On Sat, 24 Jan 2009 23:38:32 -0800
Josh Saddler nightmo...@gentoo.org wrote:
Right now, there's no canonical (heh) way of handling SRC_URI for
projects that have their files at launchpad.net. We need a standard
way of handling Launchpad SRC_URIs, similar to what we do with
On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 14:09:49 +0100
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Hi,
as specified in the PMS spec [1] and stated in #gentoo-portage,
RDEPEND will be set to DEPEND, if it is not defined in the ebuild
itself. But devmanual [2] and developer handbook [3] both state, you
have do
On Sat, 17 Jan 2009 16:41:25 +0100
Thomas Sachau to...@gentoo.org wrote:
Marius Mauch schrieb:
It's strongly recommended to set both explicitly as the behavior
could change in future EAPI versions, and to ensure that you
actually think about which deps are build deps and which
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 10:55:39 +0100
Fabio Rossi ross...@inwind.it wrote:
On Wednesday 31 December 2008, Marius Mauch wrote:
Any reason for that? Aesthetics aren't a very compelling argument
IMO, and the FHS also seems to favor the current layout (in my
interpretation at least, as we're
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 12:00:35 +0100
Fabio Rossi ross...@inwind.it wrote:
On Wednesday 31 December 2008, Marius Mauch wrote:
The same could be said about /var/lib/init.d, /var/lib/dhcp,
/var/lib/iptables or several other packages that aren't hosted by
Gentoo. In the other direction
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 16:15:54 +0100
Fabio Rossi ross...@inwind.it wrote:
On Wednesday 31 December 2008, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
Fabio Rossi wrote:
On Wednesday 31 December 2008, Duncan wrote:
Except that... in theory, some or all of those apps could
technically be used on/for other
On Wed, 31 Dec 2008 01:12:23 +0100
Fabio Rossi ross...@inwind.it wrote:
I'm proposing to reorganize the files related to Gentoo
inside /var/lib. Currently we have this situation (at least on my
system):
/var/lib/eselect
/var/lib/gentoo/enews
/var/lib/herdstat/
/var/lib/module-rebuild
On Tue, 30 Dec 2008 09:37:24 +0530
Nirbheek Chauhan nirbheek.chau...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 30, 2008 at 8:27 AM, Ben de Groot yng...@gentoo.org
wrote:
Zac Medico wrote:
Nevermind, apparently GLEP 31 already requires ASCII anyway:
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0031.html
On Tue, 9 Dec 2008 11:21:24 -0800
Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 01:44 Tue 09 Dec , Federico Ferri wrote:
today I hit this annoyance, because my laptop hung in the middle of
an 'emerge -e @world' (checking that my world set compiles with
gcc-4.3... stopped at ~ 300 of 700
On Sun, 7 Dec 2008 12:44:25 +0900
Douglas Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I also thought about renaming the list(l) option as search,
because if you look at the help output, almost every module lists
something. equery's list is actually a search, I don't see why we
shouldn't name it that. I
On Wed, 03 Dec 2008 02:05:31 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò) wrote:
metadata.xml already contains data that eix and other software should
be able to search in (like longdescriptions), and having each package
in kde-base report http://www.kde.org/ as its homepage is kinda
On Wed, 3 Dec 2008 08:19:18 +0100
Maciej Mrozowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, and I'm afraid I cannot provide any single evidence that users
actually need features like:
- per package cflags/ldflags/features
- per category use flags, accept_keywords, cflags
- or tag clouds instead of hard
On Mon, 01 Dec 2008 11:39:35 +0300
Peter Volkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This leads me to different conclusion. I was thinking about new
portage feature: emerge --info pkg . So to make portage show not
only global information but per-package either. In many cases this
will simplify analyzing
On Mon, 01 Dec 2008 15:35:32 -0700
Joe Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My intention with the RFC was to see if the concept has any worth and
to kick it around a bit. I do not really see this as a deficiency in
Gentoo's technology (which I have a feeling is how many here have
interpreted
So, time has come for me to realize that my time with Gentoo is over. I
haven't actually been doing much Gentoo work over the last months due
to personal reasons (nothing Gentoo related), and I don't see that
situation changing in the near future. In fact I've already reassigned
or dropped most of
On Sun, 30 Nov 2008 09:25:51 -0700
Joe Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bottom line here is that there is extremely valuable and critical info
in our emerge output. In a way, these messages are like
Gentoo-specific READMEs (or release notes and/or install
instructions). However, it is not
So, time has come for me to realize that my time with Gentoo is over. I
haven't actually been doing much Gentoo work over the last months due
to personal reasons (nothing Gentoo related), and I don't see that
situation changing in the near future. In fact I've already reassigned
or dropped most of
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 07:17:40 -0500
Emma Strubell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, I've started looking at the code, and I must admit I'm pretty
overwhelmed! I don't know where to start. I was wondering if anyone
on here could give me a quick overview of how the search function
currently
On Sun, 23 Nov 2008 21:01:40 -0800 (PST)
devsk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
not relying on custom system daemonsrunning in the background.
