Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: packages.g.o: new features available

2020-07-08 Thread Mike Pagano
On Tuesday, July 7, 2020 10:57:57 PM EDT Max Magorsch wrote: > Hi all, > > I am glad to announce further progress at packages.gentoo.org (pgo in > the following). Compared to previous work during the last months, > which mostly addressed the back end, the new changes are rather > comprehensive.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/3] app-admin/kube-bench: convert to go-module go.sum

2020-02-13 Thread Mike Pagano
s one of those occasions. > > Calling out bad actors (not saying veremit is one, I just mean in the general > sense) is an unfortunate but important task, but call them out on bad > behaviour, not for what appears to be an impassioned but otherwise > unremarkable query. > I ag

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: sys-firmware/iwl6050-ucode

2020-02-07 Thread Mike Pagano
On Fri, Feb 07, 2020 at 12:10:38PM -0500, Mike Pagano wrote: > # Mike Pagano (2020-02-07) > # The standalone ebuild for this driver is made > # unnecessary as it is included in the package: > # sys-kernel/linux-firmware > sys-firmware/iwl6050-ucode Bug #708622 > -- >

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: sys-firmware/iwl6050-ucode

2020-02-07 Thread Mike Pagano
# Mike Pagano (2020-02-07) # The standalone ebuild for this driver is made # unnecessary as it is included in the package: # sys-kernel/linux-firmware sys-firmware/iwl6050-ucode -- Mike Pagano Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project Gentoo Sources - Member E-Mail : mpag...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP

Re: [gentoo-dev] Keywordreqs and slacking arch teams

2020-01-02 Thread Mike Pagano
On Thursday, January 2, 2020 3:32:12 PM EST Rolf Eike Beer wrote: > > - Allowed a simple "Add keyword(s) for package " interface, > > > > that intelligently created an issue and a target list, and then once > > the list was built, constantly ensured the list to be valid, or > > determined

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/1] kernel-2.eclass: Support move of genpatches tarballs from /space/distfiles-local to devspace

2019-10-11 Thread Mike Pagano
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 11:28:48AM -0700, Alec Warner wrote: >On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 3:04 AM Mike Pagano <[1]mpag...@gentoo.org> >wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 06:23:06PM -0700, Alec Warner wrote: > >Â Â On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 10:01 AM Mike P

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v4 1/1] kernel-2.eclass: Support move of genpatches tarballs from /space/distfiles-local to devspace

2019-10-10 Thread Mike Pagano
This change will support moving the genpatches tarballs from /space/distfiles-local to the devspace ~developer/public_html/dist/genpatches. Additional modifications based on feedback. Signed-off-by: Mike Pagano --- eclass/kernel-2.eclass | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/1] kernel-2.eclass: Support move of genpatches tarballs from /space/distfiles-local to devspace

2019-10-10 Thread Mike Pagano
On Wed, Oct 09, 2019 at 06:23:06PM -0700, Alec Warner wrote: >On Wed, Oct 9, 2019 at 10:01 AM Mike Pagano <[1]mpag...@gentoo.org> >wrote: > > This change will support moving the genpatches tarballs from > /space/distfiles-local to > the devspace ~de

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v3 1/1] kernel-2.eclass: Support move of genpatches tarballs from /space/distfiles-local to devspace

2019-10-09 Thread Mike Pagano
This change will support moving the genpatches tarballs from /space/distfiles-local to the devspace ~developer/public_html/dist/genpatches. Co-authored-by: Thomas Deutschmann Signed-off-by: Mike Pagano --- eclass/kernel-2.eclass | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2 1/1] kernel-2.eclass: Support move of genpatches tarballs from /space/distfiles-local to devspace

2019-10-09 Thread Mike Pagano
Thanks for the suggestion. This is version 2 This change will support moving the genpatches tarballs from /space/distfiles-local to the devspace ~developer/public_html/dist/genpatches. Signed-off-by: Mike Pagano --- eclass/kernel-2.eclass | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/1] kernel-2.eclass: Support move of genpatches tarballs from /space/distfiles-local to devspace

2019-10-09 Thread Mike Pagano
This change will support moving the genpatches tarballs from /space/distfiles-local to the devspace ~developer/public_html/dist/genpatches Signed-off-by: Mike Pagano --- eclass/kernel-2.eclass | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/eclass/kernel-2.eclass b

Re: [gentoo-dev] GLEP 66 [git workflow] for another review round

2017-10-11 Thread Mike Pagano
patch attempts to fix. [1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.12/process/submitting-patches.html [2] https://github.com/git/git/blob/master/Documentation/SubmittingPatches Mike -- Mike Pagano Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project Gentoo Sources E-Mail : mpag...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : 52CC A0B0 F631 0B17 0

