Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 05:52:20PM -0500, Matthias Maier wrote
>
>> (A-C) gcc-5.4.0 and gcc-4.9.4 are slotted separately. What is going to
>> be the default is entirely up to you.
>
> Good to hear. Like I said, on a fresh install I'd go with the current
> version (5.4).
Tomas Mozes wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Jörg Schaible <
> joerg.schai...@bpm-inspire.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> according the logs, gcc 4.5.0-r3 is stable for amd64:
>> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/log/sys-devel/gcc?showmsg=1
James Le Cuirot wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Apr 2017 15:12:13 +0200
> Jörg Schaible <joerg.schai...@bpm-inspire.com> wrote:
>
>> As said, I synced the tree twice this morning (4 hours ago) and the
>> KEYWORDS in the ebuild do not declare amd64 as stable although it was
Tomas Mozes wrote:
[snip]
> As mentioned by others, bugs on packages.gentoo.org will not affect your
> portage tree. I've just installed gcc 5.4.0-r3 on amd64, so try syncing
> your portage tree. Don't you have it in your package.mask?
As said, I synced the tree twice this morning (4 hours ago)
Hi Tomas,
Tomas Mozes wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 18, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Jörg Schaible <
> joerg.schai...@bpm-inspire.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> according the logs, gcc 4.5.0-r3 is stable for amd64:
>> https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/log/sys-devel/gcc?
Hi,
according the logs, gcc 4.5.0-r3 is stable for amd64:
https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/log/sys-devel/gcc?showmsg=1
However, after synching the tree, this version is still unstable for me.
Looking at the packages overview, it becomes even more weird, because there
seem to be two
Hi,
after upgrading to KDE 5, all remaining KDE 4 applications report a
broken/unknown file protocol. This means:
- cannot save attachments in KMail
- cannot open HTML files FS in Konqueror
- cannot assign covers to albums from local FS in Amarok
Does anybody know how to fix this?
Cheers,
-1
I'd love to move to grub2 for all of my machines, but it does simply not
work for one of my servers. I can install grub2 and it tells me that
installation and anything else went fine, but when I try to boot with it, it
stops and reports me that it found some conflicting area in my bios why
Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 31 maja 2016 23:34:07 CEST, "Jörg Schaible" <joerg.schai...@gmx.de>
> napisał(a):
>>How can I select different linguas for individual packages with this
>>approach?
>
> Using the currently available mechanisms you could use
Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 5:34 PM, Jörg Schaible <joerg.schai...@gmx.de>
> wrote:
>> How can I select different linguas for individual packages with this
>> approach?
>
> Why would you want to?
As programmer I am used to read English manuals an
How can I select different linguas for individual packages with this
approach?
Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello, everyone.
>
> Since the previous thread doesn't seem to have brought any good
> solution to the problem other than stopping to (ab)use LINGUAS
> as USE_EXPAND, I would like to start a
Hi Tobias,
Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Tomorrow, code.google.com will turn off write access to all
> remaining projects[0]. As such, Gentoo ebuilds which still have
> HOMEPAGE= pointing there should be updated.
Hmm. Codehaus has also been shut down this year in May, but packages still
Michał Górny wrote:
Dnia 2014-06-26, o godz. 00:48:02
Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de napisał(a):
hasufell wrote:
Kristian Fiskerstrand:
On 06/24/2014 09:25 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
On Mon, 2014-06-23 at 22:15 +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote:
So, why
Jan Matejka wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 21:25:40 +0200
Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de wrote:
Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
On Mon, 2014-06-23 at 22:15 +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote:
So, why the heck, was the dependency to dev-libs/glib
hasufell wrote:
Kristian Fiskerstrand:
On 06/24/2014 09:25 PM, Jörg Schaible wrote:
Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
On Mon, 2014-06-23 at 22:15 +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote:
So, why the heck, was the dependency to dev-libs/glib changed
for an existing ebuild without increasing its version (e.g
hasufell wrote:
Jörg Schaible:
Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
On Mon, 2014-06-23 at 22:15 +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote:
So, why the heck, was the dependency to dev-libs/glib changed for an
existing ebuild without increasing its version (e.g.
dbus-glib-0.100.2-r2)?
Please see http
Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
On Mon, 2014-06-23 at 22:15 +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote:
So, why the heck, was the dependency to dev-libs/glib changed for an
existing ebuild without increasing its version (e.g.
dbus-glib-0.100.2-r2)?
Please see http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel
Hi,
can somebody tell my, since when existing (and installed) ebuilds suddenly
change without at least increasing the version number?
Today's synchronization got me suddenly dependency conflicts for installed
packages:
% =
!!! All ebuilds that
Hi Zac,
Zac Medico wrote:
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 9:51 AM, Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de
wrote:
The most annoying fact is, that none of this would have been necessary
with portage 2.2, but maybe we have to wait for 2.1.11.500 before 2.2
gets stable...
Since portage-2.1.11.20 [1
Andreas K. Huettel wrote:
Am Dienstag 08 Mai 2012, 12:30:04 schrieb Andreas K. Huettel:
After some discussion with Ulrich on IRC, we settled on the name
app-officeext,
which we'll be able to fill with a couple of hundred (open|libre)office
extensions then... :) I guess this is a compromise
dev-ran...@mail.ru wrote:
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 01:57:38PM +0100, Ben de Groot wrote:
2010/1/16 Peter Volkov p...@gentoo.org:
layman cache is nfs distributable. Also it's good idea to have it close
to PORTDIR. Thus I'd like to keep it somewhere at /usr.
I'd like both to be under /var/
21 matches
Mail list logo