Why is a portage daemon such a bad thing? Or hard to do? I would very
much like a daemon running on my system which I can configure to sync
the portage
On Fri, 14 Nov 2008 11:35:44 +0100
Gilles Dartiguelongue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Le mercredi 12 novembre 2008 à 18:16 +0100, Peter Alfredsen a écrit :
[snip]
Mart had already proposed a static-lib USE flag. Donnie just
suggested on IRC we turn this use flag into a FEATURES flag.
On Fri, 31 Oct 2008 10:52:59 -0400
Doug Goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Someone remind me again why we have the kerberos USE flag enabled by
default?
AFAIK it was added so that the default profile provides support for
joining a Windows domain (same for the ldap flag).
If no one opposes, I
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008 00:19:27 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 14:47:06 -0700
Robin H. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 05:43:38PM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Utterly illegal, needs to die.
Why? I don't agree that it needs to
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 17:20:32 -0700
Robin H. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ignoring Vapier's tirade against ciaranm there, we need the
xDEPEND-syntax for SLOTS as the real solution, however that still
wouldn't resolve the portion that has CTARGET as part of the SLOT,
since metadata
On Tue, 14 Oct 2008 10:59:39 +0200
Jose Luis Rivero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 05:38:34PM -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 02:03 Tue 14 Oct , Jose Luis Rivero wrote:
There are some others sceneries but are not so common as the one
presented could be. Any
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 14:48:19 +0200
Fabian Groffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Whatever. Some of you seem to have some quite agressive dislikement
to it. In the end it's just a name/tag. I guess I could live with
anything, including c3p0.
Well, while I dislike x64 I'm more concerned about
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 20:11:01 +0200
Fabian Groffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
amd64-linux
x64-openbsd
x64-solaris
Is there a special reason why you're using x64 instead of amd64 in
those cases? (IMO x64 is the most stupid name for the x86_64
architecture)
Marius
On Fri, 10 Oct 2008 00:16:10 + (UTC)
Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri,
10 Oct 2008 00:05:00 +0200:
On Thu, 9 Oct 2008 20:11:01 +0200
Fabian Groffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
amd64-linux
x64
On Sat, 04 Oct 2008 03:46:41 +
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would also be important to have versioned sets (depending on a
slot, for example). Marius Mauch (genone) suggested a very
interesting way to solve this by using a set config file (portage
specific
On Fri, 5 Sep 2008 17:24:57 +0200
Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- another idea that hasn't been mentioned yet is that we could simply
inject @system into world_sets in the portage ebuild when we detect a
2.1-2.2 upgrade (the ebuild already does a few other migrations that
way
On Wed, 10 Sep 2008 01:43:45 +0100
Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marius Mauch wrote:
Second for the suggestions on how to handle the transition:
- treating 'world' and '@world' differently is a no go from my POV.
One of the main reasons to implement them as sets was to remove
On Sat, 23 Aug 2008 13:39:58 -0700
Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do the name and definition of this PROPERTIES=live value seem good?
Would anybody like to discuss any changes to the name, definition,
or both?
Not sure if 'live' is really the best choice here, as many things also
apply
On Sun, 24 Aug 2008 14:01:48 -0700
Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do the name and definition of this PROPERTIES=virtual value seem
good? Would anybody like to discuss any changes to the name,
definition, or both?