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH v3] eclass/kernel-2.eclass: Remove use of tr in global scope

2017-09-06 Thread Mike Pagano
This time, use bash 4.0, but limit the use of this function to ebuild that have EAPI >= 6. Display a warning for maintainers to upgrade their ebuilds, or remove the call. Thanks to mgorny for the suggestion. Signed-off-by: Mike Pagano <mpag...@gentoo.org> --- eclass/kernel-2.ec

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2] eclass/kernel-2.eclass: Remove use of tr in global scope

2017-08-31 Thread Mike Pagano
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 07:27:10PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > W dniu czw, 31.08.2017 o godzinie 12∶33 -0400, użytkownik Mike Pagano > napisał: > > As per PMS remove calls to external command 'tr' in global scope See bug > > #629106. > > Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/6

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2] eclass/kernel-2.eclass: Remove use of tr in global scope

2017-08-31 Thread Mike Pagano
As per PMS remove calls to external command 'tr' in global scope See bug #629106. Signed-off-by: Mike Pagano <mpag...@gentoo.org> --- eclass/kernel-2.eclass | 11 --- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/kernel-2.eclass b/eclass/kernel-2.eclass

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] eclass/kernel-2.eclass: Remove use of tr in global scope

2017-08-30 Thread Mike Pagano
As per PMS remove calls to external command 'tr' in global scope See bug #629106 Signed-off-by: Mike Pagano <mpag...@gentoo.org> --- eclass/kernel-2.eclass | 8 +--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/kernel-2.eclass b/eclass/kernel-2.eclass index 094

Re: [gentoo-dev] taking a break from arches stabilization

2017-07-10 Thread Mike Pagano
It's my bad if I've never thanked you but I *do* depend on you. Thanks for the time you spend on my "stuff". Mike -- Mike Pagano Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project Gentoo Sources - Member E-Mail : mpag...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : EEE2 601D 0763 B60F 848C 9E14 3C33 C650 B576 E4E3 Public Key : http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xB576E4E3=index

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/1] kernel-2.eclass: Handle upstream rc kernel file type and, file location change for versions >= 4.12

2017-05-18 Thread Mike Pagano
On 05/17/2017 07:13 PM, Mike Pagano wrote: > For the latest rc kernel release, (4.12-rc1), upstream has decided to > change the way the patch is distributed. > The patch now resides in a git repository and is no longer compressed. > > Some discussion can be found here[1] if on

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/1] kernel-2.eclass: Handle upstream rc kernel file type and, file location change for versions >= 4.12

2017-05-17 Thread Mike Pagano
the change for rc kernels >= 4.12. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/5/13/182 Signed-off-by: Mike Pagano <mpag...@gentoo.org> --- eclass/kernel-2.eclass | 16 +--- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/kernel-2.eclass b/eclass/kernel-2.ecl

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eclass/kernel-2: Add additional help text when K_SECURITY_UNSUPPORTED is set

2017-03-05 Thread Mike Pagano
On 03/02/2017 06:56 AM, Alice Ferrazzi wrote: > On Thu, Mar 2, 2017 at 9:09 AM, Mike Pagano <mpag...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> This patch will add some additional text to bring some additional notice >> to users >> about the security considerations of a spec

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/1] eclass/kernel-2: Add additional help text when K_SECURITY_UNSUPPORTED is set

2017-03-01 Thread Mike Pagano
This patch will add some additional text to bring some additional notice to users about the security considerations of a specific kernel and direct them to the upstream website for further information. See bug #599454 Signed-off-by: Mike Pagano <mpag...@gentoo.org> --- eclass/kernel-2.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/1] kernel-2.eclass: Remove DEBLOB support.

2017-02-20 Thread Mike Pagano
On 02/19/2017 12:32 PM, Mike Pagano wrote: > Upstream does not version patches and every change breaks the manifest > which > breaks the tree. This results in a constant chasing of bugs since we can't > predict the breakage. > > Signed-off-by: Mike Pagano <mpag...@gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/1] kernel-2.eclass: Remove DEBLOB support.

2017-02-19 Thread Mike Pagano
On 02/19/2017 06:03 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 12:32 PM, Mike Pagano <mpag...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> Upstream does not version patches and every change breaks the manifest >> which >> breaks the tree. This results in a constant chasing of bug

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/1] kernel-2.eclass: Remove DEBLOB support.

2017-02-19 Thread Mike Pagano
On 02/19/2017 05:55 PM, Andrew Savchenko wrote: > On Sun, 19 Feb 2017 12:32:26 -0500 Mike Pagano wrote: >> Upstream does not version patches and every change breaks the manifest >> which >> breaks the tree. This results in a constant chasing of bugs since we can't &g

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/1] kernel-2.eclass: Remove DEBLOB support.

