On Sun, 7 Apr 2024 at 22:09, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
> What I am saying is that I want the freedom to not have things
> pointlessly enabled on my systems, because similar problems (and worse)
> happen all day every day. The less exposure I have, the better. The
> liblzma backdoor was timely
On Mon, 11 Mar 2024 at 12:31, Maciej Barć wrote:
>
> The following packages are now looking for a new maintainer:
>
> - games-util/heroic-bin - 0 open bugs, binary package, needs manual testing
>
> --
> Have a great day!
>
> ~ Maciej XGQT Barć
>
> x...@gentoo.org
> Gentoo Linux developer
>
On Tue, 27 Feb 2024 at 15:21, Kenton Groombridge wrote:
>
> On 24/02/27 03:45PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Given the recent spread of the "AI" bubble, I think we really need to
> > look into formally addressing the related concerns. In my opinion,
> > at this point the only
On Sun, 11 Feb 2024 at 02:12, Eli Schwartz wrote:
> - someone who added another account to their user group probably did so
> with the expectation that they'd be sharing files with that other
> account, and 700 mode in particular feels like going against that
This change of default would
On Sat, 10 Feb 2024 at 23:52, John Helmert III wrote:
>
> On Sat, Feb 10, 2024 at 05:57:08PM +0100, Daniel Simionato wrote:
> > Hello,
> > I'd like to start a discussion regarding setting HOME_MODE by default in
> > the /etc/login.defs file (owned by sys-apps/shadow package).
> >
> > Upstream
On Sat, 25 Nov 2023 at 23:27, Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
> * A draft upgrade document exists.
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Toolchain/23.0_update_instructions
I can't edit the draft so just to mention here, there's references
made to an update table at
On Sat, 23 Sept 2023 at 08:03, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> This seems rather restrictive, adds unnecessary redundancy, and would
> make it hard to type an entry without the aid of special tools.
>
> Also, there are other files like use.mask which probably shouldn't have
> a completely different
On Fri, 22 Sept 2023 at 15:37, Sam James wrote:
>
>
> Alex Boag-Munroe writes:
>
> > Any reason for the parseable parts to not be in an established human
> > readable/editable format? e.g. the config ini style format, or TOML?
>
> The only issue really is that dep
Any reason for the parseable parts to not be in an established human
readable/editable format? e.g. the config ini style format, or TOML?
To crib from the OP example with something configparser understands:
[PREAMBLE]
Timestamp: 2023-09-21 15:07:42+00:00
Author: Arthur Zamarin
Justification:
On Thu, 14 Sept 2023 at 19:39, Alexe Stefan wrote:
>
> Gentoo is about choice, and we should keep it that way.
It's about viable choice.
> So what is the problem with keeping the package in ::gentoo.
You mean other than all the reasons/problems given? You not liking
them doesn't make them less
On Thu, 14 Sept 2023 at 18:40, Eddie Chapman wrote:
>
> Rich Freeman wrote:
>
> Not aiming this at you personally but this argument has been made more
> than once in this thread and I personally don't think it carries any
> weight, because it can be levelled at anyone who raises an issue about
>
On Thu, 14 Sept 2023 at 18:20, Eddie Chapman wrote:
> However, I believe what I'm proposing would not have
> the result you're predicting as it would no longer be falsely promising
> something it cannot deliver,
>
So you propose to uncouple it as a provider of virtual/libudev? What's
your plan
On Thu, 14 Sept 2023 at 17:50, Eddie Chapman wrote:
>
No one is telling anyone not to use it. The question has been asked "why use it"
to ascertain reasons for keeping it in ::gentoo. Something not being in
::gentoo isn't a decree to not use it, it's a statement that it's a
pain to keep
On Thu, 14 Sept 2023 at 16:30, Eddie Chapman wrote:
>
> Alex Boag-Munroe wrote:
> > On Thu, 14 Sept 2023 at 15:17, Eddie Chapman wrote:
> >
> >> Andrew Ammerlaan wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> If someone were to step up and say they are willi
On Thu, 14 Sept 2023 at 15:17, Eddie Chapman wrote:
>
> Andrew Ammerlaan wrote:
>
> > If someone were to step up and say they are willing to spend their time
> > and effort maintaining eudev and fixing the open issues then sure we can
> > keep it, I never said otherwise. However this package has
On Thu, 14 Sept 2023 at 01:20, Madhu wrote:
>
> * Rich Freeman
> :
> Wrote on Tue, 12 Sep 2023 05:18:51 -0400:
> > On Mon, Sep 11, 2023 at 10:34 PM orbea wrote:
> >> Regardless the disappointment is a valid concern when Gentoo is willing
> >> to pull the rug up from under users feet under
On Wed, 13 Sept 2023 at 10:34, Alexe Stefan wrote:
>
> It seems like the discussion got way off-topic.
> To see where where at, I'll try to summarize what was said so far.
>
> The claims are that eudev is unmaintained upstream, downstream and has
> open bugs.
> Upstream, last commit was 3 weeks
On Wed, 13 Sept 2023 at 02:23, Alex Boag-Munroe wrote:
>
> >Matt Turner wrote:
> >> On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 5:23 PM Eddie Chapman wrote:
> >>
> >>> Why would you think that by having an alternative in tree it means that
> >>> everyone else
>Matt Turner wrote:
>> On Tue, Sep 12, 2023 at 5:23 PM Eddie Chapman wrote:
>>
>>> Why would you think that by having an alternative in tree it means that
>>> everyone else is then forced into doing work that they don't want to
>>> and it will inconvenience everyone?
>>
>> Because it's already
19 matches
Mail list logo
