Re: [gentoo-dev] */*: Mask Py2 only packages

2020-06-20 Thread Guilherme Amadio
On Sat, Jun 20, 2020 at 12:58:20AM -0400, Aaron Bauman wrote: > > # Aaron Bauman (2020-06-20) > > # Py2 only > > # Removal in 14 days > > dev-util/uftrace This is a function tracer written in C. I don't know why it's on this list. If a package has only optional support for python like this, just

Re: [gentoo-dev] Value of Continuous integration vs Code Review / Pull Requests

2020-05-27 Thread Guilherme Amadio
Hi, On Wed, May 27, 2020 at 02:45:29PM +0200, Toralf Förster wrote: > On 5/27/20 2:16 PM, Thomas Deutschmann wrote: > > The problem when doing review on Github > > for me is, that we usually create new revisions. Therefore we don't see > > what's changed in new revision versus previous revision.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] dev-python/metadata.xml: Clarify description

2020-03-09 Thread Guilherme Amadio
Hi Michał, longdescription lang="pt" A categoria dev-python contém pacotes cujo propósito principal é fornecer módulos, extensões e bindings para Python, bem como ferramentas e outros utilitários para desenvolvimento de software em Python. Cheers, -Guilherme On Sun, Mar 08, 2020 at 10:24:17AM

Re: [gentoo-dev] Need ARM/AArch64 test data for cpuid2cpuflags

2019-09-25 Thread Guilherme Amadio
Hi Michał, On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 10:44:54PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, everyone. > > I've recently (finally!) started adding tests to cpuid2cpuflags. Tests > are based on mocked syscalls that return arch-specific data read from > text files. So far I've got x86 and ppc covered, and now

Re: [gentoo-dev] util-linux build time increase?

2019-02-21 Thread Guilherme Amadio
On Thu, Feb 21, 2019 at 04:36:24AM -0500, Joshua Kinard wrote: > Does anyone have an idea why util-linux's build time would go up > significantly from 2.32.x to 2.33.x? It may be a MIPS thing, as my x86_64 > box shows no discernible change in build times between the same versions. > Can any other

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] C++ standard in ebuilds

2018-09-18 Thread Guilherme Amadio
On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 10:24:48AM -0700, Matt Turner wrote: > I don't understand what a potential solution would be. > > The various projects use -std=c++XXX because that's what their code > requires. -std=c++XXX can't generally be changed. If a dependent > project is incompatible that's no

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] C++ standard in ebuilds

2018-09-18 Thread Guilherme Amadio
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 08:46:46AM -0400, Richard Yao wrote: > > > On Sep 17, 2018, at 12:40 PM, Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov > > wrote: > > > > I'd prefer to wait another replies on the list for the main theme of this e- > > mail, but this problem also affects C (so, as **c**flags and C

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] C++ standard in ebuilds

2018-09-17 Thread Guilherme Amadio
Hi everyone, I would like to discuss a system-wide way to handle C++ standard setting in Gentoo. We currently have many packages appending -std=c++XX to their flags, and it's hard to keep track of which packages use which version of the standard. This is a problem when packages force dependencies

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] Make 'cuda' a global USE flag

2018-09-17 Thread Guilherme Amadio
Hi everyone, We have several packages (~35) with local USE=cuda. Should we make that a global USE flag? It's a quite generic flag for GPU support, so I was surprised to learn it was still local when I added support for it to a package recently. Another thing we might want to discuss is a global

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: [QA] Ban policy introduction

2018-07-30 Thread Guilherme Amadio
Hello, I like the idea of enforcing quality rules in the tree, but I have a few reservations regarding the current plan. On Sun, Jul 29, 2018 at 04:47:47PM +0900, Alice Ferrazzi wrote: > Sent from my phone. Please excuse my brevity. > > On Sun, 29 Jul 2018, 16:39 Fabian Groffen, wrote: > > >

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] udev.eclass: return unprefixed udevdir

2018-06-08 Thread Guilherme Amadio
Hi, This is a simple fix, but I'd like it to be reviewed. Without this get_udevdir returns the prefixed directory, leading to double prefix on udev related packages (e.g. fuse-common). Even if not used in prefix, udev related packages are usually pulled in as dependencies of other packages

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: Remove inherit eutils from font.eclass for EAPI=6

2018-02-14 Thread Guilherme Amadio
On Thu, Feb 15, 2018 at 03:16:22AM +0200, Mart Raudsepp wrote: > On Wed, 2018-02-14 at 23:43 +0100, Jonas Stein wrote: > > Did I miss something? > > Who can help to check with (an automatic) testenvironment, if these > > packages will survive? > > Don't check with test environments, read the

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: masking old versions of sys-devel/gcc

2017-04-25 Thread Guilherme Amadio
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 11:26:16AM -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 07:59:53PM +0200, Guilherme Amadio wrote: > > > > I would rather prefer to keep essential development tools in tree. > > GCC is not only used as system compiler, but also for developme

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: masking old versions of sys-devel/gcc

2017-04-24 Thread Guilherme Amadio
On Mon, Apr 24, 2017 at 11:01:32AM -0500, William Hubbs wrote: > On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 02:35:48PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm thinking of masking old versions of sys-devel/gcc, in particular > > older than the 4.9 branch. > [...] > > My solution > > === > > > > I