2017-02-19 Thread Mike Pagano
Upstream does not version patches and every change breaks the manifest which breaks the tree. This results in a constant chasing of bugs since we can't predict the breakage. Signed-off-by: Mike Pagano <mpag...@gentoo.org> --- eclass/kernel-2.eclass

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] kernel-2.eclass: enable eapi6

2017-02-16 Thread Mike Pagano
ed" ;; > -- > 2.7.3 > > ++ I think I've addressed all EAPI-6 bugs opened against the eclass. -- Mike Pagano Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project Gentoo Sources - Member E-Mail : mpag...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : EEE2 601D 0763 B60F 848C 9E14 3C33 C650 B576 E4E3 Public Key : http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xB576E4E3=index

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/1] kernel-2.eclass: Point user to additional kernel removal, instructions. See bug #581522.

2016-12-28 Thread Mike Pagano
Thank On 12/27/2016 09:12 PM, Alice Ferrazzi wrote: > looks like nice information to give :) > > ok, for me. > > On Wed, Dec 28, 2016 at 9:52 AM, Mike Pagano <mpag...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> This addresses concerns that users might not realize that after an >> unm

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/1] kernel-2.eclass: Point user to additional kernel removal, instructions. See bug #581522.

2016-12-27 Thread Mike Pagano
This addresses concerns that users might not realize that after an unmerge of kernel sources some files will need to be removed manually. The particular concern was specific to the files in /lib/modules/. I liked this solution, since it does not require a wordy explanation to be written in the

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/1] kernel-2.eclass: Remove code that looks for Changelog which is also breaks PMS rules going above FILESDIR.

2016-12-26 Thread Mike Pagano
On 12/23/2016 11:31 PM, Alice Ferrazzi wrote: > On Sat, Dec 24, 2016 at 7:43 AM, Mike Pagano <mpag...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> ChangeLog > > > looks good for me :) > Thanks, Alice. Committed. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/1] kernel-2.eclass: Remove code that looks for Changelog which is also breaks PMS rules going above FILESDIR.

2016-12-23 Thread Mike Pagano
Hi, this code is no longer relevant and breaks PMS. See bug #566396 --- eclass/kernel-2.eclass | 7 --- 1 file changed, 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/kernel-2.eclass b/eclass/kernel-2.eclass index 424aa03..520a4c1 100644 --- a/eclass/kernel-2.eclass +++ b/eclass/kernel-2.eclass @@

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/1] kernel-2.eclass: Remove kdbus support as it is, discontinued. First reported in bug #576614 by jon R-B

2016-12-15 Thread Mike Pagano
On 12/14/2016 07:23 PM, Mike Pagano wrote: > kdbus is discontinued and is being reworked upstream as a different > effort with a different name. > That said, remove unused kdbus support from the kernel eclass. > Committed. -- Mike Pagano Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project Gentoo So

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/1] kernel-2.eclass: Remove kdbus support as it is, discontinued. First reported in bug #576614 by jon R-B

2016-12-14 Thread Mike Pagano
kdbus is discontinued and is being reworked upstream as a different effort with a different name. That said, remove unused kdbus support from the kernel eclass. --- eclass/kernel-2.eclass | 18 -- 1 file changed, 18 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/kernel-2.eclass

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/1] kernel-2.eclass: Add required @USAGE documentation to functions.

2016-12-14 Thread Mike Pagano
On 12/12/2016 07:34 PM, Mike Pagano wrote: > According to (not pms) devmanual, @USAGE is required for functions. > This patch only touches comments and no code has been modified. Committed. If the devmanual changes, I can easily remove the empty USAGE statements. signature.asc Descr

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/1] kernel-2.eclass: Add required @USAGE documentation to functions.

2016-12-13 Thread Mike Pagano
On 12/12/2016 09:49 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 9:44 PM, Mike Gilbert <flop...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 12, 2016 at 7:34 PM, Mike Pagano <mpag...@gentoo.org> wrote: >>> According to PMS, @USAGE is required for functions. >&g

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/1] kernel-2.eclass: Add required @USAGE documentation to functions.

2016-12-12 Thread Mike Pagano
According to PMS, @USAGE is required for functions. This patch only touches comments and no code has been modified. --- eclass/kernel-2.eclass | 38 ++ 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/kernel-2.eclass

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/1] kernel-2.eclass: Convert eclass to use documentation standards.

