I see that the USE flags list is very big today but I don't know if
it's growing too fast. So, I may think that someday Gentoo will need
some mechanism to facilitate USE flags configuration.
I suggest the creation of a USE flags grouping mechanism to help the
decision making of configuring
:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Herbert,
Herbert Fischer schrieb:
| ...
|
| I suggest the creation of a USE flags grouping mechanism to help the
| decision making of configuring make.conf when doing initial setup or
| ...
You mean GLEP 29[1] ???
Danny
[1] http
Great!
Doing a grep on portage I found this another package with profile.d
things: dev-util/aegis
Thanks!
On 7/20/05, Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wednesday 20 July 2005 03:27 pm, Herbert Fischer wrote:
So... profile.d have future on Gentoo? If yes, any idea on when
that on the cited commercial OSes global customizations, that
can break the entire system, can be easily done by any user.
On 7/15/05, Michael Marineau [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 15 July 2005 06:56 pm, Herbert Fischer wrote:
Thanks... I saw that bug and saw
So... why /etc/.skel/ needs to be touched by Gentoo emerges? Isn't
this directory subject to developers installing foo-bar.sh files?
So, isn't this case the same with /etc/profile.d ??
On 7/16/05, Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 21:34:09 -0400
Mike Frysinger [EMAIL
I meant... Isn't this directory subject to developers installing
custom .bashrc or .bash_profile, or whatever automatically executed on
login?
On 7/16/05, Herbert Fischer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So... why /etc/.skel/ needs to be touched by Gentoo emerges? Isn't
this directory subject
All scripts created by Gentoo emerges have some header signature (sort
of cvs information), am I right?
If so, some sort of checking script can detect Gentoo signed files on
/etc/profile.d and just ignore them when scanning profile.d for user
scripts.
On 7/16/05, Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I'm new to this list and I really don't know if this is the right
place to post this message. I already posted something about this on
the gentoo forums and I don't know too if the correct persons are
seeing that, so I decided to post here. Sorry for the double posting,
so I'll be straight on
thanks! I did not look at bugs.gentoo.org because I did not thought
that things like this could be placed there, as I consider a
suggestion, not a bug.
On 7/15/05, Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 15 July 2005 05:59 pm, Herbert Fischer wrote:
In Slackware I had /etc/profile.d
Thanks... I saw that bug and saw that it is very old (from 2002) and
nothing was done. Did you know why?
On 7/15/05, Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 15 July 2005 06:36 pm, Herbert Fischer wrote:
thanks! I did not look at bugs.gentoo.org because I did not thought
that things
try
something.
On 7/15/05, Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 15 July 2005 06:56 pm, Herbert Fischer wrote:
Thanks... I saw that bug and saw that it is very old (from 2002) and
nothing was done. Did you know why?
hmm, us baselayout guys have discussed it before, but i guess
11 matches
Mail list logo
