[gentoo-dev] TINDERBOX and CI updates: installed packages and commit that causes rebuild

2021-05-04 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
Hello all, I would like to send an update about what recently added in the tinderbox/ci systems. At the begin of the build log, the commit SHA that causes the build is pointed out. This is useful in cases like: 1) There is a commit about package A 2) Package A needs package B as a depend 3)

[gentoo-dev] CI and be CC'ed in a bug report

2021-05-03 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
Hello, I've noticed that it's been in vogue lately say "as you were asked many times" when there is something to say. Well, this often (always?) happens without a reference but I don't care. As asked by sam, CI should CC people that are breaking stuff with their commits, see:

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] [GURU] Bug mail now directed to guru-bugs@g.o

2021-04-27 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
On martedì 27 aprile 2021 10:12:09 CEST Michał Górny wrote: > not to mention someone suddenly starting to file such a large > number of bugs without any heads up. Here are the heads up: https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/ 9dcfdcd82b774ac812bdb1e7b7fbd396

Re: [gentoo-dev] Continuous integration on GURU

2021-04-22 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
On giovedì 22 aprile 2021 15:45:11 CEST Theo Anderson wrote: > Hi Agostino, > > After some discussion in IRC we've agreed to have the maintainer of > the respective packages be assigned to the bug with guru@g.o be CC'd. > Where no maintainer exists for a package guru@g.o remains as the >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Continuous integration on GURU

2021-04-22 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
Thanks for all feedback. Please discuss all points internally (branch, email, trackers and so on) and send me an email with all changes you would like to have. Agostino

Re: [gentoo-dev] Continuous integration on GURU

2021-04-22 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
On giovedì 22 aprile 2021 14:59:00 CEST Ionen Wolkens wrote: > And, even if you don't see it like that, someday someone may want > to go on a fixing spree using those trackers (may it be for ::guru > or ::gentoo) but will keep seeing them mixed up together. You can do it as wel by doing a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Continuous integration on GURU

2021-04-22 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
On giovedì 22 aprile 2021 12:02:20 CEST Michał Górny wrote: > Well, I suppose scanning the dev branch would be preferable over > the master branch. In reality, they are usually only a few hours apart > but it might be useful to know of new breakage in dev before it's merged > to master. > > It

Re: [gentoo-dev] Continuous integration on GURU

2021-04-22 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
On giovedì 22 aprile 2021 12:22:00 CEST Theo Anderson wrote: > On the subject of many bugs, there are now almost 150 open bugs > assigned to g...@gentoo.org. With this has come quite an email avalanche > for which I think people must have set up mail filters by now. I > imagine this means that

Re: [gentoo-dev] Continuous integration on GURU

2021-04-22 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
On giovedì 22 aprile 2021 12:25:50 CEST Michał Górny wrote: > On Thu, 2021-04-22 at 11:59 +0200, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I would like to let you know that the CI is now able to work with > > overlays. > > > > Since Guru is pretty ac

[gentoo-dev] Continuous integration on GURU

2021-04-22 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
Hello, I would like to let you know that the CI is now able to work with overlays. Since Guru is pretty active I took advantage of this situation to implement and test the CI Atm it has been configured to work with master branch. I don't know how much is useful scan the dev branch since a

Re: [gentoo-dev] [TINDERBOX] Testing guru

2021-04-08 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
On martedì 6 aprile 2021 17:51:19 CEST Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > Hello, > > the tinderbox is testing the packages into guru overlay. > Please expect related bugs. > If you have any objections, please let me know > > Agostino @guru-committers: please use "repoman

[gentoo-dev] [TINDERBOX] Testing guru

2021-04-06 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
Hello, the tinderbox is testing the packages into guru overlay. Please expect related bugs. If you have any objections, please let me know Agostino

[gentoo-dev] Non-maintainer commits and CI

2021-01-07 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
Hello, it happens frequently that CI discovers failure(s) in non-maintainer commits. The most striking examples are maintainer-needed, proxy-maint and general pull request where who made the change has no visibility on the new bug. Do you think that is a good idea to CC everyone involved in

Re: [gentoo-dev] [TINDERBOX] A round with dev-lang/python-exec[-native-symlinks]

2020-12-29 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
On martedì 29 dicembre 2020 13:03:07 CET Michał Górny wrote: > @ago, could you make sure that the tinderbox tells people to read up > on the tracker? I added the note. However the first thing I would to do in reports like this is at least click on the tracker bug. -- Agostino

[gentoo-dev] [TINDERBOX] A round with dev-lang/python-exec[-native-symlinks]

2020-12-29 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
Hello, as requested by mgorny, the tinderbox is doing a round with dev-lang/python- exec[-native-symlinks]. Please expect related bugs. The tracker is at: https://bugs.gentoo.org/762406 -- Agostino

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Discontinuing LibreSSL support?