2016-12-04 Thread Mike Pagano
On 12/03/2016 04:47 PM, Mike Pagano wrote: > This patch modifies, removes and adds comments only. No code was harmed > in the creation of this patch. > This is to conform with ECLASS documentation standards. > > --- > eclass Committed -- Mike Pagano Gentoo Developer - Ker

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/1] kernel-2.eclass: Convert eclass to use documentation standards.

2016-12-03 Thread Mike Pagano
lchreest <jo...@gentoo.org> +# Mike Pagano <mpag...@gentoo.org> +# +# @BLURB: Eclass for kernel packages +# @DESCRIPTION: +# This ia the kernel.eclass rewrite for a clean base regarding the 2.6 +# series of kernel with back-compatibility for 2.4 # Please direct your bugs to the c

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/1] kernel-2.eclass: Cleanup. Remove die from global, scope per EAPI 6 rules

2016-12-02 Thread Mike Pagano
On 12/01/2016 07:27 PM, Mike Pagano wrote: > EAPI 6 prohibits dying in global scope. Move that check to pkg_setup. > > --- > eclass/kernel-2.eclass | 8 +--- > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) Committed

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/1] kernel-2.eclass: Cleanup. Remove die from global, scope per EAPI 6 rules

2016-12-01 Thread Mike Pagano
EAPI 6 prohibits dying in global scope. Move that check to pkg_setup. --- eclass/kernel-2.eclass | 8 +--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/kernel-2.eclass b/eclass/kernel-2.eclass index 547153c..91a24e9 100644 --- a/eclass/kernel-2.eclass +++

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RESEND PATCH 1/1] kernel-2.eclass: Fix eapply_user as per PMS spec and execute in, src_prepare. Support older EAPIs with epatch_user.

2016-12-01 Thread Mike Pagano
On 11/30/2016 07:32 PM, Mike Pagano wrote: > Round 3. As per mgorny's additional advice, fix eapply_user as per PMS > spec and execute in src_prepare. Support older EAPIs with epatch_user. > export src_prepare only for supported EAPI versions. mgorny, thanks for the feedback.

[gentoo-dev] [RESEND PATCH 1/1] kernel-2.eclass: Fix eapply_user as per PMS spec and execute in, src_prepare. Support older EAPIs with epatch_user.

2016-11-30 Thread Mike Pagano
Round 3. As per mgorny's additional advice, fix eapply_user as per PMS spec and execute in src_prepare. Support older EAPIs with epatch_user. export src_prepare only for supported EAPI versions. --- eclass/kernel-2.eclass | 35 ++- 1 file changed, 26

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/1] Fix eapply_user as per PMS spec and execute in, src_prepare. Support older EAPIs with epatch_user.

2016-11-29 Thread Mike Pagano
On 11/29/2016 07:05 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Tue, Nov 29, 2016 at 6:24 PM, Mike Pagano <mpag...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> 2nd round. As per mgorny's advice, fix eapply_user as per PMS spec and >> execute in src_prepare. Support older EAPIs with epatch_user. >> >&g

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/1] Fix eapply_user as per PMS spec and execute in, src_prepare. Support older EAPIs with epatch_user.

2016-11-29 Thread Mike Pagano
2nd round. As per mgorny's advice, fix eapply_user as per PMS spec and execute in src_prepare. Support older EAPIs with epatch_user. --- eclass/kernel-2.eclass | 25 ++--- 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/kernel-2.eclass

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/1] kernel-2.eclass: Support EAPI 6 when applying user patches.

2016-11-29 Thread Mike Pagano
On 11/29/2016 03:46 AM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 06:42:44 -0500 > Mike Pagano <mpag...@gentoo.org> wrote: > >> On 11/27/2016 09:06 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: >>> On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Mike Pagano <mpag...@gentoo.org> wrote: >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/1] kernel-2.eclass: Support EAPI 6 when applying user patches.

2016-11-28 Thread Mike Pagano
On 11/27/2016 09:06 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Sun, Nov 27, 2016 at 7:23 PM, Mike Pagano <mpag...@gentoo.org> wrote: >> If kernel-2_src_unpack() is called in EAPI6, epatch_user() function >> inherited from eutils.eclass is undefined. >> See bug #579188 > > ke

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/1] kernel-2.eclass: Support EAPI 6 when applying user patches.

2016-11-27 Thread Mike Pagano
If kernel-2_src_unpack() is called in EAPI6, epatch_user() function inherited from eutils.eclass is undefined. See bug #579188 --- eclass/kernel-2.eclass | 8 ++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/kernel-2.eclass b/eclass/kernel-2.eclass index

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/1] kernel-2.eclass: Remove call to KV_to_int. See bug #587318.

