On Fri, 2008-05-16 at 20:06 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
Yuri Vasilevski [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I will be adding some debian build tools to the tree, and would like to
create the debtools herd to associate with the packages.
Just please don't add Debian-OpenSSL ;)
On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 16:23 +0300, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
I'd be happy if some other unpacker is used than lzma-utils - one that
does not depend on libstdc++ - I'm sure it can be done, heck it's done
in integrated form in some other projects in less than a couple
kilobytes of code for the
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 10:20 +, Roy Marples wrote:
Hi List.
I've just removed the code to check for euid when running services and
instead
relying on permissions of the service state dir and testing errno. This is a
good thing, but it does have one side effect.
OpenRC can track
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 12:08 +, Roy Marples wrote:
On Friday 21 March 2008 10:44:12 Natanael Copa wrote:
err... run rc-status as root?
I mean if you are not supposed to see if a process is running or not as
normal user, then hardned is doin it's job when does not allow rc-status
On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 10:09 +0100, Jan Kundrát wrote:
Natanael Copa wrote:
So since I build a distro where size does matter (uclibc) I realised
that even if I submit bugs for broken RDEPEND, there will never be an
end to those bug reports. Looking at this thread, it seems i was right
On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 00:35 +0100, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
I offer my help to fix DEPEND/RDEPEND split issues which is causing me
a lot of headaches (along with localizations).
For reference, please have a look here: http://planet.sabayonlinux.org/?p=105
I'm another distro builder that uses
Rémi Cardona wrote:
Natanael Copa a écrit :
But somethimes you just need to accept we don't live in a perfect world.
I understood early that nobody cares that much about binpkgs anyway and
moved on.
I'd say you're mistaken. A lot of people care about binpkg. It's not
because a majority
Chris Gianelloni wrote:
On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 14:34 +0100, Natanael Copa wrote:
On Thu, 2008-03-13 at 00:35 +0100, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
I offer my help to fix DEPEND/RDEPEND split issues which is causing me
a lot of headaches (along with localizations).
For reference, please have
On Sun, 2008-03-09 at 21:21 -0800, Alec Warner wrote:
On 3/9/08, Natanael Copa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2008-03-07 at 19:48 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote:
What exact time constraints and responsibilities are people afraid of?
Are those concerns real or just myths
On Fri, 2008-03-07 at 19:48 +0100, Marius Mauch wrote:
What exact time constraints and responsibilities are people afraid of?
Are those concerns real or just myths?
As someone who just sent in the quiz, yes its real concerns. What scared
me off mostly is the gentoo politics. The entire
On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 08:54 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Friday 01 February 2008, Natanael Copa wrote:
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 18:46 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 31 January 2008, Natanael Copa wrote:
...
I can create a bug on this so we get rid of both perl and debianutils
On Thu, 2008-01-31 at 18:46 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 31 January 2008, Natanael Copa wrote:
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 12:35 -0500, Philip Webb wrote:
080128 Mike Frysinger wrote:
now that the mktemp binary has been moved out of debianutils
and integrated straight
On Wed, 2008-01-30 at 12:35 -0500, Philip Webb wrote:
080128 Mike Frysinger wrote:
now that the mktemp binary has been moved out of debianutils
and integrated straight into coreutils,
perhaps it's time to ask how important this package is to everyone.
current debianutils is part of
On Sat, 2007-11-03 at 01:19 +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 02-11-2007 17:35:08 +, Roy Marples wrote:
I don't see them as inferior.
I see them as more portable and less confusing.
Please stop calling it more portable. The shell code you see in
configure can in a way be called
On Sun, 2007-10-28 at 06:46 +, Steve Long wrote:
Failing that, a plaintext config file along the lines discussed in [1] would
be cool. awk could parse it pretty quickly.
[1] http://modeemi.fi/~tuomov/b//archives/2007/01/20/T11_58_29/
Something like Debian's /etc/network/interfaces?
On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 20:25 +0100, Steve Long wrote:
Natanael Copa wrote:
If you're that motivated why not just start hacking on binary support in
portage/pkgcore/paludis? There's always open bugs.
I think I did contribute with some patches for qmerge in portage-utils.
