On 14/12/16 12:29, Fabian Groffen wrote:
> On 14-12-2016 13:01:16 -0500, Doug Freed wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 12:48 PM, Nathan Zachary
>> <nathanzach...@gentoo.org> wrote:
>>> On 14/12/16 10:11, Doug Freed wrote:
>>>>> I somehow doubt that would
On 14/12/16 10:11, Doug Freed wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 11:04 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
>> On Wed, 14 Dec 2016 15:27:25 +0300
>> Andrew Savchenko wrote:
>>> On Tue, 13 Dec 2016 10:36:15 +0100 Michał Górny wrote:
+ nproc=$(python -c
ght weight replacement options, with a
> wee bit of migration detail
I was under the impression that both LXDE and LXQT would continue
development, but that LXQT would be favoured. Is there an official
statement that LXDE is dead?
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ing GitHub. Though it is a great
resource, I second the idea that Gentoo should offer the repository
space in order to stay separate.
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
> looks like a potentially safer bet ?
+1. Arch would probably be the best choice for a systemd-based rescue disc.
that the end result is something that benefits the community and
distribution as a whole.
environments, it is likely better to provide users with ample warning
than to risk the application failing and troubleshooting thereafter.
On 24/08/10 22:21, Joshua Saddler wrote:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2010 19:18:56 +0200
Christian Faulhammerfa...@gentoo.org wrote:
The big issue with the docs is that IF OpenRC/baselayout-2 are marked
stable, it will require massive changes to hundreds of our
On 05/04/10 11:07, Jon Portnoy wrote:
On Mon, Apr 05, 2010 at 08:50:49AM +0300, Eray Aslan wrote:
Just replying randomly.
On 05.04.2010 04:33, Tobias Heinlein wrote:
I think this is a good starting point to get rid of the some important
questions are too hard to answer dilemma that
On 05/04/10 13:12, Ben de Groot wrote:
After the mostly positive feedback on the recent wiki discussion, we
have now gone ahead, formed a preliminary team consisting of both
users and developers, and put up a project page . All constructive
feedback on this new project is welcome.
etc. without closing the wiki up too much.
Also, from what I could tell, this is how others are managing their
wiki as well (Arch and Amarok, for example).
I would enjoy working on a wiki as well as the fora, so I'm volunteering
of the tree. Attached to it could be a stabilisation day as well.
. As we advance further toward a
paperless computing experience, the need for printing support becomes
even less. And, as it is incredibly simple to add print capabilities by
placing the cups USE flag in /etc/make.conf, that choice should be left
to the user.
toward a paperless computing experience, the need for printing
support becomes even less. And, as it is incredibly simple to add
print capabilities by placing the cups USE flag in /etc/make.conf,
that choice should be left to the user.
On 02/03/10 13:17, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
On Tue, 02 Mar 2010, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
To make naming a bit more consistent, how about:
They're a bit long but I think it's worth to not have them crippled
On 02/03/10 13:39, Sebastian Pipping wrote:
On 03/02/10 20:28, Nathan Zachary wrote:
This looks like overkill to me. One keyword should be enough, and for
supplementary information Status Whiteboard could be used.
I agree. Simply having the BUGDAY keyword should be sufficient
at the source, I might be able to throw one together. The
best thing for you to do now though is to file the bug.
Hope that helps,
excerpt from the thread i mentioned:
Nathan Zachary ka...@gentoo.org wrote:
I would be happy to help out with the newsletter, especially
with the one article.
So, see, people are willing to help with the content. Their prowess needs
to be utilized
If one has built a system with the default python and perl USE flags,
what steps would be necessary to remove all packages and dependencies
after removing them from the USE declarations?
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
Dawid WgliDski wrote:
On Monday 08 of December 2008 11:34:21 Maciej
to manually uninstall packages that no longer
exist in the portage tree since it may not be possible to satisfy their
dependencies. Also, be aware of the --with-bdeps option that is documented
in `man emerge`.
Thanks for the information Josh.
Josh Saddler wrote:
Nathan Zachary wrote:
If one has
Mail list logo