Re: [gentoo-dev] Naming of repositories: gento-x86 edition, bike shedding wanted

2015-03-19 Thread Jan Matejka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Sat, 14 Mar 2015 22:25:56 + Robin H. Johnson robb...@gentoo.org wrote: Questions: 0. What names for the tree/repository. git://anongit.gentoo.org/portage-tree.git ? 1. afaik everyone is calling it this way already anyway. 2. Since it is

Re: [gentoo-dev] Regarding my final year thesis

2015-02-02 Thread Jan Matejka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Fri, 16 Jan 2015 21:00:24 +0100 Luca Barbato lu_z...@gentoo.org wrote: On 16/01/15 18:30, Jan Matejka wrote: On Fri, 07 Nov 2014 10:49:13 +0100 Luca Barbato lu_z...@gentoo.org wrote: On 07/11/14 06:06, Harsh Bhatt wrote: Also make

Re: [gentoo-dev] Regarding my final year thesis

2015-01-16 Thread Jan Matejka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Fri, 07 Nov 2014 10:49:13 +0100 Luca Barbato lu_z...@gentoo.org wrote: On 07/11/14 06:06, Harsh Bhatt wrote: Also make might enjoy improvements. shake? - -- Jan Matějka| Developer https://gentoo.org | Gentoo Linux GPG: A33E F5BC

Re: [gentoo-dev] don't rely on dynamic deps

2014-08-27 Thread Jan Matejka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Wed, 23 Jul 2014 00:05:32 +0200 Tom Wijsman tom...@gentoo.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 16:41:39 -0400 Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote: I wonder if there may be some form of

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Changes in installed ebuilds

2014-06-25 Thread Jan Matejka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Tue, 24 Jun 2014 21:25:40 +0200 Jörg Schaible joerg.schai...@gmx.de wrote: Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote: On Mon, 2014-06-23 at 22:15 +0200, Jörg Schaible wrote: So, why the heck, was the dependency to dev-libs/glib changed for an existing

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC GLEP 1005: Package Tags

2014-03-25 Thread Jan Matejka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Mon, 24 Mar 2014 15:25:12 +0100 Jeroen Roovers j...@gentoo.org wrote: On Mon, 24 Mar 2014 12:36:19 +0100 Jan Matejka y...@gentoo.org wrote: Categories are essentially tags, only less powerful as they can express relationship of 1:N while

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC GLEP 1005: Package Tags

2014-03-25 Thread Jan Matejka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Mon, 24 Mar 2014 09:32:40 +0200 Alan McKinnon alan.mckin...@gmail.com wrote: Who is going to approve/disapprove tagable attributes and the tags themselves? How will you resolve disagreements people have? Sounds like a job for QA What

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC GLEP 1005: Package Tags

2014-03-25 Thread Jan Matejka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Sun, 23 Mar 2014 17:40:20 -0400 Joshua Kinard ku...@gentoo.org wrote: TBH, I don't like the use of XML at all. No, we don't need to go one level (format) deeper. The 'all' thing is probably unnecessary What problem does having 'all' tag

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC GLEP 1005: Package Tags

2014-03-25 Thread Jan Matejka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Sat, 22 Mar 2014 15:33:27 -0700 Alec Warner anta...@gentoo.org wrote: https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Package_Tags Object or forever hold your peace. Or argue for 100 posts, either way. -A It might be worthwile to prototype this

Re: [gentoo-dev] dev-lang/go

2014-02-14 Thread Jan Matejka
On Thu, 13 Feb 2014 11:59:16 -0600 William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote: Hi all, I responded to this a while back, but I guess my email didn't go out for some reason. As the primary go maintainer, I do want to be involved in this. :-) On Tue, Feb 11, 2014 at 01:38:44AM +0100, yac

Re: [gentoo-dev] Dealing with XDG directories in ebuild environment

2014-01-29 Thread Jan Matejka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 What's the point of having nonempty XDG_ variables in ebuilds? Use of these variables is scoped to user applications that use these in runtime, therefore I see no business for them in package (de)installation and it should be ok for portage to

Re: [gentoo-dev] New global use flags: 3dnowext, mmxext, ssse3, sse4_1, avx, avx2

2013-12-19 Thread Jan Matejka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On Sun, 15 Dec 2013 15:34:13 -0800 Matt Turner matts...@gentoo.org wrote: And at the same time, clean up the descriptions of the other flags. The existing descriptions were clearly copy-and-pasted and contained things like faster floating point