2016-11-27 Thread Mike Pagano
KV_to_int usage should be removed. Tracker bug is at: 384041 and kernel-2.eclass bug is at 587318. --- eclass/kernel-2.eclass | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/eclass/kernel-2.eclass b/eclass/kernel-2.eclass index 1398c0c..c171940 100644 ---

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] repo/gentoo:master commit in: eclass/

2015-11-17 Thread Mike Pagano
On Tuesday, November 17, 2015 08:19:29 AM Michał Górny wrote: > On Mon, 16 Nov 2015 23:38:08 + (UTC) > > "Mike Pagano" <mpag...@gentoo.org> wrote: > > commit: aac24917ebe254a23990f0d7fff9f6f570b99d15 > > Author: Mike Pagano gentoo org> Tha

Re: [gentoo-dev] qa last rites multiple packages

2015-01-07 Thread Mike Pagano
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 01:08:21PM -0600, William Hubbs wrote: On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 01:29:15PM -0500, Mike Pagano wrote: On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 11:11:32AM -0600, William Hubbs wrote: On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 11:21:56AM -0500, Mike Pagano wrote: On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 05:47:10PM -0600

Re: [gentoo-dev] qa last rites multiple packages

2015-01-07 Thread Mike Pagano
their systems and we can remove this entry? Mike -- Mike Pagano Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project Gentoo Sources - Lead E-Mail : mpag...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : EEE2 601D 0763 B60F 848C 9E14 3C33 C650 B576 E4E3 Public Key : http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xB576E4E3op=index

Re: [gentoo-dev] qa last rites multiple packages

2015-01-07 Thread Mike Pagano
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 11:11:32AM -0600, William Hubbs wrote: On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 11:21:56AM -0500, Mike Pagano wrote: On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 05:47:10PM -0600, William Hubbs wrote: All, # # Pinkie Pie discovered an issue in the futex subsystem that allows a # local user

Re: [gentoo-dev] qa last rites multiple packages

2015-01-07 Thread Mike Pagano
On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 12:14:23PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 12:11 PM, William Hubbs willi...@gentoo.org wrote: On Wed, Jan 07, 2015 at 11:21:56AM -0500, Mike Pagano wrote: On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 05:47:10PM -0600, William Hubbs wrote: All, If you remove

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-sources - should we stable?

2015-01-03 Thread Mike Pagano
On Saturday, January 03, 2015 11:18:26 AM Pacho Ramos wrote: El vie, 02-01-2015 a las 12:25 -0500, Mike Pagano escribió: Hello, Everyone, [2] http://packages.gentoo.org/package/sys-kernel/gentoo-sources In my case I still run only stable gentoo-sources in many machines to prevent

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-sources - should we stable?

2015-01-02 Thread Mike Pagano
On Friday, January 02, 2015 01:10:21 PM Ian Stakenvicius wrote: Resending as I replied to Ian instead of the list by accident. (sorry, Ian) On 02/01/15 12:25 PM, Mike Pagano wrote: Hello, Everyone, Are there solid arguments for stabilizing any version of gentoo-sources? I think

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-sources - should we stable?

2015-01-02 Thread Mike Pagano
On Friday, January 02, 2015 04:05:42 PM Rich Freeman wrote: On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 3:44 PM, Mike Pagano mpag...@gentoo.org wrote: To summarize. In this instance, as this moment: 1. Only enter stable req bugs for 3.18 and 3.17. I assume this bit is just a transition since we don't

[gentoo-dev] Gentoo-sources - should we stable?

2015-01-02 Thread Mike Pagano
=137182668616082w=2 [2] http://packages.gentoo.org/package/sys-kernel/gentoo-sources -- Mike Pagano Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project Team Lead - Gentoo Sources E-Mail : mpag...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : EEE2 601D 0763 B60F 848C 9E14 3C33 C650 B576 E4E3 Public Key : http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-sources - should we stable?

2015-01-02 Thread Mike Pagano
On Friday, January 02, 2015 03:11:22 PM Ian Stakenvicius wrote: On 02/01/15 02:57 PM, Mike Pagano wrote: I understand your point. Maybe waiting a few days to auto stable makes sense, because less than 7 days later, a new version with bug/security fixes is released. Isn't our current

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-sources - should we stable?

2015-01-02 Thread Mike Pagano
rate of stabilization selling a promise of stability we can't stand behind? Mike -- Mike Pagano Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project Team Lead - Gentoo Sources E-Mail : mpag...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : EEE2 601D 0763 B60F 848C 9E14 3C33 C650 B576 E4E3 Public Key : http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-sources - should we stable?

