Re: [gentoo-dev] last-rite: some java stuff

2021-05-07 Thread Miroslav Šulc
i'm sorry but this package is pretty old, i could not find a working homepage for it and we have no purpose for it. it would be better if copied to the science overlay. fordfrog Dne 07. 05. 21 v 1:50 Alessandro Barbieri napsal(a): # Miroslav Šulc mailto:fordf...@gentoo.org>>

[gentoo-dev] last-rite: some java packages

2021-05-05 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2021-05-05) # no consumers, dead homepage # removal in 30 days # see bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/787329 app-misc/jitac # Miroslav Šulc (2021-05-05) # last release in 2009 # removal in 30 days # see bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/787332 app-office/hourglass # Miroslav Šulc

[gentoo-dev] last-rite: dev-java/tagsoup

2021-04-30 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2021-04-30) # no consumers # removal in 30 days # see bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/787152 dev-java/tagsoup

[gentoo-dev] last-rite: some java stuff

2021-04-29 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2021-04-28) # no consumers # removal in 30 days # see bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/786888 dev-java/zeus-jscl # Miroslav Šulc (2021-04-28) # no consumers # removal in 30 days # see bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/786864 dev-java/sun-jmx java-virtuals/jmx dev-util/jconfig

[gentoo-dev] last-rite: media-sound/bladeenc

2021-04-29 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2021-04-28) # security issues, last release in 2004 # removal in 30 days # see bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/631394 media-sound/bladeenc

[gentoo-dev] last-rite: dev-java/netty-{codec{,-http},handler}

2021-04-28 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2021-04-28) # no consumers # removal in 30 days # see bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/786522 dev-java/netty-codec dev-java/netty-codec-http dev-java/netty-handler

[gentoo-dev] last-rite: dev-java/jvmstat

2021-04-28 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2021-04-28) # obsolete, use dev-util/visualvm # removal in 30 days # see bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/786513 dev-java/jvmstat

[gentoo-dev] last-rite: dev-java/junrar

2021-04-28 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2021-04-28) # no consumers # removal in 30 days # see bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/786510 dev-java/junrar

[gentoo-dev] last-rite: dev-java/junit-addons

2021-04-28 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2021-04-28) # no consumers # removal in 30 days # see bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/786507 dev-java/junit-addons

[gentoo-dev] last-rite: dev-java/jstun

2021-04-28 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2021-04-28) # no consumers # removal in 30 days # see bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/786486 dev-java/jstun

[gentoo-dev] last-rite: dev-java/l2fprod-common & dev-java/jreleaseinfo

2021-04-28 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2021-04-28) # no consumers # removal in 30 days # see bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/786483 dev-java/l2fprod-common dev-java/jreleaseinfo

[gentoo-dev] last-rite: dev-java/jortho

2021-04-28 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2021-04-28) # no consumers # removal in 30 days # see bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/786480 dev-java/jortho

[gentoo-dev] last-rite: dev-java/jlibeps

2021-04-28 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2021-04-28) # no consumers # removal in 30 days # see bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/786441 dev-java/jlibeps

[gentoo-dev] last-rite: dev-java/jisp

2021-04-28 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2021-04-28) # no consumers # removal in 30 days # see bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/786438 dev-java/jisp

[gentoo-dev] last-rite: dev-java/jinput

2021-04-28 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2021-04-28) # no consumers # removal in 30 days # see bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/786435 dev-java/jinput

[gentoo-dev] last-rite: dev-java/jid3

2021-04-28 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2021-04-28) # no consumers # removal in 30 days # see bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/786432 dev-java/jid3

[gentoo-dev] last-rite: dev-java/jebl

2021-04-28 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2021-04-28) # no consumers # removal in 30 days # see bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/786426 dev-java/jebl

[gentoo-dev] last-rite: dev-java/jdbm

2021-04-28 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2021-04-28) # project abandoned # removal in 30 days # see bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/786420 dev-java/jdbm

[gentoo-dev] last-rite: dev-java/jdbc2-stdext

2021-04-28 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2021-04-28) # no consumers # removal in 30 days # see bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/786417 dev-java/jdbc2-stdext

[gentoo-dev] last-rite: dev-java/jcmdline

2021-04-28 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2021-04-28) # no consumers # removal in 30 days # see bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/786414 dev-java/jcmdline

