Re: [gentoo-dev] "Not a git repository" error on ebuild

2017-11-07 Thread Alan McKinnon
the parent directories): .git* > GOGC=off go install -ldflags "-X main.version=" > make: Leaving directory > '/tmp/portage/net-proxy/fabio-1.5.2/work/fabio-1.5.2/src/github.com/fabiolb/fabio > <http://github.com/fabiolb/fabio>' >>>> Source compiled. > -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Categories for GUI stuff x11 and wayland

2017-09-05 Thread Alan McKinnon
; also serves as that is what wayland and X11 have in common. It's a long unwieldy name and the "-" might trip over hidden naming assumptions. Given a vote, I'd vote for "xui". Second choice is to stick with "x11-" as it will take a very long time for all users to forget what x11 is and how wayland relates -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Restricted version of gentoo-dev mailing list

2017-05-24 Thread Alan McKinnon
eople as worthless nuisances. You are annoyed by someone or something, that much has been obvious for a long time now. I can assure you, Walter is not the correct target for your annoyance. Please deal with the correct source. -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] Reverse use of Python/Ruby versions

2017-04-10 Thread Alan McKinnon
ngineering miracle or sheer hard work. I think William has a point; sometimes making a criteria a negative one result in a lot less work. A good survey usually gives numbers that let you tell if it will. -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] Requirements for UID/GID management

2017-01-30 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 30/01/2017 01:04, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 01/29/2017 05:30 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: >> >> Good catch with symlinks. >> I don't see the point about hardlinks, they are just files with 2 >> dentries. When find gets to the second one it's already changed, so no &

Re: [gentoo-dev] Requirements for UID/GID management

2017-01-29 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 30/01/2017 00:20, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 01/29/2017 05:07 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: >> >> Sure it can be done, just don't chown -R ~user. DO it the VERY >> long way round, file by file. Say you changed user "awesome" uid 300 to 400: >> &

Re: [gentoo-dev] Requirements for UID/GID management

2017-01-29 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 29/01/2017 19:05, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > On 01/29/2017 03:26 AM, Alan McKinnon wrote: >>> >>> Can anyone think of an upgrade path for fixed UIDs? That issue aside, I >>> may have convinced myself that fixed UIDs are better. >> >> The general proce

Re: [gentoo-dev] Requirements for UID/GID management

2017-01-29 Thread Alan McKinnon
ost other Gentoo things out there. If the user already exists, it's presumably because the sysadmin wants it that way or it was installed that way from an older ebuild. Either way the ebuild cannot mess around with that. It could output an elog saying the uid/gid doesn't match the new Gentoo norm, and provide the commands to run to bring things into line (usermod, groupmod, find / -user -exec chown, etc, etc) -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Userkit.eclass

2016-11-29 Thread Alan McKinnon
ybooks and user account deployers than I care to recall; I've never run into this problem that I couldn't solve trivially - usually by just knowing the username|groupname and looking up the corresponding uid/gid. Really, it's just data mapping and we have tools to do the lookup real fast. -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: openrc 0.22 updates (second draft)

2016-09-26 Thread Alan McKinnon
the second doesn't logically follow from the first and it doesn't seem like an example of the first either. I suggest an intro para along the lines of "This version of openrc introduces two changes" and then number the paras following -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2016-08-07 Thread Alan McKinnon
ge. Realizing there are other things out there is part of the learning process. But, despite all that, Java is not special. It should run on Gentoo for anyone who wants it, just like things starting with P. You volunteering to do the grunt work? -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Packages up for grabs

2016-08-07 Thread Alan McKinnon
niche market where uni students do "clustering" - whatever that is. The interesting apps out there are mostly running python, go and (sometimes) lua. And that's what I observe in my day job - business/mobile ISP. -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] why is the security team running around p.masking packages

2016-07-05 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 05/07/2016 21:53, james wrote: * If you don't know the last commit before removal, juts load up the removal commit and copy the commit hash of the "Parent" link to get the commit before that Tada! Attic restored ^_~ Not bad, at first glance. Not too bad at all! Let me work with this a bit.