2015-01-02 Thread Mike Pagano
On Saturday, January 03, 2015 12:39:39 AM Mikle Kolyada wrote: 02.01.2015 20:25, Mike Pagano пишет: This is in no way complaining about how long it takes to stabilize a kernel. As for this fact. hat type=arch teams developer The main problem is that: we only can test sources on machine

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-sources - should we stable?

2015-01-02 Thread Mike Pagano
On Friday, January 02, 2015 03:22:31 PM Ian Stakenvicius wrote: On 02/01/15 03:17 PM, Mike Pagano wrote: On Friday, January 02, 2015 03:11:22 PM Ian Stakenvicius wrote: On 02/01/15 02:57 PM, Mike Pagano wrote: I understand your point. Maybe waiting a few days to auto stable makes sense

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo-sources - should we stable?

2015-01-02 Thread Mike Pagano
On Friday, January 02, 2015 03:30:40 PM Rich Freeman wrote: On Fri, Jan 2, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Ian Stakenvicius a...@gentoo.org wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On 02/01/15 02:57 PM, Mike Pagano wrote: I understand your point. Maybe waiting a few days to auto stable

Re: [gentoo-dev] local repo kernel ebuild search for tar.bz2 instead of tar.xz

2014-06-26 Thread Mike Pagano
/viewvc.cgi/gentoo-x86/eclass/kernel-2.eclass?view=log Diff to previous 1.278 Revision 1.279 - (view) (download) (annotate) - [select for diffs] Sat Mar 9 21:05:50 2013 UTC (15 months, 2 weeks ago) by tomwij Kernel sources and (gen)patches now use xz instead of bz2. Bug #421721 -- Mike Pagano Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: Kernel Team vanilla-sources policy

2013-08-04 Thread Mike Pagano
with some of the requested changes: Title: vanilla-sources stabilization policy Author: Mike Pagano mpag...@gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain Posted: 2013-08-07 Revision: 1 News-Item-Format: 1.0 Display-If-Installed: sys-kernel/vanilla-sources The Gentoo Kernel Team will no longer be providing stable

Re: [gentoo-dev] newsitem: Kernel Team vanilla-sources policy

2013-08-04 Thread Mike Pagano
On Sunday, August 04, 2013 07:24:23 PM Alex Xu wrote: wat. Possibly intended: For the latest upstream kernel unpatched by Gentoo Not intended --- Title: vanilla-sources stabilization policy Author: Mike Pagano mpag...@gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain Posted: 2013-08-07 Revision: 1 News

[gentoo-dev] newsitem: Kernel Team vanilla-sources policy

2013-08-03 Thread Mike Pagano
All, Here is the vanilla-sources non stablizing policy news item. If all goes well, this will be committed to the tree on 08/07 UTC. Mike Title: vanilla-sources stabilization policy Author: Mike Pagano mpag...@gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain Posted: 2013-08-07 Revision: 1 News-Item-Format

Re: [gentoo-dev] Vanilla sources stabilization policy change

2013-07-27 Thread Mike Pagano
On Saturday, July 27, 2013 09:58:08 AM Rich Freeman wrote: Unless it were stable-masked it would create the exact same problem. ^^ This -- Mike Pagano Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project E-Mail : mpag...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : EEE2 601D 0763 B60F 848C 9E14 3C33 C650 B576 E4E3 Public

[gentoo-dev] Vanilla sources stabilization policy change

2013-07-24 Thread Mike Pagano
is welcome. Original thread of discussion: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.kernel/697 -- Mike Pagano Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project E-Mail : mpag...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : EEE2 601D 0763 B60F 848C 9E14 3C33 C650 B576 E4E3 Public Key : http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search

Re: [gentoo-dev] Proper distribution integration of kernel *-sources, patches and configuration.

2013-07-04 Thread Mike Pagano
to a smaller group of our users. (Thinking about our thinkpad patches) -- Mike Pagano Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project E-Mail : mpag...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : EEE2 601D 0763 B60F 848C 9E14 3C33 C650 B576 E4E3 Public Key : http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xB576E4E3op=index

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo Hangouts

2013-06-24 Thread Mike Pagano
On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 12:04:04PM +0100, Markos Chandras wrote: On 24 June 2013 11:54, Michael Palimaka kensing...@gentoo.org wrote: On 24/06/2013 07:30, Pavlos Ratis wrote: That's why I'd like to propose Gentoo Hangouts. Gentoo Hangouts will be Google+ video Hangouts(video calls) held

Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates

2013-01-22 Thread Mike Pagano
days. It's just kernel documentation. -- Mike Pagano Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project Team Lead - Gentoo Sources E-Mail : mpag...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : EEE2 601D 0763 B60F 848C 9E14 3C33 C650 B576 E4E3 Public Key : http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xB576E4E3op=index