[gentoo-dev] last-rite: dev-java/jboss-{logmanager,logging}

2021-04-28 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2021-04-28) # no consumers # removal in 30 days # see bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/786408 dev-java/jboss-logmanager dev-java/jboss-logging

[gentoo-dev] last-rite: dev-java/javolution

2021-04-28 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2021-04-28) # last release in 2017, website is offline # removal in 30 days # see bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/786381 dev-java/javolution

[gentoo-dev] last-rite: dev-java/jarbundler & dev-java/j2ssh

2021-04-28 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2021-04-28) # library with no consumer # removal in 30 days # see bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/786237 dev-java/jarbundler # Miroslav Šulc (2021-04-28) # library with no consumer # removal in 30 days # see bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/786234 dev-java/j2ssh

[gentoo-dev] last-rite: dev-java/helpgui, dev-java/higlayout

2021-04-27 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2021-04-27) # library with no consumer # removal in 30 days # see bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/786117 dev-java/helpgui # Miroslav Šulc (2021-04-27) # library with no consumer # removal in 30 days # see bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/786120 dev-java/higlayout

[gentoo-dev] last-rite: dev-java/hamcrest-integration

2021-04-27 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2021-04-27) # library with no consumer # removal in 30 days # see bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/786096 dev-java/hamcrest-integration

[gentoo-dev] last-rite: dev-java/fscript, dev-java/fastinfoset

2021-04-27 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2021-04-27) # library with no consumer # removal in 30 days # see bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/786090 dev-java/fscript # Miroslav Šulc (2021-04-27) # library with no consumer # removal in 30 days # see bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/786087 dev-java/fastinfoset

[gentoo-dev] last-rite: dev-java/ehcache

2021-04-27 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2021-04-27) # library with no consumer # removal in 30 days # see bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/785985 dev-java/ehcache

[gentoo-dev] last-rite: dev-java/easymock-classextension, dev-java/httpcomponents-client, dev-java/httpcomponents-core

2021-04-26 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2021-04-27) # library with no consumer # removal in 30 days # see bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/785886 dev-java/easymock-classextension # Miroslav Šulc (2021-04-27) # libraries with no consumer # removal in 30 days # see bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/785883 dev-java

[gentoo-dev] last-rite: dev-java/dtdparser

2021-04-26 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2021-04-27) # library with no consumer # removal in 30 days # see bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/785877 dev-java/dtdparser

[gentoo-dev] last-rite: dev-java/commons-fileupload

2021-04-26 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2021-04-26) # no consumer # removal in 30 days # see bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/785847 dev-java/commons-fileupload

[gentoo-dev] last-rite: dev-java/commons-el

2021-04-26 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2021-04-26) # does not compile with java 1.8, no consumer # removal in 30 days # see bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/785796 dev-java/commons-el

[gentoo-dev] last-rite: dev-java/velocity-dvsl

2021-04-25 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2021-04-25) # obsolete package, nothing depends on it # removal in 30 days # see bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/785508 dev-java/velocity-dvsl

[gentoo-dev] last-rite: dev-java/cdegroot-db, dev-java/codemodel, dev-java/istack-commons-buildtools

2021-04-25 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2021-04-25) # nothing depends on it # removal in 30 days # see bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/785532 dev-java/cdegroot-db # Miroslav Šulc (2021-04-25) # uses depracated classes, not used by anything, # removal in 30 days # see bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/785415 dev-java

Re: [gentoo-dev] unmasking java 11 on gentoo (for those that maintain packages where java is involved, either directly or conditionally)

2021-04-22 Thread Miroslav Šulc
Dne 22. 04. 21 v 8:37 Kaibo Ma napsal(a): Is there a tracking issue for Java 11 on Bugzilla? Kaibo Ma this is it: https://bugs.gentoo.org/697014 fordfrog

[gentoo-dev] last-rite: dev-java/apt-mirror

2021-04-21 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2021-04-21) # no consumers, last commit 2017 # see: https://bugs.gentoo.org/784836 # removal in 30 days dev-java/apt-mirror

[gentoo-dev] last-rite: dev-java/ant-owanttask

2021-04-21 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2021-04-21) # java library, no consumers # see: https://bugs.gentoo.org/784830 dev-java/ant-owanttask

[gentoo-dev] last-rite: dev-java/ini4j

2021-04-21 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2021-04-21) # java library, no consumers # see: https://bugs.gentoo.org/784812 dev-java/ini4j