2020-12-28 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
On lunedì 28 dicembre 2020 09:56:19 CET Michał Górny wrote: > I would like to propose that we stop patching > packages, discontinue support for it and last rite it. +1 -- Agostino

[gentoo-dev] Please close bugs when a commit fixes it

2020-12-03 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
Hello, I noticed that people uses "repoman commit -b" and bugs remain opened. In case of test failures, CI does not run tests if there are already opened bugs about that so it is unable to catch if your commit really fixed the issue. Thank you

Re: [gentoo-dev] A feedback about the CI bug reporting system

2020-11-09 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
On lunedì 9 novembre 2020 13:13:19 CET Marek Szuba wrote: > I think this might be the case of a "silent majority, vocal minority" > scenario. For the record: I for one have found your tinderbox bugs very > useful, not in the least because you test unusual configurations my own > build testing does

Re: [gentoo-dev] A feedback about the CI bug reporting system

2020-11-07 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
Hello Thomas, On sabato 7 novembre 2020 17:06:56 CET Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > I have to second what other already said. > > Dropping bugs and forcing maintainer to review and spend time to check > if there is a problem and what was the reported problem at all creates > more work. And I

Re: [gentoo-dev] A feedback about the CI bug reporting system

2020-11-07 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
On venerdì 6 novembre 2020 08:21:39 CET Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > Hello all, > > 6 months have been passed after the CI system started to file bug reports. > ~ 4700 bugs have been submitted > > We _know_ that atm is not possible to set a specific summary, instead a > ge

Re: [gentoo-dev] A feedback about the CI bug reporting system

2020-11-07 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
IN REPLY to Aaron Bauman that didn't keep me CC'ed as requested: >Is this coming from the same individual who would complain when security >bugs were not filled out properly in the summary? So, take a dose of >your own medicine here. People prefer usable reports that allow them to >solve

Re: [gentoo-dev] A feedback about the CI bug reporting system

2020-11-07 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
On sabato 7 novembre 2020 07:15:31 CET Robin H. Johnson wrote: > Can you please tell us what you need to let others contribute to > improving the quality of the reports from your CI system? Hello Robin, I don't understand why in general people focus on what is missing into a simple script that

Re: [gentoo-dev] A feedback about the CI bug reporting system

2020-11-06 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
IN REPLY TO Michał Górny that didn't keep me CC'ed as requested: >I do disagree with your presumption that this needs to be automated. >The whole point behind providing a service is that you should be ready >to dedicate *your* time into the service. However, we keep feeling that >you assume that

Re: [gentoo-dev] A feedback about the CI bug reporting system

2020-11-06 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
On venerdì 6 novembre 2020 09:18:50 CET Joonas Niilola wrote: > Would it be possible for "someone" to figure it out, if you made your > tinderbox scripts/code public? ;) Hate to say it, but toralf does pretty > good job here, so it could be better. As stated multiple times, toralf said that the

[gentoo-dev] A feedback about the CI bug reporting system

2020-11-05 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
Hello all, 6 months have been passed after the CI system started to file bug reports. ~ 4700 bugs have been submitted We _know_ that atm is not possible to set a specific summary, instead a generic summary is used in case of compile failures and test failures. There are also some documented

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: Standard build environment variables

2020-06-29 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
On domenica 28 giugno 2020 14:18:23 CEST Michael Orlitzky wrote: > To avoid these issues, I suggest creating a list of "Gentoo environment > variables" in the devmanual with descriptions of how they should be used > and pointers to the references (for why we chose that meaning). That way > a user

[gentoo-dev] Add more toolchain variables to emerge --info

2020-05-28 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=722456 What is your opinion? -- Agostino

[gentoo-dev] Stabilizations and src_test

2020-04-12 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
Hello all, If you work on the stabilization workflow you may have noticed that: - There are people that rant if you don't run src_test against their packages; - There are people that rant if you open a test failure bug against their packages and you block the stabilization. So, unless there

[gentoo-dev] Last-rites: app-admin/hardening-check

2019-10-18 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
# Agostino Sarubbo (2019-10-18) # Superseded by app-admin/checksec # Removal in 30 days. app-admin/hardening-check

[gentoo-dev] Re: EAPI 2 must die

2019-06-06 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
On giovedì 6 giugno 2019 08:25:54 CEST Luca Barbato wrote: > Anybody has hardware to test it? I can do it on timberdoodle. Agostino

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Last rites: dev-db/pgadmin4

2018-10-26 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
-db/pgadmin3 I guess there is a typo in the subject. -- Agostino Sarubbo Gentoo Linux Developer

[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Future of gentoo's stable and unstable trees: what are your thoughts?