Unfortunally, its
On Sun, 2007-10-07 at 21:26 -0600, Joe Peterson wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
Fabian has summed it up nicely, thanks. i could care less what your
userland
is outside of the ebuild environment since it doesnt matter to ebuild
writers. you want a deficient runtime environment, more
On Mon, 2007-10-08 at 06:52 -0700, Alec Warner wrote:
On 10/8/07, Natanael Copa [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 2007-10-07 at 21:26 -0600, Joe Peterson wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
Fabian has summed it up nicely, thanks. i could care less what your
userland
is outside
On Mon, 2007-10-01 at 23:30 +0100, Roy Marples wrote:
On Monday 01 October 2007 22:59:40 Roy Marples wrote:
This version, I believe, is more readable and maintainable then the one
currently in portage. It also uses a lot less code and has the bonus of
being pure sh.
It should be noted
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 09:29 +0200, Fabian Groffen wrote:
On 01-10-2007 22:59:40 +0100, Roy Marples wrote:
I would like to propse a new versionator.eclass for consideration
(attached).
This version, I believe, is more readable and maintainable then the one
currently in portage. It
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 05:39 -0700, Alec Warner wrote:
I don't think there is a technical reason to avoid using bash.
Ofcourse there is. See first issue mentioned in BUGS section in bash
manpage.
-nc
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Tue, 2007-10-02 at 09:26 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 02 October 2007, Luca Barbato wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
in the general case, dash will typically parse faster than bash. but is
this speed gain relevant ? if dash can parse an ebuild in 10% of the
time that it
On Wed, 2007-09-26 at 00:43 -0700, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On 07:16 Tue 25 Sep , Konstantin Arkhipov (voxus) wrote:
voxus 07/09/25 07:16:42
I take it that, for some obscure reason, use_with() doesn't work?
if [ ! -f /etc/ssl/${PN}/${PN}.key ]; then
Are you
://www.paul.sladen.org/vserver/archives/200708/0025.html
Does anyone have any suggestion to do dynamic variables cleanly without
using arrays?
Natanael Copa
Thanks
Roy
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
On Wed, 2007-08-22 at 13:29 +0200, Raphael Marichez wrote:
On Tue, 21 Aug 2007, Natanael Copa wrote:
Hi,
I use the gentoo framework to build binary packages. I noticed that most
packages creates the ssl certificate during src_install(). This makes
all binary packages contain the ssl
net-mail/dovecot
net-misc/stunnel
net-nntp/inn
www-servers/nginx
Should I create a bug for every vulnerable package?
From a binary packagers perspective I would really prefer to create the
certs from init.d script.
Thanks!
Natanael Copa
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
to
make things harder for random developers here.
I tried to write some scripts some time ago and it was completely
horrible. I wish more people would have been thinking like Ciaran
earlier.
btw.. I keep hearing about this paladius. Is it more script-friendly
than emerge?
--
Natanael Copa
--
gentoo
On Thu, 2006-10-12 at 16:18 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 12 Oct 2006 14:24:36 +0200 Natanael Copa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| btw.. I keep hearing about this paladius. Is it more script-friendly
| than emerge?
Once we get the Ruby interface fleshed out it will be...
What about
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 00:00 +0100, Duncan Coutts wrote:
On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 17:13 -0400, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
With the increase in developer and project overlays, I see the
possibility for reducing work needed to maintain many packages. As
Natanael Copa, it would be nice for him
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 09:52 +0300, Alin Nastac wrote:
Natanael Copa wrote:
Nobody has ever showed interest and I'm not pushing my services on
anyone.
Why exactly you don't want to become a Gentoo dev?
Because of the byrocracy? Is it worth it to only maintain one single
package
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 10:18 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
On Thursday 05 October 2006 10:06, Natanael Copa wrote:
When I submit a fix/version bumb (I submit as maintainer update) to
freebsd ports, its normally committed within hours, even if its not a
popular port.
...
And I
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 00:00 +, Christian 'Opfer' Faulhammer wrote:
Tach Natanael, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID)
Natanael Copa schrieb:
Can I become a Gentoo dev, even if I'm only maintainer of 1-3 packages?
I'm trying to be realistic.
You can. And you can
On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 15:47 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 16:39:50 +0200 Natanael Copa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| I'm initially only interested in maintaining packages where I'm the
| upstream maintainer as well.
Ick. Rarely a good idea. That removes a layer of QA.
ok
there are a few packages I could maintain, but I don't think
its worth becomming a developer to just maintain 1 single package.
I think this how the do with the freebsd ports tree. I am maintainer for
1 single freebsd port without being a committer.
--
Natanael Copa
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing
34 matches
Mail list logo