[gentoo-dev] last-rite: dev-java/tapestry

2021-04-19 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2021-04-18) # our version is outdated with security issues, new version # uses gradle to build which we don't support atm, # also being a web framework deployable to application servers, # we have no usage for it, and nothing depends on it # removal in 30 days dev-java/tapestry

[gentoo-dev] last-rite: dev-java/classmate

2021-04-18 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2021-04-18) # obsolete deps, not used by any package # removal in 30 days dev-java/classmate

[gentoo-dev] last-rite: dev-java/commons-jelly

2021-04-18 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2021-04-18) # obsolete deps, not used by any package # removal in 30 days dev-java/commons-jelly

[gentoo-dev] last-rite: dev-util/findbugs

2021-04-18 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2021-04-18) # the project has been abandoned and the developement # is now under name SpotBugs # see: https://github.com/findbugsproject/findbugs dev-util/findbugs

[gentoo-dev] last-rite: dev-java/ezmorph & dev-java/ical4j

2021-04-18 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2021-04-18) # obsolete deps, not used by any package # removal in 30 days dev-java/ezmorph dev-java/ical4j

[gentoo-dev] last-rite: dev-java/commons-configuration

2021-04-18 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2021-04-18) # obsolete deps, not used by any package dev-java/commons-configuration

Re: [gentoo-dev] unmasking java 11 on gentoo (for those that maintain packages where java is involved, either directly or conditionally)

2021-04-15 Thread Miroslav Šulc
Dne 15. 04. 21 v 18:35 Joakim Tjernlund napsal(a): Yes, I found the error in dev-java/icedtea-web. Q: Should one use JDK_HOME or JAVA_HOME in ebuilds? i guess it doesn't matter (at least for packages that inherit java-utils-2.eclass):

Re: [gentoo-dev] unmasking java 11 on gentoo (for those that maintain packages where java is involved, either directly or conditionally)

2021-04-15 Thread Miroslav Šulc
Dne 15. 04. 21 v 17:56 Joakim Tjernlund napsal(a): On Thu, 2021-04-15 at 17:21 +0200, Miroslav Šulc wrote: Dne 15. 04. 21 v 16:34 Joakim Tjernlund napsal(a): On Wed, 2021-04-14 at 09:45 +0200, Miroslav Šulc wrote: in case the package does not work with java > 1.8 (still, i suggest we fi

Re: [gentoo-dev] unmasking java 11 on gentoo (for those that maintain packages where java is involved, either directly or conditionally)

2021-04-15 Thread Miroslav Šulc
Dne 15. 04. 21 v 16:34 Joakim Tjernlund napsal(a): On Wed, 2021-04-14 at 09:45 +0200, Miroslav Šulc wrote: in case the package does not work with java > 1.8 (still, i suggest we first try to resolve the issue before we use this restriction as it might cause some issues in the future) virt

[gentoo-dev] last-rite: dev-java/odfdom & dev-java/saaj

2021-04-14 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2021-04-14) # java libraries not used by any other package, # masked for removal dev-java/odfdom dev-java/saaj

Re: [gentoo-dev] unmasking java 11 on gentoo (for those that maintain packages where java is involved, either directly or conditionally)

2021-04-14 Thread Miroslav Šulc
/package.use.mask/multi:dev-java/openjdk:11 -gentoo-vm /etc/portage/profile/package.use.mask/multi:dev-java/openjdk-bin:11 -gentoo-vm fordfrog Dne 14. 04. 21 v 9:45 Miroslav Šulc napsal(a): hi guys, we're still far from unmasking java 11 on gentoo, but i hope it will happen, one day (or another

[gentoo-dev] unmasking java 11 on gentoo (for those that maintain packages where java is involved, either directly or conditionally)

2021-04-14 Thread Miroslav Šulc
hi guys, we're still far from unmasking java 11 on gentoo, but i hope it will happen, one day (or another...). currently there is one issue across the whole gentoo tree that is a sure blocker and could and should be easily resolved. as java 11 does not compile bytecode older than 1.6,

[gentoo-dev] last-rite: dev-java/cal10n & dev-java/slf4j-ext

2021-04-06 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2021-04-06) # Last release of dev-java/cal10n in 2013, no consumer # in the tree except dev-java/slf4j-ext which is not # needed by any package aswell. Removal in 30 days. dev-java/cal10n dev-java/slf4j-ext