2017-07-25 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
number of the stable packages on those arches 3) Make a more visible list (like this list in term of visibility:https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/output.html) of the arches-dependent bugs so that everyone can contribute to maintain alive the exotic arches. -- Agostino Sarubbo Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] taking a break from arches stabilization

2017-07-11 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
3) Make a more visible list( like a list here in term of visibility:https://qa-reports.gentoo.org/output/gentoo-ci/output.html) of the arches-dependent bugs so that everyone can contribute to maintain alive the exotic arches. If is not our interest to maintain those alive, just ignore my proposal. -- Agostino Sarubbo Gentoo Linux Developer

[gentoo-dev] taking a break from arches stabilization

2017-07-10 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
sparc and ia64 to ~arch, go ahead, I have no objections. I will take a break also from amd64 and x86...let's see how things will change. -- Agostino Sarubbo Gentoo Linux Developer

[gentoo-dev] About ALLARCHES

2017-01-24 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
We are working to provide some tools for the stabilization process. Unfortunately, there isn't atm something able to manage the requests with the ALLARCHES keyword, So, *everyone* with the commit access can keyword for all after a stabilization/keyword happened at least for one arch.

[gentoo-dev] The changes about the stabilization process - part 2

2017-01-10 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
Hello All, this message is an update of: https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/4b2ef0e9aa7588224b8ae799c5fe31fa What is changed in the meantime: 1) All operations on the bugzilla, about the sanity-check and so on are done with the account stable-...@gentoo.org So, if you want to

[gentoo-dev] The changes about the stabilization process

2016-12-25 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
tending this message as a sort of announcement to invite everyone to port their stable requests. I guess there isn't much to discuss here. If you don't like some of the changes that have been done, please open a specific thread about. Thanks. -- Agostino Sarubbo Gentoo Linux Developer

[gentoo-dev] ALLARCHES and the maintainer action(s)

2015-09-19 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/5d96b51ced1d1ed126951f117c828482 -- Agostino Sarubbo Gentoo Linux Developer

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Git Migration: go-live!

2015-08-09 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
in the config ? I'm asking just for have an up-to-date documentation, and maybe add all the notes there. Thanks. [1]: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Gentoo_git_workflow -- Agostino Sarubbo Gentoo Linux Developer

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: kde-base/kdepim-icons/

2015-08-09 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
. -- Agostino Sarubbo Gentoo Linux Developer

[gentoo-dev] about the stable requests

2015-01-31 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
Looks like everyone is file stable requests with own rules or better to say is without common rules. I'd like to document a sort of best-practice(s) on our wiki. Who want to partecipate? -- Agostino Sarubbo Gentoo Linux Developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Enable format-security in the dev profiles

2014-07-21 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
-Werror instead of only - Wformat. -- Agostino Sarubbo Gentoo Linux Developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Enable format-security in the dev profiles

2014-07-21 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
This is fine for me too. -- Agostino Sarubbo Gentoo Linux Developer

[gentoo-dev] Enable format-security in the dev profiles

2014-07-20 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
Hello, I'd like to enable by default format-security at least in the dev profiles. Thought? References: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=259417 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Format-Security-FAQ -- Agostino Sarubbo Gentoo Linux Developer

[gentoo-dev] Re: stabilizing libraries without testing reverse deps

2013-09-30 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
This is a delicate point. If you look at the policy, it says to test few rdeps. The arch tester is in charge to test the packages on his architecture. These type of failures are _not_ architecture dependant. So, instead of have 10 ATs that are testing the same rdeps, seems logic that the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Move m68k, sh, s390 to ~arch

2013-09-24 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
for the commits, so I really don't understand what you mean. -- Agostino Sarubbo Gentoo Linux Developer

[gentoo-dev] Move m68k, sh, s390 to ~arch

2013-09-23 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
Hello, the council has decided[1] to drop m68k, sh, s390 to unstable. If someone has something to say about, this is the last opportunity or in few days I will start to mark them as ~arch. [1]: https://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/council/meeting-logs/20130917-summary.txt -- Agostino Sarubbo

