Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: use of the /run directory

2011-05-17 Thread Drake Wyrm
Nirbheek Chauhan nirbh...@gentoo.org wrote: 2011/5/18 Olivier Cr??te tes...@gentoo.org: The main reason is that you want /run to be writable super early in the boot process, before even / has been fscked and re-mounted. That means you can do stuff like starting udevd in parallel with fsck

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-auth/munge: metadata.xml ChangeLog munge-0.5.9.ebuild

2010-11-20 Thread Drake Wyrm
Donnie Berkholz dberkh...@gentoo.org wrote: Does this user/group need to be present on the build system for some reason? Dunno about that package in particular, but for many packages, the build process involves assigning ownership of certain files and folders to particular users and groups. For

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] ebuild/emerge lookup category differently?

2009-07-23 Thread Drake Wyrm
Amit Dor-Shifer ami...@oversi.com wrote: Hi. In my overlay, I can have packages assigned to a private category, and have that category specified in profiles/categories, under the overlay itself. However, in-order to ebuild such a package I have to append the category to

Re: [gentoo-dev] I want to steal your tools

2008-02-03 Thread Drake Wyrm
Josh Saddler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: s/writtten/written s/aggregrate/aggregate s/genitellia/genitalia app-doc/nightmorph, your spellchecking tool. line 1: unterminated `s' command s/$/\// sys-apps/sed, your stream editing tool. -- There are problems in today's world that cannot be

Re: [gentoo-dev] New global USE flag: modplug

2007-11-01 Thread Drake Wyrm
Samuli Suominen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to add USE modplug to use.desc. I'll do it tomorrow, unless someone objects. -- snip packages -- Do those packages use the modplug flag to enable libmodplug support in lieu of (or in addition to) some other means of playing MOD files, or does

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in media-tv/mythtv: ChangeLog mythtv-0.20.2_p14668.ebuild mythtv-0.21_pre14666.ebuild mythtv-0.21_pre14480-r1.ebuild

2007-10-16 Thread Drake Wyrm
Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You are of course, free to ignore any and all suggestions offered; but you are not allowed to silence them. :0: * Subject:.*\[gentoo-dev\].*\[gentoo-commits\] /dev/null would neatly ignore the suggestions offered as well as creating relative silence. --

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in sys-cluster/pvfs2: ChangeLog pvfs2-2.6.3-r1.ebuild

2007-10-14 Thread Drake Wyrm
Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 13:36 Sat 13 Oct , Matti Bickel (mabi) wrote: if kernel_is gt 2 6 20 ; then epatch ${FILESDIR}/${PV}-register_sysctl_table.patch fi if kernel_is ge 2 6 22 ; then epatch

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-php5/onphp: ChangeLog onphp-0.10.6.ebuild onphp-0.10.4.ebuild onphp-0.10.3.ebuild

2007-10-14 Thread Drake Wyrm
Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 18:05 Sun 14 Oct , Konstantin Arkhipov (voxus) wrote: 1.1 dev-php5/onphp/onphp-0.10.6.ebuild file : http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/dev-php5/onphp/onphp-0.10.6.ebuild?rev=1.1view=markup plain:

Re: [gentoo-dev] new category for texlive modular ebuilds?

2007-10-11 Thread Drake Wyrm
Alexis Ballier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, this might be worth discussion also (and make me even more late on my schedule with merging texlive, but I knew I'd be) In my overlay I was using a dev-texlive category for the texlive modular texmf ebuilds [as a side note : dev-texlive $ ls

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: use flags - use options

2007-10-07 Thread Drake Wyrm
Jan Kundr?t [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tobias Klausmann wrote: For those apps that need an editor, one could think of editor=vim. USE flag change usually triggers a rebuild of the package in question. I certainly don't want to rebuild packages just because I switch $EDITOR. If there's a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Pending death of mail-filter/spamassassin-ruledujour

2007-08-03 Thread Drake Wyrm
Pierre-Yves Rofes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, August 3, 2007 2:07 am, Robin H. Johnson wrote: The upstream rules_du_jour folk have had issues over the last few months with DDoS and other attacks. Additionally, the nature of their original update mechanism causes a lot of traffic.