Re: [gentoo-dev] why is the security team running around p.masking packages

2016-07-05 Thread Alan McKinnon
> > So I would ask (beg if necessary) the kind folks that are the gentoo > devs to figure out a way to archive those old codes, and document how to > retrieve them, via github, as the attic too is probably like sunrise and > such, headed towards deprecation and the chopping block. s/github/git/g Big difference. Gentoo's tree is not hosted on github, and infra isn't going to put an attic equivalent there. -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Global USE=gui

2016-06-03 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 03/06/2016 23:33, Nick Vinson wrote: > USE="gtk" is a dependency. No. It is a feature. However, it is a feature named after the dependencies needed to enable it. If a package has a hard dependency on libgtk, a USE flag would not be added, but a soft dependency on libgtk means that libgtk

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Global USE=gui

2016-06-03 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 03/06/2016 21:34, waltd...@waltdnes.org wrote: On Fri, Jun 03, 2016 at 10:35:45AM -0400, Ian Stakenvicius wrote USE=gui is about building the graphical user interface that an application offers, when it is optional. That's it. What dependencies that means and so on have nothing to do with

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: usr merge

2016-04-09 Thread Alan McKinnon
u want it, as you do, you get to do it yourself. While it still works, grat. When it stops working, you fix it. He did not say, as you imply, that it cannot work right now. -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: adding sbin directories to PATH for all users

2015-11-26 Thread Alan McKinnon
erstand all the historical arguments but I don't think they matter too much these days anymore as times and OSes do change. I feel that the / vs /usr split is rather pointless on modern systems, but I do like the bin vs sbin split because it makes my life easier (which is the entire point of any env var

Re: [gentoo-dev] news item: OpenRC 0.18 changes to localmount and netmount

2015-09-29 Thread Alan McKinnon
s only affects mounts with "_netdev" listed under options in /etc/fstab. Such systems should use "noauto" and/or "nofail" as described above. -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] JFYIOR: A Simple Package Versioning Spec

2015-09-21 Thread Alan McKinnon
ond release of the package, so it succeeds the first > # version. > VERSION_SUCCEEDS="insaneversionspec2" > ... > EOF --- > > Obviously, the downside of this scheme is that you have to load and > parse ever

Re: [gentoo-dev] www-client/chromium gtk3 support

2015-09-10 Thread Alan McKinnon
" as a way to avoid having to deal with murky real-life corner cases is just flat out wrong. And those murky corner cases exist, they always will and are the things that separate real life from theoretical ideals. gtk2 exists and is in use. I see no plans to deprecate it globally, so those w

Re: [gentoo-dev] .gitignore

2015-08-12 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 13/08/2015 00:21, James Le Cuirot wrote: On Thu, 13 Aug 2015 00:11:45 +0200 Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: On 12/08/2015 23:29, James Le Cuirot wrote: Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo.org writes: On 10 Aug 2015 09:17, Michał Górny wrote: Dnia 2015-08-10, o godz. 02:42:21

Re: [gentoo-dev] .gitignore

2015-08-12 Thread Alan McKinnon
be in /var/portage, and the user's overlay has no business being under main tree itself -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] useflag policies

2015-08-03 Thread Alan McKinnon
-none scenario. I say stick with reasonable defaults, and for better or worse, that includes use highest version in ACCEPT_KEYWORDS unless user says otherwise -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: useflag policies

2015-08-03 Thread Alan McKinnon
for the general case. I also don't want to have to keep going back to use.desc because it's not obvious what the flag probably does. -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: openrc mount service prototype

2015-07-29 Thread Alan McKinnon
/, it might as well be /etc/fstab... There's very little useless cruft in that file -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] Managing etc/* in an embbeded system

2015-07-22 Thread Alan McKinnon
of portage's versions and your mods. Finally, reboot. This whole last step must also happen after reboot, so make it a custom init script in an appropriate runlevel where you can launch it as needed during upgrade and reboot. -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] News item about mysql client and server packages

2015-07-17 Thread Alan McKinnon
it will really work. -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: why is a line in /usr/portage/profiles/base/package.use.mask ignored?

2015-02-26 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Thu, 26 Feb 2015 02:22:40 + (UTC) Duncan 1i5t5.dun...@cox.net wrote: Alan McKinnon posted on Wed, 25 Feb 2015 14:00:57 +0200 as excerpted: Why are you messing around with the profile anyway, when all the available documentation in many many places tells you to set your chosen USE

Re: [gentoo-dev] why is a line in /usr/portage/profiles/base/package.use.mask ignored?