[gentoo-dev] Improve the security of the default profile

2013-09-05 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
Hello, during an irc debate, me and other people just noticed that the default profile could use more flags to enhance the security. An hint is here: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/ToolChain/CompilerFlags Please argue about what we _don't_ use. Note: please CC me in your response. -- Agostino

Re: [gentoo-dev] Improve the security of the default profile

2013-09-05 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
documentation would suffice. Do you intend to discuss that flag or more generally any security flag? I just want to point out the thread because other people will have something to say about. -- Agostino Sarubbo Gentoo Linux Developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Improve the security of the default profile

2013-09-05 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
any security flag? both, let's talk the toolchain guys about. -- Agostino Sarubbo Gentoo Linux Developer

[gentoo-dev] The status of the 'minor' arches in gentoo

2013-02-17 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
]: http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/#doc_chap2 [4]: http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/handbook/handbook- mips.xml?style=printablefull=1 -- Agostino Sarubbo / ago -at- gentoo.org Gentoo Linux Developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] The status of the 'minor' arches in gentoo

2013-02-17 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/base/index.xml#doc_chap4 I don't see project page for: m68k, sh, s390 20:41 ago expn m68k 20:41 willikins m68k = vapier, 20:41 ago expn sh 20:42 willikins sh = vapier,matsuu,armin76,ago, 20:42 ago expn s390 20:42 willikins s390 = vapier,armin76,ago, -- Agostino Sarubbo / ago

Re: [gentoo-dev] The status of the 'minor' arches in gentoo

2013-02-17 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
=CONFIRMEDbug_status=IN_PROGRESSv1=ia64%40gentoo.orgproduct=Gentoo%20Linuxlist_id=1560892 I don't see big queue for those arches. -- Agostino Sarubbo / ago -at- gentoo.org Gentoo Linux Developer

Re: [gentoo-dev] The status of the 'minor' arches in gentoo

2013-02-17 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
On Sunday 17 February 2013 13:14:28 Alec Warner wrote: It is not clear to me why you would email the -dev list about these arches, vapier is pretty responsive over email and irc. I don't guess is a good idea have a private conversation and then drop an arch... -- Agostino Sarubbo / ago

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last time touched bugs by year

2013-02-14 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
need to see maintainer-wanted stuff.. -- Agostino Sarubbo / ago -at- gentoo.org Gentoo Linux Developer

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] please sign your manifests

2013-02-13 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
sign. If someone know how to do it, please let me know. -- Agostino Sarubbo / ago -at- gentoo.org Gentoo Linux Developer

[gentoo-dev] Kernel calls gcc directly: fine?

2012-08-12 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
from the tracker[1], but this is for packages/ebuild. Should this bug block that tracker or it is invalid? [1]: https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=cc-directly -- Agostino Sarubbo / ago -at- gentoo.org Gentoo/AMD64 Arch Security Liaison GPG: 0x7CD2DC5D signature.asc Description

Re: [gentoo-dev] news item: upgrading to postfix-2.9

2012-07-17 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
On Tuesday 17 July 2012 13:19:25 Eray Aslan wrote: I'd like to commit the following news item on 2012-07-21. Any comments? Imho, no need a news for it. emerge -DuN world;revdep-rebuild;dispatch-conf is what you normally do. -- Agostino Sarubbo / ago -at- gentoo.org Gentoo/AMD64 Arch Security

Re: [gentoo-dev] euscan GSoC project - requesting feedback

2012-07-09 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
think about? -- Agostino Sarubbo / ago -at- gentoo.org Gentoo/AMD64 Arch Security Liaison GPG: 0x7CD2DC5D signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] About what would be included in EAPI5

2012-06-16 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
:) maybe https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=174380 ? -- Agostino Sarubboago -at- gentoo.org Gentoo/AMD64 Arch Security Liaison GPG: 0x7CD2DC5D signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Repoman check before file stable request

2012-06-13 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
will not commit anything. You can see only what happens if you go ahead without -p. Anyway, the idea is: check the other(s) ~arch depend(s) before file stable request in any method that you prefer. -- Agostino Sarubboago -at- gentoo.org Gentoo/AMD64 Arch Security Liaison GPG: 0x7CD2DC5D

[gentoo-dev] Repoman check before file stable request

2012-06-11 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
repoman commit -p -m foo In this manner we will save a lot of time for us. Thanks in advance. -- Agostino Sarubboago -at- gentoo.org Gentoo/AMD64 Arch Security Liaison GPG: 0x7CD2DC5D signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Repoman check before file stable request

2012-06-11 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
On Monday 11 June 2012 15:42:25 Agostino Sarubbo wrote: In this manner we will save a lot of time for us. Thanks in advance. s/we/you Anyway, from irc, seems is not very 'clear' what I meant. I suggested to run repoman to see if are required more packages instead of what you think

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Enable FEATURES=userpriv usersandbox by default?