Re: [gentoo-dev] multiple compile-install phases

2007-06-17 Thread Drake Wyrm
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've encountered a few cases where the build process requires building and installing something and then using that to build something else. Is there a standard way to do this? Perhaps you could build the build tools and install them to some

[gentoo-dev] Re: new herd: theology

2007-04-27 Thread Drake Wyrm
Wernfried Haas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 07:54:00AM +0200, Steffen Brumm wrote: and darwin is satan, other beliefs than christianity - death penalty, fight the sciences, womans have to go behind the cooker or into the open flame, only conservapedia is real,... This

Re: [gentoo-dev] gs use flag local - global

2007-03-17 Thread Drake Wyrm
Steve Dibb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any objections to globalizing the 'gs' use flag on support for ghostscript? snip [-] gs (app-office/rabbit): Ghostscript support [-] gs (media-gfx/graphicsmagick): enable ghostscript support [-] gs (media-gfx/imagemagick): enable

Re: [gentoo-dev] new herd suggestion: religion

2007-02-03 Thread Drake Wyrm
Steve Dibb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to propose a new herd: religion. The herd would take care of the Bible and religious software along with any genealogy programs in the tree, which there actually are a few of. I previously suggested philosophy as an alternate name, as that would

Re: [gentoo-dev] Abusing RESTRICT={no,}userpriv (was [RFC] ACCEPT_RESTRICT for questionable values of RESTRICT)

2007-01-12 Thread Drake Wyrm
Tristan Heaven [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 2007-01-13 at 00:53 +0900, Georgi Georgiev wrote: # These are games... no idea why, input appreciated games-board/ggz-txt-client games-board/ggz-sdl-games games-board/ggz-gtk-games games-board/ggz-kde-games games-board/gnuchess-book

Re: [gentoo-dev] [treecleaner] removals

2006-11-29 Thread Drake Wyrm
Steve Dibb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip # Marcelo Goes [EMAIL PROTECTED] (07 Jul 2006) # Pending removal # Please migrate to net-wireless/aircrack-ng net-wireless/aircrack snip # net-wireless/aircrack for bug(s) 152806 Use aircrack-ng snip net-wireless/aircrack snip I'm sure it doesn't

Re: [gentoo-dev] /etc/udev/rules.d nightmare II - orphaned files return!

2006-11-25 Thread Drake Wyrm
Petteri R??ty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Sven K??hler kirjoitti: i had some orphaned files in /etc/udev/rules.d. Namely 40-fuse.rules and 60-fuse.rules. The files were never removed, since they are protected - aren't they? Yeah config protected files are never removed. That is the

Re: [gentoo-dev] baselayout-1.13 going into ~ARCH soon

2006-11-07 Thread Drake Wyrm
Roy Marples [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tuesday 07 November 2006 15:59, Aron Griffis wrote: +if [[ $'\n'$(get_mounts) =~ $'\n'${svcdir}\ -w ${svclib} ]] ; then Shouldn't this be: if [[ $'\n'$(get_mounts) == $'\n'${svcdir} ... because I don't think you want to treat the RHS

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: remove my address

2006-10-24 Thread Drake Wyrm
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: stop spamming this shit and go read the mailing list page like i said already: http://www.gentoo.org/main/en/lists.xml -mike I think someone is yanking your chain, vapier. You're replying to a message that I didn't see on the list. Also, while this reply

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Developer retirement

2006-10-16 Thread Drake Wyrm
Jakub Moc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stephen Bennett napsal(a): Please, try to stay on the right mailing list. It's very annoying when you don't... No matter how hard I try, I always hit the _retarded_ behaviour of the _one_ mailing just that just _has_ to be special for _no_ apparent

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-core] Developer retirement

2006-10-16 Thread Drake Wyrm
Harald van D??k [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 10:17:00AM -0700, Drake Wyrm wrote: Jakub Moc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stephen Bennett napsal(a): Please, try to stay on the right mailing list. It's very annoying when you don't... No matter how hard I try, I

Re: [gentoo-dev] treecleaner removals

2006-09-27 Thread Drake Wyrm
Christian Heim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: # Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] (27 Aug 2006) # Masking media-radio/xlog for treecleaners and bug(s) # 88580 # Sept 27th for removal media-radio/xlog Punted. So, why was this one punted, anyway? The bug was fixed in the new version, and an updated

Re: [gentoo-dev] colon separated variables in /etc/env.d/

2006-09-10 Thread Drake Wyrm
Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Portage currently has two hard-coded lists of variables that control the behavior of env-update. I'd like to make these variables configurable so that package maintainers have direct control over them. The variables break down into two basic types: colon

[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Atom matching behavior

2006-07-31 Thread Drake Wyrm
Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 07:42:23PM +0200, Marius Mauch wrote: Was just brought to my attention that the =* operator doesn't work as I thought, as for example =foo-1.2* matches foo-1.20 as well as foo-1.2.3. snip but I'd suspect that many people share