2015-02-25 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wed, 25 Feb 2015 17:23:03 +0600 (NOVT) gro...@gentoo.org wrote: Hello *, dev-lisp/ecls-15.2.21 does not compiled with USE=cpu_flags_x86_sse. So, I've added the line =dev-lisp/ecls-15.2.21 cpu_flags_x86_sse to .../profiles/base/package.use.mask. But I still see dns ~ # emerge -pv

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-portage/portage-mod_jabber, media-sound/moodbar

2015-02-08 Thread Alan McKinnon
correctly. -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Quick RFC: USE=libav vs FFMPEG_IMPL=libav|ffmpeg

2015-02-04 Thread Alan McKinnon
better than having to deal with the existing method forever. Plus, user bug reports will never stop. -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] qa last rites multiple packages

2015-01-07 Thread Alan McKinnon
with them, etc, etc. -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] Add bc back to the stage3

2014-09-17 Thread Alan McKinnon
genkernel users and those who make menuconfig (100% unscientific survey taken from my brain and nowhere else) -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: My masterplan for git migration (+ looking for infra to test it)

2014-09-16 Thread Alan McKinnon
once a year. -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] minimalistic emerge

2014-08-08 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 08/08/2014 15:32, Jeroen Roovers wrote: If no such USE flag, what about stabilize gentoo with STABILIZED flag implementation in make.conf? Next time, please bother the gentoo-user@ mailing list. No, please don't. -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: news item for upower

2014-06-04 Thread Alan McKinnon
very different, and a news item gives them the info they need. -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: news item for upower

2014-06-03 Thread Alan McKinnon
points from user for caring) -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: news item for upower

2014-06-03 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 04/06/2014 00:32, Tom Wijsman wrote: On Tue, 03 Jun 2014 22:24:11 +0200 Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: The point is, human communication is vastly more powerful +1 It might not be clear in the moment, because it looks like a ton of bikeshedding and other ways some

Re: Off-list: [gentoo-dev] Re: UPower upstream (git master) and 0.99 release - No sys-power/pm-utils support anymore

2014-06-03 Thread Alan McKinnon
or Gnome or whatever looks exactly like an inherited class plus interfaces problem. Which is what mix-ins do :-) So once again - mixins, an awesome idea -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC GLEP 1005: Package Tags

2014-03-24 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 24/03/2014 02:43, Tom Wijsman wrote: On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 23:47:22 +0200 Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: Tags work best when they describe narrow, clearly defined attributes, and the thing they are applied to can have one, two or more of these attributes or sometimes even

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC GLEP 1005: Package Tags

2014-03-23 Thread Alan McKinnon
and the things to be described go through a defined process first before making it into the list. this concept is not present in the GLEP as currently written. -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Tightening EAPI rules

2014-02-10 Thread Alan McKinnon
in years, my thumb suck guess is 3 years after a given EAPI is finally obsoleted. As a real example - I know someone who proudly shows off a Gentoo host with a 2004 profile. Can he reasonably expect portage to still work flawlessly 10 years later? I feel no, luckily he agrees with me. -- Alan

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Tightening EAPI rules

2014-02-10 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 10/02/2014 22:56, Alec Warner wrote: On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com mailto:alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: On 10/02/2014 18:05, Ulrich Mueller wrote: Removing support for it from a package manager should of course happen much later

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy

2014-01-28 Thread Alan McKinnon
for supporting everything out there. But so what? If slow_arch_X is stuck on some old version of an @system package, who cares? It's not like portage will pick it for an amd64 box. An old ebuild is a file, it sits next to 178,477 files and does no harm, it only gets used on hardware that needs it. -- Alan

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights

2014-01-22 Thread Alan McKinnon
, we both know this. How does QA propose to curb that downside? -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights

2014-01-21 Thread Alan McKinnon
I've seen so far. Revoking access is a human problem and is solved with human solutions. Do beware the law of unintended side-effects. On 01/21/14 16:56, Tom Wijsman wrote: On Mon, 20 Jan 2014 16:09:46 +0200 Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: Speaking as someone who had this power