[gentoo-dev] last rite: media-libs/raul

2021-01-09 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2021-01-09) # media-sound/patchage used to depend on it but the dependency # has been dropped in v1.0.0. There are no other packages in the tree # depending on it. Also having issues compiling it. Removal in 30 days. media-libs/raul

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/2] eclass/java-{utils-2,pkg-simple}.eclass: features and enhancements

2020-08-30 Thread Miroslav Šulc
off-by: Miroslav Šulc commit faa407032918b43fafe7d4e1de85dde4d30ba4f2 Author: Zhang Zongyu Date:   Wed Aug 26 00:30:09 2020 +0800     java-pkg-simple.eclass and java-utils-2.eclass: features and enhancements     1) support java resources     2) support java main class and launcher     3) enable j

[gentoo-dev] last rite: media-sound/traverso

2020-08-29 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2020-08-29) # Upstream has version 1.1.2, but only for Windows, # sources are gone. Removal in 30 days. media-sound/traverso

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/2] eclass/java-{utils-2,pkg-simple}.eclass: features and enhancements

2020-08-28 Thread Miroslav Šulc
hi all, jfyi, i'm going to commit these changes to the main tree at the end of the weekend if there are no objections. (i've been mentoring this project.) we have some other work that depends on these patches so i'd like to see it in the main tree as soon as possible. regards. fordfrog

[gentoo-dev] last rite: media-libs/slv2

2020-08-22 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2020-08-22) # SLV2 has been replaced by Lilv. The latest and final version # of SLV2 is 0.6.6, released on May 26, 2009. # Removal in 30 days.  Bug #735380. media-libs/slv2

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: New "Accept Github contributions" metadata flag

2020-08-18 Thread Miroslav Šulc
Dne 18. 08. 20 v 19:06 Joonas Niilola napsal(a): On 8/18/20 7:30 PM, Miroslav Šulc wrote: hi, how would be handled cases where you and me agreed that you will take care of pull requests on behalf of sound@ and proaudio@? and what if a package is maintained by multiple maintainers or even some

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: New "Accept Github contributions" metadata flag

2020-08-18 Thread Miroslav Šulc
Dne 18. 08. 20 v 19:10 Joonas Niilola napsal(a): On 8/18/20 8:06 PM, Joonas Niilola wrote: So I think it's just simplest to enable it per-user per-project basis. We can all edit Project: pages, toggling the flag. If you're willing to look and merge sound@ PRs, you enable it for Sound project.

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: New "Accept Github contributions" metadata flag

2020-08-18 Thread Miroslav Šulc
hi, how would be handled cases where you and me agreed that you will take care of pull requests on behalf of sound@ and proaudio@? and what if a package is maintained by multiple maintainers or even some maintainers and a project, each with a different preference? how that would be solved to

[gentoo-dev] last rite: x11-libs/flowcanvas

2020-08-11 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2020-08-11) # Package dead. No consumers in the tree. # Removal in 30 days. Bug #735518 x11-libs/flowcanvas

[gentoo-dev] last rite: media-sound/tapiir

2020-08-08 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2020-08-08) # HOMEPAGE dead. # Removal in 30 days. bug #736326 media-sound/tapiir

[gentoo-dev] last rite: media-sound/specimen

2020-08-08 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2020-08-08) # Last release in 2007, HOMEPAGE dead. # Removal in 30 days. bug #736322 media-sound/specimen

[gentoo-dev] last rite: media-sound/jackbeat

2020-08-08 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2020-08-08) # Last release in 2010. # Removal in 30 days. bug #736300 media-sound/jackbeat

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] Packages up for grabs due to jlec being MIA

2020-08-06 Thread Miroslav Šulc
i'll take app-office/scribus. miroslav Dne 05. 08. 20 v 9:24 Michał Górny napsal(a): Hello, The following packages are looking for a new maintainer: [vB] app-backup/cachedir [vB] app-benchmarks/bootchart2 [ B] app-benchmarks/ramspeed [ B] app-office/scribus [vB] dev-lua/luaposix [ b]

[gentoo-dev] Last rite: media-libs/libclalsadrv

2019-12-27 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2019-12-26) # Deprecated by upstream, not used anymore in the tree. # Removal in 30 days.  Bug #703196. media-libs/libclalsadrv