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Atom matching behavior

2006-07-31 Thread Drake Wyrm
Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 04:55:09PM -0700, Drake Wyrm wrote: Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Jul 31, 2006 at 07:42:23PM +0200, Marius Mauch wrote: Was just brought to my attention that the =* operator doesn't work as I thought

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Atom matching behavior

2006-07-31 Thread Drake Wyrm
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 31 July 2006 18:48, Brian Harring wrote: Should be discussed on -dev, not here imo; why ? short term we're gaining functionality: simply add .* Just making sure that I understand you... Given the original example atom of =foo-1.2*, which

[gentoo-portage-dev] Re: Atom matching behavior

2006-07-31 Thread Drake Wyrm
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Monday 31 July 2006 21:37, Drake Wyrm wrote: Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: short term we're gaining functionality: simply add .* Just making sure that I understand you... Given the original example atom of =foo-1.2*, which currently

Re: [gentoo-dev] aging ebuilds with unstable keywords - how can we help?

2006-07-26 Thread Drake Wyrm
Richard Fish [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: A question [1] has come up on -user about why some ebuilds take so long to become stable for an arch. snip So my question is: is there anything that interested users can do to help here? I know we can file stabilization bugs, but I agree with Robert [1]

Re: [gentoo-dev] Making procfs mount as nosuid,noexec by default

2006-07-16 Thread Drake Wyrm
Ned Ludd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Not 100% sure about the noexec part as that might break upx which calls /proc/self/exe as part of it's decompresser routines. /proc/self/exe is a symlink, and the permissions of symlinks aren't used for anything. It's less than trivial (and I think

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] New emerge --mindeps option for exclusion of build time dependencies (bug #132355)

2006-07-12 Thread Drake Wyrm
Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The attached patch for bug #132355 [1] adds a --mindeps option for emerge that effectively allows build time dependencies to be excluded from dependency calculations involving binary and installed packages. With this patch, it's possible to remove all build

Re: [gentoo-dev] variable quoting, setting optional variables to , and depending on virtual/libc

2006-06-17 Thread Drake Wyrm
Harald van D??k [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any is fine, there is no word splitting or wildcard expansion in shell variable assignments. $ foo=bar * baz $ wombat=$foo $ echo $wombat bar somedir somefile baz -- ^ ^ A

Re: [gentoo-dev] variable quoting, setting optional variables to , and depending on virtual/libc

2006-06-17 Thread Drake Wyrm
Harald van D??k [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 11:31:27PM -0700, Drake Wyrm wrote: Harald van D??k [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Any is fine, there is no word splitting or wildcard expansion in shell variable assignments. $ foo=bar * baz $ wombat=$foo $ echo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Shouldn't gcc-4.1-related bugs have some kind of priority as gcc-4.1 is now unmasked?

2006-06-08 Thread Drake Wyrm
Matteo Azzali [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * (I'm not sending mails through gentoo.org account cause http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/infrastructure/dev-email.xml asks me to not use it to send mails unless absolutely necessary. , and I have others mean of sending emails) I

Re: [gentoo-dev] 259 paludis-profile messages. ENOUGH!

2006-05-19 Thread Drake Wyrm
Grant Goodyear [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Perhaps it's time to split off a thread or two...? Perhaps, even a meta-thread! -- Each night Father fills me with dread When he sits on the foot of my bed. I'd not mind that he speaks; In gibbers and squeaks, But for the seventeen years he's

Re: [gentoo-dev] ACCESS DENIED during emerge

2006-04-28 Thread Drake Wyrm
A. Khattri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, Chris White wrote: On Friday 28 April 2006 12:41 pm, A. Khattri wrote: In writing and testing a new ebuild, I ran emerge as root and got ACCESS DENIED errors when it tried writing two config files into /etc. Do I need to do

Re: [gentoo-dev] ACCESS DENIED during emerge

2006-04-28 Thread Drake Wyrm
Edward Catmur [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 14:01 -0700, Drake Wyrm wrote: You shouldn't need to completely override src_compile for just that. All you'd need to do is set EXTRA_ECONF appropriately. No, EXTRA_ECONF is for end-users to add their own cracktastic configure

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for app-laptop/ibm-acpi

2006-04-22 Thread Drake Wyrm
Henrik Brix Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The kernel module found in app-laptop/ibm-acpi has been included in the vanilla kernel since linux-2.6.10. There has been no releases of the stand-alone module since March 2005. Is Gentoo planning on eradicating the 2.4 kernel from the tree in the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for app-laptop/ibm-acpi