If it's only used to indicate that the package doesn't install any
files
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 14:20:07 + (UTC)
Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I therefore believe I like just moving them all to a *virtual*/
category better, thus obviating the need for that particular property
in the first place.
I strongly belive that it's a horrible idea to add special
On Sat, 16 Aug 2008 22:39:41 +0300
Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As per glep 42 (http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/glep/glep-0042.html)
here is the required email for a new news item. This news item is
important because otherwise users will be missing updates to the
system set if they
On Fri, 01 Aug 2008 19:02:48 -0700
Zac Medico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi everyone,
It might good to add support for a new RESTRICT=live value in
ebuilds. By specifying this value, an ebuild would be able to
indicate that it uses
On Tue, 29 Jul 2008 20:51:45 +0100
Mike Auty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sorry,
I lost my notes from when I last looked these over several
months ago, and only just found them again. I haven't copied this to
[EMAIL PROTECTED], so let me
On Mon, 28 Jul 2008 12:50:01 -0400
Doug Goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please make sure you commit any changes to use.local.desc to
metadata.xml otherwise you risk the chance of having your changes
lost. I'm currently in the process of converting use.local.desc to
metadata.xml. After a
On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 22:45:29 -0500
Jeremy Olexa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis wrote:
It will at least allow QA team to fix such bugs where patches are
already available.
So, if bugs are being fixed why is there a need to fix something that
isn't broken
On Sat, 26 Jul 2008 16:56:20 -0500
Andrew Gaffney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Duncan wrote:
--jobs=10 --keep-going --load-average=15
For a dual-dual-core setup, a load average of 4.0 is fully loaded.
Only in ideal cases, when you have long-running processes
hammering the cpu and little or no
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008 11:02:57 -0400
Doug Goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marius Mauch wrote:
Now that's a big exaggeration. It _might_ be missing from world
updates (there are still many cases where it will be included), but
that's not the only available operation in portage.
Marius
On Sun, 20 Jul 2008 17:41:58 +0400
Peter Volkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
В Чтв, 17/07/2008 в 04:51 +0200, Marius Mauch пишет:
At dev.gentoo.org/~genone/unpack.eclass is the draft for an eclass
to implement this feature.
Marius, although it's possible to do this things in eclass why
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 10:01:28 -0400
Doug Goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Olivier Crête wrote:
On Mon, 2008-07-14 at 18:01 -0400, Doug Goldstein wrote:
This brings out the fun of circular depends. I don't really know
how to address this but a lot of packages are going to have to be
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:21:24 +0100
Robert Bridge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 18 Jul 2008 16:30:20 +0200
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMHO it would be better to teach users to explicitly specify
'@system' during updates, e.g. `emerge -uDN @system
On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 07:00:32 -0500
Joe Peterson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marius Mauch wrote:
The eclass also contains it's own implementation of unpack (renamed
to unpack2) and src_unpack so the logic which tools/packages are
used for unpacking can be maintained in a single place instead
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 04:14:18 +0200
Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a result of Cardoes earlier mail we talked a bit about possible
solutions in #gento-portage, and I suggested to let portage
automatically inject the deps based on SRC_URI pattern matching.
A mapping of extensions
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 19:12:37 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 04:14:18 +0200
Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a result of Cardoes earlier mail we talked a bit about possible
solutions in #gento-portage, and I suggested to let portage
automatically
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 22:34:33 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008 23:23:26 +0200
Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right, just I'd expect the parsing of SRC_URI (with conditionals) to
be a bit tricky in bash, not something I'm going to work on. An
eclass
As a result of Cardoes earlier mail we talked a bit about possible
solutions in #gento-portage, and I suggested to let portage
automatically inject the deps based on SRC_URI pattern matching.
A mapping of extensions and their unpack deps would be kept in the tree
(e.g. mapping '.tar.bz2' to '(
On Sun, 13 Jul 2008 00:11:18 -0700
Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Betelgeuse@ dberkholz: with GLEP 55 EAPI X can add the support for
scm
Betelgeuse@ dberkholz: and older Portage versions work just fine
I thought we established that EAPI (no matter how it's defined) only
controls
On Fri, 4 Jul 2008 01:16:09 +0200
Jeroen Roovers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Disclaimer: I'm not really a package maintainer anymore.