[gentoo-dev] Re: HOMEPAGE and DESCRIPTION in ebuilds? (was: Usefulness of HOMEPAGE=https://www.gentoo.org)

2019-12-04 Thread Miroslav Šulc
hi, it's proly little bit off this topic, but why do we have to copy homepage and description from ebuild to ebuild? wouldn't it be better to move this information to metadata.xml and keep it just there? or does in reality one package really have various homepages and various descriptions

[gentoo-dev] Last rite: dev-java/balloontip

2019-12-03 Thread Miroslav Šulc
# Miroslav Šulc (2019-12-03) # Project does not exist anymore. # Removal in 30 days.  Bug #680452. dev-java/balloontip

[gentoo-dev] rfc: eclass patch for javatoolkit path change

2019-10-29 Thread Miroslav Šulc
wrt bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/627440 there is a need to update java eclasses to use correctly both current path and the new path. the attached patch should provide that. i also attached updated ebuild with the new path. in the patch i also removed the old "/usr/bin/..." path which is not

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: ant-tasks.eclass patch

2019-09-26 Thread Miroslav Šulc
Dne 25. 09. 19 v 21:44 Michał Górny napsal(a): On Wed, 2019-09-25 at 20:47 +0200, Miroslav Šulc wrote: ... I don't think you need two branches here. Non-array variable is equivalent to an array with a single element for the purpose of [@], so your 'for' loop will work correctly both for non

[gentoo-dev] RFC: ant-tasks.eclass patch

2019-09-25 Thread Miroslav Šulc
hi, as per bug https://bugs.gentoo.org/693022 we need to add dependency on dev-java/gnu-jaf (or dev-java/sun-jaf) to the package. unfortunately ant-tasks.eclass variable ANT_TASK_DEPNAME supports only single dependency (it was sufficient till now), but we need one more in this case. the

Re: [gentoo-dev] ant-tasks.eclass patch proposal

2019-01-21 Thread Miroslav Šulc
hi, i just committed the changes to the eclass: commit f14e39de0e2eaa3d3011918e9febd89bfe98f7ee (HEAD -> master, origin/master, origin/HEAD) Author: Miroslav Šulc Date:   Mon Jan 21 09:45:29 2019 +0100     ant-tasks.eclass: cleanup and improvement     1) removed obsolete code   

Re: [gentoo-dev] ant-tasks.eclass patch proposal

2019-01-18 Thread Miroslav Šulc
will be soon gone. once they are gone, this check and support for eapi5 can both be removed. attached is the updated patch. miroslav Dne 18. 01. 19 v 17:23 Brian Evans napsal(a): On 1/18/2019 11:11 AM, Miroslav Šulc wrote: @@ -130,7 +112,11 @@ ant-tasks_src_unpack

[gentoo-dev] ant-tasks.eclass patch proposal

2019-01-18 Thread Miroslav Šulc
hi, i'm preparing bump of apache ant and i found out it would be good to clean up ant-tasks.eclass and improve it little bit. there are several changes in the patch that i summarize below: 1) increased lowest jdk/jre version to 1.6 as that is the lowest source/bytecode supported by jdk 11,

[gentoo-dev] last rites: dev-java/jnlp-bin, app-misc/openjnlp, dev-java/netx

2011-10-19 Thread Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog)
, but in the end it was replaced with jnlp-api. Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog) -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk6ez0YACgkQB6q7Q15RwyCV6QCcCFCIolHppVui86eppp6UhDj9 c98Ani7j71kaFCYoIlHOGIIwLAR

[gentoo-dev] Can't update/checkout gentoo-x86 repo

2011-04-07 Thread Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 hi, today i tried to update my local copy of gentoo-x86 cvs repo but the update failed with this error: cvs [checkout aborted]: Could not map memory to RCS archive /var/cvsroot/gentoo-x86/profiles/package.mask,v: Invalid argument so i tried clean

Re: [gentoo-dev] Can't update/checkout gentoo-x86 repo

2011-04-07 Thread Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 works fine now, thanks. miroslav Dne 7.4.2011 15:44, Theo Chatzimichos napsal(a): On Thursday 07 of April 2011 15:06:37 Theo Chatzimichos wrote: Patrick already reported the issue in #gentoo-infra but unfortunately there is none available at the

