Kalin KOZHUHAROV wrote:
yes, I figured out that x86-installcd-2006.0 is the Gentoo 2006.0
Minimal install CD for x86 or is it... will any n00b figure it out?
If a n00b can't figure it out, I would suggest him start from Read The
Fine Handbook
Mike Frysinger wrote:
as part of my on going effort to make the glibc experience suck less, ive
decided to kill USE=userlocales and /etc/locales.build aspects.
but then it will suck (in) more stuff into /usr/lib/locale/, no ?
regards,
Tuan Van
PS: nice header ;)
...
User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1
Mike Frysinger wrote:
this is because your /etc/locales.gen isnt configured thus the default is to
generate *all* locales
can you magically migrate the existing /etc/locales.build to
/etc/locales.gen?
regards,
Tuan
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Carsten Lohrke wrote:
RDEPEND=cvs? ( dev-util/cvs )
svn? ( dev-util/subversion )
!cvs? ( ! svn? ( dev-util/cvs ) )
and I also saw something like below without cvs USE flag:
RDEPEND=svn? ( dev-util/subversion ) !svn? ( dev-util/cvs )
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Daniel Goller wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
The following packages require a new maintainer, some might just be
absorbed into their herds w/o a direct maintainer leaving them to the
teams maintaining those herds, others might face extinction w/o a direct
maintainer.
The other day spyderous was looking for a tool to remove extra .po
that he doesn't need. I recommended him to set LINGUAS in make.conf.
Then I realized some package doesn't respect that variable (ie eject)
Would it be better (easier) to have portage removes those extra
locales in
Mike Frysinger wrote:
wtf is /usr/share/config for ?
kde-env covers that one.
Tuan
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Paul de Vrieze wrote:
I'm proud to announce the arival of a future developer. His name is Tom. He
arived last monday on 10:22 am (UTC+02). I and my wife will take care of
mentoring him to full developership ;-).
In the meantime, he's got his own album on
http://www.cs.ru.nl/~pauldv/tom/
Jakub Moc wrote:
Ser Gio wrote:
Hello,
Why does x11-libs/gtk+-2.8.19 has the X useflag? The ebuild doesn't
look like it's using it.
thanks,
Sérgio
Because virtualx.eclass has it in IUSE and the ebuild inherits it.
I hate it when this happens.
I have an ebuild inherits perl-app. It
Mike Frysinger wrote:
thanks to solar and yoswink we have a xml version now:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~vapier/council-2006-nominees.xml
please update above link for rl03 and wolf31o2 ( unless he has changed
his mind). snipped from -core . core isn't archived so I cutpaste the
header here hope
Stuart Herbert wrote:
Hi Mike,
On 8/1/06, Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i'm tired of looking at this package, anyone care about this thing enough to
be its maintainer ?
-mike
I'll take it, if no-one else wants it.
Best regards,
Stu
so you are not leaving then :)
Tuan
--
Mike Frysinger wrote:
since i refuse to use UTF8 can someone verify that nano-1.3.7 is
broken/working in this respect ?
-mike
WFM with vi_VN.UTF-8
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Luis F. Araujo wrote:
Hello everyone,
A few days ago i glanced over package.mask , and i was surprised
about how many non-existent ebuild/packages entries are there.
please adjust your script.
=cat/foo-1.2 is valid even though foo-1.2 is no longer in the tree. I
looked at the top 4 line in
R Hill wrote:
I think that a lot of people use stage 1 because they're under the impression
that they have to in order to change their CHOST on default-linux from
i386-pc-linux-gnu to i686-pc-linux-gnu. And unless something has changed
recently, to get an NPTL glibc they _do_ have to make
14 matches
Mail list logo