Re: [gentoo-dev] January stabilization candidates

2013-01-15 Thread Mike Pagano
procedure for kernels to include opening up a bug to stabilize the corresponding linux-docs version. So going forward, you can exclude this and hopefully we'll do a better job of keeping this package stable. -- Mike Pagano Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project E-Mail : mpag...@gentoo.org GnuPG

Re: [gentoo-dev] default mta

2012-12-26 Thread Mike Pagano
/msmtp mail-mta/ssmtp rest of the list ... If there are no objections, the above change will be committed in ~10 days. Would it be prudent to coordinate Gentoo documentation changes with the above? -- Mike Pagano Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project Team Lead

Re: [gentoo-dev] systemd project created.

2011-06-21 Thread Mike Pagano
On Tuesday, June 21, 2011 05:43:10 AM Michał Górny wrote: Hello, I'd like to announce that I've created an initial project page for Gentoo systemd project [1]. The main purpose of that project page would be keeping docs for systemd users in Gentoo. Hopefully, we will include some soon. If

Re: [gentoo-dev] rfc: use of the /run directory

2011-05-20 Thread Mike Pagano
On Friday 20 May 2011 04:58:12 Luca Barbato wrote: On 5/17/11 6:57 PM, William Hubbs wrote: That shouldn't be read as endorsing the peculiar and conceptually broken init replacement called systemd. lu Just curious, would you mind elaborating on it's peculiarities and conceptual

Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-src cvs repo and svn repos migration to git

2011-01-31 Thread Mike Pagano
repo or any hooks I should be aware of. Thanks -- Theo Chatzimichos (tampakrap) Gentoo KDE/Qt, Planet, Overlays linux-patches is still active and I would like it to remain in svn. Thanks. -- Mike Pagano Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project Gentoo Sources - Lead E-Mail : mpag

[gentoo-dev] Kernel maintainers that use genpatches

2010-11-22 Thread Mike Pagano
For all the kernel maintainers that use genpatches in their kernel package, please make sure you are subscribed to gentoo-kernel so that I know I can reach all of you easily. Thanks, -- Mike Pagano Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project Gentoo Sources - Lead E-Mail : mpag...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP

Re: [gentoo-dev] Going inactive

2010-09-27 Thread Mike Pagano
the way. You set an example with your intelligence in technical matters and patience with users that goes years beyond your age. You will be missed and I hope you find your way back here someday. Best regards, Mike -- Mike Pagano Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project E-Mail : mpag

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo Council 2010/2011 - Nominations are now open

2010-06-15 Thread Mike Pagano
positive change. Thanks, again. MIke Mike Pagano Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project E-Mail : mpag...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : EEE2 601D 0763 B60F 848C 9E14 3C33 C650 B576 E4E3 Public Key : http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?search=0xB576E4E3op=index

Re: Notify people about empty herds (Was: Re: [gentoo-dev] FTR: media-opti...@g.o has no developers)

2010-06-03 Thread Mike Pagano
On Thursday, June 03, 2010 10:44:10 am Markos Chandras wrote: kernel can merge with kernel-misc. Please don't do this.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Gentoo Wiki Project

2010-04-09 Thread Mike Pagano
running on nonGentoo infrastructure. We've been looking for a new 'home' for awhile. [1] [1]http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=176186 --- Mike Pagano Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project E-Mail : mpag...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : EEE2 601D 0763 B60F 848C 9E14 3C33 C650 B576 E4E3 Public Key

[gentoo-dev] gentoo-sources 2.6.32 stable plans

2010-02-24 Thread Mike Pagano
packages in the stable tree are tracked in bug #300324. If any arise, please make every effort to fix these. Thanks, Mike Pagano Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project E-Mail : mpag...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : EEE2 601D 0763 B60F 848C 9E14 3C33 C650 B576 E4E3 Public Key : http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks

[gentoo-dev] 2.6.31 stable plans

2009-11-04 Thread Mike Pagano
packages in the stable tree are tracked in bug #291927. If any arise, please make every effort to fix these. Thanks, Mike Pagano -- Mike Pagano Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project E-Mail : mpag...@gentoo.org GnuPG FP : EEE2 601D 0763 B60F 848C 9E14 3C33 C650 B576 E4E3 Public Key : http

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2.6.30 stable plans

2009-07-22 Thread Mike Pagano
On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:28:18AM -0400, Mike Pagano wrote: I'm planning to request the stabling of gentoo-sources-2.6.30 on July 22nd, 1 week from now. We have no known regressions in the kernel. Thanks, Mike Pagano Due to serious patches released, the new plan is too release