Re: [gentoo-dev] issue with gentoo-x86 cvs repo

2010-10-02 Thread Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog)
Dne 2.10.2010 03:35, Robin H. Johnson napsal(a): On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 03:19:42AM +0200, Miroslav ?ulc (fordfrog) wrote: hi, yesterday i was able to use the repo but now i get this error (for any cvs command): $ cvs rm -f apgdiff-2.0.2.ebuild Your account has expired; please contact

[gentoo-dev] issue with gentoo-x86 cvs repo

2010-10-01 Thread Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog)
hi, yesterday i was able to use the repo but now i get this error (for any cvs command): $ cvs rm -f apgdiff-2.0.2.ebuild Your account has expired; please contact your system administrator Connection closed by 81.93.255.6 cvs [remove aborted]: end of file from server (consult above messages if

[gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-util/netbeans: ChangeLog netbeans-6.9-r3.ebuild

2010-07-21 Thread Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog)
Dne 21.7.2010 16:35, Jeremy Olexa napsal(a): On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 20:24:40 + (UTC), Miroslav Sulc (fordfrog) fordf...@gentoo.org wrote: fordfrog10/07/19 20:24:40 Modified: ChangeLog netbeans-6.9-r3.ebuild Log: netbeans-6.9-r3: added support for including custom

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-commits] gentoo-x86 commit in dev-util/netbeans: ChangeLog netbeans-6.5-r1.ebuild netbeans-6.5.ebuild

2008-11-23 Thread Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog)
Thank you both for the suggestions, I fixed these issues in updated netbeans-6.5-r1. Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog) Gentoo Java Team Jeremy Olexa napsal(a): Peter Volkov wrote: В Сбт, 22/11/2008 в 18:11 +, Miroslav Sulc (fordfrog) пишет: fordfrog08/11/22 18:11:25 Added

Re: [gentoo-dev] Adding NETBEANS to USE_EXPAND

2008-11-20 Thread Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog)
Ok, it seems there are no objections so I will implement NETBEANS_MODULES within several hours. We also discussed whether to use NETBEANS_MODULES in USE_EXPAND at #gentoo-dev and agreed on that it will be ok to implement it. Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog) Gentoo Java Team Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog

[gentoo-dev] Adding NETBEANS to USE_EXPAND

2008-11-19 Thread Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog)
netbeans_xml Btw, there is also request for this in bugzilla: http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=211455 I'd like to put the ebuild in the main tree soon as upstream just released it and we have in the tree only 5.5.1 which is very old. Thanks for your comments. Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog) Gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Adding NETBEANS to USE_EXPAND

2008-11-19 Thread Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog)
Just a note to my email, maybe it would be better to use NETBEANS_MODULES instead of NETBEANS as NETBEANS_MODULES is more accurate. NETBEANS_MODULES was even suggested by Betelgeuse in the mentioned bug. Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog) Gentoo Java Team Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog) napsal(a): Hi, I'd

Re: [gentoo-dev] Adding NETBEANS to USE_EXPAND

2008-11-19 Thread Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog)
from how Netbeans does it. Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog) Gentoo Java Team Robert Bridge napsal(a): On Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:03:12 +0100 Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to add NETBEANS to USE_EXPAND. Netbeans (www.netbeans.org) is modular IDE with 18 modules (clusters

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC Package name additions

2007-03-17 Thread Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog)
_alpha is the closest one to current netbeans 6.0 life cycle phase, though not accurate. - -- Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog) Gentoo/Java Team Mike Frysinger napsal(a): On Friday 16 March 2007, Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog) wrote: Just a note to this. I'm co-maintainer of netbeans ebuild. Netbeans does

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC Package name additions

2007-03-17 Thread Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jakub Moc napsal(a): Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog) napsal(a): According to http://devmanual.gentoo.org/ebuild-writing/file-format/index.html#file-naming-rules it seems to me the versioning is focused on package stability life cycle. In netbeans case

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC Package name additions

2007-03-16 Thread Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog)
the ebuilds netbeans-6.0_alpha7 etc. though I was assured by mkt guy from Sun it is not yet alpha quality. It would be fair to the upstream and to users to not use _alpha because it is not alpha but there's no appropriate choice available. - -- Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog) Gentoo/Java Team William L

Re: [gentoo-dev] New developer: Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog)

2007-01-01 Thread Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog)
beer conspiracy is growing! Welcome! *plop* -- Miroslav Šulc (fordfrog) Java Team -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list