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: formally allow qa to suspend commit rights

2014-01-20 Thread Alan McKinnon
whatsoever, then QA should make a well-thought out case to that other body for decision. Anything else is madness and open invitation for it to all go south. -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] overlays.gentoo.org restoration post-mortem

2014-01-18 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 18/01/2014 09:49, Alec Warner wrote: On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 11:10 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com mailto:alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: On 18/01/2014 09:04, Patrick Lauer wrote: which could link to the infra page would be good here perhaps, so when an outage

Re: [gentoo-dev] overlays.gentoo.org restoration post-mortem

2014-01-17 Thread Alan McKinnon
minutes is perfectly acceptable IMHO -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy

2014-01-16 Thread Alan McKinnon
to trust them to do the right thing. -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: revisiting our stabilization policy

2014-01-16 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 16/01/2014 20:26, Peter Stuge wrote: Alan McKinnon wrote: Respecting bug priority feels like that corporate BS I have to put up with every day. Gentoo is incorporated so maybe that fits. ;) On a more serious note, please try to understand what I meant rather than just what I wrote

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: storing predefined INSTALL_MASK directory lists in repos

2014-01-11 Thread Alan McKinnon
. How much work is it to get native support for LINGUAS into all ebuilds? That would be the intuitive place considering there is already USE flags for LINGUAS. -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: storing predefined INSTALL_MASK directory lists in repos

2014-01-11 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 11/01/2014 18:52, Michał Górny wrote: Dnia 2014-01-11, o godz. 18:15:09 Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com napisał(a): A far better method from a user point of view is to install the linguas the user explicitly asked for. Your proposal as worded will be taken at first glance to mean

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New global use flags: 3dnowext, mmxext, ssse3, sse4_1, avx, avx2

2013-12-16 Thread Alan McKinnon
possible to have a very verbose, and meaningless, description. be verbose by all means if the verbosity carries useful information -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New global use flags: 3dnowext, mmxext, ssse3, sse4_1, avx, avx2

2013-12-16 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 16/12/2013 22:17, Michael Orlitzky wrote: On 12/16/2013 01:21 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: Enable use of the SSSE3 instruction set (NOT sse3). This is needed by projects which contain assembly code or which use certain compiler intrinsics. It is not a replacement for CFLAGS and friends

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up

2013-12-04 Thread Alan McKinnon
a simple matter for them to disable it. The default install doesn't need to have a network provider with all the bells and whistles, netifrc is perfectly adequate (especially if dhcp is enabled as it always was for years) -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] Policy-level discussion for minimum versions on dependencies

2013-11-06 Thread Alan McKinnon
, only at least one that will work. If the user decides to make other versions available to his system by whatever means, then portage can deal with it by and large transparently. -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Official way to do rolling update (Was: Re: Releng breakage with respect to move from dev-python/python-exec to dev-lang/python-exec)

2013-11-04 Thread Alan McKinnon
the cost of my troubleshooting time is more than the cost of cpu cycles over a weekend. -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] Releng breakage with respect to move from dev-python/python-exec to dev-lang/python-exec

2013-11-03 Thread Alan McKinnon
, but just to alert folk that something is coming down the wire and a short description of what it's trying to achieve. Most folks are naturally suspicious of anything that alters their python setup. -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] Releng breakage with respect to move from dev-python/python-exec to dev-lang/python-exec

2013-11-03 Thread Alan McKinnon
to update gentoo, is there? It's always been emerge -avuND world I personally got used to -uaNDv and I don't even know what exactly is the difference and it's implications between that and just -uD the difference is -N, it's in man emerge -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] Releng breakage with respect to move from dev-python/python-exec to dev-lang/python-exec

2013-11-03 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 03/11/2013 12:53, Michał Górny wrote: Dnia 2013-11-03, o godz. 10:53:13 Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com napisał(a): One set of questions that were never answered and probably do deserve some kind of notification: I can help you with these. However, I don't know on how much

Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: initramfs required on Linux systems with separate /usr

2013-09-25 Thread Alan McKinnon
configurations, and this is a trend likely to grow worse. if you add For more info, see insert detailed wiki doc URL here after that paragraph, most users can have their questions answered in the simplest way possible. -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] last rites: dev-db/edb

2013-09-18 Thread Alan McKinnon
? Not that I'm opposite to delete the dep of old prehistoric version of enlightenment, but I just can't get, why do you think that upstream is dead... enlightenment is not dead, edb is. It was replaced with eet years ago. -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

[gentoo-dev] Re: Can we have process names and stdout / stderr indication to more efficiently parse build logs?