1) How do you feel when you receive an early version bump request?
I guess like with most people it depends
a) If I'm already aware of the new version, or would
On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 02:41:14 +0800
Zhang Le [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this a bug? or did I miss something here?
Thanks for your time!
The 'bug' here is that USE=multislot shouldn't exist. People using it
should be able to deal with resulting breakages on their own
Marius
--
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 15:52:37 +0200
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Bo Ørsted Andresen wrote:
On Saturday 28 June 2008 17:03:13 Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
PV=${PV/0./}
to that new ebuild. This is the cleanest way to do
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 18:20:06 +0200
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marius Mauch wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008 15:52:37 +0200
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
While portage-2.2 has support for license visibility filtering (aka
ACCEPT_LICENSE) this currently isn't very usable as we still don't have
the necessary default license group and ACCEPT_LICENSE setting in the
tree (and even the only existing license group is of questionable use,
see bug #228527).
On Sat, 14 Jun 2008 10:38:18 +0200
Luca Barbato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marius Mauch wrote:
Ignoring possible semantic issues for the moment,
Please point them so I could fix them properly ^^
For example all the ordering issues pointed out by others in this
thread. Also the whole
On Sat, 14 Jun 2008 12:32:22 +
Patrick Lauer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Portage 2.2 and others support sets, portage 2.2 even supports
dynamic sets like the @preserved-rebuild. Shouldn't be that hard to
add a live-ebuilds dynamic set.
(Comments on the feasibility of my idea from portage
On Thu, 12 Jun 2008 11:05:01 +0200
Luca Barbato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Piotr Jaroszyński wrote:
Hello,
looks like every nominee wants the council to be more technical so I
have a few technical questions for you:
1. GLEP54
Just for fun I took some of the ideas about alternative
On Wed, 11 Jun 2008 00:11:32 +0200
Bo Ørsted Andresen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tuesday 10 June 2008 18:26:55 Doug Goldstein wrote:
Let's try to aim to do an EAPI=2 sometime soonish since Portage now
has USE flag depends in version 2.2 which is looming on the
horizon. It'd be nice to hit
On Thu, 5 Jun 2008 13:44:06 +0200
Ulrich Mueller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 5 Jun 2008, Matthias Schwarzott wrote:
With #1 the user will get a message about the blockers immediately.
With #2 his emerge (maybe of many packages) will needlessly die
when it reaches your package.
On Thu, 05 Jun 2008 15:42:24 -0400
Doug Goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
Here's a GLEP for the addition of USE flag descriptions to package
metadata. It does not address any future ideas that others may have
had or suggested. It merely gives developers the necessary tools to
On Thu, 05 Jun 2008 17:01:00 -0400
Doug Goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marius Mauch wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jun 2008 15:42:24 -0400
Doug Goldstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
Here's a GLEP for the addition of USE flag descriptions to package
metadata. It does not address any
On Sat, 31 May 2008 04:26:39 -0700
Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just to jump in quickly; this thread is about adding --as-needed to
the default CFLAGS. To get this accomplished you need to:
A. Convince the portage developers to put it in
make.conf/make.defaults.
Wrong.
We don't
On Sat, 31 May 2008 00:47:44 +0300
Mart Raudsepp [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Portage developers - is there anything we should do to get --as-needed
to make.conf.example and other places, beyond fixing the known bugs on
the appropriate bug tracker?
make.conf.example is no big deal, that's just
On Thu, 29 May 2008 09:28:16 +0100
Mike Auty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marius Mauch wrote:
| The purpose of this is to keep the system operational after library
| upgrades until all affected packages could be rebuilt and to
| simplify
On Thu, 29 May 2008 11:02:55 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò) wrote:
Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As much as we want preserve-libs to be an all-curing magic, it's
not. When you need to replace a library you need to do so _for all its
users at once_, if you allow
As portage-2.2 is about to be unmasked into ~arch soon (there is one
weird bug to solve before) it's time to ask for some input on one of
the important new features, FEATURES=preserve-libs.
