Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: GCC 4.6.0

2011-04-03 Thread Branko Badrljica
On 03. 04. 2011 16:04, Mike Frysinger wrote: On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 6:19 AM, Ryan Hill wrote: On Sun, 3 Apr 2011 05:50:32 Duncan wrote: Ryan Hill posted on Sat, 02 Apr 2011 22:11:12 -0600 as excerpted: You may also want to test your packages with the new -Ofast option to be sure it doesn't

Re: [gentoo-dev] Cobra as a Python replacement for portage infra...

2010-11-23 Thread Branko Badrljica
S, René 'Necoro' Neumann piše: Don't forget, that Cobra compiles to C# which then is compiled to .NET CLI. I don't think, that anyone here feels really good about having the core package of Gentoo to require Mono. Uh. I didn't know that. I've read only that it gets compiled into bytecode,

[gentoo-dev] Cobra as a Python replacement for portage infra...

2010-11-22 Thread Branko Badrljica
Hi to all, I am sorry if I'm wasting bandwidth on gentoo-dev with this, but I have found no good answere elsewhere. I have accidentally stumbled on Codelite ( at the first glance ) _great_ IDE for C/C++/Python ( www.codelite.org). While toying with its settings for various language

Re: [gentoo-dev] Cobra as a Python replacement for portage infra...

2010-11-22 Thread Branko Badrljica
Erm, link is http://cobra-language.com http://cobra-language.com/

[gentoo-dev] Cobra as a Python replacement for portage infra...

2010-11-22 Thread Branko Badrljica
( reposted as a new thread. Sorry for inconvenience.) Hi to all, I am sorry if I'm wasting bandwidth on gentoo-dev with this, but I have found no good answere elsewhere. I have accidentally stumbled on Codelite ( at the first glance ) _great_ IDE for C/C++/Python ( http://www.codelite.org ).

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.5.1 arrived in the tree

2009-10-13 Thread Branko Badrljica
William Hubbs wrote: On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 06:23:32PM +0300, Markos Chandras wrote: On Saturday 10 October 2009 23:30:05 Matthias Schwarzott wrote: On Samstag, 10. Oktober 2009, Nirbheek Chauhan wrote: On Sat, Oct 10, 2009 at 6:42 PM, Alin N??stac mrn...@gentoo.org wrote:

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.5.1 arrived in the tree

2009-10-13 Thread Branko Badrljica
William Hubbs wrote: On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 10:55:45PM +0200, Branko Badrljica wrote: Main question is NOT whether it works for you, but whether it will break stuff on significant percent of other users. It broke on my machine, for example, and it was quite disconcerting, since

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.5.1 arrived in the tree

2009-10-13 Thread Branko Badrljica
Thomas Sachau wrote: SNIP I disagree in this place. ~arch is called testing because it actually is about TESTING new versions and packages. You should expect problems and you should be able to recover from them and you should be able to use bugzilla. Else i suggest you move to a stable arch

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.5.1 arrived in the tree

2009-10-13 Thread Branko Badrljica
Mike Frysinger wrote: i really dont buy this argument, but ignoring that, poor admin policy is no excuse. blindly accepting all unstable versions of a package instead of pinning a specific version and then expecting a stable system isnt going to happen. Thomas is absolutely right here.

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.5.1 arrived in the tree

2009-10-13 Thread Branko Badrljica
Dawid Węgliński wrote: sapphire ~ # qlist openrc | grep doc /usr/share/doc/openrc/net.example /usr/share/doc/openrc/net.default As said, I already did that. In fact, that was the first thing I was looking for. After seeing post here about radical changes in v0.5, that was the first thing I

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.5.1 arrived in the tree

2009-10-13 Thread Branko Badrljica
Mike Frysinger wrote: the mailing list is not bugzilla. any complaints you have about USE=oldnet have nothing to do with this thread. it's a bug and should be treated as such. -mike Which is why I have posted here to gripe about having documented such changes in future. I was told

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.5.1 arrived in the tree

2009-10-13 Thread Branko Badrljica
Mike Frysinger wrote: On Tuesday 13 October 2009 22:48:01 Branko Badrljica wrote: Mike Frysinger wrote: On Tuesday 13 October 2009 22:36:44 Branko Badrljica wrote: Mike Frysinger wrote: the mailing list is not bugzilla. any complaints you have about USE=oldnet have

Re: [gentoo-dev] openrc-0.5.1 arrived in the tree

2009-10-10 Thread Branko Badrljica
Joshua Saddler wrote: On Fri, 9 Oct 2009 19:57:07 +0200 Matthias Schwarzott z...@gentoo.org wrote: Hi there! As some of you have waited long for this to happen, sys-apps/openrc-0.5.1 is there. It has a default enabled (eapi-1) useflag oldnet to install the old-style network scripts

[gentoo-dev] Has anyone tried to use Linux Unified Kernel ?

2009-05-24 Thread Branko Badrljica
These gyus ( http://linux.insigma.com.cn/en/index.php ) are working on support for running Windows binaries in Linux kernel. It works by supporting Win syscalls directly in kernel or ( for unsupported ones ) by redirecting them to patched Wine server. Authors say that end effect is much less

[gentoo-dev] Can't format floppy or write to it...

2009-02-09 Thread Branko Badrljica
I needed to make bootable floppy for graphic card BIOS reflash and noticed that I can't fdformat floppy or even write to formatted one. I can mount it -o rw, but when I try to write, write would fail. Also, fdformat /dev/fd0 seems to be working, but just to the point,where it verifies written

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: what happened to /etc/init.d/hal{d,daemon,whatever} script ?

2008-12-22 Thread Branko Badrljica
Duncan wrote: Branko Badrljica bran...@avtomatika.com posted 494f1518.2020...@avtomatika.com, excerpted below, on Mon, 22 Dec 2008 05:18:32 +0100: Maybe I should have filed this as a bug, but don't have a clue to which package should I assign it, if any. FWIW, this would have

[gentoo-dev] what happened to /etc/init.d/hal{d,daemon,whatever} script ?

2008-12-21 Thread Branko Badrljica
Maybe I should have filed this as a bug, but don't have a clue to which package should I assign it, if any. I was forced to switch baselayout from stable 1.12.11* to 2.0.0, which triggered openrc install etc. I did all that etc , then after some time I noticed that system doesn't respond to PnP

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proposal: add a compiler-version entry to pkg db

2008-12-08 Thread Branko Badrljica
While at it, it might be useful to have someghing like compiler-use file ( like package.use) for per-package compiler version and FLAGS to be used. It is annoying to have emerge -eD world fail because some package requires specific compiler version or because gcc-3.4 can't be compiled with

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: ICC Profile

2008-07-18 Thread Branko Badrljica
BTW: Is ICC really worth the fuss ? I have checked around and reported that newest gcc-4.3 is able to to catch and sometimes even outperform icc ( not always, naturally). Big news seemed to be thatnew gcc si close and sometimes better than icc. Is it any truth to that and if it is, what is

Re: [gentoo-dev] What are blocks used for?

2008-04-16 Thread Branko Badrljica
Michael Haubenwallner wrote: On Wed, 2008-04-16 at 07:34 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: snip Case D, Current Behaviour: User tries to upgrade coreutils. User gets a big flashy block error saying coreutils blocks mktemp. User doesn't realise that the safe upgrade path is to force the package