Look into INSTALL_MASK.
--Brian Jackson
On Nov 5, 2006, at 12:02 PM, John Jawed wrote:
Two patches which allow a user to bypass files created with doman and
dodoc in FEATURES:
FEATURES=noman nodoc emerge -av foo
http://jawed.name/dev/gentoo/nodoc.patch
http://jawed.name/dev/gentoo
Or better yet, get the hint that someone was making fun of you for
bitching about someone else's top posting when you replied to the
wrong list.
--Iggy
On Oct 16, 2006, at 2:28 PM, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Jakub Moc wrote:
Andrej Kacian napsal(a):
Fix your mail client, and don't lay the
On Oct 11, 2006, at 12:37 PM, Zac Medico wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stuart Herbert wrote:
Whatever happened to the work to implement GLEP 42? Is there anyone
actively working on this atm?
It's been on my todo list, but I haven't gotten around to it yet due
to
You could handle it the way the baselayout ebuild does.
--Iggy
Stefaan wrote:
Hi!
I'm having an issue with the openafs-ebuild, and I don't see a
solution for the moment. I wondered if someone on the list would:
Prerequisite:
The ebuild needs to create the /afs directory, and remove that same
Ervin Nemeth wrote:
snip
I've got no full solution.
The EXTRA_ECONF way works only for automake packages.
Using INSTALL_MASK='*.a' makes me really, really terrified if I think
about sys-devel/gcc.
/Ervin
Solar had a nifty per package INSTALL_MASK in his bashrc at one point I think.
At one time we had a problem with gentoo sources having way too many use flags
and patches which lead to there being an incalculable number of ways that gentoo
-sources could turn out. It was a pita to maintain. A pita to troubleshoot.
There were weird bugs that we couldn't reproduce easily.
Use INSTALL_MASK to keep /usr/bin/mysqld or whatever from getting installed. We
aren't generally in the habit of splitting packages into a bunch of different
ebuilds. There are exceptions, but
--Iggy
Christian Parpart wrote:
Hi all,
well, regarding the request on bug 88490 [1] (and my
Martin Schlemmer wrote:
On Fri, 2005-07-01 at 15:59 -0700, Drake Wyrm wrote:
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 01 July 2005 12:25 pm, Brian D. Harring wrote:
Currently, we pretty much leave out the big dogs of build depends from
ebuilds- basically we rely on the profile to
Martin Schlemmer wrote:
snip
Big picture here:
* BDEPEND does nothing now, so don't worry about it if you don't want to
* in the future it will make other things possible
* give the man problems you see with the proposal, not just tell him that
portage doesn't handle it right now... I think out
If someone removes something that belongs to me, software patents or not, I'll
be asking for removal of (at the very least) their cvs access. If not, I'll be
asking for their total removal from the project. You can have all the views you
want on the world. I do. This is a technical project, not
Rafael Espndola wrote:
I am using Gentoo to build some small systems. While things like the
minimal useflag is a joy, the monolithic nature of most gentoo
packages is a headache.
Kde has been spit and libstdc++ can be installed without gcc but there
are many other packages that don't have this
Jason Wever wrote:
snip
From my perspective, if a package maintainer asks for testing and the
ability to keyword (i.e. Spanky asking me if it was OK to bump binutils
to 2.16, to which I said yes) then that is fine. However adding or
changing keywords in an ebuild for which you cannot test
Kevin wrote:
snip
Does anyone have any thoughts to share on:
a) general advisability of this (seems like a good thing to me---lots of
savings on space across machines, oafs has a good authentication system in
kerberos, seems better to me than running a local rsync server alone and also
Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
Hi ebuild devs,
Here's a glep draft now for (a part of) the long-term portage-goal
act as a secondary package manager ...
Comments welcome,
haubi
It's fancy, but what about ROOT? You don't like it just because you'd have
/usr/local/usr/bin/foo?
--
On Mon, 2005-05-02 at 20:58 -0400, Alec Warner wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Brian Jackson wrote:
Michael Haubenwallner wrote:
Hi ebuild devs,
Here's a glep draft now for (a part of) the long-term portage-goal
act as a secondary package manager
15 matches
Mail list logo