(if you're already familiar with it you can skip this paragraph)
Simply said, when this feature is enabled
On Thu, 22 May 2008 08:05:07 +0200
Tiziano Müller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While I think the herds concecpt is somewhat useless, I'd rather like
to see something like this instead:
maintainer
teamfoobar/team
/maintainer
This makes it clear that it is a team instead of a person (where
On Fri, 23 May 2008 14:07:41 +0200
Tiziano Müller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Santiago M. Mola wrote:
On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 10:39 AM, Tiziano Müller
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
While we're changing things around, perhaps we can then also
standardize the
Moving the discussion to -dev per leios request.
On Wed, 21 May 2008 23:42:19 +0200
Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As this topic jus came up in #-dev, and most people there seemed to
agree with me I thought it might be worth to bring this topic up
again. The topic is that I think
On Mon, 12 May 2008 20:01:34 +0200
Fabian Groffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
After a short discussion on #-portage, here a feature patch from the
prefix branch, diffed to the trunk, irrelevant hunks removed.
Antarus once was working on factoring out the vcs bits of repoman into
On Mon, 12 May 2008 02:58:55 +0200
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò) wrote:
- bison and flex should get out of the system package set, what
clearer than moving them out of sys-*?
system and the sys-* categories don't have much of a relationsship,
so that's no argument IMO.
Yes
On Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:17:54 +0200
Frank Gruellich [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
* Santiago M. Mola [EMAIL PROTECTED] 15. Apr 08:
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 1:14 PM, Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
Currently is use ':' as sed delimiter when paths are involved. I'd
also like to hear from you about proper
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 20:04:41 +0200
Björn Michaelsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
I worked through the current PMS and tried to formalize the grammar
for DEPEND a little better. Maybe someone could have a look at it and
check it for correctness. It could even become part of the gentoo
Since a few weeks ago project pages can contain a new recruitment
section to list open positions within the project that require fresh
blood (thanks to neysx for implementing this). Historically those were
only listed centrally
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/staffing-needs/index.xml, which
On Wed, 26 Mar 2008 12:07:13 +0200
Amit Dor-Shifer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
reposting, hoping for a reply this time.
Thanks,
Amit
Amit Dor-Shifer wrote:
emerge features syntax for installing a package according to certain
bounds. This is referred to in the manpage as atom specification.
On Wed, 19 Mar 2008 18:32:41 -0600
Ryan Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
There's an updated, pre-built copy of current PMS at:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~spb/pms.pdf
Thanks for keeping up with this.
* 174335: Some ebuild use FEATURES. Can we get them to stop
On Thu, 20 Mar 2008 03:59:01 +
Steve Long [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rémi Cardona wrote:
What would be the point of such a change? What problem are you
trying to solve or to improve?
Secondly efficiency; in the case of a pbuild it could be run from
within the PM; for something like a
On Sat, 15 Mar 2008 01:34:24 -0700
Alec Warner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/14/08, Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Friday 14 March 2008, Alec Warner wrote:
On 3/14/08, Mike Frysinger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i think the real solution here is allowing masking in a package
On Wed, 5 Mar 2008 22:41:58 +0530
Anant Narayanan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
If you have something you'd wish for us to chat about, maybe even
vote on, let us know ! Simply reply to this e-mail for the whole
Gentoo dev list to see.
If it's not too late for this month's meeting, I'd
On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 22:07:37 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò) wrote:
The tasks are minor tasks that don't require a lot of time at hand,
but gives a good way to judge if the person is in for the experience
or the money, and might be able to cut the deal even for Gentoo devs
On Sun, 2 Mar 2008 11:18:39 +0100
Jonas Bernoulli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And if not the handbook this should really go into the portage
manpage.
bashrc
If needed, this file can be used to set up a
special environment for ebuilds, different from
the standard root environment.
On Tue, 26 Feb 2008 10:32:45 -0800
joshua jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All,
Google is once again doing the summer of code for students. I'm
helping organize it this year and am putting out a call for some
elements to help.
1) We need idea's for things to do. Diego has already
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:40:23 +0100
Fabian Groffen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20-02-2008 19:23:26 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote:
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:59:11 -0500
William L. Thomson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please excuse my ignorance if this is a naive comment or has been
brought
On Wed, 20 Feb 2008 12:59:11 -0500
William L. Thomson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Please excuse my ignorance if this is a naive comment or has been
brought up before. With all the non amd processors now with 64bit
support. amd64 as a keyword seems a bit odd and off maybe.