2006-04-22 Thread Drake Wyrm
Henrik Brix Andersen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 12:36:53PM -0700, Drake Wyrm wrote: Is Gentoo planning on eradicating the 2.4 kernel from the tree in the next few weeks? What does that have to do with ibm-acpi? The module doesn't compile against linux-2.4.x anyways

Re: [gentoo-dev] SRC_URI component naming collision

2006-02-25 Thread Drake Wyrm
Paul de Vrieze [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 24 February 2006 15:19, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: [snip] To avoid this, ensure that your packages use versioned SRC_URI component names, and that the name part is something that's reasonably likely to be unique (e.g. includes the package name).

Re: [gentoo-dev] where to install source files for c++ templates

2006-02-13 Thread Drake Wyrm
William Hubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can get them to build outside an ebuild fine, but I have found that festival #includes actual source files from speech-tools to instantiate c++ templates. [snip] The other option would be to not keep speech-tools as a separate ebuild, but have the

Re: [gentoo-dev] [Build beagle] errors

2006-01-21 Thread Drake Wyrm
Linux Java [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ... How can I solve it? ... !!! Please attach the following file when filing a report to bugs.gentoo.org: !!! /var/tmp/portage/beagle-0.2.0/work/beagle-0.2.0/config.log I would suggest searching Bugzilla or the forums, or asking on the gentoo-user list.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Does anyone want|need a static (lib)perl still?

2006-01-18 Thread Drake Wyrm
Michael Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 20:18 -0800, Drake Wyrm wrote: Portage is not the only important system tool. Some of us actually use Perl. Please do not be with the breaking. Is this to say there is a valid need for both libperl.a and libperl.so on your

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Does anyone want|need a static (lib)perl still?

2006-01-18 Thread Drake Wyrm
Michael Cummings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 06:27 -0800, Drake Wyrm wrote: Personally, no, but others do. I should have been less ambiguous (and obnoxious) in my initial response. Please don't assume that just because _you_ don't need a static Perl, that _nobody_ needs

Re: [gentoo-dev] /sbin /usr/sbin security hole

2006-01-17 Thread Drake Wyrm
Pawe?? Madej [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Frank Groeneveld wrote: You probably have /sbin/shutdown set suid, because on all my Gentoo boxes, normal users can't run it, only root can run it. (Permission denied). What is the output of ls -al /sbin/? [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ ls -al /sbin/ [snip]

[gentoo-dev] Re: Does anyone want|need a static (lib)perl still?

2006-01-17 Thread Drake Wyrm
Joshua Baergen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm all for less cruft and more simplicity. As far as I know none of the Portage tools depend on Perl, so I don't really find a 'nuclear fallout has caused dynamic linking to be erratic' situation to be that important. Portage is not the only

Re: [gentoo-dev] New global USE flag - gs

2006-01-09 Thread Drake Wyrm
Lares Moreau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: media-gfx/graphicsmagick:gs - enable ghostscript support media-gfx/imagemagick:gs - enable ghostscript support media-libs/urt:gs - Add support for postscript Looking in these ebuilds, all: gs? ( virtual/ghostscript ) For how many of these might it make

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split definitions for an idiom

2006-01-07 Thread Drake Wyrm
Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 04 Jan 2006 05:26:44 -0700 Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: | That begs the question... No it doesn't. http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/begs.html | Curious users want to know! Perhaps said curious users should go and take a look, then.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: $BUILDDIR in ebuilds

2005-12-26 Thread Drake Wyrm
Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 02:51:26AM -0500, Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- wrote: Like in here? app-doc/halibut/halibut-0.9.ebuild: BUILDDIR=${S}/build \ net-dns/maradns/maradns-1.0.27.ebuild:BUILDDIR=${S}/build \

Re: [gentoo-dev] Installing COPYING or LICENSE files

2005-12-26 Thread Drake Wyrm
Petteri R??ty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Petteri R??ty wrote: R Hill wrote: Daniel Ahlberg wrote: * if ebuild installs COPYING and/or INSTALL into doc. Is this actually important? There are a hell of a lot of ebuilds that fail under this rule. I'd like to start filing patches for some of

Re: [gentoo-dev] another global use flag...