2013-09-03 Thread Alan McKinnon
colorized text on my terminal, but I do believe we ought to keep defaults sane - the minimum that could possibly work. Everything extra should be optional -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Can we have process names and stdout / stderr indication to more efficiently parse build logs?

2013-09-03 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 03/09/2013 23:00, Magnus Granberg wrote: tisdag 03 september 2013 22.41.14 skrev Alan McKinnon: I *do* like colorized text on my terminal, but I do believe we ought to keep defaults sane - the minimum that could possibly work. Everything extra should be optional What about NOCOLOR

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Can we have process names and stdout / stderr indication to more efficiently parse build logs?

2013-09-03 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 03/09/2013 23:03, Rich Freeman wrote: On Tue, Sep 3, 2013 at 4:41 PM, Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: The solution is obvious - default to writing plain text to log files and give the user an option to enable escapes in the log if {s,}he chooses to have it. This does mean you

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: stabilization policies

2013-08-21 Thread Alan McKinnon
On 20/08/2013 22:25, Tom Wijsman wrote: On Tue, 20 Aug 2013 22:00:52 +0200 Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: As a long time user and citizen of -user I can tell you what the general feeling of arch vs ~arch there is: Thanks for jumping into the discussion. arch has plenty

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: stabilization policies

2013-08-21 Thread Alan McKinnon
high. Our targeted userbase is somewhat unique in the world. -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: stabilization policies

2013-08-20 Thread Alan McKinnon
to consider? [snip] -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] renaming gentoo-oldnet

2013-08-06 Thread Alan McKinnon
, but certainly colloquially. Why not just keep the name net and leave other newer systems to come up with their own names? I do agree that modifiers old and new are bad ideas - they come about because of the environment and no the software itself. -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] OpenRc-0.12 is coming soon

2013-08-03 Thread Alan McKinnon
is redundant - perhaps the protest is more about that and the unfamiliar wording than anything else. I read it as an announcement of a new major version, and nothing more than that. -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] perl herd needs your help

2013-07-30 Thread Alan McKinnon
help us! Long-time Gentoo user, not a dev ;-) I've been looking for a way to contribute back to Gentoo for a while, this might be a nice easy way to get going. And I get to use perl packages a lot at work. Would you be OK with a proxy-maintainer? -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Making systemd more accessible to normal users

2013-05-23 Thread Alan McKinnon
-- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Making systemd more accessible to normal users

2013-05-21 Thread Alan McKinnon
choice is possible. And no-one ever said having choices means your exact personal preferences wrt every little thing will be baked in. -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-text/cuneiform

2013-03-24 Thread Alan McKinnon
. -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: kerberos, virtuals, rattling cages

2013-02-25 Thread Alan McKinnon
goes south when AD/Kerberos enters the mix. -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving our/portage stuff to var

2012-12-20 Thread Alan McKinnon
On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 14:19:52 -0800 Zac Medico zmed...@gentoo.org wrote: On 12/19/2012 02:01 PM, Alan McKinnon wrote: On Wed, 19 Dec 2012 14:56:44 +0100 Diego Elio Pettenò flamee...@flameeyes.eu wrote: Just mv /usr/portage /var/portage ? FFS no. Among other things, as many said before

Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving our/portage stuff to var

2012-12-20 Thread Alan McKinnon
MAKEOPTS, and let 'er rip. My local is probably years out of date. Serves me right for not reading 50 screens of man page with every new host :-) This sub-thread is probably just noise, sorry for that. -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] Moving our/portage stuff to var

2012-12-19 Thread Alan McKinnon
. -- Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for May

2007-05-04 Thread Alan McKinnon
so they will never notice that the game ebuild is not in stable alan -- Optimists say the glass is half full, Pessimists say the glass is half empty, Developers say wtf is the glass twice as big as it needs to be? Alan McKinnon alan at linuxholdings dot co dot za +27 82, double three seven, one