What's the
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008 01:44:22 +0200
Petteri Räty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you think about adding support to base.eclass for running
eautoreconf?
so instead of
src_unpack() {
unpack ${A}
cd ${A}
eautoreconf
}
would just add
EAUTORECONF=yes
inherit base
On Thu, 7 Feb 2008 12:56:43 -0800
Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 15:12 Wed 06 Feb , Alec Warner wrote:
On 2/4/08, Jonas Bernoulli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 2/4/08, Donnie Berkholz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 20:11 Mon 04 Feb , Jonas Bernoulli wrote:
Thinking
On Sat, 02 Feb 2008 09:50:21 +0100
Rémi Cardona [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Vlastimil Babka a écrit :
How about just some elog If you use make install, emerge
--noreplace debianutils in the kernel's postinst or something.
Bellow is my contribution to this thread :)
Cheers,
Rémi
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 17:57:39 +
Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 12:52:16 -0500 (EST)
Caleb Tennis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems like all source control/revision control programs live in
dev-util, but they might be better served in something like dev-scm
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 21:43:38 +0100
Matthias B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's wrong with making it an optional dependency? Something like a
useflag
Because if this would be done consistently we'd end up with several
thousand use flags long term, not really what I'd call managable.
On Fri, 18 Jan 2008 03:46:58 +0100
Hanno Böck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is the correct way to handle this? I'd suggest that enewuser might get
some force-parameter that tells it to delete and recreate the user if it
already exists. Thoughts?
Tell the user to do it manually in
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 15:09:20 +0100
Arfrever Frehtes Taifersar Arahesis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008-01-15 15:05 Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał(a):
- what feature would you like most to be implemented in portage?
(parallel builds, localization, revdep-rebuild integration, overlay
On Mon, 14 Jan 2008 04:33:48 -0800
Robin H. Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, so per the one discussion in #-dev this evening, I'm looking for
questions to put on a new user survey.
For style of questions, multiple choice (both pick-one and pick-many) or
simple integers would be best.
On Tue, 08 Jan 2008 00:42:57 +0100
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò) wrote:
I already ranted about the fact that the dependency tree of our
ebuilds is vastly incomplete, as many lack dependency on zlib; trying
to get this fixed was impossible, as Donnie and other insisted that
as
About portage:
Current status:
The portage project is mostly fine, though we've missed my original
plan to release the first 2.2 test versions last year, mostly because
of lack of time on my part. I hope we can fix that within the next two
or three months.
As Paul has already mentioned, the
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007 16:43:10 +0100
Piotr Jaroszyński [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I have updated the GLEP, hopefully it is less confusing now and hence the
discussion
will be more technical.
Still doesn't address my concerns, namely:
- silently expands the scope of EAPI beyond ebuild
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 15:50:02 +0300
Peter Volkov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This hack is just to solve portage problem which does not ignore .ebuild
files which does not follow pkg-ver.ebuild syntax and suggested solution
is not the only solution. Other possibilities are, which I like more:
1.
On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 23:34:44 + (UTC)
Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I understand the ban on non-EAPI-0 features in in-tree profiles, since
users could be using old PMs, but it's fine using them in /etc/portage/*,
provided one has upgraded to an appropriately compatible PM, correct?
Yes
On Fri, 28 Dec 2007 12:03:12 +
Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 27 Dec 2007 23:26:27 +0100
Luca Barbato [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marius Mauch wrote:
Nope. EAPI (from my POV) defines the API that a package manager has
to export to an ebuild/eclass. That includes
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 15:09:33 +
Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 15:46:06 +0100
Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The issue is with comparison rules. For the current use case that's
not an issue as it's simply a superset, so we could just use the new
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 14:40:57 +
Ciaran McCreesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 31 Dec 2007 15:33:51 +0100
Marius Mauch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- silently expands the scope of EAPI beyond ebuild contents (which is
a blocker for me)
That already happened with EAPI 1 and slot deps
1 - 100 of 491 matches
Mail list logo