2005-12-22 Thread Drake Wyrm
Carsten Lohrke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: use.local.desc:app-text/ghostscript-afpl:jasper - Enable support for jpeg2k (jasper) use.local.desc:kde-base/kdegraphics:jpeg2k - Enable support for jpeg2k (jasper) use.local.desc:kde-base/kdelibs:jpeg2k - Enable support for jpeg2k (jasper)

Re: [gentoo-dev] vendors.gentoo.org

2005-12-05 Thread Drake Wyrm
Kurt Lieber [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 04:40:28PM + or thereabouts, George Prowse wrote: Is vendors.gentoo.org going to have the new redesign that curtis119 is implementating? The eventual plan is for all web sites residing under the *.gentoo.org domain to have

Re: [gentoo-dev] browserplugin vs. nsplugin

2005-10-17 Thread Drake Wyrm
Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 22:52 +0200, dju` wrote: Probably a silly question, but why choose nsplugin over browserplugin? This may not be a particularly _good_ reason, but nsplugin is already an accepted global USE flag. At any rate, it is probably

Re: [gentoo-dev] subscribe

2005-09-11 Thread Drake Wyrm
Josh M. Anders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: subscribe -- Josh M. Anders, MVP, MCSE+ Senior System Administrator UNIX Expert Oh, the irony... -- I used to think romantic love was a neurosis shared by two, a supreme foolishness. I no longer thought that. There's nothing foolish in loving

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] EAPI

2005-08-26 Thread Drake Wyrm
Brian Harring [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 03:49:35PM -0400, Kristian Benoit wrote: [snip] the EAPI would be an ebuild API definition. The equivalent to the XML's dtd. The ebuild could point to a directory named $PORTDIR/eapi/eapi-name/ which would contain a python

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Proper commit messages

2005-08-11 Thread Drake Wyrm
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: also, four tabs rule I prefer single-character tabs. (0x09) -- I used to think romantic love was a neurosis shared by two, a supreme foolishness. I no longer thought that. There's nothing foolish in loving anyone. Thinking you'll be loved in return is

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Hello

2005-07-17 Thread Drake Wyrm
Stuart Longland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Simon Stelling wrote: Chris Gianelloni wrote: Filtering the lists leads to a slippery slope. What happens when you start getting false positives? True, but why not filtering binary attachments? *If* you have to send an attachment to these

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-embedded] Interactive command

2005-07-16 Thread Drake Wyrm
Kristian Benoit [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just checked and pkg_config does not handle make menuconfig correctly either :( Probably a bug. Sorry I didn't tune into this thread earlier... Most ncurses-based tools, including most menuconfig scripts, need to be attached to an interactive

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] Proposal: pre-emerge advisories

2005-07-09 Thread Drake Wyrm
Jason Stubbs [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 08 July 2005 16:40, Craig Lawson wrote: What I'd like to see *before* I upgrade is a list of advisories about what trouble I'm in for. How about the ChangeLog? That would be a great answer. I look for trips and traps by doing an `emerge

Re: [gentoo-dev] splitting build deps out from depends

2005-07-01 Thread Drake Wyrm
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 01 July 2005 12:25 pm, Brian D. Harring wrote: Currently, we pretty much leave out the big dogs of build depends from ebuilds- basically we rely on the profile to require a suitable toolchain. Couple of issues with this though- so what

Re: [gentoo-dev] where to put *.pm files

2005-05-25 Thread Drake Wyrm
Rene Zbinden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am writing a new ebuild. The program contains a perlscript (mainprog.pl) which needs two perl modules like (module1.pm module2.pm) I will put mainprog.pl in /usr/bin but where do I put the two modules. Shall I put them in /usr/share/programename and

Re: [gentoo-dev] .keep files

2005-05-21 Thread Drake Wyrm
marduk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, 2005-05-21 at 22:28 +0200, Andrej Kacian wrote: Are .keep files necessary in a live filesystem? AFAIK they're only there to keep portage from removing a directory from emerge-time image. Would it be possible to just remove them from live filesystem

Re: [gentoo-dev] Request for Permission

2005-05-16 Thread Drake Wyrm
Rick Sivernell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am operating a small IT service organization and I would like to put a link to Gentoo on my site. My ad: [snip] If there is a standard ad that you would prefer, I will use it. This is a service for my clients use and reference. If you allow my listing

Re: [gentoo-dev] ieee1394 useflag

2005-04-21 Thread Drake Wyrm
At 2005-04-22T08:38:22+0900, Georgi Georgiev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: maillog: 21/04/2005-23:43:57(+0200): Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten? types Same for ieee1394, usually enables support for media-plugins/libdc1394, sys-libs/libavc1394 and/or sys-libs/libraw1394. Considering that a person