Tach Matthew, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID)
Matthew Kennedy schrieb:
We hope users will contribute to our Darcs overlay instead of simply
filing bugs.
I asked to include the overlay in the official layman configuration.
V-Li
--
Fingerprint: 68C5 D381 B69A A777
Tach Tim, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID)
Tim Yamin schrieb:
So long, and thanks for all the fish...
Even I hope you rethink it...
V-Li
--
Fingerprint: 68C5 D381 B69A A777 6A91 E999 350A AD7C 2B85 9DE3
http://www.gnupg.org/
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Tach Natanael, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID)
Natanael Copa schrieb:
Can I become a Gentoo dev, even if I'm only maintainer of 1-3 packages?
I'm trying to be realistic.
You can. And you can even keep out of dev fights here on the mailing
list. On IRC you normally
Tach Thomas, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID)
Thomas Cort schrieb:
Every developer should have access to at least 1 Gentoo system. They
should also be able to determine if something is stable or not. It would
cut down on the number of keyword/stable bugs if developers
Tach Ioannis, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID)
Ioannis Aslanidis schrieb:
- Make every dev a member of at least 1 arch team
That's a sound idea, that way some herds (see KDE) won't have to be
searching for testers in every arch because _strangely_ one of the most
daily
Tach Natanael, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID)
Natanael Copa schrieb:
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 00:00 +, Christian 'Opfer' Faulhammer wrote:
Natanael Copa schrieb:
Can I become a Gentoo dev, even if I'm only maintainer of 1-3 packages?
I'm trying to be realistic.
You
Tach Josh, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID)
Josh Saddler schrieb:
Christian 'Opfer' Faulhammer wrote:
Most devs run ~arch
Says who? Did you pull that fact out of a hat, or something? Do you have
any hard numbers to back that statement?
A lot of devs run ~arch is more
Tach Natanael, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID)
Natanael Copa schrieb:
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 15:47 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 16:39:50 +0200 Natanael Copa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | I'm initially only interested in
maintaining packages where I'm
Tach David, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID)
David Grant schrieb:
On 9/28/06, Michael Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+++ Mark Stier [28/09/06 15:35 +0200]:
How about entering the removed ebuilds into bugzilla under an adequate
section?
I think my original reply got
Tach Ramon, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID)
Thanks for that post.
Ramon van Alteren schrieb:
9. Most of this mail has been on policies, expected behavior and
perceived behavior. I would like to get this discussion back to
technical issues wrt to generating stages/seeds
Tach Hanno, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID)
Hanno Böck schrieb:
Now, with the release of mesa 6.5.1 and the xorg-server-1.1.1-r1 ebuild
we have a well-working aiglx-implementation in gentoo.
So Gnome 2.16 will use AIGLX in Metacity?
V-Li
--
Fingerprint: 68C5 D381
Tach Joshua, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID)
Joshua Baergen schrieb:
Christian 'Opfer' Faulhammer wrote:
So Gnome 2.16 will use AIGLX in Metacity?
Not by default. The support wasn't deemed 100% yet and thus slipped to
2.18.
No problem, I can wait.
V-Li
Tach Chris, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID)
Chris White schrieb:
So, wondering why people use Gentoo. Put [dev] or something if you're an
actual gentoo dev and [user] if you're a user. Doesn't need to be fancy,
you can put community or something if that's all you
Tach Diego, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID)
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò schrieb:
as well as linking mkisofs to libscg, which he relicensed to CDDL
lately.
This is a bit more debatable, he *can* link it, if he can change mkisofs
license to allow linking to
Tach Gabriel, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID)
Gabriel Lavoie schrieb:
About the texmf tree, is there really many packages that would be
included in each distributions? Would a modular ebuild system like the
one used by Gnome (emerge gnome and emerge gnome-lite) and
Tach Luis, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID)
Luis Medinas schrieb:
If noone takes it will be saved on overlays.gentoo.org. Everyone needs
to know that xmms is old and tired (obsolete).
Having discussed Gentoo Status in this list: Maybe you should announce
that in GWN
Tach Hanno, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID)
Hanno Böck schrieb:
I'm all for making more use of features like test and collision-protect,
though in the past I noticed that many devs don't seem to care much. I
even think to remember of bugs getting closed invalid with a
Tach Matti, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID)
Matti Bickel schrieb:
Once there was the idea of putting AT testing system specs somewhere, so
arch devs could actually see what we're running. Is this still needed or
is the number of ATs small enough to keep that in
Tach Jeroen, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID)
Jeroen Roovers schrieb:
I propose the `emerge --info` included in arch testers' comments on
stabilisation bugs should rather be posted as attachments. The AT
comments clog up the bugs and are usually not interesting at all to
Tach Jeroen, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID)
Jeroen Roovers schrieb:
Inlining emerge info in comments bloats the e-mail message to roughly
2.5 times the normal size. I could have spoken out to get AT comments
banned altogether or to urge arches with AT teams to find a
Tach Jeroen, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID)
Jeroen Roovers schrieb:
One solution might be to open your own AT bug, make the stabilisation
bug depend on it, and use the AT bug to have ATs post their `emerge
info`. Then, when testing and stabilisation is finished for
21 matches
Mail list logo