2012-05-29 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
think that it would be reasonable to have it enabled by default. Objections? I'm using usersync since a long time, how about add it too? -- Agostino Sarubboago -at- gentoo.org Gentoo/AMD64 Arch Security Liaison GPG: 0x7CD2DC5D signature.asc Description: This is a digitally

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: new global USE flag: jit

2012-05-14 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
usage inside Qt x11-libs/qt-script:jit - Enables JIT for Javascript usage inside Qt x11-libs/qt-webkit:jit - Enable JavaScriptCore just-in-time compiler for faster JavaScript execution -Alexandre. +1 -- Agostino Sarubboago -at- gentoo.org Gentoo/AMD64 Arch Security Liaison

Re: [gentoo-dev] Testing request for =sys-apps/dbus-1.5.12 and =dev-python/dbus-python-1.1.0 before entering ~arch

2012-05-11 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
On Friday 11 May 2012 17:56:27 Samuli Suominen wrote: I'm planning on shipping these in ~arch. Give it a try and report in case of problems. Thanks, Samuli Will be done for amd64 in the next days ;) -- Agostino Sarubboago -at- gentoo.org Gentoo/AMD64 Arch Security Liaison

Re: [gentoo-dev] About dropping webapps-unmaintained alias

2012-04-21 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
-- Agostino Sarubboago -at- gentoo.org Gentoo/AMD64 Arch Security Liaison GPG: 0x7CD2DC5D signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Is gcc-4.7.0 going to be in portage tree anytime soon?

2012-04-17 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
-- Agostino Sarubboago -at- gentoo.org Gentoo/AMD64 Arch Security Liaison GPG: 0x7CD2DC5D signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.14 for stable

2012-04-10 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
On Tuesday 10 April 2012 15:35:39 Mike Frysinger wrote: there's one known bug (with a patch posted), so if you guys have anything that'd block glibc-2.14 for stable, nows' the time to file the bugs (and mark it a blocker of 370409). -mike I'd say to proceed directly in 393477 -- Agostino

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc-2.14 for stable

2012-04-10 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
. -- Agostino Sarubboago -at- gentoo.org Gentoo/AMD64 Arch Security Liaison GPG: 0x7CD2DC5D signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Can we get PIE on all SUID binaries by default, por favor?

2012-01-23 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
: fno-strict-overflow -fPIE with gcc-hardenednopie you have: fno-strict-overflow -fstack-protector-all with gcc-hardenednopiessp you have: -fno-strict-overflow -- Agostino Sarubboago -at- gentoo.org Gentoo/AMD64 Arch Security Liaison GPG: 0x7CD2DC5D signature.asc Description

[gentoo-dev] How help in arch testing work

2012-01-18 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
qlist -e $@ | xargs scanelf -L -n -q -F '%n #F' | tr , ' ' | xargs qfile -Cv | sort -u | awk '{print $1}' | uniq -- Agostino Sarubboago -at- gentoo.org Gentoo/AMD64 Arch Security Liaison GPG: 0x7CD2DC5D signature.asc Description: This is a digitally

Re: [gentoo-dev] How help in arch testing work

2012-01-18 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
in arches like sparc/ia64 where only people like armin76 works =) -- Agostino Sarubboago -at- gentoo.org Gentoo/AMD64 Arch Security Liaison GPG: 0x7CD2DC5D signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Re: [gentoo-dev] making the stable tree more up-to-date

2011-12-16 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
On Friday 16 December 2011 11:42:15 justin wrote: Hi, I really like that you open all those bugs. But it makes no sense to add arches after a time out. Personally, I agree with have more stable packages in tree, but I just point out one thing. If me, or another arch tester find ebuild

Re: [gentoo-dev] making the stable tree more up-to-date

2011-12-16 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
On Friday 16 December 2011 06:10:13 Anthony G. Basile wrote: Does your script do any checking on the quality of the ebuild, eg that it respects C/LDFLAGS. If so, that's useful and would help package maintainers to better prepare their ebuilds for stabilization. Unfortunately no. For LDFLAGS