be in southen Germany), where he's
Hi,
Am Dienstag, den 13.07.2010, 13:06 -0400 schrieb Richard Freeman:
I've seen this at work quite a bit. I've also seen an elegant solution
that works moderately well. The minutes of the meeting are taken in
realtime during the meeting by whoever will take it, and this is shared
with
79 matches
Mail list logo