[gentoo-dev] 2.6.30 stable plans

2009-07-15 Thread Mike Pagano
I'm planning to request the stabling of gentoo-sources-2.6.30 on July 22nd, 1 week from now. We have no known regressions in the kernel. Regressions in external packages in the stable tree are tracked in bug #277944. If any arise, please make every effort to fix these. Thanks, Mike Pagano

[gentoo-dev] Linux 2.6.28 stabilization plans

2009-04-11 Thread Mike Pagano
, and additional closed ones that were broken by this upgrade, are tracked at https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=252467 Please help us fix this in the stable tree in advance of the stabling date. Thanks, Mike -- Mike Pagano Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project E-Mail : mpag...@gentoo.org

Re: [gentoo-portage-dev] [RFC] Change to kernel-2.eclass for bug #233266

2008-08-25 Thread Mike Pagano
On Monday 25 August 2008 15:00:24 Mike Frysinger wrote: On Saturday 23 August 2008, Mike Pagano wrote: After querying some folks in #gentoo-portage concerning bug #233266[1], it was suggested to me to add the entire /usr/src to PRELINK_PATH_MASK. why dont we merge it into the prelink

Re: [gentoo-dev] Jeeves IRC replacement now alive - Willikins

2008-08-06 Thread Mike Pagano
On Wednesday 06 August 2008 17:18:05 Robin H. Johnson wrote: Hi folks, Sorry that it's taken this long to get completed, but the Jeeves replacement, Willikins, is finally 99% done, and ready to join lots of channels. #gentoo-kernel Thanks to everyone involved. -- Mike Pagano Gentoo

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-util/lincvs

2008-05-19 Thread Mike Pagano
Mike Pagano [EMAIL PROTECTED] (19 May 2008) Masked for removal in 30 days. Upstream has changed name to crossvc, which is available in the tree. (bug #213496) --- Mike Pagano Gentoo Developer - Kernel Project E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG FP : EEE2 601D 0763

Re: [gentoo-dev] Monthly Gentoo Council Reminder for April

2008-04-07 Thread Mike Pagano
On Monday 07 April 2008 04:37:18 pm Petteri Räty wrote: Petteri Räty kirjoitti: So I wrote a new slacker script that gets the active developers from LDAP and checks the activity for the last 60 days. One repoman commit should equal a couple entries on history but not sure on that. robbat2

Re: [gentoo-dev] Downtime: lists.gentoo.org migration

2008-01-03 Thread Mike Pagano
. It is appreciated. -- Mike Pagano [EMAIL PROTECTED] GnuPG FP : EEE2 601D 0763 B60F 848C 9E14 3C33 C650 B576 E4E3 -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] New ALSA maintainers

2007-03-28 Thread Mike Pagano
On 3/28/07, Daniel Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip ...here are the diffs of the latest alsa development release vs the latest kernel development release: snip Just a user opinion here, but I find the need to use unstable alsa-driver to solve a bug every now and then. This procedure

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: 2.6.18 going stable in 1 week

2006-10-20 Thread Mike Pagano
On 10/20/06, Daniel Drake [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Christian Faulhammer wrote: Announce it here (or -core) which needs a fix and then just commit the fix if it is trivial and there has been no reaction. I think you didn't grasp the problem exactly. There are a large number of packages which

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo World Domination. a 10 step guide

2006-10-04 Thread Mike Pagano
On 10/4/06, Chris Gianelloni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 12:21 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote: Donnie Berkholz wrote: Chris Gianelloni wrote: Now, perhaps what everyone would like, instead, would be status reports *where necessary* from certain projects? In fact, the

Re: [gentoo-dev] treecleaner removals

2006-09-28 Thread Mike Pagano
On 9/28/06, Mark Stier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How about entering the removed ebuilds into bugzilla under an adequate section? -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list In the event of tree booting, you have the option to maintain the ebuild in an overlay such as sunrise[1]. Or seeking out some

Re: [gentoo-dev] seeds, GLEPs, and projects

2006-09-21 Thread Mike Pagano
On 9/21/06, Simon Stelling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ciaran McCreesh wrote: Huge amounts of time, effort and users. How much arch team time was spent fixing genkernel? How much time was spent fixing the OS X mess? How many users did we lose as a result of all the QA screwups? Eh, I wanted

[gentoo-dev] question about non-dev submitting snapshot ebuild to bugzilla

2005-05-23 Thread Mike Pagano
I am working on a new ebuild for a currently open bug in bugzilla. This ebuild happens to be a snapshot as upstream provides anonymous web cvs but does not provide a nice tar. When a non-dev submits a snapshot ebuild to bugzilla what is the proper method of providing access to the snapshot I