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package up for grab

2016-08-03 Thread Guilherme Amadio
On Wed, Aug 03, 2016 at 11:15:30AM +0800, Jason Zaman wrote: > On Tue, Aug 02, 2016 at 04:08:34PM -0700, Jigme Datse Rasku wrote: > > I'd have to say, there is likely a reason we are looking for a new > > maintainer. I don't know what is involved, but I might be interested. > > Might be wanting

Re: [gentoo-dev] Augmenting the CPU_FLAGS_X86 list and creating CPU_FLAGS_PPC + CPU_FLAGS_ARM

2016-08-02 Thread Guilherme Amadio
On Mon, Aug 01, 2016 at 11:08:47PM +0200, David Seifert wrote: > Dear friends, > while version bumping sci-libs/fftw, I've noticed our CPU_FLAGS_X86 > list could be expanded a bit: I like the idea of expanding the list of CPU_FLAGS_X86, and having flags for other arches too, but I would be in

Re: [gentoo-dev] Need design help/input for eclean-kernel

2016-07-01 Thread Guilherme Amadio
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 02:38:26PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > So if you have some time, please reply to this thread with > a specific /boot layout that you think needs to be handled, with > as much helpful information as possible -- including possible > distinctive features and pitfalls. Looks

Re: [gentoo-dev] Migrate to Phabricator

2016-04-18 Thread Guilherme Amadio
Hello, On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 01:44:00PM +0200, Jonas Jelten wrote: > Ohai! > > Phabricator is a fun adventure game: http://phabricator.org/ > It provides a tightly coupled set of project management tools. > > Many bigger projects (e.g. blender, mediawiki, ...) started using > phabricator, it

Re: [gentoo-dev] packages to grab

2016-01-08 Thread Guilherme Amadio
Hi, On Fri, Jan 08, 2016 at 11:04:03AM -0500, Göktürk Yüksek wrote: > Hi, > > > > > I will move all packages I maintain [1] to the associated projects if > > possible. All devs are free to take what ever you are interested in. I > > am also happy to proxy contributors if they like to maintain a

Re: [gentoo-dev] [EAPI 7] Cross-compile improvements (BDEPEND, BROOT, sysroot)

2015-12-03 Thread Guilherme Amadio
On Tue, Dec 01, 2015 at 10:58:55PM +, James Le Cuirot wrote: > Sorry for the length of this but you really need to consider the bigger > picture with this stuff and not all devs are familiar with it. > > For EAPI 7, mgorny and I are seeking to address some cross-compiling > issues. This is a

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] eutils.eclass: Allow to configure base patch location for epatch_user

2015-09-05 Thread Guilherme Amadio
On Sat, Sep 05, 2015 at 02:42:15PM +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > On Sat, 5 Sep 2015, Rich Freeman wrote: > > > I certainly support the principle, but for the sake of transparency > > can we try to coordinate this so that the setting name doesn't > > change when this moves into the package

Re: [gentoo-dev] repoman adding Package-Manager: portage-2.2.20.1 to every single commit

2015-08-19 Thread Guilherme Amadio
On Wed, Aug 19, 2015 at 11:00:49AM -0700, Zac Medico wrote: On 08/19/2015 10:49 AM, hasufell wrote: On 08/19/2015 07:37 PM, Zac Medico wrote: On 08/19/2015 09:33 AM, hasufell wrote: I don't want to start a lot of bikeshed, but I think this information is practically useless. If there

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Fonts project meeting and elections

2015-03-01 Thread Guilherme Amadio
On Sun, Mar 01, 2015 at 08:59:38PM +0800, Ben de Groot wrote: On 28 February 2015 at 19:52, Michael Orlitzky m...@gentoo.org wrote: On 02/28/2015 01:47 AM, Ben de Groot wrote: Since this is mostly used for web developers, I recommend to leave it off for desktop users, but possibly on for

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Fonts project meeting and elections

2015-02-27 Thread Guilherme Amadio
Hello! On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 03:45:23PM +0800, Ben de Groot wrote: On 22 February 2015 at 03:43, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org wrote: To anyone within Gentoo who is interested in fonts I would like to announce a meeting to be held in #gentoo-meetings on Freenode, on Friday February 27

Re: [gentoo-dev] Fonts project meeting and elections

2015-02-22 Thread Guilherme Amadio
Hello, On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 03:43:33AM +0800, Ben de Groot wrote: To anyone within Gentoo who is interested in fonts I would like to announce a meeting to be held in #gentoo-meetings on Freenode, on Friday February 27 at 06:00 UTC, unless another date and/or time will be suggested by

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item review: bash-completion-2.1-r90

2014-10-13 Thread Guilherme Amadio
On Mon, Oct 13, 2014 at 07:37:19AM -0400, Alex Xu wrote: On 13/10/14 05:35 AM, Michał Górny wrote: Please review the following news item. - Title: bash-completion-2.1-r90 Author: Michał Górny mgo...@gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain Posted: -MM-DD Revision: 1

[gentoo-dev] Re: Resolving HAL vs. pciutils/usbutils

2007-10-31 Thread Guilherme Amadio
Hi guys, I totally agree with the patch sent by Daniel in the previous message. I think it clarifies to the user (me, for example), why it's not possible to build pciutils with the zlib USE flag. This is just my humble opinion, though, as a user. And sorry to a bit off this thread, but I